THE SOUTH AFRICAN CRUNCH

"The dramatic deterioration in South Africa has comprehensively shattered Australia's formerly bipartisan Africa policy." - Michelle Grattan, in The Age (Melb) July 30th.

The above journalist also commented that the South Africa question has exposed "serious and ever-widening rifts" with the ranks of the Opposition coalition. There is no doubt at all in our minds that the international forces of subversion are now in a big hurry. Events are moving quickly, and, as Dr. Monahan has elsewhere pointed out, there will be a brief time only between that period when the presence of a driving, thrusting, power movement for World Government will be obvious to sensible, thinking people (and this excludes many academics and politicians) - and the culmination of its objectives. This, we believe, is the reason for the sudden escalation of the on-going psychological war against South Africa.

Wilmot Robertson, in his "racial and political realities" blockbuster - "The Dispossessed Majority" ($18.50 posted) observes that South Africa will survive if it has THE WILL to survive. And this means the will of the European South African to survive. The late Mao-tse-tung knew the truth of this observation; he said the same, but in a different context. He was referring to his China. A blueprint for the invasion and destruction of South Africa was ordered by the Carnegie Foundation of the U.S.A. some 15-20 years ago (it is in our possession) and this was published in Reveille, an R.S.L. journal, some 15 years ago.

Whilst we are anything but military experts, we are led to believe that the military conquest of South Africa (it is probable that South Africa has nuclear weapons) would be formidable: and the political implications of same would be most formidable. We know that. And what of the "special" arrangements between South Africa and Israel? Where does that fit into the picture? Israel is not calling for any sanctions against South Africa." So it appears to us that the forces of international subversion, masquerading behind the United Nations, will still have to rely upon their intensified psychological warfare, of which trade, economic, and sporting sanctions are but a part. If the Afrikaaner has the will to stick it out, then what is happening amid the Australian Opposition, by way of fragmentation, could be repeated, greatly, elsewhere in the Western world. A distinct danger for our enemies. Time is not on their side. Time is on our side.

PROMOTING RACIAL DISCONTENT

DILUTING PATRIOTISM

We have more than once wondered what on earth would be our position, with respect to the United Nations Convention or Declaration against racial intolerance and discrimination, if another war suddenly broke out. Would Al Grassby wave an admonishing finger at us, if we called the nationals who dropped a nuclear bomb on us a nasty name, with racial overtones? We know we must not use language, which could incite racial hatred and intolerance if another race of people invaded our shores with tanks and other weapons of destruction. But perhaps our political masters would repeal the Racial Discrimination Act, but only for the duration. We could, lawfully, then let fly some racial expletives, whilst Al Grassby sulked in the background.

But this isn't all as silly as it seems! In The Thirteenth Power, by Major-General Richard Hilton, D.S.O., N.C., D.F.C., he observed: "It will be very much easier, when the time comes to force World Government upon mankind, to shepherd into the vast pen people without strong patriotic instincts, than people who still possess them. It will take many generations before the breast of a citizen of N.A.T.O. will swell with pride just because he is a citizen of N.A.T.O...."
Did someone just say that one of the effects of multiculturalism would be to break down patriotism? To make it easier for World Government?

BRIEF COMMENTS

Treasurer Paul Keating is actively engaged in conditioning Australians for a hard budget.
One press headline reads AUSTRALIANS MUST CUT LIVING STANDARDS. The story is by one of Australia's numerous economists. He does not explain why Australians must accept lower living standards. A fall in living standards would be understandable if there was a growing shortage of food, clothing, building materials, furniture, necessary household equipment, heating and power. If there are any shortages then why aren't the unemployed used to overcome those shortages? There is nothing wrong with the system of private ownership, and free competitive enterprise. But much is wrong with a financial policy, which disputes reality. And there is also something wrong with economists and Federal Treasurers who deny reality, have been brainwashed, or are too frightened to tell the truth. The situation will only change when enough commonsense Australians say they want access to the real world of plenty.

In his 1934 Melbourne Town Hall address, The Monopolistic Idea, C. H. Douglas warned that growing centralisation in industry and commerce was not the result of any natural law, but the result of financial manipulation. Amalgamations and takeovers have now become almost a way of life, with the will-to-power dominant. Coles is currently attempting to take over Myer, one report stating that it is proposed to borrow $800 million from the Bank of America in order to achieve this objective. What will be the end result of such a takeover? Will consumers obtain better service, higher quality production at lower prices, or any other tangible benefit? Will the lot of those employed in a super chain store improve? The answer to these, and similar questions, is NO. The Fabian Socialists have always regarded the programme of amalgamations as an essential development for the establishment of the centrally planned State. That is why the Fabians have never attacked debt finance.

BRIEF COMMENTS

MURPHY AGAIN

Even the Financial Review (July 15th) has its say on the Murphy affair. It, also, takes the position that regardless of the outcome of any future appeal, after a sentencing, "he (Justice Murphy) should resolve the issue quickly and cleanly by retiring with those eulogies (from friends) echoing in his ears".

A Coffs Harbour actionist (N.S.W.) sends us a clipping from the Daily Telegraph (Sydney, July 24th) having an item from journalist, Peter Hocking, in Broken Hill, N.S.W.:
"A group of tribal elders has slammed land rights activists within the aboriginal race for making claims to land white people have worked for years. "The group's view is that 'when it comes to claiming sacred sites, most of them would not know a sacred site from a molehill'. "Ten members of the Barkandji tribe, most of them women and eight of them over 60 years of age, made their criticism in a letter to a weekly newsletter printed at Wilcannia Public School, in far western N.S.W. "They said that once they had been made welcome by property owners - but we're now looked on with suspicion because of the activities of land rights activists and their advisers.
Their letter said: 'The men and women of the land councils are not interested in helping their own so-called people, only themselves. 'Most people have no say in matters of interest. 'They only do what they want to do, and we are left with whatever they believe is best for us."

LAND RIGHTS PLOT

LOCAL GOVERNMENT AMALGAMATIONS