CURRENCY BY STEALTH, OR BY THEFT?

by James Reed
Passed on by email down the chain to me was this 2006 report by Jerome R. Corsi at WorldNetDaily.com for 28/11/06, which now appears to have been 'near the mark'. George Bush has been working with great intensity to create an Americus economic block to 'rival' the EU.

The block will take in, at first, Canada, the US and Mexico, but probably later, the whole of South America. The Americus currency will be the "Amero" which will replace the Canadian and US dollar and the Mexican peso. The dollar will fall in value with China announcing that it would diversify its foreign holdings, instead of concentrating on holding US dollar foreign-exchange reserves. So, it seems the dollar may have had its day.

Most Americans know little about the new world order plan to abandon the "United States" and create a borderless Americus. The same strategy is happening in the Asia-Pacific where the process of "Asianisation" is being used to bring us into line and prime us for the elimination of Australia.

Are you ready, to cease to be? Day by day, the world as we know it, is rubbed out a little more on the great blackboard of international finance. The long-term consequences of the bloc-ization of the world will most likely be global economic collapse. A report at www.worldreports.org notes the French and German financial authorities distributed national banknotes to their banks on 15th December 2006. This could be an insurance policy against the possible failure of the EU collective currency, the euro.

If France and Germany really did have confidence in their own Frankenstein's financial monster, then they would never have taken the precautionary measures of stockpiling banknotes, like chestnuts, for the rainy day when the euro washes into the seas.
In this context worldreports.org contends that the "Amerofrenzy" issue 'on the boil' not so long ago, was a disinformation campaign "timed to throw sand in our eyes, while the internationalist crooks continue with their financial raping and pillaging operations in full daylight."

Maybe so: but it is precisely the day-to-day financial raping and pillaging operations of the Masters of International Finance that builds up economic momentum for economic blocs and common currency.

OUR RETIREMENT AND RUSSIAN ROULETTE

by James Reed
I may wish that I had taken control of all my "super" and even spent it when I had the chance. Australians have sunk well over $530 billion into superannuation funds but as early as 2002 the Australian Prudential Regulation Authority warned that many super schemes were at a high risk of collapse.

The risk is not just for the small funds but for the big boys as well, as the collapse of HIH and the Nasdaq crash well showed. Super funds are not immune from fraud and generally the government's super safety measures are weak. In these unstable financial times, should the super bubble burst, so too will the lives of those that revolve around it.

'AIR BRUSHING' HER HISTORY?

I know that photographers 'air-brush' photographs to present the subject in his/her most flattering light. But now we learn that politicians are doing the same thing with their CVs. The Sydney Morning Herald's Paul Sheehan has been most 'ungentleman-like' and gouged out the 'wrinkles' Julia Gillard had 'air-brushed' out of her CV.

He wrote: "I do know she has air-brushed her past. According to her entry in Who's Who, this was her working career prior to federal politics: solicitor 1987-95, partner 1990-95; chief of staff to the Victorian leader of the opposition, J. Brumby 1995-98.
On the Labor Party's website it says: "In 1983 she was president of the Australian Union of Students … She began working with Slater and Gordon in Melbourne in 1987 as an industrial lawyer and was admitted as a partner in 1990."

The problem with this official history is that her working career does not start until she is 26. The closest we come in her official history to filling in the missing link is her maiden speech, on November 11, 1998, when she made this passionate aside: "While experience in the student movement inspired those on the other side of the house to dedicate themselves to the destruction of unionism, it inspired us to work with and for unions … Our youthful anger may now be tempered by experience, but the same beliefs in fairness and the same fire remain."

What exactly is she talking about, or rather, not talking about? Between 1984 and 1986 she worked full-time for Socialist Forum, a group that formed after another schism in the Communist Party of Australia, with the aim of advancing the socialist agenda in Australia. She served as a member of Socialist Forum's management committee until 1993, well into her career as a lawyer. Melbourne University's archives confirm: The Socialist Forum was established in 1984, initially by disaffected members of the Communist Party of Australia: <https://www.lib.unimelb.edu.au/collections/archives/collections/pdfs/socialistforum(102~28).pdf> (CPA). The question is asked: Is Gillard ashamed of her past that she fails to mention an allegiance that spanned nine years?"

Comment: Julia may not be the only politician who might want to 'air-brush' his/her curriculum vitae. But let's not stop there. Let's look at the members of the Coalition and follow the threads back to their former - and present - allegiances. We might be surprised by the facts!

