The White Coat Summit, bringing together doctors who were fighting against Covid technocratic tyranny, was recently held in Washington, D.C. by America’s Frontline Doctors (AFLDS). Leading doctors critical of the Covid mandates spoke out about the censorship that was imposed. Dr. Scott Jensen, a family physician and former Republican member of the Minnesota State Senate described the censorship as a type of “cancer” that began at the policy level, but soon spread throughout all aspects of society, as both doctors and the ordinary people did not systematically organise in sufficient numbers to resist. The fear of job losses was a major factor controlling the masses. And while governments tracked people’s movements via their mobile/cell phones, neighbours took it upon themselves to dob in fellow neighbours who may have violated the Covid mandates. It was an extraordinary and shocking time, and nothing is preventing a repeat.
The Midwestern Doctor writes longish, and profoundly researched pieces on the “forgotten” or rather, under-discussed side of medicine. A recent piece gives a very detailed account of what is fast emerging as a global depopulation agenda. Not all aspects of this have been carefully planned, and some are simply a by-product of harmful chemicals in the environment from industrialism, but most aspects are planned.
This was a very surprising thing to see in the Weekend Australian magazine; a very detailed exposure of Robert Kadlec, former assistant secretary for preparedness and response at the US Department of Health, and others in the Covid lab release cover-up. Kadlec, Dr Fauci and National Institutes of Health director Francis Collins, worked in the early stages of the Covid plandemic, to divert attention away from the likely lab leak from the communist Wuhan Institute of virology.
According to Kadlec: “I think Tony Fauci was trying to protect his institution and his own reputation from the possibility that his agency was funding the Wuhan Institute of Virology researchers who, beyond the scope of the grants received from the National Institutes of Health, may have been working with People’s Liberation Army researchers on defensive coronavirus vaccines.” “I think it’s evident from his later released emails (obtained via Freedom of Information requests) that he had more sense of what his institute had funded at that moment. This was a reputational risk to him and his institute and certainly he probably sided with the international scientists that believed that false or unsubstantiated accusations could have a chilling effect on scientific collaboration between the western world and China.”
Robert Kennedy Jr, presidential candidate, and the first such candidate to have a wide-ranging scepticism about the effectiveness and safety of vaccinations in general, the social agenda of Big Pharma, and its financial role on the media. For America and New Zealand, Pharma can advertise on TV, and for America 75 percent of advertising revenues comes from pharmaceutical companies. Kennedy relates how he had produced a documentary on the harms of some vaccinations, and presented it to Fox News. Then Fox News executive Roger Ailes, said that if anyone from Fox showed this, or talked to Kennedy on this topic, he would be forced to fire them. It is obvious here that he who pays the media piper, plays the tune of Big Pharma. It is hardly surprising, even for Australia, that there is little coverage of the adverse effects issue with the vax; the absence of such discussions, just gives the game away.
https://vigilantfox.substack.com/p/rfk-jr-exposes-big-pharmas-control
It is all coming out in the wash regarding the Voice and its less than open agenda. While PM Albo maintains that it is a symbolic gesture, many of the cultural elites are moving to the heavy white guilt mode, that a No vote will doom Aborigines. It is prima facie absurd, since it means, given that there is no present “Voice” apart from a non-representative number of Aborigines in parliament, which does not count of course, Aborigines are doomed now, and were for a long time. Who will fall for this emotional output? Surely only those who are already in the grips of trendy inner-city white guilt, and neo-Marxist university brainwashing.
But, the real thing behind this though is that the Voice is needed for the next step of the agenda: “Repatriation of stolen cultural heritage, development and aid programs, compensation, and other measures are part of the global human rights response to the legacy of imperialism and colonialism.”
It seems that communist China has used its super-hackers to install malicious computer code inside the networks controlling power grids, communications systems and water supplies that feed military bases in the United States and around the world. The code is thought to be poised to go, to disrupt the US when China invades Taiwan. What I did not find out from reading the story is how they managed to pull this one off. My guess is that there must be CCP agents working within the US military, which would not be surprising given their adoption of multi-racialism, as the ruling ideology. And, almost certainly, this malware is infested Australian IT as well.
