Reality of Conspiracy - The Sutton Revelations - BombShell
Facts - The Truth About The Russian Revolution -
Who are The Jews? - Financing
The Soviet By Wall Street - Soviet-Zionist
Collaboration - Soviet Real Victors
In Six-Day War -
October 1973 - The Anti Semitic
Smear - The Myth of The Six Million - Towards
The World State
In 1966 The Macmillan Company, New York, and
Collier-Macmillan Limited, London, published a revealing history
in which the author claimed, in essence, that international financial
groups, exercising power through the creation and control of financial
credit on an international scale, had worked closely with Communists
for the purpose of creating a New World Order. The author was no
'Right-wing extremist', but the prestigious American historian, Dr.
Carroll Quigley, who formerly taught at Harvard and Princeton, and
who has done special research in the archives of France, Italy and
England. He subsequently became professor of history at the Foreign
Service School of Georgetown University in Washington.
D.C. Dr. Quigley's 1300-page Tragedy and
Hope created little public interest until Mr. W. Cleon Skousen,
who served with the American FBI for sixteen years and became
publicly known with his best seller The Naked Communist, reviewed
it in The Naked Capitalist (1970). As a highly trained
investigator of Communism, Skousen had observed a number of strange
developments which seemed to point to a conspiratorial control
centre higher than either Moscow or Peking.
He had waited for someone 'on the inside'
of the international power structure to talk, and was convinced that
Quigley was a genuine insider. Quigley states that 'I know of the operations
of this network (of the international power structure) because
I have studied it for twenty years and was permitted, for two years,
in the early 1960's, to examine its papers and secret records.'
Why did Dr. Quigley write such a revealing book, documenting the
links between Big International Finance and Communism? Quigley makes it clear that he is a strong
supporter of those striving to create a New World Order: 'I have
no aversion to it or to most of its aims and I have, for much of
my life, been close to it and to many of its instruments. I have
objected, both in the past and recently, to a few of its policies
but in general my chief difference of opinion is that it wishes
to remain unknown, and I believe its role in history is significant
enough to be known' (p. 950).
Dr. Quigley's thesis is that the men working
towards a New World Order are highly cultured, well-educated and
have the best interests of the human race at heart. They offer
the hope of the world. It is too late, anyhow, to turn back
their progressive schemes, and therefore those who resist them
represent tragedy. This is why he called his work Tragedy
and Hope. The will-to-power has been a dominant feature
of man's long history and while it is true, as Lord Acton said,
'That all power tends to corrupt,' it is also true that many of
those who have sought power over their fellows have been pleasant
individuals. Some of them have been great idealists convinced that
the world would be a much better place if they had complete power. The idea of World Government is as old as
man. But whereas an Alexander the Great had to rely primarily on
the force of the sword to gain power, over the past two-hundred
years a new instrument has become available for centralising power
that of financial credit creation, increasingly operating on an
From the beginning of the famous Rothschild
dynasty down to the present time Dr. Quigley gives a brilliant
picture of the development of a closely-locked International Money
Power. He quotes the famous statement made by Reginald McKenna,
one-time British Chancellor of the Exchequer, and Chairman of the
Midland Bank, who, in addressing a meeting of shareholders of the
Bank on January 25, 1924, said, as recorded in his book, Post-War
Banking, 'I am afraid the ordinary citizen will not like
to be told that the banks can, and do create and destroy money.
The amount of finance in existence varies only with the action
of the banks in increasing or decreasing deposits and bank purchases.
We know how this is effected. Every loan, overdraft or bank purchase
creates a deposit, and every repayment of a loan, overdraft
or bank sale destroys a deposit.'
A number of public investigations have taken
place since Reginald McKenna publicly said what the operators of
credit creation had known for centuries, all demonstrating that
trading banks create new finances when making loans and advances.
Giving evidence before the New Zealand Royal Commission on monetary
systems in 1955, Mr. H. W. Whyte, Chairman of the Associated Banks
of New Zealand, readily agreed to the realities of credit creation. 'They
have been doing it for a long time, but they didn't quite realise
it, and they did not admit it. Very few did. You will find it in
all sorts of documents, financial text-books, etc. But in the intervening
years, and we must be perfectly frank about these things, there
has been a development of thought, until today I doubt very much
whether you would get many prominent bankers to attempt to deny
that banks create credit.'
The real credit of a community is its productive
capacity and real wealth. But if this real credit can only be used
on terms dictated by those who have a monopoly of creating and
issuing financial credit, a mere bookkeeping arrangement,
then it is elementary that if this monopoly can be developed on
an international scale, those controlling such a monopoly have
a major instrument for imposing a World State. Just as trading banks, whether called private
or Government, have progressively become the mere instruments of
Central Banks, so are Central Banks now becoming instruments of
the International Monetary Fund, which now creates a form of international
credit called 'Paper Gold' or Special Drawing Rights. One of the
principal architects of the International Monetary Fund, and the
World Bank, was Harry Dexter White, Under-Secretary of the U.S.
Treasury during World War II, and subsequently discovered to have
been one of the Soviet Union's top agents in the United States
Administration. When the White House was informed about White,
he was neither removed nor arrested, but appointed as the new Executive
Director of the U.S. Mission to the International Monetary Fund,
and his salary was substantially increased!
The power to create financial credit is the
power to control all forms of economic activity, including the
media. Once the nature of this power is grasped, and how present
methods of credit creation generate increasing debt, heavier taxation
and accelerating inflation, the nexus between International Finance
and International Communism can be readily seen. Credit loans are
the instrument which has been used to move massive quantities of
Western production and technology from the West to the Soviet Union.
Irrespective of Dr. Quigley's intentions in revealing the news
that those international groups with the credit power were working
to produce an international millenium, the publicity given to his
history by Skousen, and later by Gary Allen in his best seller None
Dare Call it Conspiracy, had a most revealing effect: Tragedy
and Hope soon became almost impossible to purchase! It disappeared
from some libraries and today an original copy is a collector's
THE REALITY OF CONSPIRACY
Governments do not govern, but merely control
the machinery of government, being themselves controlled by the
hidden hand. This provocative statement was made by a character
in one of Benjamin Disraelis's novels. The famous British Conservative
Prime Minister of Jewish background used his novels to shed light
on the suppressed realities of the world. Disraeli clearly was
convinced that even in his times the 'hidden hand' was that of
an international money power associated with revolutionary groups
to subvert traditional society.
Controllers of the news media of the world
insist that there is no such thing as a conspiracy operating behind
national and international events, but themselves provide evidence
of conspiracy by the manner in which they attempt to suppress or
distort information which provides a strikingly different picture
of world affairs to that generally presented. When a senior South African Cabinet Minister,
Mr. P. W. Botha, attacked the notorious American Council on Foreign
Relations praised by Quigley in his work in 1973, stressing that
it was dominated by Socialist-minded individuals and was subverting
South Africans associated with it, there was a howl of rage and
indignation from both the Afrikaans and English press of South
Africa. The Pretoria News of September 6, 1973, said that
it was ridiculous that an organisation chaired by Mr. David Rockefeller,
the well-known international financier, could be pro-Communist. The
Pretoria News said that "A London report said that Western
diplomats had received the Botha charge with a mixture of mirth
And then came the comment that Mr. David
Rockefeller "can safely be presumed to have no interest in supporting
an organisation dedicated to world socialism".
Shortly afterwards, while visiting South
Africa, Mr. Rockefeller described the Botha charges as "absurd" but
as will be seen in this examination of censored history, Mr. David
Rockefeller and other international financiers have played a major
role in financing Communism.
When he opened his Chase National Bank in
Moscow in May, 1973, it was at the most prestigious address in
Moscow: 1 Carl Marx Plaza. The Rockefellers have for a long time
been financing and urging closer cooperation with the Communists.
On November 25, 1959, Study No. 7, published by the Council
on Foreign Relations, advocated 'building a new international order
which must be responsive to world aspirations for peace and for
social and economic change... a new international order including
states labelling themselves as 'Socialist'.
In May of 1973 David Rockefeller was urging
American Congress to grant favoured nation status to the Soviet.
As far back as 1955 David Rockefeller was saying that it was 'politically
foolish' to ignore Communist China. In July, 1974, the Rockefeller
Manhattan Bank started doing business with Red China, the first
Western Bank to do this for 24 years. David Rockefeller urged that
Red China also be given favoured nation status. At a press conference in Hong Kong at the time of the Red China deal, David Rockefeller said that apart from
the banking arrangement with the Red Chinese, he had discussed
with them the possibility of links between the Council on Foreign
Relations and the Chinese People's Institute for Foreign Relations.
'I think they were very much interested in knowing more about how
we conduct foreign relations and our attitudes on many subjects',
As the amazing Dr. Henry Kissinger has played
a major role in advancing closer relations between the United States
and both Communist China and Communist Russia his background is
of importance. Before Richard Nixon was first elected President
in 1968, Kissinger rather contemptuously said that he was unfitted
to be the President of the United States. Kissinger had worked
for the Rockefellers for years. He is a One World advocate. But
when elected Nixon's first major appointment was Dr. Henry Kissinger
as his personal adviser on foreign affairs, thus demonstrating
the source of real power in the United States. It was Kissinger
who prepared the way for the dramatic Nixon change of attitude
towards Peking, a victory for the policies of International Finance.
Kissinger negotiated the 'peace-with-honour' deal in South Vietnam,
leaving South Vietnam with no peace and the prospect of ultimate
take-over by the Communists.
