|Home||blog.alor.org||Newtimes Survey||The Cross-Roads||Library|
|OnTarget Archives||The Social Crediter Archives||NewTimes Survey Archives||Brighteon Video Channel||Veritas Books|
29 April 1994. Thought for the Week: "So long as the Crown is part of the Executive, it will be difficult for any elected government to act in a willful and high handed way in disregard of the law or the public interest unless it is prepared to expose itself as deliberately choosing to disregard the law and the public interest; and it will be impossible for any bureaucracy to do unobtrusively anything other than what Parliament has empowered it to do."
Sir Paul Hasluck (former Governor General) in "The Office of the Governor General
THE PRICE OF THE ASIAN SALVATION
Australians received another warning, about Prime Minister Keating's aspirations to become "part of Asia" last week, by the man who is credited with coining the phrase "white trash of Asia". Singapore's Lee Kwan Yew has again pointed out the philosophical and cultural differences between Asia and the West, and makes a subtle point about the rapidly rising Asian economic ascendancy.
His point is that if Australia wishes to become
involved with rising Asian wealth and influence, we shall find that
it will be on Asian terms, not on our own, as we have so far assumed.
In particular, Lee stressed the Asian attitude to the work ethic, which
he believes the West has largely lost, and Australia in particular has
downgraded, assuming that the "lucky country" is wealthy enough to carry
Lee again makes the point that some Asian standards place a higher priority upon stability and order than the Western worship of the system of "democracy" in solving all political and social problems. He undoubtedly has in the back of his mind the Western criticism of Singapore concerning the sentencing of a young American to be caned for vandalism when he points to Western decadence, violent crime, and the breakdown of civil society, particularly in the United States.
Another Asian visitor who reinforces some of Mr. Lee's comments is the Thai businessman, Narongohai Akrasanee, who points out that few Asians would accept Australia as a part of Asia. Geographically Australia is not a part of Asia, he said. Historically or ethnically, anthropologists could not say Australia was a part of Asia; in terms of politics, law, cultural and social policy, Australia is not a part of Asia, he says. "To integrate the social and cultural aspects, considering the differences in the systems, would only spoil the relationship," said Dr. Narongohai, although he is certain that in economic and trading terms, a close relationship is desirable and likely.
The greatest danger for Australian independence is that the "globalising" process of trade is merely paving the way for the merging of social, cultural and ethnic identities into regions, rather than the maintenance of the traditional nation state.
Dr. Narongohai also supports the proposal for an Asian free trade bloc, in which Australia and New Zealand would be involved. This was accepted by Mr. Keating when he was in Thailand recently, as an extention of the Closer Economic Relationship between Australia and New Zealand to involve the Asian "region". It is exactly the same regionalisation process that is drawing Britain into Europe, with the correspondent erosion of national sovereignty and the passing of more political and constitutional powers to "Europe".
Australia's unique constitutional structure is a strong advantage, as a monarchy rather than a disadvantage in trading relations. Lee Kwan Yew rejected the suggestion that changing to a republican form of government would improve our Asian standing. Perhaps Prime Minister Keating may take note.
It is clear that Asian observers are somewhat bemused by the temptation by Australians to see their future in "Asia". Mr. Lee warned that Asia will be no economic saviour for Australia. And while the Asian value system is suitable for Asians, the only real answer to Mr. Lee's charge of Western decadence is for Western nations like Australia to rediscover their values, which means a re-appraisal of spiritual weaknesses and moral values that betray us.
SOUTH AFRICA'S POLITICAL INFERNO
With events changing by the hour in South Africa,
in an atmosphere more highly charged than usual, only the basic physical
realities can be expected to remain unchanged after this week's "majority
rule" election. The most basic of all realities is that of African tribal
differences, and Chief Buthelezi's demands for some form of self rule
for Kwa-Zulu in Natal were based on such a reality. He called for a
federation of disparate States of South Africa, on the American model,
insisting that the Zulus wanted their own independence in their own
regions, including financial independence.
In the negotiations that led to the Zulu inclusion in the electoral process, Buthelezi has secured recognition of the Zulu kingdom, the Zulu King, and protection of land under the control of the (Zulu) Crown, to be enshrined in the Constitutional agreement when the South African Parliament is hastily called together for the purpose.
The Zulu truce has been hailed euphorically everywhere, as a sign that peace is possible after the elections. However, one journalist, R.W. Johnson, reported on the A.N.C. Inkatha struggle for The Times, writing: "Others point more mundanely to the very considerable strength now mustered by the South African Defence Force in Natal, whose force of tanks and armoured cars was quietly built up even before the emergency was declared there. With detention without trial and press censorship already in place in Natal, the scene is set for a draconian post election crackdown."
There is no doubt that many within the A.N.C. wanted to use the S.A.D.F. as a partisan weapon to smash Chief Buthelezi's forces with the same brutal thoroughness President Mugabe deployed in Matabeleland after his "liberation" election in 1980 (in Rhodesia). Certainly, observers in Natal feel that Chief Buthelezi was in effect negotiating with a gun to his head "
Irrespective of the final election results, the basic reality in South Africa is that 8.5 million Zulus - the largest ethnic/tribal group in South Africa - are demanding some form of self-determination, even though they are internally divided. Can the Communist-dominated A.N.C. accommodate this? Already there is news that the Communist element within the A.N.C. is furious that the Zulu King is to have his status and authority enshrined in the new Constitution.
