THE CANADIAN MULTI-CULTURAL DISASTER

Eric Butler reports from Toronto, Canada. This report is being written on the eve of leaving for London.
The multicultural faddists continue to hold Canada up as a shining example of the success of their theories. There was a time when Toronto was the biggest Anglo-Saxon city on the North American continent. A current projection shows that by the year 2000 the Anglo-Saxons could be a minority of 10 percent. The character of Toronto has changed dramatically, with a flood of West Indians and other non-Europeans. The police battle with a rising crime rate, but are not supposed to mention that non-Europeans dominate in the field of violent crime.

During a series of meetings in Ontario, I was made aware of the rising concern of the English-speaking majority of the threat of compulsory bi-lingualism. The policy first introduced by Fabian Socialist Pierre Elliott Trudeau. There is a rising tide of anger, particularly when in Quebec there is a policy of uni-lingualism with the English speaking 20 percent being blatantly discriminated against. Now comes the harebrained suggestion in Ontario that where there are at least 25 people of any cultural background, they should be entitled to instruction in their own language. It is estimated that there could be at least 50 or more groups entitled to such instruction!

It has been a sight to behold as the political parties spend large sums of money to buy tickets for West Indians, East Indians and others to bus them in to party nomination rallies. Some of these people are standing as candidates with the veiled suggestion that they see parliament as a means of increasing their own group's influence. A recent decision of the Ontario Court of Appeal, has resulted in Ontario Education Minister ordering that the Province's public schools will only be allowed to begin each day with The Lord's Prayer if accompanied by teachings from other religions. This decision is designed to reflect the reality of the multicultural society. Jewish pressure has been applied in the United States for years against any Christian influence in the public school system.

Canadian ex-servicemen have been shocked by a Department of Veteran Affairs instruction that the traditional white crosses should not he used at any Remembrance Day services in centres operated by government. The ruling follows complaints that the cross might offend certain "religious sensibilities". This is another way of saying that there had been Jewish complaints about the use of the traditional Christian cross. Some Canadian Legion representatives have complained, but as some of its own Members point out, Legion leadership "sold the pass" over twenty years ago when they agreed to have the Union Jack with its three Christian Crosses taken out of the Canadian Red Ensign. However, at long last Canadian Christians of all kinds are beginning to realise that Christian Canada is finished unless they pull together against their common enemy.

WHY SOCIETY NEEDS ITS DISSENTERS

"The House of Representatives' Legal and Constitutional Affairs Committee is examining the League of Rights. It seems there is concern about where the League gets its money. - John Hyde, in The Weekend Australian, November 26-27.

According to Mr. Hyde, the "enquiry" is already proceeding: we are hearing a variety of different, and differing, reports, but the number of articulate commentators who deplore the very notion of any "enquiry" into a legal, law abiding body, however "controversial", is growing. All agree that there is a gross abuse of parliamentary power taking place. All agree, "the League of Rights today, then who tomorrow?" A most dangerous precedent, which could even, be turned back on today's eager "enquires" by some future government. The precedent is there.

Mr. Hyde thanks the League of Rights for introducing him to the important book, "The Road to Serfdom", by Professor F.A.Hayek, which deals, among other matters, with the abuse of political power. Mr. Hyde reminds us that the power to "discipline" so-called divisive groups is a worse "evil" than the divisive groups themselves. Divisive groups should be tolerated, in a democracy. That's the line adopted by Mr. Hyde, and we agree that this is fair enough. Of course, who is to say what groups are divisive? That's another question. How about the "multicultural society"? That's not divisive, we suppose. What about the demonstrating Macedonians and Croats over the past few days. What about the Yugoslav boy being shot outside a Yugoslav Consulate in Sydney. Is all this senator Ray's idea of perfect racial harmony? The multicultural society is, for one thing, bringing into Australia many of the hatreds and tensions from Europe that has existed for centuries. What idiocies are perpetrated by politicians!

THE LEUCHTER REPORT

In the last issue of On Target (November 25th) Eric D. Butler, in his report from Canada referred to the Leuchter Report as a "historic document": and indeed it is. Mr. Butler mentioned that it was the Leuchter Report, which convinced British historian David Irving, that the Holocaust is a hoax: the mass gassings could not have possibly occurred. We have before us a copy of the Leuchter Report, which it may be possible for us to make available to supporters, in due course.