Henry Kissinger immigrated to the United States
from Germany before the Second World War. Serving with him in the
U.S. Army's Jewish intelligence task force in Germany at the end
of the Second World War were Michael Fribourg, the multi-billionaire
grain operator who is reputed to have cleared $700 million from
Kissinger's massive wheat deal with the Soviet Union, Captain Walt
Rostow, later White House Chief Adviser under Presidents Kennedy
and Johnson, and Helmut Sonnenfeldt, now top adviser to the U.S.
A former K.G.B. agent, Colonel Michael
Golleniewski, has been quoted as charging that Kissinger was at one
time a secret unit of Communist intelligence. In spite of former State Department officials
and security officers charging that Sonnenfeldt was a security
risk, one charge being that he had leaked highly classified information
to the Israel Embassy in Washington, Sonnenfeldt was employed by
Kissinger as one of the top aides on the National Security Council
staff. He accompanied Kissinger on all his trips to Peking and
Moscow and is therefore familiar with all secret deals made by
When a group of American Congressmen proposed
that Aleksander Solzhenitsyn, the famous exiled Russian writer,
be brought to America to address the American Congress on the oppression
inside the Soviet Union, Kissinger strongly opposed this, arguing
that it would jeopardise detente. But Solzhenitsyn warned
that massive American economic aid to the Soviet was enabling the
Soviet to expand its military strength; detente was a myth. Paul Scott, distinguished American commentator,
in The Wanderer, March 26, 1974, states that 'In his testimony
before the Senate Finance Committee Kissinger clearly indicated
that the Nixon Administration policy of accommodating the Russians
now has priority over U.S. relations with Western nations. The
signing of 67 bilaterial U.S.-Soviet agreements, ranging from political
consultation to joint space exploration, since President Nixon
took office is cited as proof that the NixonKissinger policy
puts relationships with Russia ahead of proven allies.
'Like the international power groups he is
serving, Dr. Kissinger takes a detached approach to the suffering
of the millions of victims of Communism in both the Soviet Empire
and Red China. These noble advocates of a New One World are opposed
to any policies which might free the victims of Communist tyranny.
They are prepared to ensure that Soviet military strength is maintained
with financial and economic blood transfusions from the U.S.A.
and other Western nations. They may be well-educated, as Dr. Quigley
asserts, but they are traitors to Civilisation.
THE SUTTON REVELATIONS
"...100,000 Americans have been killed in Korea
and Vietnam 'by our own technology. The only response from Washington
and the Nixon Administration is the effort to hush up the scandal".
This is the explosive indictment, not of some 'neurotic right-wing
extremist', but of Antony C. Sutton, the Western world's most outstanding
academic on Western technological and economic aid to the Soviet
Antony Sutton's carefully documented studies
shatters completely the most dangerous myth ever presented to a
gullible mankind; a myth accepted by non-Communists as well as
Communists and their fellow-travellers. The myth was once stated
to me as follows by a young first-year school teacher: 'Communism
has certainly been responsible for brutalities with which we cannot
agree. But starting with an impoverished Russia in 1917, Communism
has in the face of bitter opposition from the capitalist world,
progressively built the Soviet Union up to the stage where it is
one of the great super-powers in the world. We must admit its tremendous
industrial and technological achievements and now learn how to
co-exist with the Soviet Union.
Like tens of millions of other people,
that teacher was reflecting an image created by the instruments of
modern centralised propaganda. A false image can be created by a combination
of both distortion and suppression. The result is that people are
living in two worlds: the one presented by the creators of false
images and the one of reality.
The reality presented by Antony Sutton
is one which the deeper students of Communism have known about
for a long time. Some of these have dealt with different aspects
of the evidence concerning the external financing of the Soviet
Union. In his last book, The Bolshevik invasion
of the West (1966), the late Louis Budenz, the former top
Communist and Managing Editor of The Daily Worker (U.S.A.),
who eventually came back to his Christian Faith, warned of a
growing alliance between 'Wall Street' 'international financial
groups' and Moscow. However, the evidence presented by Sutton
is much more concrete than that presented by others. Once it is
grasped that Western technology and industry has been primarily
responsible for the creation of the formidable Soviet military
machine, and the expanding Soviet naval power, the reality takes
on a chilling significance which those who wish to retain freedom
can only ignore at their peril.
British-born Antony Sutton, former professor
of economics at California State University at Los Angeles, began
a study late in the 1950's of the transfer of Western technology
to the Soviet Union and how the Soviet economy and military-industrial
complex had benefitted from this flow of Western assistance. The
first work was completed in 1966 and published in 1968 by the Hoover
Institution at Stanford University under the title Western Technology
and Soviet Economic Development, 1917 to 1930. Deeper students of International Communism quickly perceived that
an outstanding academic had carefully documented in detail the vast
technological and economic aid which the West had been supplying
to the Soviet Union since 1918, confirming what they already knew.
The second volume of Sutton's study was published
by the Hoover Institution in 1971 under the title Western Technology
and Soviet Economic Development, 1945 to 1965.
Although Sutton's studies are of the greatest
significance, they were only publicised in reviews in a few conservative
and anti-Communist publications. But the media generally ignored
what is beyond doubt the most significant work of the last 50 years.
However, a few Members of the Republican Party grasped the vital
importance of Sutton's research work with the result that he was
invited to testify before a sub-committee of the Platform Committee
of the Republican Party at Miami Beach, Florida, on August 15,
1972. I am informed that many of those who heard
Sutton found it a most shattering experience, which is not surprising
when they were told that President Nixon, the man they were planning
to re-elect in November, was permitting American troops in Vietnam
to be killed with American technology. If it had been adequately
publicised, Sutton's testimony would have caused a national sensation
and had a major impact on the elections.
Sutton made his position clear at the beginning
by stating that he was not a politician and that his responsibility
was to present facts. He was not concerned about whether his listeners
liked or disliked his facts. After pointing out that he had spent
ten years in research on Soviet technology, he then proceeded in
a short fifteen minutes to drop bombshells such as the following:
There was no such thing as Soviet technology. 'Almost all' perhaps
90-95% came directly or indirectly from the United States and its
allies. In effect the United States and the NATO countries have built
the Soviet Union, its industrial and its military capabilities. This
massive construction job has taken 50 years. It has been carried
out through trade and the sale of plants, equipment and technical
assistance. The United States is spending $80 billion a year on defence
against an enemy built by the United States and West Europe.
Even stranger, the U.S. apparently wants
to make sure this enemy remains in the business of being an enemy.
"The Soviets have the largest merchant marine in the world, about
6,000 ships. I have the specification for each ship. About two-thirds
were built outside the Soviet Union. About four-fifths of the engines
for these ships were also built outside the Soviet Union.
About 100 Soviet ships are used on the Haiphong run to carry Soviet
weapons and supplies for Hanoi's annual aggression.
I was able to identify 84 of these ships. None of the main engines
in these ships was designed and manufactured inside the USSR. All
the larger and faster vessels on the Haiphong run were built outside
SAll oviet automobile, truck and engine technology comes from the
West.” The Gorki organisation, built by the Ford and Austin
companies, produced most of the trucks used to carry Soviet-supplied
military equipment down the Ho Chi Minh trail. Automobile factories
can also be used to build tanks.
Antony Sutton summarised his testimony with
his charge that 100,000 Americans had been killed with American
technology, adding "The only response from Washington and the
Nixon Administration is the effort to hush up the scandal". No wonder
the Republicans listening felt chilly! While they could not argue against Sutton's
charge that "You do not subsidise an enemy", they also feared that
Sutton was right when he said that "when this story gets out and
about in the United States, it's going to translate into a shift
of votes". It was therefore essential to ensure that as far as
possible the story did not get publicised. Political survival and
party loyalties were much more important than trying to expose
a treacherous policy of aid to an enemy killing American troops.
But what about the news media? Surely the
Sutton exposure was news by any standard? Both the two major American
wire services UPI and AP received copies of the Sutton testimony.
Both suppressed it! And the media generally has ignored Antony
Sutton's book, National Suicide (1973) in which he tells
the whole dreadful story of how the Soviet has been built up by
the West over fifty years. At the conclusion of an address to a British
audience in 1972, during which I had mentioned the emerging policy
of Western nations openly providing the Soviet with increasing
credits on a long-term basis and at low interest rates, a member
of the audience took me aside and introduced himself as an oil
technologist whose work took him throughout much of Soviet Russia.
He stressed the appalling state of much of the Soviet economy,
particularly agriculture. He also told me of how in Moscow he had
met with a number of American computer experts who had come to
the Soviet to instruct the Russians on the latest American computer
equipment being supplied on credit. Sutton points out that computers
are now indispensable in modern warfare. And so are heavy, multi-axle
trucks for transporting both troops and heavy equipment.
The huge Soviet Kama organisation, the biggest in the world, has
been virtually a gift from the United States. The American Export-Import Bank has advanced
direct loans of $86.5 million for the project, while the Rockefeller
Chase National Bank of New York anticipates making loans up to
$192 million. The Kama organisation is projected to manufacture
100,000 trucks per year, more than all the American truck manufacturers
In a testimony presented to the United States
of America House International Trade Sub-committee of the Banking
and Currency Committee, on April 24, 1974, Sutton said that "About
1968 I became concerned with our policy of technical assistance
to the Soviet military-industrial complex, a policy denied by the
State Department, and some Members of Congress. This technically
subsidised Soviet economy was providing about 80 per cent of all
supplies to North Vietnam and U.S. troops were being killed in
Vietnam. I made numerous attempts to bring the problem to public
none of these efforts on my part had any recognisable
impact. Therefore, in late 1972 I put together the information
immediately at hand into a book: National Suicide: Military
Aid To The Soviet Union, published by Arlington House in New
York". This was in October, 1973.