An illegal Chinese bioagents lab has been raided by the FBI, CDC and California public health Department in Fresno County, California. The government agents found numerous infectious agents at the lab, including malaria, Rubella, HIV, Covid-19 and much more. Lab mice used in experiments were also discovered. The lab was only discovered by accident, so be sure that this is just the tip of the iceberg, for here will be much more like this, out there, all from modern liberal immigration. Western labs in China would only exist if approved by the CCP. Thus, it looks like bioweapons attacks are all ready to be rolled out. Probably Australia has these labs as well. What is interesting is that this lab was close to a US military installation.
https://gizmodo.com/cdc-20-infectious-agents-unlicensed-california-lab-1850685858
Carl Sagan (1934-1996), American astronomer, planetary scientist, cosmologist, astrophysicist, astrobiologist, science communicator, author, and professor, before his death made a statement about the dangers of technocracy. One of the key issues is people not reading much science, and knowing little about science and technology. And yet, science and technology rule the society, maybe as much as finance, since technological innovation set the pace for the shape of things to come. As he asks, if the people remain ignorant, who is controlling the whole show? Contrary to Hamlet, that is the question.
https://armageddonprose.substack.com/p/carl-sagan-predicted-from-the-grave
While many have argued that Marxism/communism are totally incompatible with Christianity, the extension of this thesis to include liberalism as well, is controversial. For, isn’t liberalism the doctrine that liberty is the principal and most important political value? And who can disagree with that, surely, given all the threats to freedom we now have post-Covid? But the fact that modern liberalism is so different to the liberalism of the past, such as found in John Stuart Mill (1806-1873) in his classic defence of free speech, On Liberty (1859), should give us pause, as modern liberalism can accommodate Black Lives Matter, feminism, LGBTQ+ ideology, cultural Marxism, and classical economic Marxism.
Introduction to the Special Edition on the “Quadrant” Critique of the Voice Referendum By James Reed
Today’s blog, which will remain without addition over the weekend for extended viewing, summarises the core papers published in the Quadrant Special Digital Edition, August 2023. Three cheers for Keith Windschuttle and the team for putting this together, it may prove to be one of the most important publications in recent times in Australian politics. It is a long document, and the articles are superb and finely reasoned, which must be done to win the intellectual debate. But, for many readers, it will be heavy going. Hence the present output, produced in record time, with sleep-cutting to get out the first review of this material, which will be freely released next week for the public; subscribers have got their copy. Every one should forward material from this great work to everyone needing convincing. But for now, here is a simple guide to the best arguments against the Voice.
Of the main themes of the political agenda of the Voice referendum, that runs through many articles at the Quadrant Special Digital Edition, August 2023, is that the Voice is like an iceberg, where only the tip of it is revealed. The rest is hidden, and like giant icebergs, are dangerous. This the theme discussed in detail by Keith Windschuttle in his contribution, “Hiding the Voice’s Content from the Voters.” The politicians, he says deliberately seek to hide the content of the Voice, because if the full agenda was known, as the Quadrant special details, the public would certainly vote against it; even now it is likely that the Voice will be defeated, but we should not relax our vigilance, as the elites want this in at all costs.
Nick Cater, “The Vision of the Anointed, in the Quadrant Special Digital Edition, August 2023, discusses the argument commonly made that the Voice is needed to deal with terrible problems facing some Aboriginal communities, including alcoholism, domestic violence and child sexual abuse. Child sexual abuse is a shocking problem that the Left intellectuals shy away from; clearly even if there was historical racism, that would not explain this, and would in fact deny agency to Aboriginals, which is arguably “racist,” or worse, in itself:
https://bmcpublichealth.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s12889-022-13982-4
A very good historical background to the lead-up to the Voice is given by Michael Conner, “A True history of the Voice,” Quadrant Special Digital Edition, August 2023. This piece being a running account of the players in the Aboriginal industry beginning in 1981 - Bob Collins, H.C. “Nugget” Coombs, Marcia Langton, Shorty O’Neill, Al Grassby, Judith Wright, Garth Nettheim, Lyndall Ryan, Henry Reynolds and Eddie Mabo – is difficult to summarise given all that they got up to. But, Eddie Mabo gave us the Mabo case, and native title, which now covers over 60 percent of the Australian land mass, and it is not finished yet.