What about the Fabian Socialists within the Labor hierarchy? A short history of the early Fabians and their links to Soviet Russia and the pursuit of power were recorded by Malcolm Muggeridge in "The Great Liberal Death Wish". His father was an early member of the Fabians and an associate of Sydney and Beatrice Webb. In the early days, the Fabians would meet in the Muggeridge family home and Malcolm, as a young boy, would sit in on the meetings. He eventually married the niece of Sydney and Beatrice Webb.

In later life he wrote:
"It's difficult to convey to you what a shock this was, realizing that what I had supposed to be the new brotherly way of life my father and his cronies had imagined long before, was simply on examination an appalling tyranny, in which the only thing that mattered, the only reality, was power."

IN THE SPIRIT OF FREEDOM WITHIN A DEMOCRACY

by Betty Luks
A NSW Upper House committee has ruled that Cardinal George Pell was not in contempt of the State Parliament when he warned Catholic MPs they would face "consequences" if they voted in support of a stem cell-related bill. The Melbourne Age, 20/9/07 reported that the privileges Committee of NSW's Upper House released its findings following an investigation into comments made by the cardinal earlier this year.

Cardinal Pell released a statement welcoming the decision, which he said was "no surprise and a win for religious freedom". He added: "Christians in Australia have long played an important part in ensuring that fundamental human rights are respected. My contribution to the public discussion on human cloning was made in this spirit and tradition (and) to prevent religious leaders from publicly stating their claims to truth would stifle religious freedom and hamper open debate on matters of public interest."

Australians have lost sight of the fact that even exalted parliamentarians are subject to the moral Law as are the rest of us. Australians are a long way from understanding that God's mills grind slowly - but they do grind exceedingly small. Australia needs more Cardinal Pells to remind us of this, not less.

For those Australians who don't know, Archbishop Stephen Langton was the guiding light and authority for that group of Englishmen who, in the 1200s, challenged King John's tyrannical policies. They were willing to fight unto death for their rights and the Church in England, through Archbishop Stephen Langton, backed them and helped set out their grievances and the policies necessary to right the wrongs in that most famous of charters - Magna Carta.

That document proved to be an inspiration for the hatching of rights and freedoms of the British peoples for years to come. It also insists on the rights and freedoms of the Church! The first clause of Magna Carta declares:
"That the Church of England shall be free, and enjoy her whole rights and liberties inviolable." Racial and religious vilification legislation:

Charles Francis QC ("Freedom of Speech" Endeavour Forum May 2007) rightly observed:
"Those Australians who believe in political correctness and their right to stifle philosophies which conflict with it may well consider that in the first decade of the 21st century their golden era has begun…
"Freedom of speech is a priceless asset within a democracy, but we are now being governed by people who no longer value that freedom and who want their own philosophies to govern our lives… Judges and administrative tribunals are not qualified to determine religious or theological matters and the State has no business encroaching into matters of religious belief and values."

ANOTHER WAR FOR THE MADMEN IN THE WHITEHOUSE?

David Isenberg of UPI (9/9/2007) asks has the public relations blitz for an attack on Iran begun?

Is there a September roll-out for an attack on Iran by America? "White House Chief of Staff Andrew Card once famously said of the administration's 2002 campaign to get support for the invasion of Iraq:
''From a marketing point of view, you don't introduce new products in August.'' Now August is behind us, and - right on schedule - marketers both in the White House and among their supporters outside are rolling out their newest product, a public relations blitz urging a U.S. military adventure in Iran.

Consider the recent speech by President Bush to the American Legion. In it he said, "Iran's active pursuit of technology that could lead to nuclear weapons threatens to put a region already known for instability and violence under the shadow of a nuclear holocaust. Scare us, Mr. President!
"Iran's actions threaten the security of nations everywhere. And that is why the United States is rallying friends and allies around the world to isolate the regime, to impose economic sanctions. "We will confront this danger before it is too late," he concluded.

Of course, President Bush's speech, not for the first time, stood in 180 degree contrast to reality. The day before, while making public the recently completed agreement with Iran regarding its nuclear program, Olli Heinonen, deputy director of the International Atomic Energy Agency, said, "We have in front of us an agreed work plan. We agreed on modalities on how to implement it. We have a timeline for the implementation.""

