|Home||blog.alor.org||Newtimes Survey||The Cross-Roads||Library|
|OnTarget Archives||The Social Crediter Archives||NewTimes Survey Archives||Brighteon Video Channel||Veritas Books|
21 March 2003. Thought for the Week: "Something seems to have gone radically wrong with the programming of many human cerebral computers... we are plagued with self-destructive positive feedback subsystems. The marketplace and big business are obsessed with the positive feedback of greed's more and more for mine's own one self, and its less and less for many or all others or for the system as a whole."
Peter Lock in "The Great Harlot", 2002
THAT HIDEOUS EBOLA DISEASE
by Betty Luks
Emerging Viruses: Aids & Ebola Nature,
Accident or Intentional?
On the WHO he writes: "Dozens of WHO Chronicle articles revealed that by 1968 the WHO had been solely in control of the world's experimental 'biologicals' for almost two decades. "WHO has exerted a powerful influence on the quality control of biological substances since its very inception in 1948. ... Since 1952, when WHO interest in the establishment of international requirements for such biological products began, various possible measures have been examined for attempting to achieve a greater degree of uniformity in the quality, safety, and potency of vaccines, antisera, etc. ... for the control of substances of particular interest to WHO in relation to its mass immunisation and mass prophylaxis schemes in developing countries... (WHO Chronicle, 1968; 23; 1:3-15)
1969 World Health Organisation report
All this happened during the so-called 'cold war'. At the time, "Russian and American researchers were privy to the same vaccines, viral samples, and information about how the human immune system could be bolstered or destroyed by old and newly developed germs, including those produced from monkey viruses."
Marburg, Ebola and HIV engineered in
That poor man in the north western region of the Congo is just one of the now many innocent victims of germ warfare. No wonder Bush, Blair and Howard are concerned about Saddam Hussein's 'weapons of mass destruction' the West first supplied him with them! We do not know where this horror will end, or who will be the future victims, what we do know is that those producing 'biological and chemical weapons of mass destruction' are quite mad they have lost all sense of reality.
Peter Lock (The Great Harlot) warns us: "We do not know what further surprises Nature has in store for those who threaten her delicate vital sense of balance with their man-made evil positive feedback instabilities. Nature does not employ defensive mechanisms. Any offence against her stimulates her to attack and turn the situation to her own advantage."
WHEN THE POLLIES AND THE PEOPLE ARE POLLS APART
Melbourne columnist Terry Lane thinks CIR might be the way to go in the present political climate of elected dictatorship. The Sunday Age, March 9th, 2003.
What prompted him? Last Thursday, March 6th, one lone citizen by the name of Mark Gwynneth was thrown out of Parliament House having been crudely gagged by a security guard's hand over his mouth. His offence? Trying to gain his attention, he shouted at John Howard, "Killing Iraqi children is immoral." Now, writes Terry Lane, there is going to be a war vote in Parliament, but if the vote goes against Howard it won't make any difference. "That," says Mr. Lane, "is democracy at work, Howard-style."
What to do about it? He thinks the time has come to put CIR into place. He sets out to demolish the arguments against CIR comparing the Swiss people's control over their governments and our lack of control over ours: "In Australia 100,000 people in the street accomplishes nothing. In Switzerland, 100,000 petitioners can force a government to seek popular endorsement for its actions." He doesn't accept the argument CIR would open the door to 'populist demagogues'. The evidence from Switzerland is that only about one in 13 non-government referendum proposals get a yes vote anyhow. He concludes: "South Australia could be about to become a CIR laboratory if its Speaker, Peter Lewis, gets his way on the constitutional reform that is his price for supporting government. All power to his arm."
CONSERVATIVE AMERICAN INDICTS 'WAR PARTY'
In this week's American Conservative,
March 11th, 2003, editor Pat Buchanan issued a controversial
5000-word indictment of Bush's 'War Party.' He alleges:
Richard Perle wrote a paper urging Israeli
PM Netanyahu to dump the Oslo Peace Accords and target Iraq
five years before 9/11.
The neocon vision is 'to conscript American blood to make the world safe for Israel.... [They] seek American empire and the Sharonites seek hegemony over the Middle East. The two agendas coincide precisely.' Mr.Buchanan can expect a backlash as a matter of course.
DR. TOBEN'S NEWS UPDATEThe Adelaide Institute newsletter has advised its readers the appeal lodged by Dr. Toben against Justice Catherine Branson's decision that 'holocaust' material on the institute's website must be removed, has been adjourned, because of a legal technicality, until the next Federal Court sessions. The three appeal judges determined before the February 25th hearing that the actual appeal may raise constitutional matters, and accordingly advised the counsels. Now the various States and Territories Attorneys' General must be notified that this case is before the court so that they may voice their objections, or otherwise, on the matter under consideration. It would appear the actual Racial Discrimination Act could be in contravention of the Foreign Affairs Power.
by Ron Owen
ARREST FOR ASKING A FORENSIC QUESTION?
by Ian McNiven
He writes that the presentation by the
guest speaker was quite professional and almost identical
to the article in the Australian Police Journal, September
98, Vol 52 No 4. There were two statements made in the article
and by the presenter that were of interest to Ian McNiven:
"The killer never used the FN-FAL .308 rifle until he returned
to the boot of the Volvo" and that "Bryant obtained the weapons
used in the killings on the black market." Having read many
of the witness statements, he had a specific reason for asking:
"Was any solid empirical forensic evidence such as fingerprints
or DNA found that links Martin Bryant to the shootings in
the café?" The presenter avoided a direct answer, referring
to "ballistics" and when pressed further, to "ballistic evidence"
and "witness statements". Not one to give up, McNiven interrupted
the speaker once again and insisted that his "question was
not about ballistics but about fingerprints and DNA".