The Quadrant Special Digital Edition, August 2023 develops the most systematic critique of the voice referendum proposal to date. Among the contributions are three that strike a lawyer of particular note are: “Introducing Conflict” by Damien Cremean, “A Legal Ruse” by Alasdair Millar, and “The Voice Referendum: Cheating the Constitution,” by Professor Emeritus Michael Detmold, former constitutional law lecturers at the University of Adelaide. The first two items are letters, but profound ones, which alone, separately, destroy the Voice proposal; the latter article by Professor Detmold raises insuperable constitutional law difficulties the Voice referendum raises. A summary of the first two letters, now follows. The Detmold paper is discussed separately.
“The Voice Referendum: Cheating the Constitution,” by Professor Emeritus Michael Detmold, former constitutional law lecturers at the University of Adelaide, in the Quadrant Special Digital Edition, August 2023, delivers a knockout blow to the constitutional soundness of the Voice Referendum.
The short question will be before voters: “A Proposed Law: to alter the Constitution to recognise the First Peoples of Australia by establishing an Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Voice. Do you approve this proposed alteration?” The prosed law is outlined in a little more detail, albeit, still highly vague in the outline but does mention two things; first the Voice’s function (of making “representations to the Parliament and the Executive Government of the Commonwealth …”) and second, the Voice’s structure (Parliament’s “power to make laws with respect to matters relating to the Voice, including its composition, functions, powers and procedures”). But, these provisions, Detmold points out, are not going to be inserted into the constitution, and nor is the short question which is actually visible on the ballot paper. So, what exactly would go into the constitution if the Yes is carried? If this is confusing to legally trained minds, how much more difficult would this be for the ordinary voters to know what is going on? And if people are in the dark about this, as I see it, the Voice referendum is nothing more than an expensive and nasty deception.
“Why Christians Should Vote No,” by James Jeffery, in the Quadrant Special Digital Edition, August 2023, is an important critique, since as far as I am aware, the woke churches have been championing the Voice as a social justice necessity; supporting the Voice is just the Christian and right thing to do, and the No vote is somehow immoral, to state matters bluntly. That is a position that needs to be attacked and defeated, at least on the intellectual level. But, we should not under-estimate the high degree of emotionalism that still will be pushed on this by woke church leaders.
The Quadrant Special Digital Edition, August 2023, “Why the Voice Would be a Disaster for Australia,” contains the leading criticisms of the Voice, some quite complex and perhaps too time-consuming for the average reader to digest. That is why there is the present special Alor.org blog presentation, which summarises the key arguments, and gives the intelligent ordinary reader, pressed for time, a thumbnail sketch of the key points. Here I mention some articles that deliver a plethora of anti-Voice arguments that the reader can use in their own personal campaign for the No side.
While this topic is grim, there is some humour to be made, as made by Roger Franklin, “Fifty Reasons to Vote No,” details. Some of the reasons are hilarious, but all true, such as:
As one of the younger writers at Alor.org blog, I must confess that before seeing the light and becoming a conservative, I was a Leftist, mainly through university. I was thus interested in the take made by Peter Baldwin “The Progressive Case Against the Voice,” Quadrant Special Digital Edition, August 2023. Can one reason with the liberal Left at the universities, and white-anting the entire society now, against the Voice? How does one overcome the high moral groundism, and pseudo anti-racism supremacy that the liberal Left get from parading the Voice virtues?
If there are ways, it cannot be through the use of conservative arguments as the liberal-Left simply reject the entire paradigm. So, most of the arguments considered in other articles in the Quadrant special edition, will fail against this folk. But, as Baldwin notes, here are considerations that should phase the liberal Left, although I have my doubts.
I did not know this previously, but the Federal court has ruled that public does not have legal access to beaches north of Broome. This decision is presently being challenged by the Federal and Western Australian governments. But, it is but one more example of native title in action, which has delivered over 50 percent of the land mass of Australia over to native title. The Voice, if successful will finish off what remains of Australia. Time to stand up against this surrender of Australia!
https://www.abc.net.au/news/2019-06-27/legal-fight-for-beaches-in-high-court/11245540
