Flag of the Commonwealth of Australia
Christian based service movement warning about threats to rights and freedom irrespective of the label.
"All that is necessary for the triumph of evil is that good men do nothing"
Edmund Burke
Flag of the Commonwealth of Australia
Home blog.alor.org Newtimes Survey The Cross-Roads Library
OnTarget Archives The Social Crediter Archives NewTimes Survey Archives Brighteon Video Channel Veritas Books

On Target

2 December 1988. Thought for the Week: "Our doubts are traitors, And make us lose the good we oft might win, By fearing to attempt."


Eric Butler reports from Toronto, Canada. This report is being written on the eve of leaving for London.
The multicultural faddists continue to hold Canada up as a shining example of the success of their theories. There was a time when Toronto was the biggest Anglo-Saxon city on the North American continent. A current projection shows that by the year 2000 the Anglo-Saxons could be a minority of 10 percent. The character of Toronto has changed dramatically, with a flood of West Indians and other non-Europeans. The police battle with a rising crime rate, but are not supposed to mention that non-Europeans dominate in the field of violent crime.

During a series of meetings in Ontario, I was made aware of the rising concern of the English-speaking majority of the threat of compulsory bi-lingualism. The policy first introduced by Fabian Socialist Pierre Elliott Trudeau. There is a rising tide of anger, particularly when in Quebec there is a policy of uni-lingualism with the English speaking 20 percent being blatantly discriminated against. Now comes the harebrained suggestion in Ontario that where there are at least 25 people of any cultural background, they should be entitled to instruction in their own language. It is estimated that there could be at least 50 or more groups entitled to such instruction!

It has been a sight to behold as the political parties spend large sums of money to buy tickets for West Indians, East Indians and others to bus them in to party nomination rallies. Some of these people are standing as candidates with the veiled suggestion that they see parliament as a means of increasing their own group's influence. A recent decision of the Ontario Court of Appeal, has resulted in Ontario Education Minister ordering that the Province's public schools will only be allowed to begin each day with The Lord's Prayer if accompanied by teachings from other religions. This decision is designed to reflect the reality of the multicultural society. Jewish pressure has been applied in the United States for years against any Christian influence in the public school system.

Canadian ex-servicemen have been shocked by a Department of Veteran Affairs instruction that the traditional white crosses should not he used at any Remembrance Day services in centres operated by government. The ruling follows complaints that the cross might offend certain "religious sensibilities". This is another way of saying that there had been Jewish complaints about the use of the traditional Christian cross. Some Canadian Legion representatives have complained, but as some of its own Members point out, Legion leadership "sold the pass" over twenty years ago when they agreed to have the Union Jack with its three Christian Crosses taken out of the Canadian Red Ensign. However, at long last Canadian Christians of all kinds are beginning to realise that Christian Canada is finished unless they pull together against their common enemy.


"The House of Representatives' Legal and Constitutional Affairs Committee is examining the League of Rights. It seems there is concern about where the League gets its money. - John Hyde, in The Weekend Australian, November 26-27.

According to Mr. Hyde, the "enquiry" is already proceeding: we are hearing a variety of different, and differing, reports, but the number of articulate commentators who deplore the very notion of any "enquiry" into a legal, law abiding body, however "controversial", is growing. All agree that there is a gross abuse of parliamentary power taking place. All agree, "the League of Rights today, then who tomorrow?" A most dangerous precedent, which could even, be turned back on today's eager "enquires" by some future government. The precedent is there.

Mr. Hyde thanks the League of Rights for introducing him to the important book, "The Road to Serfdom", by Professor F.A.Hayek, which deals, among other matters, with the abuse of political power. Mr. Hyde reminds us that the power to "discipline" so-called divisive groups is a worse "evil" than the divisive groups themselves. Divisive groups should be tolerated, in a democracy. That's the line adopted by Mr. Hyde, and we agree that this is fair enough. Of course, who is to say what groups are divisive? That's another question. How about the "multicultural society"? That's not divisive, we suppose. What about the demonstrating Macedonians and Croats over the past few days. What about the Yugoslav boy being shot outside a Yugoslav Consulate in Sydney. Is all this senator Ray's idea of perfect racial harmony? The multicultural society is, for one thing, bringing into Australia many of the hatreds and tensions from Europe that has existed for centuries. What idiocies are perpetrated by politicians!


In the last issue of On Target (November 25th) Eric D. Butler, in his report from Canada referred to the Leuchter Report as a "historic document": and indeed it is. Mr. Butler mentioned that it was the Leuchter Report, which convinced British historian David Irving, that the Holocaust is a hoax: the mass gassings could not have possibly occurred. We have before us a copy of the Leuchter Report, which it may be possible for us to make available to supporters, in due course.

