IRAN, ISRAEL & NUCLEAR FIRECRACKERS: SUM OF ALL FEARS

by James Reed
Iran's president Mahmoud Ahmadinejah has recently said that the "tumour" of Israel should be moved to Europe to promote peace in the Middle East. The president has also doubted that the Jewish Holocaust occurred:
"Some European countries insist on saying that Hitler killed millions of innocent Jews in furnaces. They insist on it to the extent that if anyone proves something contrary to that, they condemn that person and throw them in jail." The Jewish Holocaust was not accepted as true by Iranians he said but "if we suppose it is true, our question to the Europeans is: is the killing of innocent Jewish people by Hitler the reason for their support to the occupiers of Jerusalem?
If the Europeans are honest they should give some of their provinces - like in Germany, Austria or other countries - to the Zionists and the Zionists can establish their State in Europe. You offer part of Europe and we will support it. Why do they insist on imposing themselves on other powers and creating a tumour so there is always tension and conflict."

The President's "solution" for Middle East peace seems to be nuclear annihilation of Israel. A first strike against facilities which Iran has surely securely buried underground will be difficult. Israel will respond with possibly hundreds of nuclear bombs which Mordecai Vanunu alerted the world to 20 years ago, but which Israel denies that it has. The nuclear and political fallout from such a conflict will threaten civilization in the northern hemisphere.

SPELLING IT OUT

by James Reed
At long last - Establishment acknowledgement that the present "whole word" approach to teaching reading is inferior to phonics based teaching. (The Australian, 9 December 2005). The government is planning a back-to-basics approach to the teaching of reading, writing and comprehension following recommendations of the National Inquiry into the Teaching of Literacy.
Some schools which have already introduced phonics - which is based on the relationship between letters and sounds - have found that their schools have gone from failing to meet State bench marks to near the top of the State.

The "whole word" approach is more suitable for Asiatic languages and no doubt our culturally traitorous generation of teachers have begun preparation for our children's "Asian future". The little blonde girl of 10 who lives next door to me, and who goes to a multicultural school (as most now are) can speak words in broken Chinese, but cannot write a simple letter to Santa in grammatically correct English.

**We recommend you read Jean M. Wallis' "The Disaster Road: Planned Failure & Psychological Seduction in the Schools," a 1986 publication. Twenty years ago, Mrs. Wallis was one of the few teachers who could see what the "agents of change" were about within the Australian education system - and rang the alarm bells.
She understood the intentions and aims of those "agents of change" who became securely entrenched within the system. As you read her book you will want to exclaim: "What she said would happen has indeed happened!" Price: $20.00 posted from all League Book Services.

PINTERING IT ON THEM

by James Reed
Recent Nobel literature laureate, Harold Pinter, in a lecture broadcast to the Swedish Academy in Stockholm, said that US President George Bush and British Prime Minister Tony Blair should be frog marched before the International Criminal Court and tried for State terrorism for the invasion of Iraq. In his lecture Pinter said:
"We have brought torture, cluster bombs, depleted uranium, innumerable acts of random murder, misery, degradation and death to the Iraqi people." It's all in a day's work in "bringing freedom and democracy to the Middle East."

However Pinter, if he was truly deserving of Nobel Prize status should have continued his critique and also attacked the regime of deposed Iraqi dictator Saddam Hussein - with arbitrary arrests and torture, organized rapes of prisoners, arbitrary executions and the burial of victims of the regime in mass graves. Some authorities estimate that up to one million people are missing in Iraq, presumed dead. Saddam Hussein's genocidal Anfal campaign aimed to exterminate the Kurds in an act of ethnic cleansing. Chemical weapons were used against them and up to 180,000 Kurds died or disappeared between February and September 1988 alone.

The Iraqi situation is not a black-and-white one as the pro-American and con-American camps in this debate portray. It is a black-and-black situation consisting of various degrees of evil. It is not a choice between good and evil, but evil and evil. That is why there can be no real solution to the Iraqi situation. And I haven't even mentioned until now, the forbidden word, "Zionism".

TALKING SENSE ON BUSINESS MIGRATION

AND WHAT ABOUT THE ASIAN SELL OUT BY JOHN HOWARD?

by Robert Hart
And what can John Howard do as PM to prove that he is a better Asian puppet than his predecessors? According to The Australian, 12 December 2005, Howard will implement a new "Colombo Plan" as part of his contribution to the East Asian Community concept discussed at the ASEAN and East Asian summits.
Hundreds of millions of dollars will be spent on the scheme. Meanwhile our own students must face financial hardships completing a degree and a massive HECS debt after its completion.
Why not scholarships for our own students?
The answer is that the "Colombo Plan" was the first major assault on the White Australia policy, and the first step to make Australia a colony of Asia. Howard continues that tradition.

