Andrew Tate, the champion of masculine virtue and strength, has recently stated his defence against sex trafficking charges that the Romanian police are to lay against him. He and his brother are under house arrest until the charges are laid and trial begins. Certainly, Tate has done good in encouraging young men to resist the feminist attacks upon their manhood, and in these desperate times, we cannot be too picky about allies. Still, as detailed by Lifesitenews.com, the Tate position falls far short of the Christian ideal on manhood, which among other things involves defending Christian values and virtues, such as the faith from false teaching and heretics, and institutions such as marriage, and opposition to abortion. Tate does not go into any of his, and as far as I can see, he remains a secular humanist, and probably a sexual liberal.
He contrasts with Roosh, who once was a womaniser, like St. Augustine before his conversion to Christ, but now Roosh lives an orthodox Christian life. He is a preferable model I think to Tate, even given his enormous popularity with a generation of alienated young men. Roosh’s latest, where he argues that the life of a Godless man is pointless, no matter how much affluence they have: