|Home||Blog||Freedom Potentials||The Cross Roads||Veritas Books|
|OnTarget Archives||Newtimes Survey||Podcast Library||Video Library||PDF Library|
|Actionist Corner||YouTube Video Channel||BitChute Video Channel||Brighteon Video Channel||Social Credit Library|
October 10 1975. Thought for the Week: "Water-pollution and air-pollution are now quantitatively measurable facts of life, but it also appears that an insidious psychological poison is permeating the modern consciousness, destroying man's mind and moral fibre."
D. Williams, in "Trousered Apes" - quoted by Dr. John Court, in "Law, Light and Liberty".
INFLATION TOLLS KNELL FOR SMALL BUSINESSES
"Up to 60,000 small businesses throughout Australia could fail in the next year, according to research results presented to the Melbourne Chamber of Commerce". The Age, (Melbourne) October 4th.
The reason can be given in one word - "costs".
Small businesses are invariably under-capitalised and do not have the
financial flexibility to withstand the strain of the escalating costs
of the seventies. Along with the expected factors presented to the Chamber
by the researchers, there was the some-what surprising "syphoning effect"
of colour television.
Other factors are the escalating unemployment; and this could top half a million by February 1976, when all the school-leavers are dumped on to the labour market. Quarterly tax payments will slash "liquidity"; etc., etc. In all, not a pleasant aspect. But one that is inevitable as the finance-economic system spins off its integral inflation, as a spider spins its web.
THE KELSO PLAN
We have yet another American expert, on this or that, in our midst. We have had economic experts to tell us everything about inflation, except the means to halt it. Professors Paul Samuelson, John Kenneth Galbraith, Milton Friedman have expounded and expatiated on the inflation theme but we still have inflation. So has America, where they all come from. And it's getting worse!
Now Louis O. Kelso is paying us a visit, to wheel his barrow. He is not an economist, thank heavens, but a lawyer, of whom we have more than a surfeit at Canberra. Quite apart from the fact that this Kelso "Plan" would come into immediate conflict with Australian taxation law, the theoretical "second income" would be largely scooped up by the Commission of Taxation.
Financial credit, to finance the "worker participant" into part ownership of the industrial enterprises, must come from the traditional source - the banks. First of all, will the banks "oblige" by making credit available for some unproven, pie-in-the-sky, common-ownership plan? We think not. And fundamentally, will the policy of the Central Bank (the Australian Reserve Bank) be any different, in any way because a few business enterprises might wish to experiment with a worker-participation plan? Of course not.
This is the key to it.
SOUTH AUSTRALIAN ANNUAL DINNERA reminder for South Australian supporters. Mr. Donald Martin, National Director of the British League of Rights will address the S.A. Annual Dinner, Saturday, October 18th, and also the Annual Seminar. Venue: Room 4, Y.M.C.A., 76 Flinders St., Adelaide. Action Conference - Sunday. October 19th, at same venue. Tariff: Dinner $7.00...Seminar $2.00. Full details from Mr. Frank Bawden, G.P.O. Box 1297, Adelaide, S.A. 5001. Mr. Eric Butler, National Director of the Australian League of Rights, will be present at these functions.
MR. DONALD MARTIN IN WESTERN AUSTRALIAThe Greenough Regional Council (W.A.) holds its Third Annual Dinner on Sat., 25th October, at Ampol Roadhouse, Camamah, commencing 6.00 p.m. The Guest Speaker is Mr. Donald Martin, National Director of the British League of Rights. Tariff: $5.00 single $10.00 double. R.S.V.P. 23rd October, Mr. Geoff Broad, Three Springs.
Perth Conservative Speakers' Club holds its next Dinner on Wed., the 22nd October at the Rivervale Hotel, Rivervale, Tariff: $3.20 per person. Guest Speaker, Mr. Donald Martin. Enquiries and R.S.V.P. - Mr., H. Fammar, on (Perth) 86 4107.