"RACISTS" REVOLTING: ON THE BATTLE FOR THE BEACHES

by Tom Barnes
After seeing the late TV news on that day 11 December 2005, about the "racists" rioting at Cronulla Beach, it was not too difficult to predict what the newspapers would say the next day. I had written an article on 11 December 2005 which now follows, in the section "Before".
I return to the present in the following section called "After". I can't resist the human-all-too-human temptation of "I told you so":

1. BEFORE: 10 December 2005
Violent clashes have apparently occurred between "Aussies" (Anglo-Australians) and what one girl (cited in The Australian 10-11 December 2005 p.10) called "wogs" (i.e. Lebanese) on the Southern Sydney beach of North Cronulla. The Australian in its wisdom, featured a full colour photograph of five men of Middle Eastern extraction" who "were enjoying the beach" - whilst fully clothed. These youths were poker faced and extremely well built.
One lad had an "Everlast" boxing gym singlet on and had huge arms and muscles where, as a lad I didn't even have places! Said one of these musclemen: "Everyone gives us crap because of the way we look." I doubt it - unless they had a small army behind them. One Cronulla resident was cited as saying that the fully clothed powerhouses were "not here to swim."
The main thrust of The Australian article was that someone, presumably an "Aussie" had sent out text messages urging "Aussies to attack Lebs and wogs."
A Lebanese youth leader was cited as calling for the new sedition laws to be used against the author of the message. A spokeswoman for Attorney-General Ruddock said that these laws have not yet been enacted but were "designed to target people who incited one group to violence against another."
However the article also said that police are set to charge the author of the call-to-brawl text under existing laws, indicating that the use of the sedition laws is unnecessary. But as with race vilification laws, these laws will be used to keep the "Aussies" in their place in the multicultural fascist republic of "Australaisa".
Of course I don't support the call-to-brawl texter who deserves punishment, but I know that the situation at Cronulla is more complex than the portrayal given in The Australian of the disadvantaged and discriminated-against ethnic who needs multicultural laws to be protected from "Aryan-Nazi Anglos".
This perpetuates the myth of multiculturalism that the ethnic is a type of angel sent to us by god, to "enrich" us with their divine "diversity".
But such a myth is not a human reality. If our system were not founded upon anti-Anglo Saxon racism, it would be interesting to discover what "text" messages were being sent by the "prosecuted" ethnics. Such interception techniques were used in Sydney back in 2001 when ethnics were racially targeting Anglo-Australian girls for gang raping.
And while we are on this topic, have you ever wondered why tax audits by the ATO relentlessly target Anglos - yet it is an open secret that many ethnics established themselves in Australia en masse from the largesse of Arthur Calwell, and have operated a "cash-in-hand" economy that has made them rich? This includes a plethora of ethnics from tradesmen and fruit and vegetable folk through to white collar professions. Anglo-Australians since the end of World War II have become renters to ethnic landowners. Many, in only average paying jobs (up front) often have a number of houses while many Anglo-Australian couples struggle to own one home in a life-time.
It would be easy for the ATO to systematically show that the assets of such people couldn't be accounted for from their salary. The ATO could start the ball rolling by targeting one Australian settlement first - such as Griffith, New South Wales. But don't hold your breath while waiting for this to happen.

2. AFTER: 12 DECEMBER 2005
When the Muslim race riots occurred recently in France, the media generally cried "French racism". When Blacks riot in America the media generally cries "White American racism". Rioters are "victims" driven to extremes by the 'racism" of the system. When White Europeans riot - and it is an extremely rare event - the cry is different.
The attacks upon people of a Middle Eastern background were described by NSW Police Assistant Commissioner Mark Goodwin as "disgusting". The Herald Sun 12 December 2005 had the headline "Race Hate: A Shameful Day for Our Nation". The paper detailed attacks, brawls and slogans used by various Anglos in the mob, as did The Age: "it's time for a f----ing war, so join the army of the hard core".

