|Home||blog.alor.org||Newtimes Survey||The Cross-Roads||Library|
|OnTarget Archives||The Social Crediter Archives||NewTimes Survey Archives||Brighteon Video Channel||Veritas Books|
23 March 1989. Thought for the Week: "There can be no doubt that the subject of Finance is, in many cases, guarded by Black Magic. Intrinsically, nothing could be simpler. You bake a loaf of bread; you give someone a white pebble; next day the white pebble is offered to you, and you accept it in exchange for the loaf, and everyone is happy. A more complex system is demanded by a more complex economy, but the fundamental principle that money ought to be simply an accounting, demand system never changes, but is never observed."
C.H. Douglas, 1949
THE GREAT BANKING RIP OFF
The banking system of Australia consists of a group of extremely privileged institutions, which have been authorised by the Federal Government to create and administer the financial credit of Australia. As witnessed by the enormous profits declared by the banking institutions, banking is an extremely profitable service industry, much more so than those who grow and create real wealth. While the media carries reports on never ending bankruptcies among those engaged in operating the economy, there is no suggestion that any of the banks are likely to be threatened by Bankruptcy.
In view of their privileged position, it would be reasonable to expect the banks to at least attempt to create the impression that they are adopting a conservative policy during a period, which is becoming increasingly difficult for the great majority of the Australian people. But no sooner had the latest current account deficit been announced than the banks were falling over one another to push interest rates still higher, with housing loans soaring to 16 percent. The higher interest rates will add payments of $30 a month on a mortgage of $75,000. Not surprisingly, homeowners are loud in their protests, stressing that it has become increasingly imperative for families to have two incomes.
The major thrust of present financial policies is against the traditional family. Having children is regarded by many as a luxury they cannot afford. But before placing all the blame on the trading banks for the escalating interest rates, it must be stressed that these rates have the full support of the Reserve Bank, whose policies are in fact used to justify the increased rates. The Australian of March 11th carries the following headline on the front page: "RESERVE IS TELLING BANKS TO LIFT RATES".
The story, which follows, written by Laura Tingle, starts: "The Reserve Bank has resorted to telling major trading banks directly to lift interest rates on housing and business loans because it believes rates set in the deregulated financial system are not going up fast enough." Laura Tingle says that the Reserve Bank has been ringing the major trading banks, urging them to lift interest rates.
According to the Federal Constitution, the Federal Government is responsible for monetary policy. Only recently Treasurer Paul Keating claimed that the banks did what he wanted. If this is the case, then Mr. Paul Keating must take full responsibility for the high interest rates. But in an attempt to minimise the political backlash from high interest rates, both Paul Keating and Prime Minister Hawke are attempting to create the impression that these rates are the result of "market forces" over which they have little control.
Mr. Hawke says that interest rates had increased about 7 percent in the past 12 months - "about in line with the general increase in the cost of living". Mr. Hawke does not point out that higher interest rates reduce the standard of living still further for the home buyer, while higher interest rates for industry are an added cost which must, if possible, be recovered through higher prices. Treasurer Paul Keating says that higher interest rates would remain "for several months" - "to cool excessive demand".
The practitioners of black magic would have Australians believe that the economy is "overheated" - whatever that means - and that higher interest rates are necessary to "cool" the economy.
The world's greatest Treasurer, whose predictions have been proved consistently wrong - remember how last year Keating was projecting a reduction in the inflation rate to 4 percent - says that "the policy settings we have now will mean that interest rates will only be at these levels so long as necessary and for the shortest possible time before we start moderating economic activity". Australians are not told what type of economic activity, and why it is excessive.
The true purpose of a production system is consumption, and production should be dictated by the individual using his own money "votes". But for reasons, which have been outlined in League literature, debt financing makes it mathematically certain that inflation is permanent. High interest rates only make the situation worse. Financial credit could be made available for housing and every other form of essential production at an interest rate as low as 3-4 percent. And the banking system would continue to make adequate profits.