There is an "Introduction" by Dr. Robert Faurisson, the internationally known French revisionist historian. The full title of the Report is - The Leuchter Report (The End of a Myth): "An Engineering Report on the Alleged Execution Gas Chambers At Auschwitz, Birkenau and Majdenek, Poland." We can merely cull some relevant extracts from the Report (the full Report runs to 192 pages): "Summaries" could possibly be made available. Dr. Faurisson writes in his introduction:
"Fred A. Leuchter, 45, is an engineer living in Boston, Massachusetts, who specialises in the design and fabrication of execution hardware throughout the United States. One of his major projects was the design of a new gas chamber at the Missouri State Penitentiary at Jefferson City… "I decided to ask (Fred Leuchter) to prepare an expert opinion on the alleged gas chambers in Auschwitz, Birkenau, and Majdenek.

Synopsis and Findings
After a study of the available literature, examination and evaluation of the existing facilities at Auschwitz, Birkenau, and Majdenek, with expert knowledge of the design criteria for gas chamber operation, an investigation of crematory technology and an inspection of modern crematories, the author finds no evidence that any of the facilities normally alleged to be execution gas chambers were ever used as such, and finds, further, that because of the design and fabrication of these facilities, they could not have been utilised for execution gas chambers. Additionally, an evaluation of the crematory facilities produces conclusive evidence that contradicts the alleged volume of corpses cremated in the generally alleged time frame. It is, therefore, the best engineering opinion of the author that none of the facilities examined were ever utilised for the execution of human beings and that the crematories could never have supported the alleged work load attributed to them...."

The procedures involved in the study and forensic analysis that resulted in the report were as follows:
1) A general background study of the available material.
2) An on-site inspection and forensic examination of the facilities in question which included the taking of physical data (measurements and construction information) and a considered removal of physical sample material (brick and mortar) which was returned to the United States for chemical analysis.
3) A consideration of recorded and visual (on site) logistic data.
4) A compilation of the acquired data.
5) An analysis of the acquired information and comparison of this information with known and proven design, procedural and logistic information and requirements for the design, fabrication, and operation of actual gas chambers and crematories.
6) A consideration of the chemical analysis of the materials acquired on site.
7) Conclusions based on the acquired evidence."

After reviewing all of the material and inspecting all of the sites at Auschwitz, Birkenau and Majdenek, your author finds the evidence as overwhelming. There were no execution chambers at any of these locations. It is the best engineering opinion of this author that the alleged gas chambers at the inspected sites could not have then been, or now, be utilised or seriously considered to function as execution gas chambers.
"Prepared this 5th day of April, 1988 at Malden, Massachusetts. Fred Leutcher Associates. (signed) Fred A. Leuchter, Jnr., Chief Engineer.


The Asian Studies Council (Chairman, Dr. Stephen Fitzgerald, former Australian Ambassador to China) is telling us that we must "go" Asian. The Australian education system is no good (we agree with him, but most probably not for the same reasons.... O.T.) We are in the Asian region of the world, we must learn Asian languages, Asian history, Asian this, and Asian that. Please don't mention that "shudder word", British. All the rest of it: "Asian Dynamos", huge Asian markets to be exploited by us, etc., etc. We've already mentioned in these pages that the "Asian Dynamos" could collapse overnight.


The following letter has been sent to the Editor of The Age (Melbourne) by John Bennett, President of the Australian Civil Liberties Union. It has not been published, to our knowledge (we would be surprised to see its publication...O.T.)

"Comments by T.Levy, the Chairman of the B'nai B'rith Defamation Commission (Age, 12/11/88) on the unprecedented decision to investigate a pressure group disliked by the Zionist lobby, draws attention to the threat to freedom of speech and freedom of information posed by the lobby, which represents a section of 0.5% of the population. "The power of the Zionist lobby in Australia is reflected in the introduction of a Holocaust kit and pro-Israel propaganda in N.S.W. schools, the suspension of Paul Madigan from Radio 3RRR, legislation in N.S.W. to limit freedom of speech, concessions in relation to dual nationality and taxation of pensions, changes in autopsy laws, an investigation of the League of Rights, the exclusion of PLO spokesmen from Australia, the cancelling of a UN Conference in Australia because one speaker would have been a PLO representative, and the pulping of a 'survival kit' for students because it described Hitler as cruel and evil but also said he was popular in Germany. The power of the lobby is also reflected in the exclusion of the views of people, querying the extent of the Jewish Holocaust, from the media, the spreading of disinformation about its critics, which is uncritically accepted by most of the media, and the ready access to politicians and the media by Zionist leaders.
"The passage of a unanimous resolution by the Senate accepting the official version of the Holocaust (the only resolution about 'history' ever passed by the Senate), a unanimous resolution by Parliament rejecting the finding by the United Nations that Zionism is racism, the abolition of a Monash University funding committee because it proposed funding an inquiry into Palestinian rights, and the acceptance by the media of a largely mythical Libyan threat in the Pacific, are further illustrations of the power of the Zionist lobby in Australia.
"The power of the Zionist lobby is due to its wealth (8 of the 20 wealthiest people in Australia are Zionist Jews), the ready access by Zionists such as Sir Peter Abeles, Isi Liebler, Neville Norman, and David Block - to Mr. Hawke, and guilt induced by constant references, in the media to the Jewish holocaust (other and greater holocausts) such as the Ukrainian holocaust are ignored. "It is difficult to think of anything important to the Zionist lobby it has failed to achieve. But it may have overplayed its hand in its vendetta against alleged war criminals, and the use of a Parliamentary committee to interrogate its critics."


