Dr Robert Malone notes that the face mask mania has returned to the United States, with numerous schools now requiring students to wear all day, N95 face masks. I remember how students in my day, mainly boys, hated wearing ties because they were uncomfortable. How much more so the face mask! And there is a good reason why these things are so uncomfortable; not only are the masks full of forever chemicals, and plastics that go into young bodies, remaining there until death, but the masks elevate carbon dioxide levels, which in the long term, can have serious health effects. And, we are dealing with children here, who will have to endure whatever illnesses masks cause for the long term. It is surprising there have not been more mask law suits, but maybe the time for this has come.

New UK legislation has crept through the dusty halls of parliament, net zero measures contained in the Energy Bill. The new measures will impose penalties upon those who violate the energy restriction requirements. That is, “non-compliance with a requirement imposed by or under energy performance regulations,” face imprisonment for up to a year and fines of up to £15,000! Even supplying false information about energy consumption will lead to fines.

One of the reasons for keeping a close eye on the cultural develops of the United States, is that this culture, and its woke politics has a tremendous impact upon Australian society, usually for the worst, nowadays. It was once said that what happens in the US happens five years later in Australia, but with globalisation and information technology, things are now pretty much instant.

The UK is seemingly a test case for what has to be a war on the cars of the ordinary working people. What is happening in London now, and soon the entire UK no doubt, is the government effectively making people pay to drive their cars, through the Ultra Low Emissions Zones. At any point people who are clocked to have a vehicle exceeding an arbitrary  low emission level, get fined £12.50 at a time. This is a tax upon the poor, who cannot afford the latest electric vehicles, or new cars with pollution-minimisation. And as well, for the rich, paying a fine of £12.50 at a time, is not much of a burden. But, mothers trying to get children to school in peak hour traffic, and small business people, and just ordinary working people going to work, are being stung.

It is but another example of nastiness and dissimilatory nature of present climate change ideologies, which do not target of inconvenience the rich, but deliver often damaging economic blows to the ordinary working class people.

I had not read about this aspect of debanking in the Australian media, and thus rely upon Natural News.com. But it seems that there is a new paradigm of woke emerging, with a major bank planning to start debanking customers who engage in "mean" speech, such as tweets, or other on-line comments that hurt people’s feelings. Those who commit such an offence will have their bank accounts closed.

Infowars.com has a great post covering the story of how the introduction of a Central Bank Digital Currency (CBDC), the eNaira, led to social chaos in Nigeria. By the date of the set-up of the CBDC, many poor people and small businesses did not have bank accounts, and then they were left with old useless banknotes. Protests erupted that continued for three months, until a new president re-established banknotes. In the time leading up to that people were desperate and hungry.

The relentless march of the UN to world government continues, as no doubt the minions work 24/7 on this. Thus, as part and parcel of the UN’s information control, the  United Nations Peacekeeping division has launched a program to recruit a "digital army" of young people. Their mission is to detect "false information" online and replace it with "real facts." It is easy to guess what this will entail; detecting any material critical of the globalist narrative, and correcting it with the view of the UN, which is assumed to be all-knowing and correct. The youth, who are in most countries, including Africa, learn to detect information that the UN does not want, such as anti-Covid vax material, and to replace it with a standard narrative.

With the anniversary of the 9/11 event coming up, it is timely to reflect upon the entire event. Who did it and why? We are to believe that a group of jihadist terrorists hijacked jets, and flew them into the Twin Towers in a suicide mission. The jet fuel caused the steel structure to pancake down, just as if an implosion demolition occurred.

But, even if this narrative is accepted for the sake of argument, it leaves  World Trade Center Building 7. As Tucker Carlson has noted, it also collapsed, exactly as if a demolition implosion occurred, but this time, there was no impact by a plane at all. The standard story is that burning debris from the other buildings caused fires that led to structural collapse, something not seen before. But, this is open to challenge, as detailed below

Most people in the West are not conscious of the dangers of nuclear war with Russia. Recently Tucker Carlson in an interview predicted that the US regime would be engaging in a hot kinetic war with Russia within the next year, probably as yet another measure to ensure continuity of power in the 2024 elections, and disposal of Donald Trump, if election fraud and lawfare do not do the job.

John Tierney has published a great article at the City-Journal debunking the ideology that modern society is riddled with misogyny. That idea is seen most clearly in feminists like former Australian prime minister Julia Gillard, who without jest, has argued that women are discriminated against, even though she reached the top position. Her book, Not Now, Not Ever (20220 is an example. But there is no evidence that women are being systematically discriminated against in employment as Tierney shows, and in professions such as academia, especially in the Arts/social sciences, women have come to dominate the professions, if they can be called that. In fact, discrimination against young men in the education sectors and a range of other professions is occurring as women rise in leadership roles, and in fact discriminate against men.