BOMB IRAN WITH THE BEACH BOYS

FOR THE NEW CLASS WHITE IS BLACK AND BLACK IS BLACKER

by James Reed
The front page of The Weekend Australian 5-6/5/07 featured a "black boy" and a "white baby" and the headline: "Why Life's a Black and White Issue".
The point to be made is presumably that race is a social construction and that life expectancy between the two races is also a social construction.
Articles that followed raised the familiar black armband view that we are a long way from "reconciliation," that more money will need to be poured into the reconciliation pot (or black hole, depending on how it is viewed) etc, etc. It has all been heard before. This would have been a good time to discuss again the shocking incidence of sexual abuse and violence against women and children in Aboriginal communities.
The effects of violence and alcohol in lowering Aboriginal life expectancy could have been dealt with instead of going down the standard 'white guilt' path.
But that approach implies a high degree of responsibility for one's own plight. It is far easier for guilty white liberals to spend the tax dollars of hard working Australians than to deal with an issue where their own distorted "altruism" has had such ill effects, on a people they claim to want to help.

SO, FINALLY IT COMES OUT!

by Betty Luks
When the Race Hate legislation was in its Bill stage, government representatives repeatedly said that its aim was not to have a chilling effect on free speech. When Dr. Toben appeared before the Federal Court, one judge admitted, hypothetically, that there could in principle be a critique of the Holocaust numbers, which did not constitute vilification. In other words, the legislation did not necessarily make "Holocaust denial" a crime.

Consider this:
Colin Rubenstein, writing the editorial for the May 2007 edition of the Australia/Israel Review says this in the context of discussing an alleged new form of anti-Semitism which is "anti-Israel and anti-Zionist".
"Australian Jewry has been successfully defending itself, according to anti-Semitism expert Prof. Dina Porat of Tel Aviv University. Australia has in place legislative measures that restrict some of the manifestations of anti-Semitism, including Holocaust denial from being expressed in this country. Australian society] is Anglo-Saxon and places enormous stress on law and order," Parat commented." Emphasis has been put on "Anglo-Saxon".

Apart from showing what the race hate legislation was really about, one wonders about the fate of Jews in an Asianised Australia - and in the late 21st century, a Muslim Asianised one. Jewish thinkers in Europe and the United States are asking these questions in the face of Islamic demographics, but here in Australia the media elites operate with the Alice in Wonderland view of multiculturalism/immigration/multiracialism. We are not at the Holland stage, just yet, but these sorts of questions should be investigated.

Professor Dina Porat notes (AIR May 2007, p12)
"Antisemitism is more violent than in the past and [this] is attributed mainly to Muslim immigrant groups."

If this is a fact, couldn't one be permitted to ask: When will Anglo-Saxon numbers dwindle and Muslim numbers become the majority - then whither "anti-Semitism"? When the Anglos go, then what for Jewry?

Professor Robert Wistrich says that "a climate of appeasement and indifference exists in the West toward Arab racism, jihad and the brazen, genocidal form of anti-Semitism that exists in Iran and throughout the Arab world, including the Palestinian Authority."(p.14)
True, but where does this attitude of acceptance and "tolerance" come from - could it be from decades of multicultural ideology which has led to the Anglo Saxon population being too afraid and apathetic to criticise any other culture or race?

Perhaps Anglo Saxons have become too deracinated to help the Jewish people any longer and are now content to die quietly in their historical corner, leaving the Jewish people alone against the might of radical Islam?
I would very much like to put this question to Professor Wistrich:
Will a world dominated by China and radical Islam be kinder to the Jews than the present one of diminishing Anglo influence? Perhaps Australian Jews should read the blog of the Jewish American multicultural critic Lawrence Auster, who bravely addresses these issues on his website.

CHIEF CONSTABLE OF CAMBRIDGESHIRE SPEAKS OUT

The following report verifies the fact the social(ist) revolution continues unabated in the UK:

In our repressive world of thoughtcrime and guiltspeak, it now takes great courage to tell the truth, even when it's obvious. Fortunately there are a few brave people prepared to do it, and Julie Spence, the chief constable of Cambridgeshire, is one of them. Last week she courageously said the unsayable and pointed out that the large numbers of recent immigrants are causing serious problems in her manor.

Dangerous crime, such as drink driving, human trafficking, credit card fraud and knife crime, has gone up substantially and her officers are now having to deal with people speaking nearly 100 different foreign languages. The cost in translation fees for Cambridgeshire is close to £1m a year.

What's true of Cambridgeshire is true of the country as a whole, and not just in policing. The Labour government, in its 10 years of office, has allowed more than a million new people from all over the world to settle in this country. That is little short of a social revolution. Whatever the positive results of this astonishing change, there are some very spectacular negative ones. Big city hospitals are weighed down with masses of new patients who don't speak English, or who won't see male doctors or who cannot get GPs and clog up casualty departments.
Local authorities, as in the notable case of Slough, find they have large numbers of immigrants for whom they cannot get extra money to meet the new costs of housing, social care, welfare and so on.

