Science of the Social Credit Measured in Terms of Human Satisfaction
Christian based service movement warning about threats to rights and freedom irrespective of the label, Science of the Social Credit Measured in Terms of Human Satisfaction
"All that is necessary for the triumph of evil is that good men do nothing"
Edmund Burke
Science of the Social Credit Measured in Terms of Human Satisfaction
Home Blog Freedom Potentials The Cross Roads Veritas Books
OnTarget Archives Newtimes Survey Podcast Library Video Library PDF Library
Actionist Corner YouTube Video Channel BitChute Video Channel Brighteon Video Channel Social Credit Library

On Target

4 April 1985. Thought for the Week: Anybody who defends the legal existence of Communism in a democratic country is defending the legality of high treason. The Left-wing Labor defenders of Communism are the worst enemies of their countries, worse than the Communists themselves. These Left-wing defenders of Communism conceal all the facts about Lenin's teaching and claim that in a democratic country no political opinion must be suppressed. Their pretended love for pure democracy is bluff and fraud, for they were, and still are, ready to suppress by force the political opinion of anybody who, in their opinion, is or may be a fascist. But by defending Communism under the pretext of protecting democracy they are confusing masses of well meaning people who would never listen to Communists, but are ready to accept the opinion of Left-wing defenders of Communism".
V.L.Borin, exCzech Communist leader,' in How to Betray Your Country (1956)


Mr. Eric Butler reports from New Zealand
Prime Minister Lange of New Zealand is that type of genuine liberal do gooder who delights the Marxist totalitarians. There is no, evidence to suggest that Mr. Lange has at any time been a Communist, but as a young lawyer he was refused a visa to the United States at a time when he was working for an Auckland law firm employed by the Communist Party. Although Mr.Lange says that he is not a pacifist, he also says that he has been greatly influenced by his close friend, the British pacifist Lord Soper. Mr. Lange has been a Methodist lay preacher and his general attitude creates the impression of a naive man divorced from reality. Mr. Lange says he believes in defence for New Zealand, but presumably if the USA found it necessary to help with the defence of New Zealand, nuclear weapons would not be permitted.
Prime Minister Lange belongs to that group of people who believe that by declaring an area or a nation nuclear free, this will ensure that there is no threat of any possible nuclear attacks.

Writing to one of the New Zealand papers, a lady said that she had declared her car to be accident free and had taken out no insurance, only to find that someone had ignored her declaration and had run into her car, badly damaging it. She felt this was extremely "unfair". The Marxist totalitarians are not impressed by appeals to fairness, which they regard as a manifestation of "capitalist decadence." Needless to say, Prime Minister Lange is strongly opposed to "racism" and "discrimination". But one of his first foreign policy decisions was to have a New Zealand Embassy opened in India, which he regards as a great moral leader among the nations of the world. Mr. Lange conveniently overlooks that India has spent vast sums in an attempt to become a nuclear power and that there are constant violence and deaths in a nation which still imposes its inhuman caste system.

Now Prime Minister Lange is to seek closer links with five nations in "liberated" Africa. Mr. Lange is pleading with New Zealand Rugby officials not to make a final decision about visiting South Africa just yet. He would not like this decision to be made before his African safari, which will not, of course, include South Africa. The South Africans are so evil they must be ostracised in every possible way. Mr. Lange is not prepared to go so far as to ban New Zealand Rugby players and spectators from visiting South Africa, but he is doing everything possible to prevent the proposed tour from going ahead. The moral Mr. Lange has even insisted that the New Zealand Government tourist bureau must not accept bookings for those wishing to follow the New Zealand Rugby team to South Africa.

In spite of the massive injections of foreign aid, with few exceptions, the whole of "liberated" Africa is sinking back into a new type of barbarism. There has been a widespread decline in food production with the withdrawal of European expertise and energy. But like an innocent abroad, Prime Minister Lange will believe all that he is told by the flamboyant but corrupt African leaders like Mugabe of Zimbabwe and Nyerere of Tanazania. There will be the usual attacks upon South Africa and almost certainly promises of generous New Zealand aid, at the expense of the hard pressed New Zealand taxpayers. It will be a major miracle if Mr. Lange has anything critical to say about the criminal activities of Africans like Comrade Mugabe of Zimbabwe, who hold innocent people in prison where they have been tortured.

