Flag of the Commonwealth of Australia
Christian based service movement warning about threats to rights and freedom irrespective of the label.
"All that is necessary for the triumph of evil is that good men do nothing"
Edmund Burke
Flag of the Commonwealth of Australia
Home blog.alor.org Newtimes Survey The Cross-Roads Library
OnTarget Archives The Social Crediter Archives NewTimes Survey Archives Brighteon Video Channel Veritas Books

On Target

14 October 1977. Thought for the Week: "The penalty for not doing anything when freedom is threatened is to lose the freedom to do anything"
J. Kesner Kahn.


Like a cracked record, Prime Minister Fraser continues to repeat his claim that his Government's policies are solving Australia's basic problems. In his weekly radio broadcast last weekend, Mr. Fraser claimed that the country 'was back on the road to economic health.' Even many of his own colleagues do not believe what he is saying. A number agree with the realism of veteran Member, W.C. Wentworth, who announced last week that he would not be seeking re-election in his electorate because of his strong disagreement with the Fraser Government's finance economic policies. Mr. Wentworth has consistently made the obvious point that one essential step to avert increasing disaster, was a substantial reduction in taxation.

While the Fraser cracked record continues to be played monotonously, from the United States comes a report that some economists fear that the non-Communist world is on the road to an even greater disaster than the Great Depression of the 'thirties'. The Herald, Melbourne of October 6th, quotes the Victorian director of the Australian Institute of Management, Mr. Ron Gilchrist, as warning that Australia was facing an ''economic crisis''. "The tragedy is that few people perceive it as such."
Numbered amongst these must be the Prime Minister and his "advisers"!

Mr. Fraser presents as evidence of his "recovery" claim, that consumer spending was increasing. "Consumers were saving 12.5% of their pay cheques in the first quarter of this year compared with 19% in 1974." A study of Savings Bank figures shows that until June of this year depositors had kept pace with inflation by increasing their accounts at a rate, which closely matched the inflation rate, thus maintaining the purchasing power of their savings. But this is no longer the case.

The truth is that the Fraser-Lynch policy is forcing consumers to spend more of their incomes to keep pace with inflation. Their financial reserves in the form of savings are losing their value. Many of the unemployed have been forced to draw upon their savings to maintain a reasonable standard of living. This is a strange type of "success".

Then the Government's own poverty inquiry stated last week that the number of people below the poverty line is growing. Professor Ronald Henderson, an inquiry commissioner, said that the rising rate of inflation and unemployment was a major factor in the increased poverty line. Mr. Fraser's cracked record keeps on insisting however, that inflation has now been "brought under control". Using his own figures, Mr. Fraser claims that the inflation rate has been reduced to 9.2% Even if the prediction of a 3.25% increase the September quarter Consumer Price Index, quoted in connection with Mr. Justice Ludeke's calculations for the rise of doctors' fees last week, is proved excessive, it is almost certain that it will be at least 2.75%, and possibly 3%. It will certainly be in excess of Prime Minister Fraser's figures.

Why attempt to juggle with statistics, as the Government now is attempting with unemployment figures, when the basic facts of Australia's deepening crisis are clear?
Every day that the Fraser Government persists with its present policies, the closer it takes Australia towards an open revolutionary situation. No early election can resolve Australia's crisis. Members of the Fraser Government must be told to continue in office to implement policies of construction, not destruction, starting with the tax reductions promised in Mr. Fraser's policy speech.


The deepening finance economic crisis is going to produce major party political convulsions affecting the whole of national life. Generally ignored by the press, an interview on the ABC's "PM" programme of Thursday, October 6th, with a spokesman for the Federal National Country Party, indicated the shape of things to come. He bluntly said that the Federal Coalition was in jeopardy because of the threat of re-distribution to the strength of the Federal National Party. When it was pointed out that the Liberals had a sufficient majority to govern in their own right, the National Party spokesman replied that this would not be the case after the next Federal Elections, at which the Liberals must lose seats.