As for schools, why nobody makes the obvious point that standards in schools are bound to suffer when many tens of different languages are spoken among the schoolchildren; how can any child progress in reading, writing and talking English, and being acculturated as an English-speaking Briton, when the rest of the class don't speak it?

At a local school in west London there are more than 90 mother tongues, and a high proportion of recent immigrants or asylum seekers - dislocated, confused and homesick as they must be. It is a perfect recipe for collapsing standards in education, which is what we've got.

Even Trevor Phillips own outfit, the Commission for Racial Equality (soon to become the Commission for Equality and Human Rights), published a grim and angry report last week about a "fracturing" society, growing ethnic segregation and growing extremism. This fracturing of society will gradually be seen as too important an issue to excuse the mumbling of feel-good pieties whenever immigration is mentioned in polite circles.

KING ARTHUR, THE POLITICALLY CORRECT!

by James Reed
Some of our older readers may not be keeping up with politically correct 'trends' in popular culture, so an occasional note on the odd film or two will not go astray. Consider "King Arthur" (Jerry Bruckheimer) released a couple of years ago. I knew that this film would get my blood pressure up when seeing the shorts on TV.
The film has Guinevere as a feminist super-warrior, and the bit played on TV goes (roughly): Hero : There are blood-thirsty men over there… Guinevere : Don't worry I won't let them rape you.

How's that for economy of political correctness : the gender and homosexuality agendas in a few short lines, allegedly delivered about 1,500 years ago! The plot borders on the historically absurd : Arthur is a Briton, trained by the Romans to keep the Britons in line. But the Saxon invasions are also in full swing. "Don't let history get in the way of propaganda lads!"

The Saxons are stupid and cruel and don't know how to fight. Guinevere with flaming arrows and Arthur's handful of men wipe out - down to zero! - an utterly enormous army of Saxons. The Saxons are blonde and Nordic, the heroes are dark and swarthy, so obviously the dark "good guys" have a field day punishing these evil proto-Nazis.

I was disappointed to see Arthur and Guinevere marry : I thought that it would be more appropriate to have a lesbian theme and perhaps run the line that Arthur and Lancelot were gay! With the lack of disabled characters I am afraid I could only give this movie three politically correct stars.

THE PLANNED DESTRUCTION OF SOUTH AUSTRALIA

from Len the Cleaner
South Australians know their State is the driest State in the driest continent on earth. It is now facing a very severe water crisis - made worse by the corporatisation and privatisation of the nation's precious water resources. We also have a Premier who likes to push his "green" credentials and is very big on 'climate change'.
But your readers need to be reminded he wants a population for Adelaide of two million by 2050, mostly Asians of course. He is carrying on the Labor Party ideologies of Don Dunstan.

This population target was made in 2004 and reaffirmed in the State Strategic Plan released 24th January, 2007 (The Australian). This target is so fruit-loopy that former Opposition Leader Iain Evans was moved to say: "Where is the increase in water supply in the State Strategic Plan? "Where is the sewage recycling, where is the desalination plant?"
"If I was premier I'd be seeking scientific advice as to whether South Australia can sustain a two million population… South Australians are concerned with our population growth, that we can't sustain it because we don't have adequate water."

Tough talk at the time, but if the political roles are reversed in the future could we expect the Liberal leader to act on behalf of the citizens of this State, or would he be following the orders of the black spiders of the NWO?
The spider men of the NWO don't care about sustaining South Australia: SA is just another community to exploit and then let die. My God! I must be careful, I am turning into a James Reed!

ZUNDEL - APPEAL DENIED

from Ingrid Rimland
On 12 September 2007, the German Bundesgerichtshof, a sort of appeal court, rubberstamped the treason against the German People - that they have absolutely no right to hear the truth about their history. The judgment stands as Judge Meinerzhagen pronounced it shamelessly while sentencing Ernst Zundel:
"It is of absolutely no relevance whether the Holocaust happened or not. Denying it is a punishable offense. That is the only thing that matters to the Court." (Source: Berliner Tageszeitung, 2 Feb 2007)

Five years in PRISON for speaking the truth about the Holocaust as documented by forensic science! Let it be said that the defence submissions appealing the harsh Mannheim sentence consisted of more than 800 carefully crafted pages of legal arguments.
The Bundesgerichtsamt's reply consisted of one-and-a-half pages of blah-blah!