The unrealism of Mr. Lange was graphically demonstrated when, following the Soviet's enthusiastic support for his government's anti nuclear policy, he sent for the Soviet Ambassador in Wellington and, according to press reports, said that "My message to him was very simply that the policy of this country is not for consumption, endorsement, applause or whatever by the Soviet Union." No doubt the criminals of the Kremlin laughed into their vodkas as they read this type of nonsense from Mr. Lange, possibly recalling Lenin's famous words about the great value of useful innocents to their strategy.


Only sixteen weeks ago, Australians were being told they were lucky enough to live in "the fastest-growing economy in the world." Treasurer Keating was nominated "Treasurer-of-the-year" and the "top-of-the-political-pops" was the A.L.P.'s "Recovery". Those who pointed to the real facts and figures were "prophets of doom". A few socio-economic psychologists suggested that warnings of caution might of themselves stunt the recovery. It was all too reminiscent of those who claimed a few years ago that Enoch Powell's warnings of racial violence in Britain would create the very thing he was concerned about.

To take Australia's mind off the obvious fact that "the recovery" was simply an election mirage, the proposed tax summit in July is the next piece of theatre. It is unlikely, however, that the Hawke Government will get its act together for a successful summit. The faction fighting in the ALP is set to explode. Despite orders to remain silent, the Social Security Minister in the Victorian Government, Mr. Howe, - a leading spokesman for the Left - has attacked the Hawke Government's proposals for a major shift from direct to indirect taxation. He also called for a Capital Gains Tax.

The Left wing and Union theory is that indirect taxation will shift the tax burden from high-income earners to the lower income groups. They fail to realise that all taxes - whether direct or indirect are loaded into the price structure which consumers have to pay. Taxes as a whole are a vital part of the cost structure, and arguments about how to extract them are really immaterial.

What is important - and wholly ignored by politicians - is the size of the total tax package, and the proportion of gross domestic product (GDP) annexed in the taxation process. Even socialist theorists in earlier times warned that a tax package, which took more than 25% of national income, hampered economic growth and equity. Australia's three tiers of government between them are just on the 50% mark. Taxation is now totally destructive, and a Tax Summit that simply seeks to altar the method of extraction, without reducing the overall impact, will solve nothing.

Australia can expect little opposition from the Lib-Nats, Shadow Treasurer Howard has long been an advocate for a shift from direct to indirect taxation. So he really agrees with Hawke's proposals. They will probably stand united in opposition to the Left. Editor Julian Cribb, writing in The National Farmer (Nov. 29 - Dec. 12, '85) summed it up well:
"In all the political lather and debate over the taxation system in Australia, there appears to have been one central factor which has been largely overlooked - or ignored - by the politicians of all parties. They 're arguing furiously among themselves about whether we should have income taxes. VAT, sales-tax increases, capital gains or capital taxes. They have obviously heeded one clear message from the electorate - that the Australian public is becoming fed up with taxation. But so far no single politician or party has had the courage or the integrity to address the real issue; that we should all pay less tax. At most they have promised (and what are promises worth during an election campaign, one wonders?) to restrain the rate of government growth. This is simply not the same as cutting it.

A wise man once observed: "If governments make a bad law - even honest men will break it..." So what do Australians currently pay? The following figures tell the story:


Commonwealth States Local Govt
$3,800.00 660.00 150.00

Total: $4,610.00 This represents a total tax-bill of $18,440 for the average Australian family of father, mother and two children. The real question is whether the proposed Tax Summit will reduce this total figure or not? Anything else is political sleight-of-hand!


David Thompson reports from W.A.
During his recent visit to Australia, Dr. Geoffrey Dobbs, of Wales, made the point that eventually the failure of orthodox policies would force an examination of other policies. Premier Brian Burke, although accepting the possibility of some form of capital gains tax, has started to apply the pressure to Messrs. Hawke and Keating. Mr. Burke warned that a retail tax of 10% would increase inflation and unemployment, have a "vivid" impact on demand and the level of economic activity, and cut the spending power of people on fixed incomes. Mr. Burke's most significant comment, as reported to The West Australian, was that the W.A. Government's submission to the Tax Summit would stress that the tax system should be simpler, fairer without increasing overall tax collections.

