Science of the Social Credit Measured in Terms of Human Satisfaction
Christian based service movement warning about threats to rights and freedom irrespective of the label, Science of the Social Credit Measured in Terms of Human Satisfaction
"All that is necessary for the triumph of evil is that good men do nothing"
Edmund Burke
Science of the Social Credit Measured in Terms of Human Satisfaction
Home Blog Freedom Potentials The Cross Roads Veritas Books
OnTarget Archives Newtimes Survey Podcast Library Video Library PDF Library
Actionist Corner YouTube Video Channel BitChute Video Channel Brighteon Video Channel Social Credit Library

On Target

17 August 1990. Thought for the Week: "Yet science and technology have become ends in themselves and increasingly the very idea of progress becomes identified with the now self-sustaining and largely meaningless expansion of a technology which has subordinated science to its own indefinite ends, and displaced spiritual values in favour of economic indices. The end of Man is no longer ultimate union with God, but the part he plays in the expansion of the gross national product. All this is simply a reversion to a new but complex and highly dangerous barbarism."
Dr. B.W. Monahan, in The Moving Storm (1969)


"On the surface, the issues involved in the Middle East crisis are almost transparently simple. In reality, they are immensely complex, more riddled with subtleties and ambiguities than any war-or-peace challenge Australia ever faced." - Peter Robinson, "Candid Comment", The Sun-Herald (Sydney), 12/8

Firstly, what of Prime Minister Hawke's (hasty?!) decision to send Australian war vessels to the aid of the United States in the latter's intervention in the Arabian Gulf imbroglio? Did he act without consultation with Cabinet? He probably did. Senator Evans, Foreign Minister, has quickly come to Mr. Hawke's aid by announcing that the Prime Minister "consulted with some of his senior ministers" before making his decision. Perhaps he did; but that isn't consulting Cabinet. The Labor Left is against sending naval vessels to the Gulf; indeed, we are confident they don't want Australia to become involved at all. The position of the Australian Democrats is similar, unless U.N. backed.

On current information, the United States is acting on its own initiative; it is not, as yet, a United Nations exercise. Indeed, we are compelled to agree with Mr. Robinson when he observes, "The Prime Minister's decision to commit Australian naval forces to the Arabian Gulf 'peacekeeping' effort was no doubt taken after some considerable agonising, but it is one he - and we - may come to regret." Further, he says, "But why we should be among the first nations to volunteer the commitment of our limited military strength to assist the U.S. in its oil based strategies is difficult to understand."

Why us? There appear to be adequate Western forces in the Gulf area, and the U.S. is sharply strengthening its forces, virtually by the day. In addition, there are escalating British and French military forces there, also. Why our small naval force from the other side of the world? We are not getting the full story on the present threatened Gulf hostilities. What is the position of Israel? Israel seems to be almost distancing herself from the imbroglio. Shamir is talking tough, saying that any attack on Israel will meet with maximum response; but that Israel wants peace. This remains to be seen: there are some very hawkish political and military identities in Israel.

However, we can observe that Australia's position is extremely vulnerable whilst dependent on oil from overseas. We are, we believe, 80% self-sufficient in oil now: we should make it 100%, urgently. Why, exactly, should we be paying more for oil, at the bowser, now? Have the costs escalated sharply in the last week or so? We have read that the Federal Government will reap a bonanza in increased oil revenue: we don't expect the Government to be making desperate efforts to keep the price of petrol-at-pump down. Finally, we could observe that one of the roles of Israel has been that of an irritant in Middle Eastern affairs. The traditional pro-British Arab regimes through the Middle East have been alienated, and we are paying the price.


We have, from time to time, been questioned by supporters who are apprehensive concerning the viability of' the State Bank of Victoria, in lieu of the Victorian Pyramid Building Society collapse. Some few people seem to have convinced themselves that the State Bank of Victoria, and even other State Banks, could collapse. Some are claiming that the State Banks are not guaranteed by their respective governments. Well, we have sighted an official letter from the Secretary of the Reserve Bank of Australia on this very issue. In the letter he states that the liabilities of the State Bank of Victoria (S.B.V.) are guaranteed by the Government of Victoria. The guarantee is documented in Sections 40 and 41 of the State Bank Act, 1988.