The slogans - including "No more Lebs/Wogs" etc., etc., are indeed racist slogans. The anger of the largely Anglo crowd was simply frightening to see. But why were these people angry and violent? I want to play the "apologist" for the real oppressed. It has been said that a conflict such as this one has been brewing in Sydney for a number of years - at least since the 2001 racially motivated Lebanese gang rapes of about 50 women.

Former detective, Tim Priest, in Quadrant of January-February 2004 pointed out that Lebanese gangs who control a substantial portion of Sydney' drug trade often bash Anglo males "for no other reason that that they are "Skips", as they call Australians" (p.13).
And, he said: "There is a clear and definite link between attacks on our young men and women being racial as well as criminal."
In the name of political correctness the Sydney police have and still do, ignore the situation. Is it "racist" to hypothesise that these events were the straws that broke the "Skips'" backs? The violence is not justified but it is understandable.

SPECIAL THREE-IN-ONE New Times Survey PACK -- $3.00 POSTED:
Australians need to understand the elitists' goal of diluting the racial mix of the Australian people in order to fit us into their New World Order. Three issues of the New Times Survey are being offered for the price of one:
"Racial Treason: From White Australia Policy to Yellow Australia Policy":
"China-Threat: Yellow Peril Revisited":
"It's Time: For a New Anti-Immigration Movement in Australia".
NTS Special Pack available only from Box 1052 G.P.O. Melbourne, 3001. Price: $3.00 posted.

BASIC FUND

LETTERS

NATIVE TITLE? NOT CROWN TITLE? SURELY NOT!
Have we really been caught not just 'napping,' but in a deep slumber as David Barton's letter to Malcolm Turnbull MHR suggests? Mr. Barton has posed an especially relevant question.
What would be the foundational Land Title under their proposed, God forbid, New World Order republic? What type of Land Title have they in mind to replace the present Crown Title?

SUBJECT: REPUBLIC FOR AUSTRALIA:
To: Malcolm Bligh Turnbull, MHR, Federal Member for Wentworth, Parliament House, Canberra. ACT 2600. 12th January 2006.
Dear Mr. Turnbull,
· I enclose herewith copy of my correspondence to Mr. Mark Latham MHR, then Leader of the Opposition letter dated 9th August, 2004.
· I also enclose copy of my letter to you, dated 10th October, 2005 with which I enclosed a copy of the above mentioned letter to Mr. Mark Latham.
As my letter to you has been dishonoured through lack of reply within a reasonable passage of time, I take it that the two questions raised in my letter namely:
1. Would you require the people of Australia be fully informed as to how Native Title will replace the Crown Title as the basic foundational title of all land titles in Australia, BEFORE the question of Australia becoming a Republic is placed before the Australian people at a referendum?
2. As basic constitutional changes have been made of late without recourse of referenda can I be assured that no change to a Republic will be made without the matter FIRST being placed before the Australian people by way of referendum, would be answered by you in the negative.
That is, you would NOT require the Australian people to be fully informed how Native Title would replace the Crown Title as the basic foundational title of all land titles in Australia, in the event of Australia becoming a Republic.
Likewise you would NOT be in favour of the matter of Australia becoming a Republic being placed before the Australian people by way of referendum before a change to a Republic is made.
If I do not hear from you to the contrary within twenty-one days of the date of this is letter, I will feel free to publicly proclaim your intention to deceive the people of Australia by withholding this vital information regarding their title to land, from the Australian people.
Yours faithfully, John David Barton, Collarenebri, NSW.

Section 51 of the Commonwealth Constitution Act now reads: 51. The Parliament shall, subject to this Constitution, have the power to make laws for the peace, order, and good government of the Commonwealth with respect to: (XXVi) the people of any race for whom it is deemed necessary to make special laws. (emphasis added…ed)

TREATING DISSIDENTS AS 'PARIAHS': Editor of The Australian, 11th February 2006:
Sir:
Waleed Aly is right to object ('Selective outrage', 11-12/2) to the way in which legal action forbidding the 'denial' of genocide and, in particular, the Holocaust prevents people 'from mounting certain arguments'. However, his assertion that 'such arguments are uncivilised nonsense' is quite baseless.
The dissident theses of many Holocaust revisionists are genuinely academic in both contents and style. They are not claiming that there was no Nazi persecution of the Jews, but only that in some respects this has been very seriously exaggerated. There is nothing inherently unethical or absurd in taking up such a position. As such, they deserve to be fairly and properly debated in public forums.
This is especially so when several of their leaders have accepted imprisonment rather than retract their beliefs. Continuation of the present policy, widespread throughout the Western world, of treating them as pariahs and refusing their views intellectual respect is an academic outrage; and, whatever his faults, the president of Iran was correct to draw attention to this and condemn it.
Nigel Jackson, Belgrave, Vic