UNITED NATIONS 'PEACE-KEEPING' FAILURES
United Nations troops returning from the failed peace keeping mission in Rwanda were so disgusted with the political restrictions placed upon them, that they publicly shredded their blue U.N. berets in protest. The policy of nonintervention in the Rwandan tribal massacres over the last three weeks meant they had to stand by and watch as thousands of Tutsi women and children were simply hacked to death by the majority Hutu tribe.
In the former Yugoslavia, the United Nations record has been very little better, with the slaughter in Bosnia proceeding despite the U.N. intervention. The Moslems in Bosnia have been offered "safe zones" in which to find refuge. The failure of this policy is now evident, given that the city of Gorazde itself is supposed to be a safe zone.
If the South African elections become little more than a pause in hostilities that resemble civil war already, what role would the U.N. be expected to play? If "peacekeeping" operations in so many other parts of the globe have been such a failure, what makes the South African situation any different? If anything, the differences between the Bosnian Serbs and the Moslems must be regarded as minor compared to the differences between Zulus and Xhosa. The concept of the U.N. as the World Government's police force can now be seen to be a farce.
The judgment in the N.S.W. Supreme Court last
week that abortion is still a crime in N.S.W. has provoked the feminists
to rage. In addition, Attorney General Hannaford has promised that where
the law is broken, prosecutions will follow, which has re-opened the
whole question in N.S.W. The 1972 District Court ruling that abortion
is only permitted where a serious danger to the mental or physical well
being of the mother has been used liberally to virtually ensure abortion
on demand in N.S.W. After Justice Newman's decision, this is certain
to be considerably tightened.
We had predicted that the Federal Liberals would be unable to defend their Tasmanian counterparts against U.N. intervention unless they were prepared to defend legislation making sodomy a crime. But we did not anticipate that the attack would come from within the Liberals' own ranks. Former Senator Chris Puplick has warned that Dr. Hewson's new policy of 'inclusion' is impossible if "gays" feel that the Liberals are "pandering to the prejudice" of their Tasmanian Party Branch. It is a measure of how low the Coalition have fallen that they now depend upon the homosexual vote.
We note that the Victorian Department of Health & Community Services have suffered the complete collapse of their case against "The Family" and settled out of Court. The settlement terms are believed to be the same terms The Family offered in 1992. What has changed? The totalitarian nature of the Department in kidnapping children is now exposed.
from Herald-Sun, Melbourne, April 14th
"Your assertion that communities are not leaping to the defence of their councils because all councillors are seen to be involved out of self-interest has more to do with the fact that every story in your paper on the issue has connected the sacking of councils with some very contentious examples of 'last minute spending sprees'.
"Messrs. Hallam and Kennett have justified the sackings by claiming that councillors do not have the skills to manage reform. "If councillors are all incompetent, one has to ask what makes ex-councillors more competent? "The appointments to date of people judged to be competent to deliver reform are mainly ex-councillors and retired State politicians. You're right when you say that communities have not mobilised to defend their councillors, but I believe that has more to do with the fact that the community hasn't yet worked out that local democracy has gone. "The Herald-Sun has done its best to confuse the issue so that they don't." (Cr. Michael Noske, Mayor, City of Portland, Vic.)
SEX ADVICE WRONG
from Herald-Sun (Melbourne), April 18th
"The risk of primary school children contracting AIDS from sexual activity appears to be slight, if at all, unless their education tends to encourage sexual experimentation. "There is a lot of evidence that children who receive sex education at school are more likely to become sexually active as children, more at risk of contracting sexually transmitted diseases including AIDS. "The American Planned Parenthood Federation recently has conceded that its own surveys show this to be so. "The last thing Victorian parents need is uninformed advice about sex education for small children." (James Bowen, Chairman, Education Committee, Australian Family Association)
PUTTING COUNCILS AT RISK
from Diamond Valley News (Melbourne suburban
newspaper), April 12th
"The essence of genuine democratic government is that there are checks and balances concerning the use of power. "One of the worst legacies of the Cain and Kirner Governments was that they produced an electoral backlash which gave the Kennett Government too big a majority in both the House of Assembly and the Legislative Council, destroying all checks and balances.
"It is no secret that many of the backbench government members are unhappy about a forced amalgamation program, which only a few years ago was denounced by the Deputy Premier, Mr. McNamara, as 'horrible', and other present Cabinet Ministers use similar language. "Victoria's slide towards a complete totalitarian State can only be checked by sufficient Members of Parliament being prepared to challenge the Executive.
"Victorian ratepayers and their municipal councils have the power to reverse what is happening by making it clear that the only government members who will survive the next State elections will be those who insist that ratepayers have the right to vote on what, if any, changes they desire to their municipalities. This is what Premier Jeff Kennett was advocating when he was in Opposition." (Eric D. Butler, "Runnymede", Alma Road, Panton Hill, Vic.)
|© Published by the Australian League of Rights, P.O. Box 27 Happy Valley, SA 5159|