QUEENSLAND ACADEMIC SCRUTINISES PUBLIC SERVICE
"The Public Service in Australia could still function at an acceptable level if its numbers were cut by a third, a Queensland University lecturer in Public Administration said yesterday". - The Age, (Melbourne) October 2nd.
Mr. Kenneth Wiltshire, of course, wasn't telling us anything. Anyone who has witnessed the workings of the Public Service at close hand knows that the inefficiency therein is most serious. We would not be over-ready to blame individuals: the system itself stifles energy, enterprise, initiative, imagination, and all those other qualities that, if allowed a free rein, set the machinery of organization tolling along at a fast clip. Big Business suffers to a lesser extent from the same choking inefficiency: the larger a private enterprise becomes, in general, the less efficient it is.
The overall reason, and this is being a little "simplistic" (the word which sets all the trendies a-quiver) is that the efficiency of an organization deteriorates in proportion to the "gap" between decision making and implementation. The greater the "gap" the greater the inefficiency. This is the basic reason that the whole economic systems of Communist countries are so abysmally inefficient.
The individual is afraid to accept responsibility - anyway he is just a little cog there is really no reason to work strenuously. There is a vast bureaucracy between the management and the plant floor -the assembly line, if you like. Decisions are held up, held up, held up, awaiting approval from higher up; from Moscow, from Leningrad, from the Kremlin - from this, from that: Big Business in the West is growing like this; it could never be anywhere as bad, for one reason alone; staff can be hired and fired with rapidity.
To the Americans, an inefficient executive is a financial catastrophe. If he can be given the "golden handshake", and pensioned off somewhere else, then that is good business: money well spent. This sort of thing doesn't happen in Socialist countries, where the emphasis is on security and irremovability. Efficiency plummets, as could be expected. Mr. Wiltshire says that most Australian public servants are grossly overpaid - think of Gough Whitlam's super girls on their $15,000-$20,000 a year. Think of "Ms" Elizabeth Reid, and some of the riff-raff she brought out for the recent Women and Politics Conference. Think of Mr. Al Grassby on his $32,000 to make racial mischief where none has traditionally existed.
A further glaring example of public service inefficiency was given by Mr. Wiltshire. He said: - "Federal Governments leaned on Departments to expand recruitment to mop up the unemployed, especially during the embarrassment of large numbers of jobless school leavers". We doubt whether Government Departments will be doing this during early 1976.
INSURANCE INDUSTRY ON THE RECEIVING END
"The non life insurance industry made an overall underwriting loss of $156 million in 1973-74, according to the first report of the Insurance Commissioner (Mr. M.A. Bassett)." - The Age, (Melbourne) October 2nd.
The heavy insurance losses were suffered in the fields of Workers' Compensation Insurance, and compulsory Third Party motor insurance. Then there were the large claims as a result of the Brisbane flood ($36 million).
Here is something to warm the hearts of business enterprises. Mr. Bassett warned that the provision for claims on workers compensation was in the region of $100 million less than the amount needed. Commerce and industry are reeling now under the just recent increases in premiums for Workers' Compensation Insurance, and this will be a significant factor in the steady escalation of Australia's inflation. A further increase in this particular overhead will be the straw that breaks the camel's back, as far as very many small business are concerned.
As regards the life sector of the insurance industry, the picture there isn't rosy. According to the 1974 report of the Life Insurance Commissioner, cancellations of life policies rose substantially - 407 thousand in 1974, as against 255 thousand in 1973. There was an upsurge of complaints about the surrender value of life policies. The basic reason for the growing disenchantment with life insurance is, of course, inflation. As an investment, life insurance is for the birds: one could do better by placing ones money with a Building Society at 10-11% interest. As just emergency cover, it isn't all that good any more.
One has to have it, unless Lady Luck smiles down with the major prize in a lottery; but with inflation running at 17%, and soon to be way beyond that, life cover has had its value stripped from it. Some of the Life Houses are coming up with a few schemes to "cushion" the effects of inflation on a policy, but generally there's no way round the problem.