Rebecca M's statement
Rebecca M's companion stated
Fingerprints, DNA, saliva
Did the investigating police neglect to collect this vital evidence or was it collected and failed to match Bryant's prints and DNA and suppressed? That is why I asked the forensic officer if any of Bryant's DNA and prints were found in the cafe..."
The Collyer statement
Therein lies the big problem... I think it was too long to fit in the blue sports bag which was left on a table in the café, along with the video camera which was alleged to belong to Martin Bryant. If the SLR was too long for the blue sports bag, it must have been carried in a 'really big bag' or a 'long bag' exactly as the witnesses stated. "Supposedly the gunman carried both rifles back to Seascape, so how did he get both of them and the spare magazines back to the Volvo. In the long bag of course. But that is two bags, the long bag and the sports bag on the table. We know from the witness statements that the gunman only had one bag when he went into the café so the only conclusion I can make is that the blue sports bag was inside the long bag with the rifles and spare magazines. "So we come to the nub of the matter. We have a freckled faced or acne scarred pitted faced gunman dropping a blue sports bag and video camera which were alleged to have belonged to Martin Bryant on a table in the café before or during the shootings... This theory can only be correct if G. Collyer was shot through the throat and neck with an SLR as he clearly states. "I believe that is what happened because it is supported by the performance of the two types of projectile used. This is clearly laid out in The Wound Ballistics Review published in The Journal of the International Wound Ballistics Association Vol 3: N04...
Two types of ammunition used
I believe Collyer survived being shot clean through the throat and neck because as he states, he was shot with the .308 SLR/Fn FAL. This raises the question, why were no spent cases and projectiles found in the café? Who collected them and where are they? Why do Police react so strongly when someone asks questions about these things? Why has a major Australian TV Company filmed a documentary about these matters but has been sitting on it for over a year, refusing it show it? Why has our presenter claimed that Bryant bought the guns on the black market, when it has been alleged in the Australian Media that the Colt .223 used in the killings was handed into Victorian Police in an amnesty?
If Bryant bought the guns illegally on the black market, why has no one ever been charged with selling them to him. Why has no forensic evidence been produced that links Bryant to the guns and to the shootings in the café. Why on the next day, April 30th, was a carpenter sent into the café to paint out the windows and nail the doors shut. Possibly a first in Forensic examination of a major murder site... And finally... why was Bryant's plea of guilty accepted without a proper enquiry or even a complete Coroner's Inquest?"
PROTECT YOUR PROPERTY RIGHTS - FREE ASSOCIATION MEETING
The Mackay FREE ASSOCIATION is holding
its AGM and a PUBLIC FORUM 7.15pm, Thursday, April 3rd, 2003
after the AGM which commences at 6.15pm. Venue is: Fairview
Tavern, Farleigh. Guest speaker will be Narrabri's Bevan O'Reagan
of the Constitutional Property Rights Committee.
Come and hear the facts! Further information: Mick Hodge Phone/Fax 4954 6607 or Neville Halliwell Phone 4942 2776
Book...EVERY DROP FOR SALE
Our desperate battle over water in a world about to 'run out', by Jeffery Rothfeder.
Australians know from very recent experience, without a reliable source of water, no community is sustainable for long. Water is essential for life. That is why they need to be aware of what is happening to the world's water supplies. The writer explains in this vivid and well-told account, water the most necessary ingredient of life may well become the flashpoint for the most serious conflicts of the future. This is a well-researched book, with fascinating insights into a problem that will soon emerge as a series of catastrophes if we don't pay attention to it. The author warns: "In the most striking incident, the Six Day War of June 1967 between Israel and Egypt, Jordan and Syria, Israel quickly conquered the Sinai Peninsula, the Gaza Strip, the West Bank and the Golan Heights. But while most people think of the war as yet another border dispute, it was actually fought over water." "People generally regard June 5th 1967, as the day the Six Day War began," says Israeli prime minister Ariel Sharon, an army general during the conflict, "But in reality, it started two and a half years earlier, on the day Israel decided to act against the diversion of the Jordan." (Pages 51-52). Water conflicts may affect the future of the planet. In the overall water crisis itself, any number of initiatives can be undertaken to alleviate water scarcity and pollution, and to undo the negative consequences of unnecessary dams and misguided diversion efforts. But by their very nature, water conflicts tend to pit one against one even when one means "many" face to face, my need versus your need".
A reading must Price $56.00 posted: Order from your State Bookshop.
|© Published by the Australian League of Rights, P.O. Box 27 Happy Valley, SA 5159|