There is an "Introduction" by Dr. Robert Faurisson, the internationally known French revisionist historian. The full title of the Report is - The Leuchter Report (The End of a Myth): "An Engineering Report on the Alleged Execution Gas Chambers At Auschwitz, Birkenau and Majdenek, Poland." We can merely cull some relevant extracts from the Report (the full Report runs to 192 pages): "Summaries" could possibly be made available. Dr. Faurisson writes in his introduction:
"Fred A. Leuchter, 45, is an engineer living in Boston, Massachusetts, who specialises in the design and fabrication of execution hardware throughout the United States. One of his major projects was the design of a new gas chamber at the Missouri State Penitentiary at Jefferson City… "I decided to ask (Fred Leuchter) to prepare an expert opinion on the alleged gas chambers in Auschwitz, Birkenau, and Majdenek.

Synopsis and Findings
After a study of the available literature, examination and evaluation of the existing facilities at Auschwitz, Birkenau, and Majdenek, with expert knowledge of the design criteria for gas chamber operation, an investigation of crematory technology and an inspection of modern crematories, the author finds no evidence that any of the facilities normally alleged to be execution gas chambers were ever used as such, and finds, further, that because of the design and fabrication of these facilities, they could not have been utilised for execution gas chambers. Additionally, an evaluation of the crematory facilities produces conclusive evidence that contradicts the alleged volume of corpses cremated in the generally alleged time frame. It is, therefore, the best engineering opinion of the author that none of the facilities examined were ever utilised for the execution of human beings and that the crematories could never have supported the alleged work load attributed to them...."

Methodology
The procedures involved in the study and forensic analysis that resulted in the report were as follows:
1) A general background study of the available material.
2) An on-site inspection and forensic examination of the facilities in question which included the taking of physical data (measurements and construction information) and a considered removal of physical sample material (brick and mortar) which was returned to the United States for chemical analysis.
3) A consideration of recorded and visual (on site) logistic data.
4) A compilation of the acquired data.
5) An analysis of the acquired information and comparison of this information with known and proven design, procedural and logistic information and requirements for the design, fabrication, and operation of actual gas chambers and crematories.
6) A consideration of the chemical analysis of the materials acquired on site.
7) Conclusions based on the acquired evidence."

BRIEF COMMENT

THREAT TO CIVIL LIBERTIES

The following letter has been sent to the Editor of The Age (Melbourne) by John Bennett, President of the Australian Civil Liberties Union. It has not been published, to our knowledge (we would be surprised to see its publication...O.T.)

"Comments by T.Levy, the Chairman of the B'nai B'rith Defamation Commission (Age, 12/11/88) on the unprecedented decision to investigate a pressure group disliked by the Zionist lobby, draws attention to the threat to freedom of speech and freedom of information posed by the lobby, which represents a section of 0.5% of the population. "The power of the Zionist lobby in Australia is reflected in the introduction of a Holocaust kit and pro-Israel propaganda in N.S.W. schools, the suspension of Paul Madigan from Radio 3RRR, legislation in N.S.W. to limit freedom of speech, concessions in relation to dual nationality and taxation of pensions, changes in autopsy laws, an investigation of the League of Rights, the exclusion of PLO spokesmen from Australia, the cancelling of a UN Conference in Australia because one speaker would have been a PLO representative, and the pulping of a 'survival kit' for students because it described Hitler as cruel and evil but also said he was popular in Germany. The power of the lobby is also reflected in the exclusion of the views of people, querying the extent of the Jewish Holocaust, from the media, the spreading of disinformation about its critics, which is uncritically accepted by most of the media, and the ready access to politicians and the media by Zionist leaders.
"The passage of a unanimous resolution by the Senate accepting the official version of the Holocaust (the only resolution about 'history' ever passed by the Senate), a unanimous resolution by Parliament rejecting the finding by the United Nations that Zionism is racism, the abolition of a Monash University funding committee because it proposed funding an inquiry into Palestinian rights, and the acceptance by the media of a largely mythical Libyan threat in the Pacific, are further illustrations of the power of the Zionist lobby in Australia.
"The power of the Zionist lobby is due to its wealth (8 of the 20 wealthiest people in Australia are Zionist Jews), the ready access by Zionists such as Sir Peter Abeles, Isi Liebler, Neville Norman, and David Block - to Mr. Hawke, and guilt induced by constant references, in the media to the Jewish holocaust (other and greater holocausts) such as the Ukrainian holocaust are ignored. "It is difficult to think of anything important to the Zionist lobby it has failed to achieve. But it may have overplayed its hand in its vendetta against alleged war criminals, and the use of a Parliamentary committee to interrogate its critics."

WAR CRIMES LAW UNJUST

TRIBUTE

NO CRIME ON THE WINNING SIDE

LIMIT POLLIES' TERMS IN OFFICE

REPUGNANT