National Suicide published
as an appendix Sutton's testimony before the Republican Party Platform
Committee in August, 1972. Also given are the specifications of
the ninety-six Soviet ships identified transporting weapons and
supplies to North Vietnam, 1966-1971. Sutton tells the whole dreadful
story of how the Soviet has been built up over fifty years. He
names firms, organisations and Presidents. National Suicide has
been generally ignored by the media. It is too explosive, even
for those self-proclaimed 'fearless' journalists who are allegedly
always searching for the truth.
National Suicide was also too much
for some professed anti-Communists. In his Testimony before the
American Banking and Currency Sub-committee, Sutton revealed how,
after National Suicide came to the attention of the Hoover
Institution, "Immediately and I mean immediately" came under considerable
criticism and hostility for publishing the book. My name was removed
from my position as Research Fellow at the Hoover Institution.
My hasty conversion into a non-person was so complete that the
third volume of my Hoover series, which was then in press, had
its dust jacket changed to read "was a Research Fellow at the Hoover
Institute from 1968 to 1973".
'Sutton has commented that his shameful treatment
by the Hoover Institution because of his protests against American
military aid to the Soviet Union 'parallels the police state tactics
of Hitler's Germany and is a pitiful state of affairs to encounter
at one of this country's great universities'.
Sutton effectively disposes of the argument
that it is possible to have 'peaceful' trade with the Soviet Union.
Automobile manufacturing organisations can also be used for producing
a variety of military vehicles. The Gorki organisation, for example,
built under the guise of 'peaceful trade', produced in 1964 the
first Soviet wire-guided anti-tank system. Western-provided tractor plants have been
used to produce Soviet tanks. Technological assistance to the Soviet
to produce chemicals for agriculture has in fact meant vital assistance
to the Soviet munitions industry.
Antony Sutton says 'let's take
a look at the Soviet industry that provides the parts and materials
for Soviet armaments: the guns, tanks, aircraft. The Soviets have
the largest iron and steel plant in the world. It was built by
McKee Corporation. It is a copy of the U.S. steel plant in Gary,
Indiana. All Soviet iron and steel technology comes from the U.S.
and its allies. The Soviets use open hearths, American electric
furnaces, American wide strip mills, and so on, all developed in
the West and shipped in as peaceful trade.
The Soviets have the
largest tube and pipe mill in Europe, one million tons a year.
The equipment is Fretz-Moon, Salem, Aetna Standard, Mannesman,
etc. All Soviet tube and pipe making technology comes from the
U.S. and its allies. If you know anyone in the space business,
ask him how many miles of tubes and pipes go into a missile.
Perhaps the classical example of what 'peaceful'
trade with the Soviet means was provided by the U.S. State Department's
approval that Burmeister and Wain of Copenhagen, Denmark, should
provide the Soviet with technical assistance for the manufacturing
of diesel engines. These engines were used in the ships which carried
Soviet nuclear missiles to Cuba!
Early this century the Baku oil field in Russia
was producing more than a half of the total world output of crude
oil, but the Bolshevik Revolution resulted in a halt to all drilling.
As Sutton points out, by 1922 half the wells were idle and the
others were producing increasing quantities of water. The Soviet
imported 'massive quantities of equipment from the American firms
of International Barnsdall Corporation and Lucey Manufacturing
Company. Rotary drilling methods introduced by Barnsdall increased
speed of drilling by a factor of ten and reduced costs by more
than one-half between 1924 and 1928.' The Soviet granted a number of foreign companies
concessions to develop Soviet oil fields. Nineteen large oil refineries
were constructed in the Soviet between 1917 and 1930, but only
one of these contained units manufactured in the Soviet. The electrical
equipment was supplied largely by General Electric.
By 1923 a number
of foreign oil companies, including Standard Oil, were purchasing
Soviet oil. In 1927 Standard of New York built a kerosene factory
at Batum, leasing it back from the Soviet to supply Standard markets
in the Near and Far East markets. Standard was one of John D. Rockefeller's
creations. Closely associated with Standard Oil and other Rockefeller
concerns was Jacob Schiffi of the Wall Street banking firm of Kuhn,
Loeb and Company.
Stalin himself provided the most revealing
statement concerning the manner in which the Communists in the
Soviet Union have been almost completely dependent upon the West
for their industrial and technological developments. W. Averell
Harriman, closely associated with the Wall Street financial groups
which have financed the Soviet, and American Ambassador to the
Soviet Union during the Second World War, reported in June, 1944,
to the State Department on a discussion with Stalin:'
tribute to the assistance rendered by the United States to Soviet
industry before and during the war. He said that about two-thirds
of all the large industrial enterprises in the Soviet Union had
been built with United States help or technical assistance.'
Sutton observes in National Suicide that
Stalin could have added that the 'remaining third of Russia's industrial
enterprises and military plants have been built with German, French,
British, Swedish, Italian, Danish, Finnish, Czech, and Japanese
help or technical assistance.'
Any realistic examination of the long-term
motives of those responsible for financing the Soviet Union, thus
enabling Soviet strategists to maintain. an international programme
of revolution and subversion, backed by an expanding military and
naval power, must start with the First World War.
Two events of the greatest significance took place during this war:
the establishment of the Bolshevik regime in Russia and the British
Government's agreement to the Political Zionist policy of establishing
a 'National Home' for Jews in Palestine. Both events were closely
linked. They were two major preliminary events in
a course of events which have brought man-kind to the present world
crisis. They were a dramatic demonstration of the power of credit
creation exercised by international banking groups operating across
national borders even during times of world wars. During World War I the international banking
organisation of Kuhn, Loeb and Company, and a number of associates,
based upon Wall Street, New York, were pro-German, anti-Russian
and anti-British right up until the Czarist Government was overthrown
in Russia and the British Government signed what was known as the Balfour
Agreement, promising the Zionists a 'National Home' in Palestine.
Well-known Zionist writer, Professor Norman
Bentwich, wrote in Wanderer in War that 'The Russian
Revolution and the Declaration concerning the Jewish National Home
were born in the same month, November 1917. Soviet Russia and Palestine
represent the most striking achievements in our time of reconstruction
for peaceful needs.'
In Judea Lives Again (London 19##),
Bentwich said that the seizure of power by the Bolsheviks and the
British Declaration on Palestine 'might seem to have little direct
connection, but there was a deeper relation between them than that
of chronological coincidence. In origin they are related to twin
aspects of man's perpetual effort to establish God's kingdom on
earth, although one claims to be godless. They go back to that
millenial vision of the Prophets for whom the return of the people
of Israel of Zion was bound up with a just order and peace on earth.
For Russia inherited, too, a Messianic faith, and a passion for
the regeneration of mankind. And she established the first Socialist
State on the principles of a Jewish thinker (Marx)'.
THE TRUTH ABOUT THE 'RUSSIAN'
One of the biggest hoaxes ever inflicted upon
a gullible mankind is the generally-believed story that the revolution
which took place in Russia in November, 1917, was the result of
the down-trodden Russian people rising up against their exploiters
under the brilliant leadership of Lenin and Trotsky. The hoax also
insists that from 1917 until the present time the Communists have,
in the face of world-wide opposition from 'the wicked capitalists',
literally pulled themselves up by their own bootstraps until they
have created one of the two greater superpowers of the world.
When the Russian Czar was forced to abdicate
in March, 1917, by revolutionary pressures generated by the activities
of Jacob Schiff and his colleagues of Kuhn, Loeb and Company, and
similar international financiers, Trotsky was in New York working
for a Communist newspaper. Lenin was in Switzerland. He had been
in Europe since 1905 when he was expelled from Russia for his part
in the abortive Communist uprising which took place that year.
Bolshevism was not in March, 1917, a viable force capable of taking
over Russia with its own limited resources. First Lenin was sent
from Switzerland into Russia in a sealed train along with at least
50 of his fellow Bolsheviks. As Winston Churchill graphically described
this remarkable episode, Lenin was sent into Russia 'in the same
way that you might send a phial containing a culture of Cholera to
be poured into the water supply of a great city. No sooner did Lenin
arrive than he began beckoning a finger here and a finger there to
obscure persons in sheltered retreats in New York.
In a revealing article written in 1920, Churchill
wrote about 'This world-wide conspiracy': Trotsky lost no time
responding to the beckoning finger of Lenin, boarding a ship in
New York and taking with him 275 fellow Bolshevik revolutionaries.
But when his ship, the S.S. Christiana, reached Halifax, Nova Scotia,
the Canadian Government promptly arrested him and impounded the
large sum of money he was carrying. The Canadian Government very
logically took the view that as Trotsky and his fellow Bolsheviks
had openly proclaimed that when they took control of Russia they
were going to make a separate peace with Germany, and that as this
would mean the use of all German troops against the Western Front
where large numbers of Canadians were fighting, they should prevent
Trotsky from continuing on his revolutionary mission. Trotsky was
held for five days, but then allowed to proceed by a Canadian Government
forced to yield to the 'world-wide conspiracy'.
The core of this conspiracy was the international
financial groups linked with Kuhn, Loeb and Company. One of the
principal figures was Jacob Schiff, whose own grandson has admitted
he had invested at least $20 million in a revolution which in fact
was imposed upon the unfortunate Russians from outside their country.
Trotsky later married the daughter of one of the wealthy bankers
who backed the Bolshevik Revolution, Jivotovsky. A leading member of Kuhn, Loeb and Company
was Mr. Paul Warburg, who together with his brother Felix left
Germany for the United States in 1902, leaving behind brother Max
to run the family bank of M. N. Warburg and Company, Frankfurt.