The State Bank of Victoria is established under specific legislation of the State of Victoria. State banks are not generally subject to the Banking Act, 1959, which provides the legislative backing to the Reserve Bank's supervisory role. The Reserve Bank of Australia and the Government of Victoria have recently reached an understanding about the future prudential supervision of S.B.V. The Government of Victoria has agreed that the State Bank of Victoria will meet all the Reserve Bank of Australia's prudential standards. In return, the Reserve Bank of Australia will exercise prudential supervision over the State Bank of Victoria in the same way it does for banks authorised under Commonwealth legislation.

The "R.B.A." will also meet from time to time with representatives of the Government of Victoria and the Board of the State Bank of Victoria to discuss matters arising from its prudential supervision. The Reserve Bank of Australia is able to make discretionary support available to banks authorised under the Banking Act, 1959, or to State banks (our emphasis). The Reserve Bank of Australia's response to calls for support from any bank would be based on the need, at the time, to maintain financial stability, and confidence in the financial system generally. To us, this puts the matter of the viability of State Banks, in particular, beyond any doubt.


Committee to advise the Attorney General on Racial Vilification. There is a proposal to set up laws against "racial vilification" in Victoria. We, ourselves, do not believe that it is possible to legislate on attitudes, and that an attempt to do such will actually increase and fan hostility, where the former freedom of speech kept such at a tolerable level. To its credit, the Victorian State Government booklet on "Racial Vilification in Victoria" does set out the arguments against such laws; they are:
1) There is no evidence that allowing the expression of racist sentiments causes racial violence. Freedom of speech is an important civil right, and should not be restricted unless it can be clearly demonstrated that the restriction will prevent serious harm being caused.
2) A racial vilification law will suppress the discussion of certain issues, which are of legitimate public interest and should be openly debated, such as immigration policy.
3) A racial vilification law will not change the views of racists - attitudes are changed by debate and education, not by laws.
4) Suppressing the expression of racist views could drive racists underground, where their activities would be even more dangerous.
5) Prosecuting racists for breaking the law would allow them to use the courts as a platform from which to gain publicity for their views, and make martyrs of themselves.

Victorian supporters who do not want to see "vilification laws", based on race, introduced, should send their notice of disapproval to: "Committee to advise the Attorney General on Racial Vilification", 232 Victoria Parade, East Melbourne, 3002. Phone number is (03) 412 6229.


More on the Gulf crisis. A factor which could have unknown consequences in any actual "war" in that part of the world. The situation is different to what it was in 1973; military hardware has become much more technologically advanced since that time. For example, numbers of troops, would not be as important a factor, now; with the actual hostilities being fought with high-tech, push button hardware. Iraq, Israel and the U.S. have all this state-of-the-art technology.

The greenies are pushing too hard and too far. Latest awareness is that Australia cannot afford to insist on setting too tough environmental standards because of trade competition, says the Business Council of Australia. Naturally the Australian Conservation Foundation thinks this is awful, and its leader, Mr. Phillip Toyne, responds by saying that Australia cannot afford NOT to implement the most stringent environmental standards. So where do we go from there? The B.C.A. has asked the Treasurer, Paul Keating, to include in his forthcoming Budget the Provisions for business, generally, to allow environmental costs to be tax deductible. We don't like their chances.

Some "pearls" from Victoria's new Premier, Joan Kirner: "Let's get it clear. Everybody in the Labor Party is a socialist." "Socialists are people who believe in public planning, public ownership of goods to the extent that it is in the best interests of the community, social justice. All those are party platform."
Who decides what are the "best interests" of the community? Why, silly; the SOCIALISTS! And we have been assured (by the Fabians) that their Society is just a "debating group".