The following letter was published in The West Australian (March 25th) over the name of "W.R.B.Hassell". Mr. Hassell is Leader of the (State) Opposition in W.A.:
"In response to Peter Trott's feature article 'land rights: Moderation the Key' (March 15), I raise the following points.
* Is it moderate to make available for claim more than 45% of W.A. to Aborigines on the basis of their race?
* Is it moderate to make available for claim properties in the metropolitan area and elsewhere, owned for the public by the Department of Community Welfare and valued at millions of dollars?
* Is it moderate to make available for claim more than 45% of W.A. to less than 3% of the population?
* Is it moderate to make available for claim fishing waters off the Northwest coast?

Mr. Trott's article went on to justify the so-called moderation of the Burke Labor Government's land rights legislation by stating that 10 organisations were involved in the drafting and their approval of the legislation justified land rights. "It surprises me that non-elected government by specialist interest groups has become so acceptable that he describes it as a 'masterpiece of diplomacy'. "I doubt that the wider electorate would approve of specialist interest groups, like that Chamber of Mines, and the Aboriginal Land Trust, drawing up legislation for W.A. which will have a critical long-term effect on the State as a whole.

"The article includes a warning from the Premier, Mr. Burke, that if the legislation is not passed by the Upper House, the Federal Government will introduce its preferred land rights model. Incidentally, we know of no one who prefers it.
"The Federal Government's land rights legislation will proceed in any event. "Indeed, Mr. Holding's 'preferred model' states clearly that the Commonwealth will 'add rights' to those accorded under State laws where necessary. "I challenge the Premier to state unequivocally that if the W.A. Bill is passed there will be no application of federal law to this State."

Mr. David Thompson, in a most recent communication, states that the W.A. mining industry has more or less collapsed in its former opposition to land rights legislation, and that it is actually supporting Premier Burke's land rights legislation now. Mr. Thompson repeats that it is essential that Opposition Legislative Councillors (who control the W.A. Upper House) be stiffened, against the passage of Premier Burke's land rights Bill. We have been informed that, at least one mining company, and we suspect more, are coming under pressure from some of their shareholders who feel strongly about the land rights issue.


The following self-explanatory letter was published in Stock and Land (March 14th) over the name of "Alan Chandler, of Fairfield, Vic.:
"The letter from the Goulburn group of municipalities (Feb. 21) warned of the threat by the Minister for Local Government that on the subject of amalgamation, municipalities should 'hurry up or else' "This is only the tip of the Iceberg that 'restructure' really is. That this Government and this particular Minister are dedicated to the takeover of local government by political party adherents is not news to some of those who have the misfortune to live in a party controlled municipality, and particularly the Minister's electorate of Northcote.
"Every shire or city that enjoys local government not dominated by party politics should absolutely reject any proposed reform until the whole package of restructure is presented clearly in every aspect. "In the meantime, a very close watch should be centred on the City of Northcote where a 'request' from the Council to the Minister that it should become an unsubdivided 'no ward' city has already been moved and passed by the council, a move opposed by all independent councillors, but carried by the party councillors because of their minimum possible majority.
"As a resident and an independent councillor of Northcote, there is no doubt in my mind that this request from the Council is an orchestrated exercise with the purpose of this City being used to give the lead for other councils to follow, and that it is only one plank in the structure of reform which is to include amalgamations and triennial elections as two of the known moves, with others still only to be guessed or speculated upon. "On the surface, sinister aspects cannot be readily seen, particularly when each is viewed as an unrelated proposal, but to date no comprehensive set of proposals have been offered for evaluation as a whole package. One has to look into the Local Government Act as it now stands on the question of how the voting must be counted in the event of a spill of council to get a glimpse of the implications. "To date, while structure changes have been suggested or demanded in several directions, some of which, such as an unsubdivided or no ward city, would suggest that a change of the vote counting system would be necessary. No changes have been suggested, much less is it certain to happen.
"The existing Local Government Act contains a seldom used and little known system that could be very readily used for triennial elections a no ward city election, or both of these moves combined, where an individual, independent candidate facing a disciplined party vote could poll one primary vote short of an absolute majority and not be elected, while a candidate or several candidates on a party ticket can be elected without gaining one primary vote. "No citizen of Victoria should accept any structural reform to local government while this possibility exists, and it will exist until the Act is changed. My second warning is that no change to the Act relating to counting of votes should be accepted until thoroughly examined by a committee of interested and highly qualified scrutineers who have no political party interests or affiliations.
© Published by the Australian League of Rights, P.O. Box 27 Happy Valley, SA 5159