Paul Warburg married Solomon Loeb's daughter, and Felix married
Jacob Schiff's daughter. Mr. Paul Warburg was the architect of
the Federal Reserve Board, one of the early steps towards developing
what later became known as Central Banking.
While millions of troops were locked in battle
in Western Europe during the First World War, the international
financiers were operating on both sides of the fighting lines.
Max Warburg, for example, was playing a vital role in Germany while
brothers Felix and Paul were doing likewise in the U.S.A. A very
cosy type of family arrangement! Sir Cecil Spring-Rice, British Ambassador
to Washington during the first part of World War I, complained
on numerous occasions about the pro-German attitude of these groups.
In a letter to Sir Edward Grey, British Foreign Minister, on November
15, 1914, Sir Cecil Spring-Rice wrote, 'The Jews have a strong
preference for the (German) Emperor, and there must be some bargain
The desperate British later did make a bargain,
a major part of which was outlined in a letter dated November 2,
1917, from Lord Balfour, the British Foreign Secretary, to Lord
Rothschild, informing him that the British Cabinet was in favour
of 'the establishment in Palestine of a national home for the Jewish
people'. Lord Rothschild was requested to bring the British Cabinet's
decision to the knowledge of the Zionist Federation. Some of those members of the British Government
which agreed to the 'Balfour Declaration', including Winston Churchill,
subsequently recorded quite frankly that the promise was made to
the Political Zionists in order that they would use their enormous
international influence on the side of the Western Allies at a
time when their military situation was so desperate that failing
assistance from the United States, there was no real alternative
to making some type of peace agreement with Germany.
Probably bearing in mind that the promise
to the Political Zionists conflicted with an earlier promise made
to Arab leaders, who were promised Arab independence if they would
join against their colonial masters, the Turks, one of Germanys
main allies, the British Cabinet did declare in the Balfour agreement
that the establishment of a National Home for the Jews must not "prejudice
the civil and religious rights of existing non-Jewish communities
in Palestine . ."
When Great Britain was given the Mandate over
Palestine at the end of the First World War, the population was
95% Moslem and Christian Arabs, and only 5% Jews, many of these
coming in from Russia under various Zionist colonising schemes.
The Palestinians could trace their history back over two thousand
years. They had a far greater rightful claim to Palestine than
have, for example, the Europeans to the United States. But the
imposition of the Political Zionist programme upon Great Britain
set in motion a chain of explosive events leading to the expulsion
of the Palestinians from their country, a frightful Palestinian
refugee problem, the cynical exploitation of that problem by the
Soviet Union, and a Middle East crisis which has resulted in periodic
major military explosions between the Arab nations and the Zionist
State of Israel.
WHO ARE THE JEWS?
One of the most potent emotional arguments
used by the Political Zionists to establish a State in another
peoples country, is that they have a special moral and religious
the land of their forbears. The great majority of those
called Jews, probably at least 85%, have no racial relationship whatever
The Universal Jewish Encyclopaedia gives
the history of the great Khazar Empire of Middle Asia, the people
being of mixed stock with Mongol and Turkish affinities. They were
an extremely warlike but able people. It was probably towards the
end of the eighth century that King Bulan, having called representatives
of Judaism, Christianity and Mohammedanism, decided upon Judaism
as a State religion. The eminent Jewish history Professor H. Graetz,
in his History of the Jews deals with the progressive Judaising
of the Khazars, relating how it became the fundamental law of the
State that only Jewish rulers could ascend the throne. The Khazars
were the first population of people to be called Jews in Eastern
Europe. Eventually they were dispersed throughout Russia, Eastern
Europe and then through to Western Europe. Obviously there has been considerable mixing
with other peoples over the centuries, but this group of Jews,
broadly described as Askenazims, can claim no racial relationship
with Palestine. The small minority group of the Jews, the Sephardim,
have lived in peace and harmony with the Arab peoples over the
centuries. They are different from the Askenazim Jew in may ways,
including appearance. One of the most distinguished members of this
group was the British Prime Minister, Benjamin Disraeli, whose
novels revealed that he had a great understanding of the power
exercised by international finance. He said that the world
is governed by very different people from what is imagined by those
who are not behind the scenes. The famous writer, Dr. Oscar
Levy, was also a Sephardic Jew, and persecuted by the Zionists
because of his critical anti-Zionist writings.
Political Zionism was born amongst Eastern
European (Askenazim) Jews, its philosophical power concept being
first outlined in The Jewish State, by Theodor Herzl, a
work originally entitled An Address to the Rothschilds. Political
Zionism was strongly opposed by prominent Jews in the West. The
distinguished American Jew, Henry Morgenthau, Snr., summarised
the feelings of his fellow anti-Zionist Jews with his comment that Zionism
is the most stupendous fallacy in Jewish history . . . It is a
retrogression into the blackest error and not progress towards
the light . . it is a betrayal; it is an Eastern European proposal,
fathered in this country by American Jews which if it were to succeed,
would cost the Jews of America most that they have gained of liberty,
equality and fraternity.
The first Australian-born Governor-General,
Sir Isaac lsaacs, was badly smeared by the Zionists because of
his anti-Zionist stand. Not even the status of that cultured Jew,
Moshe Menuhin, father of the famous violinist, Yehudi Menuhin,
saved him from the hatchet attacks of the Political Zionists when
he wrote his classic work, The Decadence of Judaism in Our Times (1965)
in which he described Political Zionism as A monstrous historical
crime and curse.
The views of the many prominent Jews who have
warned about the long-term dangers of the policies of the Political
Zionists, have been almost completely drowned out by international
propaganda supporting Zionist policies. Or the non-Zionist Jews
are given the silent treatment.
FINANCING THE SOVIET BY
Following the imposition of the Bolsheviks
upon the Russian peoples, and the British acceptance of the Zionist
project for Palestine, the Schiffs, Warburgs and their international
associates took the necessary steps, including the entry of the
United States into the conflict, to bring the First World War to
an end. They were represented on both sides at the Versailles Peace
Conference. British Prime Minister Lloyd George later wrote, The
international bankers swept statesmen, politicians, journalists
and jurists all on one side and issued their orders with the imperiousness
of absolute monarchs . . . American President Woodrow Wilson changed
his attitude on a vital issue following the receipt of a telegram
from Jacob Schiff.
At Versailles Schiff and associates insisted
upon the recognition of the Bolshevik Government in Russia. They
also supported the first step towards trying to create a World
Government, the League of Nations. But although American public
opinion revolted against accepting the Bolsheviks, the international
financiers took every possible step to ensure that the newly established
Bolshevik regime did not collapse. Credits were furnished through
Germany, these enabling the Bolsheviks to obtain the Western economic
assistance they desperately needed to keep control of Russia. Communism as a production system is an abject
failure, as demonstrated in the Soviet Union over half a century.
The Great Depression of the thirties, eventually
becoming world-wide, was precipitated by the Wall Street international
financiers. They demonstrated the truth of the statement attributed
to the first Rothschild, Mayer Amschel, of Frankfurt, that so
long as he could issue the credit of a nation he did not care who
made the laws.
Congressman Louis McFadden, Chairman of the
American House Banking and Currency Committee, and former President
of the Pennsylvania Bankers Association, bluntly said in
the U.S. Congress on December 15, 1931, that the Great Depression was
not accidental. It was a carefully contrived occurrence the
International Bankers sought to bring about a condition of despair
here so that they could emerge as rulers of us all.
The sudden drastic curtailment of credit in
the United States produced the necessary conditions for the election
of President Roosevelt. Desperate Americans were urged to recognise
the Soviet Union so that loans could be openly granted to them.
This would be good for American business, was the theme.
This is the same theme being used today to justify massive credit
and economic blood transfusions not only to the Soviet Empire,
but also to the Red Chinese. The international financiers have
an excellent public relations man developing this theme with an
added emphasis: the building up of both the Soviet Union and Red
China will lead to the creation of an international order. This
public relations man is Dr. Henry Kissinger. Those thrusting towards the age-old dream
of a World State today are using a variety of policies and techniques,
including economic centralism. Also essential is a continuing state of crisis,
with each new crisis being exploited to develop centralised power
still further. Consider how Political Zionism and the Soviet Union
have combined to produce a series of Middle East crises, the October
1973, crisis resulting in a solution by Dr. Henry Kissinger.
This met with the warm approval of the Soviet leaders, who look
forward to the reopening of the Suez Canal so that they can easily
move their growing naval forces from the Mediterranean Sea into
the Indian Ocean.
The Middle East crisis started to develop
from the moment the British permitted the Zionists to start establishing
a National Home in Palestine after the First World
War. Growing Zionist immigration, the overwhelming majority of
the migrants being Askenazim Jews, produced inevitable friction
with the indigenous people, the British trying to preserve peace.
As the Second World War approached, the British decided to revise
their policy and in the White Paper of 1939 announced a drastic
curtailment of Zionist immigration to Palestine. There was a storm
of protest from the Zionists and violent anti-British threats. The British declaration of war on Hitlers
Germany temporarily ended the Zionist threats, but as the war proceeded
there was a growing Zionist drive to use Jewish refugees from Europe
to breach British immigration laws for Palestine. Steps were also
taken to establish a Zionist underground terrorist movement, ready
to strike against the British when the war ended.
In a world where terror tactics have become
almost commonplace, it is easy to forget that the Zionist terrorists
were responsible for some of the most shocking crimes. There was
the blowing up of the King David Hotel, the murdering of British
soldiers and police. Some were kidnapped, flogged and then hanged.