A major study has appeared in the leading journal, Climate, which has radical consequences for the mainstream climate crisis narrative. This narrative, as has been document in many posts at the blog, is responsible for the elites pushing for bans upon farming practices, the eating of red meat, and the use of fossil fuels. The idea that human-caused climate change is occurring is based upon climatic data, but how good is that data? And, if that data is shown to be inadequate, then the climate change crisis narrative is immediately challenged. So, the science is highly relevant.

The Prime Minister in defending the Voice has addressed the issue of the Uluru Statement from the Heart. In parliament he has said that the document is on A4 page long, and he held up a piece of paper. Then the prime minister responded to the claim that the actual document is 26 pages long, by comparing such claims to various absurd conspiracy theories, such as the fake moon landing.

When pressed for details about how the Voice will operate, the Prime Minister has said to go have a look at the Calma-Langton report. Well, the Institute of Public Affairs has done just that and produced a critical response, Undemocratic, Unfair, Complex and Divisive: An Analysis of the Calma-Langton Report (June 2023). This model has a group of elites of the V who are not democratically elected, but who will be influencing every aspect of Australian social and political life. But, the Voice elites will not be accountable to anyone; however, the Voice will legally enforce consultations if governments dare not to consult (i.e. accept) their dictates.

Stephen Chavura, in a tweet reposted by Malcolm Roberts, makes the point that the Voice to parliaments, is not simply that. There will be a Voice to the entire public service, which will involve everything they do, and in addition there will be 35 regional voices, interacting with all aspects of state and local government. The Voice is then a vast structure which will essentially be a replacement government, for as the Prime Minster has said, even though the Voice has no veto power, it would be a brave government to defy the voice. If the YES side succeeds, then democracy ends in Australia, to be replaced by the rule of Woke. As well, economic decline will be rapid as the Voice drains away the life blood of the country.

Malcolm Roberts draws our attention to explicit statements by a leading Voice proponent:

Italian Prime Minister Giorgia Meloni, was elected for being a hard-liner on immigration, the “turn back the boats,” type. But this year over 100,00 illegals have arrived in Italy, and conservatives and those from the Right who formerly supported her, have become somewhat sour with her, and rightly so. She has failed to put into place measures that she promised, to block boat landings, and establish offshore reception centres to evaluate asylum applications. These measures could easily have been put into place, so the logical inference to make is that the globalists have got to her and neutralised her, just as was done to Donald Trump during his presidency. Trump could easily have secured the US border, but did not move.

This is an illustration of the sheer power that the globalist elite wield, and the difficulty we face, but not impossibility, in defeating them. We must fight even harder.

Covid king Dr Fauci has made a return to the Covid mandate circuit, appearing in an interview with CNN, expressing his sympathies for a return of the mask mandates. However, this time on a conventional media outlet, he got hammered by material showing that masks are useless in stopping transmission, as extracted below.

Flustered, the technocrat pushed the line that this may be true on a social level, but not an individual level. Of course, this is a logically absurd position, as the social is just made up of those individual instances. Anyway, good to see that this time round, there is a bit more opposition, even from mainstream sources, to the Covid mandate tyranny.

Jeremy Bell, Lecturer in History, Philosophy, and Literature at Campion College, has a fascinating piece on J. J. R. Tolkien and philosophical anarchism, the view that, not that beared men should throw bombs, but that the state is largely in part or whole unjustified, and many state institutions tend to tyranny. In a letter of 29 November 1943 to his 18-year-old son Christopher, he said: “My political opinions lean more and more towards Anarchy (philosophically understood, meaning abolition of control not whiskered men with bombs) — or to ‘unconstitutional’ Monarchy.” The latter position seems to be very much a “return of the king,” idea, which seems dangerous in these centralisation times, but as argued by Bell, Tolkien has large sympathies for the idea that people are best off working out relationships and institutions beyond the nation state. Bell goes into great detail discussing and rebutting some of the obvious objections to this position of moving beyond the state. Most importantly since Covid, especially in the United states, we have seen how a state can declare war upon a significant segment of the population which is opposed to the Biden regime.

Probably the longer-term future of humanity will involve states breaking down and collapsing, so the anarchist position may come to be adopted by default. Tolkien may well be proven to be correct after all.

James Roguski has written a People’s Declaration, which opposes, in essence, the New World Order that the elites are creating. It covers all the bases in a simple and concise way. It is not a petition, but is something for individuals to either modify in their own words, or circulate as if. It is a personal statement of resistance that can be put on social media, and publications, or just handed to friends.

Here is an incredible story from New Zealand, covered in America, of a woman who had a surgical tool, the size of a dinner plate left inside her after the delivery of her baby by C-section. It took sometime for the medicos to figure this out, and after a time, negligence was found by an investigating board. But, the moral here is that if mistakes can be made with something as simple as doing a surgical tools count, how much more easily can mistakes be made with drugs, and, perish the thought, vaccines?