AN OPEN LETTER FROM INGRID RIMLAND TO ZUNDEL'S TRIAL JUDGE:
To Judge, Dr. Ulrich Meinerzhagen. JVA Mannheim, Herzogenriedstraße 111, D-68169 Mannheim Germany:

Dear Dr. Meinerzhagen:
With the trial against my husband, of which you are in charge, about to start again, I take this opportunity to lay before you a few facts and some of my reflections as the wife of a man who is, by all accounts, about to be silenced for good for his politically incorrect thoughts. On the eve of these fateful days, I feel an obligation to write this letter to you in the hope that I will find the right words worthy of serious reflection.
Before I do so, however, I want to tell you in all honesty that I, for one, never really was offended by your censorship and that you, as the judge in this historical trial, read all our letters and came to know our innermost thoughts. I saw this unpleasant constraint, imposed by what I always thought was surely a country of civilized conduct, namely the homeland of my ancestry, less as an infringement on our rights but rather as a golden opportunity to give you a few glimpses of who we really are, what motivates us deeply, how we conduct ourselves, and how this heresy trial - for that is what it is - is viewed by the rest of the world.
I would also like to say that I agree with Ernst that nothing could be gained by heaping scorn, derision and disdain upon your head - as seems to have happened from the pens of a handful of livid Zundel supporters, which must have shocked, distressed, and greatly angered you.
In courtesy to you, I will try to be brief, concise - and polite. Nonetheless, it is important that I speak clearly. I am not sure you are aware of the importance of your role, of the great privilege of this rare opportunity to serve your country by serving historical truth - not just for Ernst, not just for Germany, but for the remnant of the Western world, and maybe for humanity. A train called "Aufstand für die Wahrheit"* is roaring your way, full speed, full weight, full force - and you are tasked by fate to set the direction. And here you are, already hearing the rumble, sensing the tremble, feeling the dread. There's no one else to act for you - you must decide. What is it going to be? A resolute choice for Truth in History - or the proverbial boot upon the human face that Orwell spoke about?
Of course, as Ernst's wife, I shall hope for that gesture of courage from you - knowing all the odds against it. I hope for it, but I don't count on it. I see a sad, humiliated country parading in sack cloth and ashes, willingly wearing its blinders, mired in self-blame and guilt - obediently demonizing those who, confronted with facts and with logic, abandoned both sack cloth and blinders. How that should be so - in a country as accomplished and proud as Germany was - is a case for the Freudian couch, not for a German courtroom.

Here are the facts in a nutshell, for you as well as history:
The Holocaust is Fraud writ large. It's an extortion racket. It has been proven to be so from documents, from decades' worth of research by conscientious men and women from all walks of life all over the world, and from forensic science - and millions upon millions know that. My husband led that effort by digging deep and bringing forth that first forensic kernel of truth. That is the action of a man of principle. An honest country would reward such a man - not punish and imprison.
Ernst was the first one ever who, in response to four decades of Germany's demonization by its enemies, sent a team to Auschwitz looking for the so-called "murder weapon" - the dreaded "gas chambers" of Hitler's concentration camps. That first forensic expedition documented what they found, and what they did not find. Has Germany ever done that? Why not? Please show me an insurance company that doggedly refuses to investigate a murder claim for which it must pay through the nose! What Ernst initiated was long overdue - and it was not a crime. If he is wrong, as many are led to believe for self-serving reasons - why not re-check his findings? Or why not use the testimony sworn under oath in his two trials in Canada and spare you the expense and effort? It's all there, for the asking, in the records of Canada's two Great Holocaust Trials of 1985 and 1988.