The deadly letter bomb was used. The British Minister-Resident
in Cairo, Lord Moyne, was murdered in cold blood. The British who had exhausted themselves in
the war against Hitler, were now vilified internationally, particularly
in the United States, as being worse than Hitlermerely
because they were attempting to ensure that a balance was maintained
The co-operation of the Soviet leaders with
the Zionist drive on Palestine was dramatically highlighted when
the British Chief of the United Nations Relief and Rehabilitation
Organisation, Lieut-General Sir Frederick Morgan, publicly charged
that there was a secret organisation to further mass movement
of Jews from Europe
and that this movement was being used as an umbrella for Russian
secret and criminal agents. The Soviet not only provided Jewish manpower
for the Zionist Palestinian campaign, but when the Zionist forces
looked like being defeated militarily by the Arab armies following
the Zionist conquest of Palestine, following the British withdrawal
in May 1948, Stalin personally ordered that the Zionists be provided
with the best available military equipment. Pressured by both the Communists and the Politicial
Zionists the United Nations had previously decided that when the
British left, Palestine should be partitioned under the UN supervision.
But the Zionists launched a terror campaign which resulted in hundreds
of thousands of Palestinians fleeing from their own country. This
was the beginning of the dreadful Palestinian refugee problem which
predictably led to what has taken place since: exploitation of
the situation by the Soviet strategists, experts in exploiting
problems they have helped to create.
The assassination on September 17 1948, of
Count Folke Bernadotte is another generally-forgotten example of
Zionist terror tactics to establish themselves in Palestine. Former
President of the Swedish Red Cross and noted internationally for
his humanitarian works, Count Bernadotte was appointed as United
Nations mediator in Palestine. Arriving immediately following the
Zionist campaign against the Palestinians and the proclamation
of the State of Israel on May 14 1948, Count Bernadotte was shocked
to see the tens of thousands of Arab families scattered all over
Palestine and neighbouring Arab countries. In his report to the UN, he said that the
new State had been born in violence and bloodshed. When
Count Bernadottes proposed solution for fixing boundaries
was presented to the UN on September 18 1948, the Zionists were
hostile that they should be asked to hand back territories occupied
in excess of what they had been allocated under the UN Partition
Plan. The Count was murdered in Jerusalem on September 17, his
murderers never brought to justice by Israel. Zionist writer Ben Hecht, author of the statement
that One of the finest things ever done by the mob was the
crucifixion of Christ, commented that Count Bernadottes
assassination was that of an ass who wasnt worth so
fine a death."
When eventually fighting was brought to an
end between Israel and the Arab States by Armistice agreements,
Israel held all of Galilee and the northern part of the Negev,
thus enlarging Israeli-held territory by 22 per cent in excess
of that allocated by the UN Partition plan. The Armistice agreement contained a paragraph
stating that The Armistice Demarcation lines should not be
considered as the permanent boundary between Israel and her neighbours. This
was only an armistice, not a peace settlement, and the longer the
stalemate continued without settlement the deeper became the bitterness
amongst the Arabs and the greater their determination to attempt
to recover the homeland of Palestinian Arabs.
In three oustanding works, Mr. Alfred Lilienthal,
the American Jewish expert on the Middle East, warned of what must
happen as the result of forcing the Zionist thorn into
the Moslem world. What Price Israel?, There Goes the Middle
East, and The Other Side of the Coin, are essential
source works for those wishing to study a terrible story by a non-Zionist
Jew. Mr. Liienthal has been threatened and smeared
and his books are now very difficult to obtain. Events have confirmed
Mr. Lilienthals central warning: that uncritical Western
support for the Zionist State of Israel must assist Soviet strategy
in penetrating the Middle East and influencing the whole of the
Moslem world. A constant state of crisis has been punctuated
by three major military explosions, the first in 1956, when the
British under Prime Minister Eden decided, together with the French,
to make an effort to re-establish their authority over the Suez
Canal area. They were forced to retreat in a major loss of face,
not by Egyptian military force, but by combined threats from Moscow
and Washington. Washington threatened severe finance-economic sanctions
if the British refused to retreat. Soviet influence increased enormously.
SOVIET REAL VICTORS IN
Then came the Six-Day War of May, 1967. Superficial
anti-Communists, encouraged by Zionist propaganda, enthusiastically
proclaimed that as Soviet Russia was backing the Arabs, the devastating
defeat of the Arabs by the Israelis was a major set-back for the
Soviet strategists. Israel, allegedly threatened with extinction
by the Communist-backed Arabs, was presented as a courageous David
showing the whole world how to defeat the Communist Goliath. The
truth was exactly the opposite. The real winners were the Soviet
strategists, subsequently revealed to have triggered the conflict
by providing Egypt with a false report that Eygpts ally Syria
was about to be attacked by Israel.
So far from the Soviet strategists believing
that Egypt had the capacity to defeat the Israelis on the battlefield,
they knew, as did every real authority on the Middle East, that
the Egyptians and their allies were in a hopeless position. One of the real experts on the Middle East,
the famous Sir John Glubb, (Glubb Pasha) who spent
much of his life in the Middle East training Arab troops, analysed
the 1967 Arab-Israeli conflict in a booklet, The Middle East
Crisis. Sir John Glubb pointed out all those with military
experience in the Middle East over the previous twenty years knew
that the Egyptian Army had not the faintest chance against
the Israelis. He observed that he had predicted that the
duration of any battle in the Sinai would only be forty-eight hours.
The Egyptians were defeated in sixty hours.
As Sir John Glubb points out, the Soviet strategy
had two main objectives: To lure the Arabs into a catastrophic
defeat, with the United States and the British completely committed
to Israel. If the two objectives were achieved, the Arab States
would be convinced that the West had no sympathy whatever for them
and that, however resentful the Arabs might be that the Soviet
had not actively entered the conflict to prevent their defeat,
they have no alternative but to rely solely on the Soviet for reconstruction. The Soviet strategy worked out perfectly.
Israel expanded enormously its occupation of Arab territories,
including the West Bank of Jordan, this resulting in a new flood
of Arab refugees into neighbouring Arab countries. Sir John Glubb
remarked, If Soviet leaders ever laugh, this must have been
the moment. Yes, indeed. And while dupes of Political Zionist propaganda
were believing the story that the Soviet was backing the Arabs
to destroy Israel, the Communist press of the world was reminding
the Communists everywhere that Soviet policy had played a decisive
role in creating Israel and that there was no intention of allowing
Israel to be destroyed. Two Israeli Communist leaders visiting Moscow
after the 1967 ArabIsraeli conflict were given the same assurance.
The truth is that the retention of Israel is essential for Soviet
strategy not only in the Middle East, but right throughout the
Under cover of the 1967 Arab-Israeli war the
Soviet strategists increased their naval build up in the Mediterranean
and subsequently continued to exploit the aftermath of the
war, which saw the Middle East crisis deepening. At the United
Nations the Soviet happily supported the resolution demanding that
Israel give back Arab territories conquered in the 1967 war, confident
that the Western nations were not going to apply any pressure to
Israel to do this, while at the same time pouring more military
equipment into those Arab nations prepared to accept Soviet assistance. Blinded by their fear and hatred of Israel,
which they have been led to believe is but an instrument of Western
imperialism in the Middle East, few Arabs have considered
the significance of the fact that if it were not for the massive
economic blood transfusions from the Western imperialists to
the Soviet Empire, the Communists would not be in the position
to play their dialectical game in the Middle East. If the Arabs
examine the long-time financing of the Soviet Union from the West,
by the same people ensuring that Israel is sustained by external
assistance, they must logically reach the conclusion that they,
along with their oil, and the Israelis are regarded as but pawns
in a much bigger game - one with the ultimate objective of establishing
a World State.
As the Arab nations watched Israel consolidating
its control of Arab territory conquered during the 1967 war and
became increasingly desperate that apart from supporting pious
resolutions at the United Nations requesting Israel to return the
Arab territories, the non-Communist nations were not going to do
anything to assist them, they became receptive to the Soviet suggestion
that if they could not regain their territory in another military
effort, they should attempt to use oil sanctions. All Western nations and Japan had become increasingly
dependent upon Arab Middle East oil. The October, 1973, conflict
was the signal for oil sanction against those nations who would
not openly condemn Israel. And the price was substantially increased.
The oil strategy not only shattered relations between Western Europe
and the United States, but dramatically brought home to the Japanese
their perilious plight. But even more serious was the explosive
impact of higher oil prices on an inflation already starting to
create economic chaos in all non-Communist nations, including Japan,
struggling with an inflation rate of over 30 per cent.
The Soviet had cynically obtained cheap Arab
oil (they have their own independent oil supplies) from the desperate
Arabs in exchange for Soviet munitions and then later resold it
to West Germany and other European nations at 300 per cent. profit!
But in spite of past massive Soviet military
assistance, some of the Arab leaders, including President Sadat
of Egypt, were becoming increasingly concerned about the growing
open relations between Moscow and Washington.
An article in The
Jewish Observer and Middle East Review of August 17, 1973,
stated that Israeli intelligence had obtained secret Arab documents
showing that Sadat was convinced that because of the policy of detente arranged
by Dr. Kissinger and the Soviet leaders, the Arabs could no longer
depend upon the Communists. The article quotes Egyptian papers
as saying that America would now be more daring in consolidating
Israel politically, economically and militarily . . . The
article then gloats over the fact that the Soviet Union was now
helping the Israelis with manpower by permitting 35,000 Soviet
Jews to migrate to Israel annually.
