|Home||blog.alor.org||Newtimes Survey||The Cross-Roads||Library|
|OnTarget Archives||The Social Crediter Archives||NewTimes Survey Archives||Brighteon Video Channel||Veritas Books|
10 December 1993. Thought for the Week: "Every country in the world is in debt to the financial system, and while it is in pawn for amounts which are ridiculously below the values which would be arrived at by the costing system, the holders of the mortgage are desirous of being repaid as quickly as possible, not with a view to the mortgage being released from debt, but with a view to the creation of fresh debts upon adequate security... the world is held in fee to a handful of financial manipulators, (and) it will not take you long to realise that, in fact, nearly all problems at the present time are bound up with the monopoly of credit"
C.H. Douglas, 1932
PRINCE CHARLES AND THE AUSTRALIAN MONARCHY
by David Thompson
But does this mean that the republican cause in Australia is lost? In our view it certainly does not. There are much more able and astute figures behind the campaign against the Crown than Mr. Keating. It means that in the present hiatus, the hard-line republicans behind the visible republican movement are regrouping, distancing the republic from Mr. Keating's eventual political demise, and revising their strategy for the destruction of the Australian Monarchy.
THE IMPORTANCE OF PRINCE CHARLES
What is required of those loyal to the Crown, is to take the initiative while the republican cause is in disarray, and demonstrate that loyalty during the Prince of Wales' visit. The Australian Heritage Society proposes to provide a lead in this, by taking out an advertisement welcoming Prince Charles, and re-affirming loyalty to the Crown in a prominent place in The Weekend Australian on January 22nd. The public will be invited to take part in this project, which can be duplicated in as many as possible other newspapers around the nation.
There is no doubt that Prince Charles is a central figure in the entire republican debate, even though protocol requires that he take little direct part in the debate. As the future King of Australia, however, even his indirect comments are significant. The Prince of Wales appears to be prepared to subject himself to whatever discipline is required to assume the throne, despite the unfortunate state of his marriage, and whatever constitutional complications this raises.
When he was in Australia in 1988, the Prince's address to the nation was inspirational. He said, "In two world wars, Australians fought wholeheartedly against intolerance and tyranny. They didn't just fight for the old Empire. They fought for freedom, which lasts, if it is looked after and nurtured..." In the British heritage of law, he said, "every family in this remarkable country has its rights protected and cherished.... The true celebration of this nation is its Constitution..."
In an earlier Royal Visit, in 1974, the Prince stated his views on the role of the Crown when addressing both Houses of Parliament in N.S.W.: "I also believe that the institution of Monarchy... is one of the strongest factors in a continuance of stable government."
With the ability to think for himself, and his sometimes-unorthodox ideas, Prince Charles would make no ordinary King. From the immense pressure under which he and his family have been placed, it is clear that Prince Charles is regarded as a threat to the further centralisation of power on a global scale. His support for French rural culture, under threat by the GATT negotiators, drew strong disfavour from the internationalists. Australia could yet be the key to the future of the monarchy throughout the British world. If the idea of monarchy dies in Australia, it is jeopardised everywhere. Let us take this opportunity to provide a right royal welcome for the Prince of Wales, and demonstrate support for the Crown itself.
The media have been full of dire warnings of
what will happen to the world unless at long last, after seven years
and tens of thousands of talks by a roving army of bureaucrats, the
"Uraguay Round" of GATT agreements is not signed by December 15th. While
the vital issue of agriculture has been highlighted, with the "selfish"
French being blamed if an agreement is not reached, this tends to mask
the fact that the GATT programme was designed to try to advance the
vision of a New Global Economic Order.
When a number of authorities warned that the
MABO affair could lead to violence and civil war in Australia, opponents
of, the Mabo Madness were accused of being "extremists" and, of course,
"racists". But we have never heard of Charles Perkins, former head of
the Department of Aboriginal Affairs, being described as a "racist"
- even though he once strongly criticised the policy of Asian immigration.
Now Mr. Perkins has joined with others who have criticised Prime Minister
Keating for helping to further the possibility of violence with his
call for black leaders to "knock down" opponents of his MABO legislation.
As Charles Perkins points out, echoing what people like Labor M.H.R.
Graeme Campbell have been saying, this is inciting violence against
the many Australians of Aboriginal background who are opposed to the
A study of the Zionist Jewish press makes it
clear that every effort is being made by the opponents of British historian
David Irving to keep him out of Australia, in blatant defiance of the
ruling in favour of Irving by the Federal Court. Clearly Immigration
Minister Nick Bolkus is attempting delaying tactics by refusing to respond
to Irving's application for a visa to visit Australia early next year.
The Australian Jewish News of December 3rd reports that the Australian
Institute of Polish Affairs has urged Bolkus to keep Irving out. Victorian
Premier Jeff Kennett has also been approached. Zionist leader Isi Leibler
has described the action by the Polish organisation as "most important
and highly appreciated".
Once again Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn warns the West, pointing out that Communism is far from dead in the former Soviet Union, that "In some republics, its institutional structures have survived in their entirety, while in all of them millions of Communist cadres remain in reserve, and its roots remain embedded in the consciousness and the daily life of the people". The election of Communists in Poland at the last election highlights Solzhenitsyn's warning. Western nations like Australia would be extremely foolish to link their future with nations of the former Soviet.
|© Published by the Australian League of Rights, P.O. Box 27 Happy Valley, SA 5159|