CALCULATING EUROPE'S ARAB FUTURE
by Brian Simpson
According to Bouvier and Smith, Europe's below re-placement level fertility (replacement fertility is approximately 2.1 children per woman) and increasing (non-White) immigration leads to this problem: "Put an end to immigration, and the European populations will eventually reach a level where they cannot maintain current and desired levels of economic viability. Allow unfettered growth and the new societies will no longer be French, German or Italian as we currently know them." (p.180).
Bouvier and Smith state that
by the middle of the century, in about 42 years time, current trends will make
Arabs an absolute majority in Europe. As typical liberals they hope that "Europe
can embrace these immigrants, encourage them to assimilate and maintain much of
the cultural status quo." (p.170) If, however, Europeans resist this "peaceful
invasion" (Bouvier is author of "Peaceful Invasions" (1991) by gasp, "racism"
- the bombings in Madrid and the current crisis in parts of Paris only hint at
the potential for conflict."
who watch and monitor all that is said, note that Palestine's present population
of 3.6 million will reach 12 million by 2050. If the present Middle East situation
is thought to be a threat, wait for the future.
The issue of the below replacement
fertility of the White race needs to be addressed is we are to survive. Existing
scholarly literature, does not of course address the birth dearth problem in racial
terms, but it not too difficult to adopt such material to our needs. James Reed,
writing some months back, mentioned a book by Phillip Longman : "The Empty Cradle"
(New America Books, 2004). Longman observes that Feminism has been a major force
for bringing about the demographic crash of the West; "as women gain in education
and economic opportunity, people are producing fewer and fewer children." (p.8)
our present society, Longman notes, "a professional woman is unlikely to have
completed her education before her prime childbearing years are already behind
her." (p.34) Consequently there has been a rise in infertility because women's
fertility falls off rapidly in their thirties and gynaecologically, women are
classified as "elderly" after about the age of twenty five. Thus "the most educated
and most materially successful members of modern societies are those least likely
to have children." (p.34) According to Longman:
There is thus
an evolutionary advantage to those who reject modernity. Longman then confronts
the question : "how can the modern economy, the modern welfare State, and modern
principles of equality be sustained in a world in which the threat of population
loss becomes even more apparent?" (p.36) Longman rejects the idea that technology
presents a full answer to this problem.
From 1985-1999 the US became efficient at computer manufacturing (accounting for 12 per cent of the US economy) but the rates of productivity growth for everything else fell. (p.118) New technology only made a temporary contribution, but now the high tech bubble seems to have burst. Finally, even given technological improvements, because of other social conditions these improvements are often wasted. Thus worsening traffic conditions means that even with better cars it takes longer to drive from point A to point B than it did 30 years ago. (p.119)
the article by James Reed discussing Longman's work, he refers to an article by
Longman in The Australian where Longman argues that the birth dearth problem
will have to be solved by a rejection of feminism and a return to patriarchy.
Longman doesn't directly argue for this in "The Empty Cradle", but rather lists
a number of band aid solutions (e.g. more home production).
IMMIGRATION AND GENETIC REPLACEMENT
by Brian Simpson
Professor Frank Salter is author of "On Genetic Interests" (Peter Long, 2003). Check Amazon.com for this book and you will see that it is unavailable. You see, Salter presented a biological theory - really just commonsense - which was politically incorrect. He argued, to simplify, that ethnic groups (and races) suffer genetic losses when fellow ethnics are replaced by immigrants from another area. Genetic interests vary with the genetic distance that the immigrants have from the host population.
Using accepted sociobiological theory, namely the altruism theory of W.D. Hamilton, Salter argued that "self-sacrificial altruism is adaptive when it preserves the genetic interests of a population of genetically similar individuals." Ethnic nepotism would be adaptive when the acts serve to prevent replacement.
Thus immigration constitutes a force of ethnic genocide upon the host population. In a world of limited resources, according to this theory, immigration of genetic-others limits the genetic fitness of the host population. Hence you can see why Salter's book is "not available". But he has a readable essay in Population and Environment, vol.24, 2002 at: http://majorityrights.com/index.php/weblog/egi. Enjoy.
open borders view of Kevin Rudd and Barak Hussein Obama, maybe America's first
and last black president, is a genetic replacement position which will inevitably
lead to ethnic conflict. It has only been possible to perform the great racial
experiment that began in the 1960s because times have been relatively good. But
as Dante observed in "The Divine Comedy", there is no greater misery than being
in misery now and looking back at what one had.
borders immigration, as advocated by the likes of Kevin Rudd, is a form of free
trade of people. However, the impact of people is considerably greater than the
importation of goods. It impacts upon regions for all time and as Salter has shown,
can change the fundamental genetic nature of society. It usually leads to civil
"Fascist Europe Rising" by Rodney Atkinson
Globalisation: Demise of the Australian Nation" by Graham Strachan