Then The Jewish Observer and Middle East Review made the highly
significant statement that detente would allow the Soviet
Union and the U.S.A. to tighten the grip
on the Arab world."
On June 7, 1974, Dr. Henry Kissinger said
in Washington that the U.S.A. had no intention of eroding Soviet
influence in the Middle East. The Kissinger statement could only
mean that the U.S.A. and the Soviet were going to share their influence
in the Middle East. Dr. Kissinger said that President Nixons
tour of the Middle East was designed to put American relations
with Arab countries as well as Israel on a new basis. Following the Middle East tour President Nixon
and Dr. Kissinger went on to the Soviet Union where they had friendly
discussions with the Soviet leaders about the creation of a new
world. Further massive economic aid to the Soviet Union was one
of the major subjects discussed.
While many people now realise that independent Israel
could not survive for more than a short period without the massive
external financial credits provided by the international Political
Zionist Movement, and the military equipment virtually given by the
United States, comparatively few ask about the source of Israels
migrants, desperately necessary to maintain a population of which
a big percentage is constantly trying to migrate out of Israel. Israel
is described as a National Home for the Jews, but there
is no rush, for example, of Jews from New York to settle in Israel.
A Zionist weekly newspaper, The Australian Jewish News of
February 7, 1974, carried the headlines FLOW OF SOVIET JEWS
CONTINUED DURING WAR. Underneath was a story from New York
confirming what informed observers have been pointing out for some
time, that the Soviet Union is the source of the overwhelming majority
of migrants to Israel:
The flow of Soviet Jews to Israel continued unabated during
the last part of 1973, despite the (October) war, bringing the total
for 1973 to 35,000, officials of the Greater New York Conference
on Soviet Jewry said last week.
The Australian Jewish News of June
14, 1974, quotes Mrs. Rachelle Leibler, President of Mizrachi Womens
Organisation in Australia, recently returned from a visit
to Israel, as saying that during the height of the October
War 4,000 immigrants per month had been coming in from the Soviet.
She said, Our women provided not only financial and material
help but were instrumental in the integration of the new settlers. An Arab hijacking in 1973 revealed to an astonished
world that Austria was providing, near Vienna, a staging camp for
Soviet Jews being sent to Israel. In spite of the Arab terrorists
pressure on the Austrian Government, the Austrian transit camp is
still being used, but Soviet Jews can now only stay for 48 hours.
While Christians and others wishing to get
out of the Soviet Union must risk their lives crawling under barbwire
protected by machine guns and land-mines, the Soviet has been sending
out trainloads of Soviet Jews for Israel. Even more astonishing
is the fact that this mass movement of people is being financed
by Washington with the clear understanding that Soviet Jews must
go to Israel and nowhere else. No doubt many of these Jews from
Russia are Communist agents. The remainder are unfortunate raw
material required to ensure that the Moscow-Washington strategy
for creating the World State is advanced.
In There Goes The Middle East (1957),
Alfred Lilienthal prophetically wrote that . . . the Russians
believe they have devised a super and surer method of penetrating
the area (the Middle East). The as-yet-non-ingathered Jews are
always held in reserve as a trump card for a tour de force via
Israel should the Arab route fail.
Both the Communists and the Political Zionists
need Israel for their own ends. It is now too late to turn the
clock back and remove three million Israelis from what most now
regard as their home. This would be yet one more injustice. But
moderate Arab leadership would accept the permanency of Israel
as an independent State in the Middle East if conquered Arab territory
were returned, the Palestinians provided with a guaranteed State
of their own, and adequately recompensed for territories taken
from them by the establishment of Israel. But such a settlement
requires agreement between the Soviet and the Political Zionists. A massive exodus of Russian Jews to Israel
is the surest way to keep the Middle East crisis alive. Jewish
protests in the West against Soviet anti-Semitism would
be much more worthwhile if directed against the international financiers
who sustain the Soviet tyranny with economic aid. For example,
there has been no organised protest against the activities of Armand
Hammer of Occidental Petroleum Corporation, which in June, 1974,
concluded the biggest trade deal ever with the Soviet Union. The
Hammer association with the Soviet has been permanent since the
days of Lenin. In 1919 Dr. Julius Hammer, father of Armand, was
an executive member of the American Communist Party.
THE ANTI-SEMITIC SMEAR
All references to the historical relationship
between Political Zionism and Communism is met with the antiSemitic
smear. Anti-Zionist Jews are also smeared. Both Communists and Zionists
use the smear, which has over a long time been used primarily against
the rank and file of Jews.
A massive book could be written on this subject, showing how many
anti-Semitic acts have been promoted by the Zionists
themselves. Mr. Sussman of the American Council of Judaism, as quoted
in Moshe Menuhin s classic, The Decadence of Judaism in
Our Time, observes that The Zionist Movement wants to picture
Jews constantly in trouble. It is bad for fund-raising and bad for
immigration to Israel if Jews are not in trouble. But trouble must
be of a particular kind. It must be Jewish trouble. It
must fit the Zionist pattern of inevitable anti-Semitism just as
surely as the inevitable class war fits classic Marxism."
A striking example of how the Zionists work
was provided in Canada in 1965, when three young students candidly
admitted on a CBC programme that they had worked for the Canadian
Jewish Congress as agents pro vocateurs, fostering the impression
that the Canadian Nazi Party - consisting of three members
at the time, was much stronger than it was.
In The Other Side of The Coin (1965), Alfred
Lilienthal devotes considerable space to an examination of Zionist-fostered
anti-Semitism, and quotes the following very candid advice
given in Davar, the official journal of the Mapai, former
Israel Prime Minister Ben-Gurions party: I shall not
be ashamed to confess that, if I had the power, as I have the will,
I would select a score of efficient young men . . . and I would send
them to the countries where Jews are absorbed in sinful self-satisfaction.
The task of these young men would be to disguise themselves as non-Jews,
and plague Jews with anti-Semitic slogans, such as Bloody Jew, Jews
go to Palestine, and similar intimacies! I can vouch that the
results in terms of considerable immigration to Israel from these
countries would be ten thousand times larger than the results brought
by thousands of emissaries who have been preaching for decades to
From time to time there are Zionist-inspired
campaigns concerning alleged anti-Semitism" in the Soviet
Union, but there is no reliable information suggesting that religious
Jews are treated any worse than Christians or Moslems. Some Christian
Churches have even passed resolutions condemning alleged anti-Semitism in
Russia but apparently do not feel that they should protest against
the plight of the Christians in Russia. Following a 1965 campaign concerning alleged
anti-Semitism in Russia, even the President of the World
Jewish Congress, Dr. Nahum Goldman told officials of Jewish orgamsations
in the United States that accusations of anti-Semitism against the
Soviet were grossly exaggerated and that such unjustified accusations
do more harm than good. American Examiner, of December 9, 1965,
described as New Yorks largest Jewish family weekly
newspaper, quoted Dr. Goldmann as saying that Jewish communities
throughout the world should seek closer liaison with the
Soviet Union. He stressed that they should not alienate the
Soviet. Red China, he emphasised, is the real danger and
not the Soviet Union.
If Political Zionism is opposed to the Communism
being imposed upon the victims of the Soviet Union, then it should
be leading an international campaign to have strict economic and
other sanctions imposed against the Soviet. Dr. Henry Kissinger
should be a number one target!
THE MYTH OF THE SIX MILLION
The Zionists greatest propaganda asset
has, of course, been National Socialist Adolf Hitler and the story
of the gassing of six million Jews. Hitler was a curse to Germany,
and to Western Civilisation. But it is important to remember that
Hitler came to power backed by International Finance, as some of
his closest associates admit, and because the German Communists
were directed by Stalin to permit Hitler to come to power in order
to advance Soviet long-term strategy. (See The Red Pattern of
World Conquest). One of the most illuminating documents not
presented at the Nuremberg Trials, was that with Hitlers
signature next to Max Warburgs appointing Dr. Schacht as
director of the Nazi banking system.
The collaboration between the Nazis and Political
Zionists to use European Jews against the British in Palestine,
is a matter of record, most of the record being provided by Jewish
writers. Eichmann dealt with the Zionist representative, Dr. Rudolph
Kastner, and was offered inducements to let thousands of young
Jews immigrate illegally into Palestine to help fight against the
British. Mr. Ben Hecht provides evidence in his book Perfidy that
the Zionists could have saved more Jews from the Nazis but deliberately
refrained from doing so.
J. Klatzkin, a leading Zionist in pre-Hitler
Germany, said in 1925: Instead of establishing societies
for defence against the anti-Semites, who want to reduce our rights,
we should establish societies for defence against our friends who
desire to defend our rights. (quoted by R. Matuvo in The
Zionist Wish and Nazi Deed, Issue, Winter, 1966-67).
Professor Norman Bentwich, Zionist writer
previously quoted, made the following observation in 1938 in his
book, The Promised Land (1917-1937): Seen
with the eyes of Providence, Hitler was like Cyrus, a divine instrument
to bring back to their land Western Jews who could make a contribution
of order and method.
Sisley Huddleston, the English writer, quotes
the Jewish leader who told him that when Hitler
comes to power I hope he will persecute the Jews - we thrive on
persecution - In My Times.
Dr. Solomon Goldman, Vice-President of the
Zionist Palestine Appeal, said in an address at the Hotel Aster,
New York, in 1937: Hitler is a passing phenomenon. German
Jewry would have disappeared in less than a century if Hitler had
not come into power.
Mr. Douglas Reed, the famous British writer
and Central European correspondent for The Times, described
in Lest We Regret how he was told of the Prague Rabbi who
was preaching in the synagogues before the Second World War that
Hitler was the Jewish Messiah.
