|Home||blog.alor.org||Newtimes Survey||The Cross-Roads||Library|
|OnTarget Archives||The Social Crediter Archives||NewTimes Survey Archives||Brighteon Video Channel||Veritas Books|
15 January 1999. Thought for the Week: "As no government can carry on for a month without money, it is not necessary to labour the point that the visible government of a country is obliged to take its orders and to shape its policy, and particularly financial policy, in accordance with the instructions of the dealers in this indispensable implement, so long as they hold a practical monopoly of it."
C.H. Douglas, Social Credit (1924)
MONARCHISTS THANK PRESIDENT CLINTON
by David Thompson
It is no surprise that the Murdoch press, spearheaded by The Australian, is already arguing the case for the republican model produced by the Constitutional Convention. This model provides a serious dilemma for republicans. It provides for the appointment of a president by the Prime Minister in consultation with Parliament. It is widely agreed that this model is a poor substitute for the present system, and merely produces a republic in name only. Many leading republicans are disgusted with the "Turnbull camel", and ask, "Why bother?" Such is the division among republicans that some propose to campaign actively for the defeat of the Turnbull model. Former Governor General Bill Hayden and former Independent Members of Parliament Phil Cleary and Ted Mack have announced that they will do likewise.
With the republican camp divided, the fiercely anti-monarchist Murdoch press urges all republicans to heal their divisions and campaign for the Turnbull model, because it is at least a step towards a popularly elected president. It is clear that the "big guns" are trained on the Australian Crown. The press, the ALP, big business and big money will campaign for the republic. The big money interests are represented by Malcolm Turnbull, with global merchant banking interests, and Australia's allegedly wealthiest woman, Janet Holmes a Court. Both are expected to pour at least $1 million into the republican campaign.
In the face of this assault, the traditional supporters of the Crown, the "conservative" political coalition, will, for the most part stand by and watch the attempt to destroy it. The likes of Sir Robert Menzies would be turning in their graves. It is ironic that perhaps one of the most useful campaign figures for the monarchists is likely to be President Bill Clinton. Clinton is, of course, anathema to the old-school conservatives of politics everywhere. But even the fibbing, womanising, adulterous Clinton can fulfill a useful role in the Australian campaign on the Crown. He can be held up as a bad example!
Clinton's impeachment trial begins as
we go to press, and even if it is a relatively short affair,
it is of immense significance, and commands acute attention
around the world. It should be stressed that Mr. Clinton is
a popularly elected president, in the general mould demanded
by many Australian republicans.
Do Americans regret their choice of Head of State? The evidence so far is that they do not, with opinion polls still supporting Clinton. But do Americans regret the enormous disruption to their system of government by having to try their Head of State for perjury? The evidence is that they certainly do regret it.
The contrast with the monarchy could not be more stark. While previous monarchs have stained their reputations with adultery (and worse) it has not affected the stability of the British system of government. This is the key to the Australian debate. Do we insist on choosing our own Head of State, or continue to leave that choice to Providence? So far, Providence has a better track record than the manipulation and corruption that accompanies the selection of the Head of State for the Republic of the United States of America.
RED IN THE MORNING-SHEPHERD'S WARNING
by Jeremy Lee
On January 8th Mr. Fred Argy wrote a
letter to The Australian Financial Review. Fred Argy,
more than anyone, was responsible for the implementation of
Paul Keating's de-regulation policies, which delivered Australia
into multinational hands. In the last two or three years Mr.
Argy has spoken increasingly strongly against the results
of the policy he administered. In his letter he said the world
was being divided into two:
Ranged against this, Mr. Argy said was
the "asset" economy, booming round the world. In effect, economies
were being looted by the powerful, raising the question "Can
this really go on?" He concluded:
We have seen that explosion in places like Indonesia, Malaysia, Russia and South Korea. In various forms it will be played throughout the world unless there are big changes in financial policy. The Prime Minister and his Treasurer seem oblivious to what is really happening. They apparently believe that Australia as a whole is booming. At last month's interest-rate cut, John Howard told Parliament, "This is the most golden of days for the Australian economy." Peter Costello said of his fellow-Australians: "They are out there shopping, I think, because they've got more money in their pockets than they've ever had before." If he only knew it - and you'd think that even treasurers can glimpse reality now and then - he is NOT talking about Australia as a whole, but a dwindling percentage.
THE GREAT DIVIDEThe Weekend Australian Financial Review (9-10/1/99) carried a major report by Stephen Long on what is really happening:
"Since 1993 the share of the nation's wealth held by the richest 10 percent has increased by almost five percentage points, from 43.5 percent to more than 48 percent . . . Over the same period, the richest 1 percent of Australians increased their share of national wealth by almost three percentage points, from a little over 12.3 percent to 15 percent... The new wealth divide has been buttressed by globalisation, which is concentrating employment and high-income opportunities in the centre of cities while marginalising their industrial fringes and rural and regional Australia... In the mid-1980s there were about 25,000 millionaires in Australia. By 1993 there were 71,700 of them according to Access Economics. In the five years since, the number rose by more than 60 percent, to 188,200 people. Their share of total wealth almost doubled to 21.5 percent, rising from $136 billion to $377 billion between 1993 and 1998..."
Although more than 5 million Australians live on or below the poverty-line, completely unrepresented in the glowing statistics so glibly quoted by politicians, conditions elsewhere are far worse. The United Nations Development Programme (UNDP) for 1998 gave the following sombre picture:
* Global consumption will top $24 trillion
this year, twice the level of 1975 and six times that of 1950.