Events have overtaken the Hawke-Keating strategy. There are even greater disasters ahead. Not even Keating's media minders are able any longer to disguise the fact that Keating has been misleading the Australian people for six years. But, unfortunately, there is no evidence that a Howard-Sinclair Government would do other than make the position worse. John Howard is firmly in the grip of the Black Magic of financial orthodoxy. Australia's future depends upon enough Australians freeing themselves from the Black Magic. The widest possible distribution of The Money Trick ($6.00 posted from all League addresses) would assist.
At a time when every industrialised nation
in the world, including South Korea, is attempting to make
their economies work by bigger and better "export" drives,
designed to achieve the "favourable trade balance", Prime
Minister Hawke exhorts the Australian people "to respond flexibly
to global market development and to demonstrate a willingness
to adapt to the rapid pace of technological change". Making
use of the current jargonese, Mr. Hawke said the Government
was committed to something known as "micro-economic reform",
also known as "restructuring". Mr. Hawke cited what he called
the Button steel plan under which the government, unions and
BHP had "together rescued the steel industry..." Unfortunately
for Mr. Hawke, the Government Bureau of Industrial Economics,
in a recent report, said that government policies had little
effect on the steel industry, with one of its main planks,
price restraint - actually reducing profitability from 1984
Remember that myth about the Reagan administration solving the inflation problem in the U.S.A.? Well, a series of record deficit budgets made it certain that inflation would continue, and increase. Mr. Alan Greenspan, chairman of the U.S.A. Federal Reserve Board, announced last week that the central bank would not be deterred from its policy of gradually pushing up interest rates "to fight inflation". Not surprisingly, many see major disasters ahead for the U.S.A. There can be no genuine stability under debt finance, heavy taxation and high interest rates.
Commenting on the decision by the Freemasons' Hospital, Melbourne, to refuse to handle AIDS patients, Dr. Alvis Kucers, director of medical services at the Fairfield, Melbourne, infectious diseases hospital, says that "The good thing about the Freemasons banning patients with AIDS is that it has evoked long overdue discussion of the infection risk through normal hospital practices". Since the Freemasons' decision, some of Australia's leading surgeons have publicly spoken out about the risks they take in operating on people with AIDS. At long last some reality is taking over on the subject of AIDS, with the "gay" lobby being forced on to the defensive.
Gorbachev and his colleagues have introduced a drastic new farm programme, with stress on private ownership and personal initiative, in an attempt to help overcome the Soviet's critical food situation. It is ironic that while the Communist nations are trying to revert back to traditional farming, the West is moving in the opposite direction, phasing out the family farm in favour of corporation farming. The overall food situation for the world is extremely critical and is one of the basic issues confronting the whole world.
We note that John Howard, at the Liberal Party's State (Vic.) Council Meeting, confirmed that the next Coalition Government will sell off Qantas, Australian Airlines, the Commonwealth Bank, and "communication enterprises". Qantas is our national airline, and has a proud record. Should it go in the scraping of the national asset barrel? Australian Airlines (the old T.A.A.)? Perhaps a case could be made for that. But the Commonwealth Bank? Arguably the only all-Australian financial body left to implement all Australian financial policy. We oppose the sacrifice of the Commonwealth Bank. What are "communications enterprises"?
FROM HANSARDOctober 12th, '88. Appropriation Bill (1) '88-'89. Mr. A. Webster (Lib. - Macquarie):
Everyday when we come in here, Madam Speaker says a prayer seeking guidance. I know the Minister is very well aware of the scriptural injunction that we take special care of widows, and they do not get some pre-eminence in the care that we, as people, as governments, exercise. It is important to say that because that responsibility does not stop when we come in the front door of this place; it becomes a great reality when we legislate here for our fellow humans. I urge the Minister to look not at some marginal lift in the wage benefit cut off point but at a significant boost to the amount a widow can earn before she loses benefits. At present she can earn $40 and I believe one of the serious deficiencies in this system is that widows, who have great family responsibilities, and many of them are very young, are being forced out into the cash economy. In fact, this is forcing them into engaging in criminal activities. If they earn cash in excess of that $40 that is not accountable they are engaging in a criminal activity. We must look hard at this concept of raising the threshold, particularly for widows, for the earnings they can receive before their pensions are reduced or removed.