Further confirmation of Zionist collaboration
with the German National Socialists is provided by the well-known
Jewish writer, Hannah Arendt, in her book, Eichmann in Jerusalem (1963).
She reveals how in the early days of the Hitler regime the Zionists
were the only Jews associating with the German authorities. They
were responsible for the slogan, Wear the yellow star with
pride, as part of the campaign to discredit non-Zionists.
The Zionist policy was to exploit the National Socialists declared
anti-Jewish sentiments to make an agreement between the Jewish
Agency for Palestine and the Germans for illegal Jewish immigration
into Palestine in defiance of British policy.
Both the Gestapo and the SS were helpful with this project. Another well-known Jewish writer, a Zionist,
states that Zionist agents in Europe regarded the British as the
chief enemy, not Germany. He comments that Eichmann
may go down in history as one of the arch murderers of the Jewish
people, but he entered the lists as an active worker in the rescue
of the Jews from Europe. (The Secret Roads: Illegal Migration
of a People, 1938 to 1948, Jon and David Kimche, 1954.)
Just how many Jews did die during the Second
World War has become a question of increasing doubt as objective
examinations have shown conclusively that the much-publicised figure
of six million was a blatant fabrication. But Zionist propagandists
have used the alleged mass massacre of Jews during the Second World
War, not only to create a guilt complex amongst non-Jews, particularly
concerning the method of establishing and maintaining the State
of Israel, but also to intimidate Jews everywhere into supporting
Zionist demands. The propaganda built around the story of the six
million is mind-numbing. The best-known is undoubtedly The Diary
of Anne Frank, a work which has been a major best-seller, over
40 editions having been published. It was also made into a highly
successful Hollywood film.
Otto Frank, Anne Franks father,
made a fortune out of a highly emotional work which has influenced
millions of people.
But The Diary of Anne Frank was established
as a hoax in a New York case only seven years after first being
published. The Diary has been presented as the work of a
Jewish girl of 12 whose father found her diary after
being released from the German concentration camp in which his
daughter Anne allegedly died. The Swedish journal Fria Ord revealed
the truth about the Frank Diary in 1959. The Swedish articles observed
that any informed literary inspection of the work would have shown
it to have been impossible as the work of a teenager. This was
confirmed when the well-known American Jewish writer, Meyer Levin,
was awarded $50,000 by the New York Supreme Court, to be paid by
Otto Frank for Levins work on the Anne Frank Diary. Levin
was awarded the $50,000 because Frank had used the dialogue of
Levin just as it was and implanted it in the diary
as being his daughters intellectual work.
One of the first to challenge the propaganda
picture about the six million Jews was the well-known French Socialist,
Mr. Paul Rassinier who, although himself a victim of the German
National Socialists, having been interned at Buchenwald, said after
the war that his concern for truth compelled him to say that he
had neither seen nor heard of mass gassings. He subsequently conducted
intensive researches, lecturing throughout Germany calling for
first hand witnesses to come forward. His works are models of thorough
documentation. In his Le Drame des Juits europeen Rassiier
shows with exhaustive cross-checked statistics that the total number
of Jewish casualties, from all causes, during the Second World
War could not have exceeded 1,200,000 noting that this was accepted
as valid by the World Centre of Contemporary Jewish Documentation
at Paris. Rassiier stresses that this is the maximum figure and
refers to a lower figure of 896,892 given by the well-known Jewish
statistician Raul Hilberg. But Zionist Israel has maintained the figure of six million casualties,
with an indemnity of 5,000 marks for each one.
One of the most objective reports on the conditions
of Jews under the National Socialists has been provided by the
International Committee of the Red Cross. So effective has been
the historical blackout on the question of the six million Jews,
that comparatively few have ever heard of the Red Cross Report.
The International Committee of the Red Cross consisted mainly of
neutral Swiss nationals. The Red Cross Committee issued in three
volumes in 1948 in Geneva the Report of the International Committee
of the Red Cross on its Activities during the Second World-War. This
definitive report incorporated and supplemented two previous reports.
When the first reports appeared in 1942 that Germany was implementing
a policy of mass internment of Jews, the ICRC felt that previously
satisfactory conditions in German civilian internment camps might
be affected, and eventually persuaded the German Government to
grant them supervisory authority. From the latter part of 1942 right through
until the last chaotic days of the war in 1945, the ICRC maintained
a massive food relief programme. Letters of thanks from Jewish
internees poured in. On October 2, 1945, the ICRC first warned
the German Foreign Office that Allied bombing was threatening to
collapse the German transport system and that starvation conditions
were becoming inevitable. The ICRC attempted to set up its own
improvised transport system and its role was so important in the
latter stages of the war that it was ICRC representatives who displayed
the white surrender flags at Dachau and Nauthausen.
The ICRC made their last visit to Theresiebstadt
(Terezin) in April, 1945, and praised the conditions under which
the large Jewish community, enjoying complete autonomy under a
Jewish Council of Elders, was living. The ICRC praised the attitude
of the Ion Antonescu administration in Rumania towards the 183,000
Rumanian Jews, whom the ICRC was able to provide with special relief
up until the Russian occupation. The ICRC had contact with Auschwitz
until the time of the Soviet occupation. Nowhere in the ICRCs
comprehensive reports is there any mention that ICRC representatives
at the internment camps or anywhere else in German-controlled Europe
found any evidence of a policy of exterminating the Jews.
There are no reports of gas chambers. It
is true that many Jews, and other internees, died in German camps
during the final months of the war, when food supplies had broken
down and when most of the Jewish doctors from the camps were being
used to assist the German armed forces.
Stephen F. Pinter, an attorney for the War Department of the United
States Government and with the American Occupation Forces in Germany
and Austria for six years after the Second World War, gave the following
expert testimony on the subject in a statement which appeared in
the well-known American Roman Catholic publication Our Sunday
Visitor, on June 13, 1959:
I was in Dachau for 17 months
after the war, as a U.S. War Department Attorney, and can state that
there was no gas chamber at Dachau. What was shown to visitors and
sightseers there and erroneously described as a gas chamber was a
crematory. Nor was there a gas chamber in any of the other concentration
camps in Germany. We were told that there was a gas chamber at Auschwitz,
but since that was in the Russian zone of occupation, we were not
permitted to investigate since the Russians would not permit it.
From what I was able to determine during six postwar years in Germany
and Austria, there were a number of Jews killed, but the figure of
a million was certainly never reached. I interviewed thousands of
Jews, former inmates of concentration camps in Germany and Austria
and consider myself as well qualified as any man on this subject.
But the most striking proof of the myth of
the six million figure has been the steadily increasing number
of Jews who claim that they are survivors of the Nazi horror and
who have been claiming indemnities from West Germany. By March
31, 1956, West Germany had paid indemnities to 400,000 Jews and
at that time 852,812 claims were pending. (Vide Jewish Aufbau, July
12, 1956). But by June, 1965, the number of Jews claiming
indemnities from West Germany had almost tripled, 3,375,020 claiming
that they had suffered under the Nazis. Assuming that Jewish claims
are authentic, this means that of the total number of European
Jews who came under Nazi control, at least three and a third million
are alive and have been subsidised by West Germany!
Among the many prominent Jews who did not
die in German wartime camps was the former French-Jewish millionaire
Popular Front Socialist Premier, Leon Blum, who spent his time
writing a book advocating a United States of Europe. The German
National Socialists also advocated this policy. And, of course,
there was the Nazi General who handed back the famous French Rothschild
mansion in Paris in impeccable condition, with nothing destroyed
or removed, remarking that the Hitlers may come and the Hitlers
may go, but the Rothschilds continue on - so should be treated
with proper respect!
Since the end of the Second World War there
has been an inspired campaign to blacken the name of Pope Pius,
the charge being that he did not publicly condemn the Nazis' campaign
to "exterminate" the Jews under their control. The Pope
declined to protest because he had no evidence of such an extermination
programme. The Vaticans representative working with The International
Red Cross certainly could provide no such evidence.
The difficulty in discovering the exact number
of Jews who died during the Second World War is the fact that the
major casualties allegedly took place in the concentration camps
like Auschwitz, which Western observers were not permitted to inspect.
From Nuremberg onwards the Soviet has supported the Zionist claims
about Jewish extermination. The Soviet leaders, themselves
notorious for gigantic propaganda hoaxes to serve their own purposes,
made the astonishing claim that after they had "investigated Auschwitz,
that no less than four million Jews had been gassed there! Commonsense
and firsthand evidence to the contrary have exploded this
monstrous fabrication in the eyes of objective observers.
There is no doubt whatever that large numbers
of Jews did die during the Second World War. But today no honest
person can deny that the numbers have been grossly exaggerated,
to suit the purposes of both the Communists and the Zionists. It
is significant that the Soviet Communists, in spite of their verbal
anti-Zionism, have done nothing to deprive the Zionists of their
most valuable propaganda myths.
Political Zionism and Soviet Communism grew out of the Askenazim
Jewish communities of Russia. A fascinating picture of the development of
Political Zionism. side by side, and also at times in conflict,
is provided by the Zionist leader Dr. Chaim Weizmann in his Trial
and Error. Dr. Weizmanns description of a typical Jewish
community does not tally with the propaganda stories about pogroms
of the Jews by the Russians. A typical Jewish family is depicted
as having a house of seven rooms, a garden and some acres of land,
with the father employing fifty or sixty Russians at different
times throughout the year. Russian servants were employed. But
there was ferment about the future. Jewish families were divided
between themselves. The cleavage amongst the younger Jews was about
whether they should overthrow the Czars and gain power in Russia,
or work to recreate a Jewish nation in Palestine. The matriarch
of the family said that if the revolutionary son were right, then
all would be well in Russia, but if the Zionist son was right she
could go to Palestine. All would be well irrespective of who proved
to be right.