* Ernst Zundel has a fine mind, a will of steel, and an impeccably unblemished record. He dug in his heels and refused to budge, but he has always respected the law. Never once, in almost half a century of almost incessant insults, murderous violence and non-stop demonization did he raise a hand against his tormentors. Should such a man endure years of detention in inhuman, abusive surroundings - with not a chance of that proverbial snowball in hell to be allowed to offer a defence?
Specifically, it has been claimed Ernst owned and ran the Zundelsite, an American-based website, famous around the world. I call that an affront against my dignity as a professional and as a citizen of the United States of America, a country with a Bill of Rights as part of its Constitution. In the United States, to speak one's mind is guaranteed by law, no matter how embarrassing and inconvenient to vested political interests. I happen to have a mind of my own. The Zundelsite is my own property. Ernst did not found the Zundelsite. I did. Ernst does not run the Zundelsite. I do. I have done that for close to 12 years!
Out of respect for him, I crafted and refined the Zundelsite so that it accurately, and to the best of my ability, reflected and reflects what Ernst is all about - an honest, questing man who cannot help but speak the truth as he knows it. I have been told that Germany has issued an arrest warrant for me as well. I, too, have an impeccable record, having always lived within the law, in deference to my chosen country.
I was a respected, accomplished writer long before I ever met Ernst Zundel. For many years, I used to make a living as a convention speaker, keynoting about the history I knew to audiences as large as 6,000, being booked alongside accomplished entertainment stars, state governors, and senators. No one objected - ever! Whatever made me suddenly a "criminal"?

*I understand the prosecution is going to present three "witnesses" to make its threadbare case. Who are these witnesses? Ernst's second wife - a fractured personality whose fevered mind hallucinates concocted stories. Two government spooks who nested in the entrails of German embassies and consulates to do their dirty work for alien interests - instead of shielding and defending a tortured German national, as would have been their duty. That's it! That's all the shabby "evidence" the prosecution conjured up after three decades' worth of spying, harassing and subverting - and millions' of taxpayers' money! I measure these three traitors to the truth against the thousands of testimonials collected over decades from supporters all over the world who know Ernst and vouch for his conduct.
You have been tasked to finish off this man. I need to point out that you are in a position to do precisely what is right, as opposed to what might be politically useful. I must assume you did not choose this role and do not cherish it. You did not make the laws. You must obey the laws - or must you? You know by now that what the so-called "Holocaust" connotes is far from "offenkundig".

This obscene trial is a political circus, meant to solicit applause from New York, Washington, London, and Tel Aviv. The Holocaust Lobby is holding the hoop. You are expected to overrule your German conscience and jump through that hoop like a poodle. Ernst Zundel is a man who never has jumped through the hoop for the sake of applause. Future generations will have no difficulty according this rare individual great honour for his determined stand against corruption and deceit in his homeland.
How they will judge his judge, whom fate has chosen to preside over literally life and death at such a crucial juncture in Western people's history, is as of this late date still written in the stars.
Sincerely, Ingrid Rimland Zundel, Ed.D.

ADELAIDE CONSERVATIVE SPEAKERS' CLUB:
South Australians go to the polls on 18th March, so the CSC has invited a number of minor party representatives and Independents to participate in a Public Forum on the CSC night. Each candidate/representative will be given an allotted time to present him/herself to the audience and the Forum will then be opened for your questions. Come prepared to ask those questions of those who have accepted our invitation to participate in the Forum.
The Public Forum will be held at the next meeting of the Adelaide CSC, Monday 6th March at the Public Schools' Club, 207 East Terrace (cnr. Carrington) Adelaide. The Dinner commences at 6.30pm and then the Forum will follow at 7.30-7.45pm. Dinner is $18.00 per person. Please phone: 8296 4704 and make your booking.

STATE SEMINAR, VICTORIA:
The State Seminar for Victoria will be held at the Central Hotel, Beaconsfield on Saturday 8th of April with lunch commencing at 12.30pm. The Lunch will be followed by the Seminar presentations. Invitations with full details will be sent to all Victorian supporters at a later date.

THE LEAGUE'S 60th YEAR! IT IS A TIME FOR CELEBRATION!
Come and join League friends and supporters as we celebrate the 60 years of achievement at the 2006 National Weekend. We commence celebrations with "The New Times" Dinner: Friday 6th October, Seminar: Saturday 7th October and Action Conference: Sunday 8th October 2006.
Mark the dates in your diary. Book your accommodation early - phone the Hume Motor Inn in Albury (02 6021 2733) and book your accommodation early.

INVERELL FORUM COMING UP IN MARCH

The convenors of the Inverell Forum have notified us of their annual Forum to be held over the 17-20 March 2006.. There will be a wide range of interesting and challenging speakers including Professor Andrew Fraser. Professor Fraser was banned from teaching at a Sydney university after he publicly aired his views on non-whites and Africans in Australia.
Send to Inverell Forum Inc. P.O. Box 987, Inverell NSW for more information. Visit their website on www.northnet.com.au/~rub