"The second matter I raise concerns the need to ensure that increased disposable income for low and average income families is achieved through less taxation rather than greater dependence on government benefits. One of the classic works of liberalism is the book, "The Servile State". I am sure the Minister, who is widely read in these matters, will have read it. It warns against the development of a society characterised by utter dependence on the State for income security - a fairly serious warning. There is no doubt that our welfare system needs the mechanisms of redistribution and targeting for a good many people who are unable to care for themselves or their families in times of difficulties. We know that. Nevertheless, I must say that I find it dangerous that real improvements in disposable income have come to many working families from welfare payments when they could have and should have been achieved by tax cuts.
"Getting a person a job and then letting him keep his earnings, rewarding self-reliance, minimising reliance on the State - these should be the key social objectives. It is neither good for the individual nor prudent politically constantly to increase the level of reliance on the State for income security. I put the point that real improvements in disposable income and living standards should come as far as possible - I know it cannot be done in every instance - from tax cuts. That is, increased disposable income can and must come from the State getting off the worker's back as far as possible. There is a lot of room for this to be done in this portfolio.
"I raise the question, therefore, of whether the Government can review its social justice strategy with a view to giving welfare payments less of a role in future growth in disposable income for low and average income earners: it is better for self-esteem if a person is able to live off the income that he or she receives with reduced taxation rather than to have a taxed income and have it supplemented by benefits from taxation. I suggest that the Government shift the balance of tax to tax cuts, which produce independence as well as improved living standards..."
FABIAN SOCIETY FEARThis letter, over the name of "Len G. Pietsch", was published in The Yass Post (N.S.W.), March 6th:
"Madam: In the October 1987 Edition of the 'Fabian Newsletter', the following was written under the sub-heading:
'ABOUT THE AUSTRALIAN FABIAN SOCIETY'.
"'The Fabian tradition is one of achieving social progress through research and education. "'Edward Pease, Frank Podmore and Hubert Bland began it in London in 1884, and were joined shortly afterwards by Bernard Shaw and Sidney Webb. "'Other prominent Fabians included Beatrice Webb, Edith Nesbitt, Margret Cole, G.D.H. Cole and H.G. Wells.
"'Generations of Fabians have placed its stamp on every facet of British and American society. Gough Whitlam adopted the Fabian approach from the day he entered Parliament, and the seminal 1972 Whitlam policy speech was the drawing together of twenty years of systematic Fabian planning and research. Arthur Calwell before him was always proud to call himself a Fabian, and the tradition has been carried on through Bill Hayden, Bob Hawke, John Cain, John Bannon, Bob Carr and Neville Wran. The present leader of the British Labor Party, Neil Kinnock, is a Fabian, as were before him, Michael Foot, Harold Wilson, Hugh Gaitskell and Clement Attlee.
Australia had its first Fabian Society as early as 1891, and 1947 saw the establishment of the Victorian Fabian Society, which became the Australian Fabian Society in 1984. The Australian Fabian Society, with more than 1,000 members drawn from every State and Territory, is the largest Fabian body ever to exist outside of Britain itself.'
"The Fabian Society that Mr. Hawke and many of his Cabinet Ministers and associates so proudly proclaim was formally launched in 1884 by a group of mischievous and resentful men and women, who took exception to ordinary enterprising people becoming self-sufficient and self-supporting during the then new and booming Industrial Era.
"The philosophy of the Fabian Society was written in 1887, and each member is obliged to support it. "It reads ... 'It (Fabian Society) therefore aims at the re-organisation of society by the emancipation of land and industrial Capital from individual and class ownership ... The Society accordingly works for the extinction of private property in land '
"The Fabian Society acknowledges the principal tenet of Marxism; the abolition of private property, in this case, the right to own land. "They then align themselves with the non-violent arm of Marxism by accepting the non-violent road of patient gradualism to achieve total government. "The Australian Fabian Society held its 100th anniversary banquet in Melbourne in 1984, at which the Prime Minister, Mr. Bob Hawke, as guest speaker, boldly proclaimed that the entire strategy of his Government is based on the Fabian plan.
"The members of the Australian Fabian Society are not the fair-minded and respectable people they prefer to present themselves "
|© Published by the Australian League of Rights, P.O. Box 27 Happy Valley, SA 5159|