How has this global division, on a scale
never seen before, been achieved? And is the old socialist
nostrum - to take from the rich and give to the poor - the
solution? Are we doomed to a global version of the old class
war between the "haves" and the "have-nots"
These are the questions confronting us as we approach the millennium. Unless Australians can forge a new initiative in which successful human association can correctly analyse the problem, agree on the right alternative, and strive to co-operate in its achievement, the future is a dark age such as has never been seen before. The alternative, for which we are more technically equipped than any preceding generation, is peace on earth and life more abundant - for all.
GETTING RID OF MORE FARMERS
The Victorian Government now has a policy
of buying out farmers, amalgamating the farms, and re-selling
We'd like to be able to report that the National Party, on behalf of rural Australia, condemned the scheme as indicative of a disastrous lack of direction for the well being of the farming community and the whole future of decentralisation in Australia. The loss of farmers over the last quarter of a century has been enormous, the plight of country towns devastating. Rural politicians go round with sticking plaster, rather than alternatives to rebuild the bush. The most they have come up with so far is that the dwindling number of farmers should have access to the internet!
MORE DAIRY FARMERS TO GO
The Weekly Times (30/12/98) also reported that Victoria's dairy farmers are thinking of setting up their own supply company to counter the deregulation of the fresh milk market, which is anticipated to force a further 2,000 Victorian dairy farmers to leave the industry. Prices received by dairy farmer have already fallen by as much as 20 percent in the past two years. It is now estimated that deregulation will cut farm gate milk prices by a further 8 percent, resulting in an average loss of $16,000 for dairy farmers in Victoria. Does this mean that consumers will be getting cheaper milk? Not unless they live overseas. Milk exports are considered much more important than local consumption.
A report by the United Dairy Farmers of Victoria " . . . predicted over the next five years 2,000 farmers would be forced out and dairy companies would have to merge and restructure ... The plan also raises concern about the vulnerability of the dairy farmer co-operatives to takeover bids by the big multinationals, such as Parmalat and Coca-Cola Amatil . . . To all readers - A Happy New Year!
THE GRAVITY OF 1999
It is clear that 1999 will be dominated by "millennium" issues, with much "froth" encouraging the suspension of critical faculties. However, the League intends to offer a lead, by "keeping our eye on the ball". The major issue for this year is expected to be the constitutional future of the nation, challenged by the republican idea. The importance of this cannot be allowed to be obscured by nonsense and red herrings. The decision on the Crown referendum will be one of long-standing consequences, well into the next millennium. The way our descendants live will be heavily influenced by the decision we make this year. Let us not shirk our responsibility by passing it off lightly, but determine to do whatever is open to us to resist the challenge of the globalists to destroy the Australian Crown.
Other issues expected to dominate the politics of 1999 include Prime Minister Howard's attempt to introduce the poisonous goods and services tax. The strongest possible resistance to the GST should be continued, with the objective being nothing short of defeating this odious tax.
ACTION ON VICTORIAN FARMSWhat is the explanation for the Victorian Government moving to aggregate farming properties, through the Rural Finance Corporation? Who approved the use of $10 million of Victorian taxpayers funds for this programme? We suggest Victorians begin to raise the issue with their MPs - especially in rural areas. This is taking economic rationalism to an extreme! At a time when the United Dairy Farmers of Victoria is warning of the elimination of 2,000 dairy farmers following deregulation of the milk industry, Mr. Kennett and his colleagues have some explaining to do!
SOCIAL CREDIT GOES TO HUNGARY
In recent years, the League has had significant
contact with Australians with Hungarian heritage distributing
League material among them. This has assisted in establishing
a significant Social Credit movement in Hungary. The following
letter of gratitude from a Canadian Hungarian informs us of
some of the results of this assistance:
"In a real democracy everyone is given the same rights and same duties and a man must be judged by his character, talent or public usefulness. Unfortunately, in the present social order there is a great distinction between the rich and the poor. "Observing this gross unfairness in my homeland, I came to the decision that I shall attempt to enlighten the Hungarian people. I will explain to them that there is another alternative to the present day economic dictatorship. "I put the Douglas ideas in writing, adapting them to the Hungarian custom and mentality. I issued it in a pocketbook form as a private edition. Most of the 5,000 booklets distributed as gifts to people who are living in villages. They are the most uninformed, the many times deceived creatures of the land who heretofore found refuge in idle indifference in regards to politics.
"My informative activities with the pocketbooks in Hungary started on August 16th, 1996. "I came to Hungary again to get ready for the 1998 national elections. I prepared a four-page leaflet and received great assistance from the Louis Even Institute (Rougemont, Quebec, Canada); they printed and in a container delivered one million copies to Budapest, Hungary.
"From this point in time I could start to write: WE have diffused most of the leaflets in the country. The reason I could say we, is because as the time passed and as the people read my booklets they started to understand and became activists in the 'National Credit Movement'. "Today, we estimate that we have approximately 3,500 people, who are acquainted with 'National Credits which is really Social Credit. We call it National, because in Eastern Europe during the 45 years of communist era the people got fed up with the word: social.
"At present our movement has six communities as focal points waiting for their countries' bureaucrats to accept them as legal entities. In the elections we were successful, because we were able to get elected to the Hungarian Parliament, Professor Dr. Erzsebet Gidai, who is a professor of Economics at the University of Sopron. She is already a spokesperson of our movement, in and out of Parliament. With her there are other sympathizers of National Credit also in the Parliament.
"Next spring, with the help of the Good
Lord, I will return to Hungary and shall continue to work
with the other patriotic Hungarians. We estimate that we need
another two years to enlighten the people in Hungary to get
ready for a referendum. The people must know National Credit's
monetary and economic theory before they can make a decision
about their and their children's future. "Our undertaking
is not easy and we - as soon as our movement became a legal
entity - shall be looking for sponsor-membership all over
the world among those Hungarians who still remember their
|© Published by the Australian League of Rights, P.O. Box 27 Happy Valley, SA 5159|