The next step, which the Socialists are working
up to, is "free insurance" for all; at a price, like "free national
health" for all. Medibank hasn't got off the ground yet - the cost of
it will be fantastic. It's the same old, old story. The individual is
having his economic sovereignty stripped from him to such an extent
that he is no longer capable of managing his own affairs in the fields
of Health, Education: Welfare - and Big Brother, always watching you,
will tender to your needs in return for your freedom.
The Courier-Mail (Brisbane) August 18th carries an article by Denis Warner around the subject of the World Peace Council. The secretary-General of the World Peace Council, which is a major Communist front, claims that half the members of the Whitlam Cabinet are members. A foremost objective of the World Peace Council is to campaign for "non-alignment" (translation: neutralisation). This slots in with what has been going on in the field of Australia's foreign policy since the Whitlam cabal gained power. Our traditional allies in the West have been given the brush-off, and new associations with the Communist world, and the "Third World" pursued. If that isn't neutralisation, we'd like to know a better word!
Mr. Talbot Duckmanton, the General Manager of the Australian Broadcasting Commission has sounded a timely warning on the continuing threat to the freedom of the mass media. Regular readers of League journals will know that we criticise the media strongly because they do not present a true picture at all of many of the key issues of our day. For example, the media distort the true state of affairs in Southern Africa: suppress vital information, especially of an anti-Communist nature: attack anti-Communist organizations by denigration. etc., etc. However, it is vital that the media retain their freedom to express their opinions, and we have noticed a startling change in the media over the past year or so with respect to the Whitlam Socialist Government. Generally the media were advocating the election of the Whitlam Government in 1972. Now they are virtually waging a campaign to get it out. The name-columnists who were panting with excitement for a Labor victory in 1972, are now disillusioned; or writing as though they are. We strongly suspect that the not-too-carefully' concealed attempts by Whitlam's Department of the Media (Department over the Media) to lasoo the media, have alarmed them into opposition. They must know that they are for the wringer, eventually, if the Socialists continue in office. Mr. Duckmanton says that appeals to newspapers and broadcasters to be "more responsible" were a subtle threat to the freedom of the media. He made the telling point that without free communication, no nation could have liberty. Speaking at a Convention in Brisbane recently he said that there were many journalists in prison, under house arrest, and newspapers closed in countries of the British Commonwealth. Yes, African and Asian "nations" not Crown Commonwealth nations. Mr. Duckmanton said that freedom of the Press was being threatened by too much law. This is correct: we are suffering from too much Government, we are over governed. When newspapers are closed, says Mr. Duckmanton, valuable diversity of opinion is lost. True enough. Mr. Duckmanton is to be congratulated on his most timely and valuable observations.
The Consumer SubsidyThe subsidy is the one way by which the vicious wage-price spiral can be broken. If the Government, when allocating its deficiency money, decided that it was desirable to rapidly reduce the price of certain necessities, while keeping the producers solvent, it would have the means to do so. In order to ensure that producers did not abuse the system by producing large amounts of unwanted goods so that they could claim the subsidy, it should be paid only on goods sold, rather than on goods produced....Lest any of the standard objections to the subsidy should be brought forward in opposition to this, it must be pointed out that the present economic system is subsidised also; but not with actual money. It is subsidised by small farmers and small businessmen, and their wives, who have to count their time as being worth nothing, if their books are to show any sort of profit.
(The present economic system) is subsidised every time anyone does work which adds to the sum total of production without being paid for it, or without being paid the full rate. It is subsidised every time an amateur dressmaker, or carpenter, or electrician, or mechanic "does-it-himself", instead of engaging a qualified tradesman. In short, it is subsidised by anyone who works more than 40 hours whilst being paid only the equivalent of an average weekly wage, and by anyone who works 40 hours a week, but is paid less than the average wage. It is also subsidised by bankruptcies, which always result in other people, as well as the bankrupt, remaining unpaid for work they have done, or for goods they have produced.
|© Published by the Australian League of Rights, P.O. Box 27 Happy Valley, SA 5159|