In spite of the comparatively large representation in the present Federal Parliament, the Federal National Party is threatened by an increasingly hostile rural electorate (which has not noticed the "recovery" mentioned by Prime Minister Fraser) together with redistribution. Speaking to the Federal National Country Party Federal Council last weekend, Mr. Doug Anthony revealed publicly for the first time the friction inside the Coalition. He said: "After we came back to office in 1975 the National Country Party pushed very hard for the re-introduction of the 20% tolerance (it is now 10%). We also put up an alternative proposal for consideration. But it was made clear to us that these proposals would not get through the Senate because some Liberal Senators would vote with Labor against them."

Providing the National Country Party finishes with the balance of power after the next Federal Elections, it then will be in a position to fight to ensure that effective representation for the rural communities is not further eroded. But, as the NCP spokesman said on "PM", this could mean a break in the Coalition.

While a desperate rural Australia is attempting to survive by a much more militant political approach, as witnessed by the activities of the Cattlemans' Union, the continuing growth of the Don Chipp Party indicates that both the Labor and the Liberal parties are under threat of the loss of many of their supporters. While we can discount the fact that 31% of the electors have indicated in a recent public opinion poll that they would "consider" voting for the Australian Democrats at the next Federal elections, what cannot be discounted is that 8% firmly state that they would support the Australian Democrats if an election were held "today".

If the Federal Coalition continues to flounder along its present disaster course, it can be confidently predicted that the Chipp Party's prospects must improve. Our prediction is that Australia is now well on the way to new political realignments. The present Fraser Government, in spite of its large majority, is now living on borrowed time. The only hope of avoiding growing political fragmentation is for the Liberal Party to "clean house," return to its traditional principles and make the necessary financial adjustments to make those principles practical.

We doubt if there is enough health left for this to happen. However, political fragmentation could lead to a situation in which the Senate becomes of much greater significance and the States take the initiative in promoting the policies necessary to keep the Commonwealth free and secure.


Father Pascal Slevin, the Roman Catholic missionary expelled from Rhodesia, claims that he learned of many black Rhodesians who had been beaten and tortured by Rhodesian troops. But he admitted he had never been a witness. He says that the blacks "see the guerrillas as their liberators". The 1300 blacks that have been brutally murdered by the terrorists did not find them liberators. The most charitable comment one can make about Father Slevin is, that like the recently expelled Nun, who quoted Marxist slogans, he is a little soft headed. But, like Bishop Lamont, he will be manipulated by people who are much more hard headed.

If the Fraser Cabinet Ministers were genuine about their growing verbal attacks upon Communist Trade Union leaders, they would implement the type of policies, which would deprive the Halfpenny's of situations, which they can exploit. A drastic reduction in all taxation, starting with Sales Tax, would do more to hurt the Communist leaders than verbal assaults. The basic cause of the power strike in Victoria is financial.

Just when the Australian sugar industry was faced with big problems, with customers like Japan attempting to take advantage of a world glut of sugar and lower prices, Communist China indicates that it is interested in a big sugar purchase from Australia. While such a purchase will help, in the short tern, Australian sugar growers, it will make Canberra even more subservient to Peking. We wonder if those strong "anti-Communists", Fraser, Nixon and others, have ever read a Communist treatise on the use of "trade" to further International Communism! And how is the proposed big sugar export to Communist China to be financed.? Perhaps international financier, S.G. Warburg, associated with the Commonwealth Sugar Refinery Ltd., could answer that question?

Professor Bill Ford of the University of N.S.W., told a Sydney forum on migrant and industrial relations last weekend that migrants should use their votes to "make sure this is a truly, multi-cultural society." Professor Ford urged that migrants should use the tactics of the Women's Electoral Lobby. Professor Hill has, unconsciously no doubt, indicated one of the problems about "multi-cultural societies." Each minority group is manipulated by the power seekers to dominate the majority. The Dispossessed Majority, by Wilmot Robertson ($6.75) is the classic on this important subject.