"V. Guppy" of Lower Templestowe (Melb. suburb) in The Herald (Melbourne), November 21st:
"The Government has introduced legislation that could well have Australian ex-servicemen charged for acts of war while in the process of defending Australia against an enemy. "The M.P.s responsible would not have been old enough to be servicemen during World War II, yet they support this despicable legislation. "It is so wrong that people, who live freely because our ex-servicemen fought for and won that freedom, can place even one ex-serviceman under threat. "The Japanese meant to beat Australia in that war and our Army, Navy, and Air Force went into battle to preserve this country for Australians. "Those servicemen deserve medals and our eternal gratitude, not destruction by retrospective legislation..."


In The Australian, November 22nd, appears this letter from Sir Brian Murray, Former Governor of Victoria, who was levered from office by the Victorian Fabians, headed by John Cain, Premier of Victoria (again) - because of the miserable disarray of the so-called conservatives, headed by Mr. Jeff Kennett, of the Victorian Liberal Party. Sir Brian writes:
"As a former member of Kanga Force, I should like to pay my personal tribute to the survivors of the R.A.A.F. Beaufighter crews who fought in the Battle of the Bismark Sea. Had the Japanese succeeded in landing these reinforcements, Kanga Force, already heavily outnumbered and wholly dependent upon tenuous air supply across the Owen Stanleys, would have faced a very bleak future indeed. Sinking the convoy was a legitimate act of war. To bomb and strafe the garrison which they were joining was also a legitimate act of war. But the academic lawyers apparently argue that an enemy who has not surrended should be granted immunity from further attack until he has reinforced an enemy garrison. The Beaufighter crews who prevented Japanese reinforcements reaching Lae are, in the view of those academics, 'probably guilty of murder.' If this is correct interpretation of the Government's war crimes legislation, then a poddy calf could win the next Federal election - provided it did not have A.L.P. endorsement...


In The Sun (Melbourne), November 22nd, "Agent Nicolas" of Huntingdale (Melb. suburb) puts his views on "war crimes'':
"I confess to being a war criminal. However, I will not be tried, as luckily we won the war. "Between 1942 and 1944, as a British officer I was parachuted into France to organise the Resistance. "I was responsible for blowing up bridges, trains full of German soldiers, etc. "A hero to the French, to the Germans I was a terrorist. "In 1945 in Burma, I continued my crimes against the Japanese. "Had we lost the war I would have been executed as a war criminal, together with Winston Churchill, Nancy Wake, Odette and hundreds of others. "For many of the war criminals now being investigated in Australia, their only crimes were, first, obeying orders, and, second, losing the war…"


"Geoff Barnard" of Greenborough (Melbourne suburb) has this to say in The Herald (Melbourne), November 22nd. Sir Marcus Oliphant, distinguished Australian scientist, and former Governor of South Australia, also put forward the concept of the limitation of the terms of office of Australian politicians:
"Soviet leader Mr. Gorbachev has set himself the mighty task of revitalising the long established Soviet system of government that has proved itself so inefficient in his country. He wants to limit to two terms the people who occupy the country's decision making body to eliminate the stultification and entrenched inefficiency that accompanies established power over the years. We could gain a great deal if we introduced a similar limitation on our own politicians. Each election time we re-shuffle the same pack of largely ineffectual party hacks when what we urgently need is an influx of new thought into our parliaments. Most of our M.P.s are more concerned with holding on to their seats than they are with the national well-being because the size of their over-generous superannuation packages depends on the number of parliamentary terms that they serve. An M.P, who hasn't injected any original thinking into a parliament in two terms is not worth keeping. He's only part of the numbers game that determines which party will govern and that role could be carried out by the most limited intellect."


"Frank Connolly" of Thorneside, Queensland, in The Australian 25/11comments on the War Crimes Trials (that may come). There is - even at this late hour - a shred of hope that the insanity will be defeated:
"The pursuit of war criminals is not supposed to turn up malefactors on our own side. It is supposed to punish survivors of the other side, who wore repugnant labels. What will the vigilantes do when Father Time finally wipes the last name and number from World War II's slate? Prosecute the great- grandchildren?"
© Published by the Australian League of Rights, P.O. Box 27 Happy Valley, SA 5159