Liike a good colonial puppet Prime Minister John Howard was beside himself over the prospect of a free trade deal with China: it is his number one priority. Yet even a globalist such as South Australian Premier Mike Rann is having second thoughts, having released a discussion paper expressing concern that the free trade deal will gut Australian manufacturing. Nevertheless, as a sample of how things will go, China has bought a 60 per cent share of the Crocker Well uranium field in South Australia. This will enable China to bypass Australian suppliers and export uranium directly for making more nuclear bombs - oops, sorry - nuclear power to cut greenhouse gas emissions to save furry creatures!
For a moment I forgot that it is taboo to mention that China is the only nation on Earth that has its nuclear missiles trained on the major capital cities of the West, and who has recently freely stolen US military secrets.
Australia's ruling elites treat Australia like a whore, and they themselves act like pimps out of a Hollywood movie. But is China the right master to deliver the bound and gagged Australia to, for economic exploitation? In the short term, there seems to be good dollar reasons for the criminals, who control the fate of the ordinary man, to do so. But what about in the longer term? Is China really the new imperial master of the 21st Century to whom all traitorous, profit-centred elites must bow?
Gordon G. Chang in his book, "The
Coming Collapse of China," (Random House, New York 2001) predicts a breakdown
of China due to a collapse of the Communist government's finances. Although the
West is fixated upon the image of China as an economy on steroids and growth hormones,
like a perverse Asiatic body builder, China's economy has severe weaknesses. The
Communist Party still clings to a multitude of uncompetitive state-owned enterprises
and the Party forces the banks to lend to these enterprises to keep them afloat.
The Party itself is corrupt and ill equipped to lead China into the free trading
world of the World Trade Organisation rules. China has done well by playing a
game of economic hypocrisy - exploiting free trade when it suits it, but being
selectively protectionist - but according to Chang, China is "unprepared
for unforgiving globalisation."
Chang observes that business in China largely consists of brides and protection money paid to Party cadres rather than operating on legally enforceable contracts. Economic mismanagement on a grand scale has resulted in 70 to 130 million unemployed roaming China for work. A real army of the unemployed. Workers in China often go for months without pay - not a wise recipe for social harmony.
concludes that all the signs of a collapse of China are present.
Along with all of this are the long term demographic problems noted by Phillip Longman in "The Empty Cradle" (New America Books, New York 2004) and Tyrene White, "China's Longest Campaign: Birth Planning in the People's Republic 1949-2005," (Cornell University Press 2006). China has an ageing population, so much so that the median age will be older than the US by 2020. Its labour supply will be rapidly contracting so that every 10 Chinese workers will have to support, by 2050, seven younger or older Chinese. China will become, given its fertility rate of 1.5-1.65, a "4-2-1" society where one child supports two parents and four grandparents. This to be sure, is a fate facing other countries, but they developed before the demographic crash.
How sensible is it for a country such as Australia to play at being a bootlicking puppy around the feet of an ageing giant when it is only a matter of time before the giant falls and crushes all in its path? Y. Yamamoto, reviewing "The Coming Collapse of China" for the Tokyo Free Press concluded: "But to tell the truth I don't care too much about the fate of China. Essentially it's a matter of when, not whether, that we see the self-deceptive regime tumbling." Watch out Australia!
Reflections on a Critique of Shakespeare's Shylock
by Betty Luks
In fact, he insisted to his Jewish readers, it is time "we accepted the fact that Shylock as portrayed by Shakespeare is an upright man - a man of strength and of human weakness - who towers above a hypocritical, corrupted society, a society that can compel a helpless Jew to convert, largely in order to deprive him of his wealth."
It is to be sure his Jewish readers would understand where he is coming from, but not necessarily a gentile reader. I had hoped the writer would have gone on to examine the reasons why he thought that Shylock was being compelled "to convert, largely in order to deprive him of his wealth," instead he went on to examine "the very origins of its (the play's) creator. I was much disappointed.
The core of the matter is centred in "the fundamentals of human life" as Mr. Rosenberg clearly recognises; and the viewpoint Shakespeare presented is from his own community, with the interests of his own community at heart. Hence when in the trial scene, just as Shylock is advancing towards Antonio with a sharpened knife in one hand and a pair of scales in the other Portia declares:
a little, there is something else,
Shakespeare understood and sympathised with Shylock's situation, the quarrel as he represents it in the play, is not personal and private but national and elemental, a clash between two separate self-contained moral systems, each with its own sense of right and wrong and its own keenly felt sense of personal honour. The reader who wishes to come to grips with the origins of, the fundamental causes of the troubled relations, which are national and elemental, could do no better than study the chapter 'Shakespeare and the Law of Equity' which centres on The Merchant of Venice in Ivor Benson's "The Zionist Factor".
a brilliant explanation he wrote:
quotes from W. Moelwyn Merchant's introduction to a Penguin edition of the play:
Benson appreciated that "Shakespeare had read and thought deeply about the troubled relations of Jew and gentile, and that long before his play was entered in the Stationer's Register in 1598 there had been in progress a ferment of debate on this subject all over the Western world."
He refers to Raphael Holinshed's History of England, Sir Thomas Wilson's Discourse Upon Usury and Francis Bacon's "deeper and more restrained comments on the same subject as sources from which Shakespeare would have drawn copiously" in the writing of his play.
common law and equity
England it was early realised that under common law, grave injury could go unredressed
to the detriment of civil order and national unity. Aggrieved persons who found
themselves denied a remedy in the common law courts petitioned the king in council
for redress, and the petitions were remitted by the council to the Lord Chancellor
as 'keeper of the king's conscience' for investigation.
is the relation of common law to equity which, more than any other aspect of law,
comes into question in the quarrel between the money lender and the merchant of
In the play, Portia having been invited to examine Shylock's suit and pass judgement according to the law, makes a plea for equity in one of the most famous and moving speeches in English drama: "The quality of mercy is not strained "
Mercy in this sense is not the softening and undermining of the law, but an exercise of sympathetic understanding which enhances the power of the law by freeing it of defects which must attend a written law that cannot take into account an infinite variety of circumstances.
as I guess all Jews, shows he is aware of this antagonism between the two systems
when he writes of Shylock as "an upright man - a man of strength and of human
weakness" but also helpless in
a society that can compel a helpless Jew to convert,
largely in order to deprive him of his wealth".
What we are shown in The Merchant of Venice is an enmity in nature, involving two nations, each with its own legal and moral code - which cannot be resolved by any mutually acceptable law. The matter is as yet unresolved.
"Culture of Critique," by Professor Kevin MacDonald. Price: $58.00 posted An evolutionary analysis of Jewish involvement in Twentieth-Century intellectual and political movements. Prof. MacDonald discusses the 'politically incorrect' issues of the day and the strategy of the Jews in helping change western society for their own ends.
Books available from all League Book Services