Theodor Herzl had expressed the view in his
basic work, A Jewish State that When we sink, we
become a revolutionary proletariat, when we rise, there rises also
our terrible power of the purse.
The common philosophy of the Communists and
the Political Zionists was expressed by Theodor Herzl in his Diary: My
Russian Jews, who constitute the great reservoir of unskilled labourers,
will be organised as a labour camp. Labour to be organised on army
lines, perhaps with uniforms. The Israel Kibbutz has
been described as Communism without the machine gun.
Israel is a Socialist State. and in spite
of public differences with the Soviet Union, has a consistent record
of pro-Communist voting at the United Nations. On November 21,
1951, Prime Minister Ben-Gurion told the Soviet that Israel would
never be a member of any kind of union or agreement which
pursues aggressive aims against the Soviet Union.
in Jewish Chronicle (Canada) of February 8, 1974, Dr. Nahum
Goldmann observes that
Israel was the main instrument of Soviet penetration into the
Middle East, and that To believe, therefore, that
the Soviet Union is the implacable and permanent enemy of Israel,
keen on its liquidation, is one of the many nonsensical and hysterical
notions which contribute to this atmosphere of gloom and despair. Dr. Goldmann goes on to say that after a peace settlement in
the Middle East, "relations between Israel and the Soviet
could even become friendly, certainly as long as the Brezhnev-Kissinger
policy of detente prevails and especially if Jewish emigration continues."
The two great international movements which
provide the main driving force behind the movement towards the
World State are Political Zionism and International Communism,
both rooted in non-Semitic Russian Jewry, often in conflict, but
generally running in double-harness towards a common objective.
The Russian Jews who flooded into the United States before the
First World War produced an extraordinary number of subverters
of the American tradition. But while many non-Jews have co-operated
enthusiastically in the grand design promoted by Political Zionism
and International Communism, it has been a number of courageous
anti-Zionist Jews, some of them former Communists, who have played
a major role in exposing the most incredible conspiracy in the
recorded history of mankind. The Russian Jew Mr. J. Anthony Marcus said
to an American Senate Committee in 1949 that Reluctantly,
I must confess that too many of my fellow immigrants . . . are
largely responsible for the subversive movements plaguing
this country today. Dr. Henry Kissinger, the Askenazim
Jew, is acceptable to both International Finance and International
The distinguished Semitic Jew Dr. Oscar Levy warned
in 1920: Jewish elements provide the driving force for
both Capitalism and Communism for the material as well as the spiritual
ruin of the world.
The full wrath of the conspirators was heaped
upon the conservative part-Jew, Senator Barry Goldwater, when he
contested the American Presidency in 1964. The man who said he
was proud of his Jewish ancestry gained but a handful of the big
Political Zionism and International Communism
are united in their hatred of traditional Christianity with its
philosophy of elevating the individual over the group and its stress
upon diversity and decentralisation of power. Practical Christianity
is the complete answer to the exploitation of human beings by the
exponents of centralised power, whoever they may be. The real tragedy
of the Jews, irrespective of their racial background, is that they
have suffered more than most from the imposition of the philosophy
of centralised power.
TOWARDS THE WORLD STATE
The major results of the October, 1973, Arab-Israeli
conflict were the pressuring of the Israelis to move back sufficiently
to allow the Suez Canal to be re-opened, and the Arabs use
of oil sanctions, these resulting in no real advantage for the
Arabs, but creating the conditions so helpful for the next development
of the grand design for the establishment of the World State. Dr.
Kissinger and his associates were ready with a United Nations project
for an international economic rights charter. The well-informed American journalist, Paul
Scott, wrote in The Wanderer of February 21, 1974:
is Kissingers contention that no one nation can cope with
the energy and food problems and that new international machinery
and political organizations must be set up to handle them. In private
White House discussions, Kissinger takes the position that the
time is now ripe for the Nixon Administration to take the lead
in using the energy, financial, food, and population problems of
the world to develop a
World Community or new international order.
The Presidents chief foreign-policy adviser sees the development
of a new international currency under control of the International
Monetary Fund as a way of helping to finance the new international
order. He believes the soaring cost of oil has set the stage
for such a revolutionary monetary development.
The drafting of the charter for economic rights and duties of states
was discussed at length with Soviet Foreign Minister Andrei Gromyko
during his recent White House meeting with President Nixon and Kissinger.
The Russian official was told that the charter would guarantee his countrys
rights to access to Middle East oil, U.S. technology and food, and financing.
Both Moscow and Peking participation in the charters drafting and the development
of the world community is being sought..."(Emphasis added.)
Apart from what Dr. Kissinger has written
and said concerning his work to further the World State, his close
friend, Dr. Richard N. Gardner, professor of Law and International
Organisation at Colombia University, and former deputy Assistant
Secretary of State for international organisations during the Kennedy
and Johnson Administrations, has outlined very clearly the grand
strategy of the international bankers principal public relations
man. Dr. Garner says that Dr. Kissinger is evolving a more indirect
strategy for creating World Government by first building new
Dr. Garner is frank: The hopeful aspect
of the present situation is that even as nations resist appeals
for world government and the surrender of sovereignty technological,
economic and political interests are forcing them to establish
more and more far-reaching institutions to manage their mutual
independence. Dr. Garner also predicts that the growing international monetary
crisis will require much greater powers for the International Monetary
Fund, a product of the Bretton Woods Conference of the Second World
War, at which the dominating figure was Harry Dexter White, subsequently
exposed as a top Soviet agent in the American Treasury Department. Dr. Garner is specific about the key role
of the IMF in creating the World State: We are embarked
on an ambitious negotiation for the reform of the international
monetary system, aimed at phasing out the dollar standard . . .
The accomplishment of those objectives will inevitably require
a revitalization of the International Monetary Fund, which will
be given unprecedented powers to create new international reserves
and to influence national decisions on exchange rates and on the
domestic monetary and fiscal policies.
A rigid international credit monopoly, international
control of the basic raw materials of the world, and an international
economic system - the multinational corporations are paving the
way - are essential for the establishment of the World State.
a New York dinner he gave on October 4, 1973, Dr. Kissinger said
in honouring delegates to the U.N., that I pledge you
that the United States is ready to begin the journey towards a
world community... I ask you to join me in toast to the United
Nations - the treasury of mans noblest aspirations. Just prior to the formal establishment of
the United Nations Organisation in San Francisco, 1945, the American
Assistant Secretary of State, Mr. Nelson Rockefeller, was provided
with documentary evidence by representatives of the FBI proving
that the senior State Department official acting as Organising
Secretary for the Conference, Mr. Alger Hiss, was a top Soviet
agent. Rockefeller destroyed the FBI documents.
Later when Hiss was publicly exposed, he was supported by representatives
of the international financiers. No doubt Commentary, the official magazine
of the American Jewish Committee in New York, wrote with inside
knowledge when it said in 1958 that The international
government of the United Nations, stripped of its legal trimmings
then, is really the international government of the United States
and the Soviet Union acting in unison.
If the policy makers of the United States
and other Western nations were genuinely anti-Communist, they could
have collapsed the Soviet Empire Without, in the words
of Antony Sutton,
using a single gun or anything more dangerous than a piece
of paper or a telephone call. We have Soviet technical dependence
as an instrument of world peace. The most humane weapon that can
be conceived. But when the Soviet dictators were in serious
domestic trouble in 1972, resulting from yet one more failure of
Communist farming, there was no suggestion of applying pressure to
force the release of the millions in the Soviet concentration camps,
or freedom for the Captive Nations. Dr. Kissinger went to Moscow and arranged
to provide the massive credits which enabled the Soviet to remove
one third of Americas wheat reserves. Since then there has
been a flow of credits and loans for even bigger Soviet purchases
of American machinery and technology. Andrei Sakharov, the famous Soviet scientist
and friend of Aleksander Solzhenitsyn, has warned that Western
technological assistance to the Soviet Union liberated the Soviet
leaders from the problems the Communist system cannot solve, enabled
them to concentrate upon building up Soviet military strength, and
as a result the whole world would be disarmed and facing our uncontrollable
The self admitted liar Richard Nixon has resigned,
and even Dr. Kissinger will eventually leave American administration
to continue to work elsewhere. But those replacing them will, unless
prevented by sufficient opposition, carry on serving the One World
Dr. Bella Dodd, a former member of the National
Committee of the U.S.A. Communist Party, has expressed the opinion,
based upon years of experience, that I think the Communist
conspiracy is merely a branch of a much bigger conspiracy.
The Communist conspiracy, with its world-wide revolutionary and subversive
programmes, is but a most essential front and instrument for those
international financial groups obsessed with the One World concept.
The frightful results to date of the policies of these international
power fanatics are nothing compared with what now threatens mankind.
It is no use suggesting that they can be appealed to, pointing out
that their policies of centralising power run so contrary to reality,
that the end result must be the complete collapse of what remains
of Civilisation and their own destruction. Hitler did not think that he was going to
be forced to commit suicide in the rubble of destruction his policies
What is required is that all power be progressively
decentralised everywhere, particulary credit power, enabling the
individual to have effective control over his own affairs. One
of the first major policies necessary for salvation is that the
documented facts concerning the financing of Communism be circulated
as widely as possible and Western Governments forced to end what
Antony Sutton has correctly described as a policy of National Suicide.