In keeping with our policy of attempting to provide actionists with as much supporting material as possible, we provide the following revealing extracts from an article, "Fighting Colonialism" in Soviet Weekly of August 26, 1972 (please note the date)
"The Soviet Union supports UNO in every step it takes to free colonial peoples, to denounce and boycott racialist regimes. UNO has done much to promote the development of national liberation movements and foster the feeling that racialism and apartheid are things not to be endured. On December 14, 1960, the United Nations, on the initiative of the USSR and a number of Asian and African countries, adopted a resolution on the granting of independence to colonial countries and peoples - a landmark in history. That resolution has ever since set UNO on an anti-colonialist course... Students from practically all the colonial territories are getting professional training in Soviet schools and colleges. The USSR as well as the Ukraine and Byelorussia, as members of the UN, send material aid to victims of apartheid in South Africa, through Canon Collins's International Defence and Aid Fund in London …Finally, it should be said that the Soviet Union fulfills to the letter all UN obligations to end trade, economic and other relations with racialist and colonial regimes."


The following item should be compared with Father Slevin's charges - mentioned in this week's "On Target"'

"On my desk in front of me is a story written by a fifteen-year old black schoolgirl going home for the August holidays from Elim Mission north of Inyanga. The children were travelling in three buses. The first was blown up by a landmine, and the survivors climbed into the second. An ear splitting explosion followed as this struck another mine. Most of the children had squashed into the rear. They scrambled out, leaving the blazing vehicle and the driver being sizzled to a cinder. The pathetic remnant of that happy holiday party walked for long hours in the blazing sun till they reached a telephone and were taken under the wing of missionaries and the security forces. Their school, of course, has had to be closed, but the children who are left are now being taught near Umtali. The episode illustrates what the so-called freedom fighters mean by 'the armed struggle', and the World Council of Churches by "combating racism"

The above comment comes from veteran Rhodesian missionary, Father Arthur Lewis, in his Occasional Newsletter of the Rhodesia Christian Group, October.

From Hansard: The Senate (October 4th) Senator G. Shiel (Qld.) attacks the United Nations (We quote in part only)
"It is now possible for the Security Council to take momentous decisions and implement them without the concurring votes of any of the five permanent members..."
"Since World War 2, on any one day there has been an average of 12 major wars. Troops from 80 nations have fought in 70 different countries. The number of dead and casualties has reached tens of millions, and most of the wars have taken place in Third World countries armed from the industrialised nations. There is no end in sight to this appalling record of violence. As a mediator, the United Nations is a failure, and as a peace keeper with extensive powers to keep the peace it is an abject failure....despite the fact that the United Nations by its Charter is precluded from interfering in the internal affairs of any country it has a special committee set up to crush Apartheid in South Africa, which has been the policy of that Government since 1948. Also, on May 27th this year the Security Council passed a resolution to close the four Rhodesian Information Centres situated around the world. Being a Security Council resolution, it becomes a mandatory requirement on member nations of the United Nations, and the Australian Government has started drafting the legislation...."
(We understand that this is probably not so, and that the Fraser Govt. has decided to back-peddle on this projected legislation until a "safer" time obtains in the future. This in itself is a victory for the League and its allies. But we must not relax pressure; rather the reverse.)
...... It would be wrong to imagine that the peoples of South Africa have not tried systems of government other than Apartheid. They have tried them all - assimilation, integration, limited franchise and the destruction of the chieftain system. They have tried all forms of government, but every change made everybody's problems get worse.
Black nations refused to co-operate with other black nations. In deed, they were largely belligerent to one another. The Indians would not integrate with the blacks, and vice versa. There was outright hostility between the Zulus and the Indians. Nobody would integrate with the coloureds and the chieftain system was merely driven underground.
The separate development of all these different peoples became obvious to them. It started with its own self-generation. It was really an extension of the policy adopted by the English when they decided to relinquish South Africa. England gave independence to Bechuanaland, now Basutoland, Lesotho where the Sotho live, and Swaziland where the Swazi live. The South African Apartheid policy is merely an extension of the English plan. However the English gave these peop1es independence long before they were economically viable units…."

© Published by the Australian League of Rights, P.O. Box 27 Happy Valley, SA 5159