A Trafalgar (Vic.) actionist sends us the "Opinion" column from the Gippsland Times (10/7)." In England in the 1880s a group of educated people who, while believing in the theory and principals of communism, disagreed with the Lenin style military revolution. "The group adopted the name of 'Fabian' after a third century Roman general who never confronted the enemy in open battle but was victorious in many small battles, escaping after each successful foray. "The Fabians aim to achieve their objective by stealth.
"Our country's Federal Government has pushed Australia well down the road to socialism. "Most of the Government's Parliamentary members are Fabians, bent on removing the right of the individual to make his own decisions, removing an individual's sense of responsibility and tending to make people become dependent on the state.
"The number of Australians who now rely directly or indirectly on the government for their existence is an illustration of Fabian policies at work. "Also victims of the long-term Fabian plan are farmers, many of whom have been forced off the land in the past two or three years, the rapidly escalating number of small businesses going broke, all through high interest rates and tax impositions.
"The 1930s Fabian document 'Political and Economic Planning Movement' states '…whether we like it or not, and some will dislike it intensely, the individual manufacturer and farmer will be forced, by events, to submit to far-reaching changes in outlook and methods. What is required if, with only a view to equitable treatment of individuals, is transfer of large blocks of land, not necessarily all land but certainly a great proportion of it, into the hands of proposed corporations, public utility bodies and land trusts'.
"The government's promises of interest rates reductions, lower fuel prices, no capital gains tax, planting a billion trees, and other hollow promises, suggests that an engineered financial collapse is closer than many of us may like to think.
"While Fabians may believe in the Fabian philosophy, many do not believe it should apply to them. "A survey in Britain and America of several hundred Fabians in the 1960s revealed, with hardly an exception, all managed to live a high lifestyle through speculation, profit making or were high-salaried government employees. "Free thinking Australians need to expose Fabians for what they are and what they are going to do to our country."


from Gippsland Times, 31/7 "It is my view that it's tantamount to treason against the Australian public that we have a Fabianist group of politicians governing this country, for their own personal benefit, but not for the benefit of the people whom they should, by virtue of their commission, serve faithfully. "It is my opinion and that of many thinking Australians, that an intricate and malicious labyrinth of misinformation has been used to destroy the economy of the nation. "Total control of this country's resources, of funds, lands, oceans, and forests, has pawned our homeland's future, in the hands of traditional enemies of state.
"The history books may well record the Fabianists autonomous power to control the people, and that aim was achieved by formation of a Para-military style conservation corps, which limits the movements of the people; the tourist venues across Australia, and forces the proud Australian Military Forces to resort to asking conservation departments for permission to conduct exercises in their own territory. "They have achieved total, unequivocal jurisdiction over our financial institutions and businesses by manipulating interest rates to disadvantage the public and our community's business ventures.
"The latest coup attempted to assault the last vestige of Australians' rights, has seen the engineered sale of public assets, in the guise of privatisation. "Many are not aware that socialism is the intellectual's word for Communism, Marxist style. "It slipped so quietly by us and became law, a way of life, and the destruction of the future of our children.
"While apathy is the worst self inflicted enemy to face, even the unions members are annoyed with privatisation. "Unionists are sick and tired of assaults on their employers by the radical conservationists, serving the Fabianist elitists. "To bring us all back to realism, reason, and save this great country, we must insist on the Fabians' worst enemy….. referenda. "Then show government the people's will must be obeyed, not taken out of the Constitution." (Peter J. Mulheron, National Park Road, Loch Sport, Vic.)

from The Sun (Melbourne), 10/8. "If there is any confirmation needed as to the truth of the remarks of Bruce Ruxton re the history being taught in our schools, then the letter from M. Francis (July 30) on the benefits confirms it. I expect what is taught is correct, but it is what is conveniently forgotten which makes it a lie. "If confirmation is needed as to what will happen to the Australian way of life and our freedom, look what happened to Fiji. Indians multiplied at such a rate they now outvote the Fijians and it will happen here with the Asians. Racist? No, I do not dislike Asians. I just prefer my way of life and want my grandchildren to have it." (S.G. Harris, Narooma, N.S.W.)

© Published by the Australian League of Rights, P.O. Box 27 Happy Valley, SA 5159