|Home||blog.alor.org||Newtimes Survey||The Cross-Roads||Library|
|OnTarget Archives||The Social Crediter Archives||NewTimes Survey Archives||Brighteon Video Channel||Veritas Books|
9 February 1968. Thought for the Week: "We can choose to be governed by God, or we can condemn ourselves to be ruled by the new scientific 'elite.' Without a belief in God's moral law, there can be no ground or basis for the enforcement of law and order in society. When God and His moral law are rejected by a nation, all defence against arbitrary power vanishes, too, at the same time."
Rev. E.L.H. Taylor, M.A., England.
VIETNAM REACHES POINT OF MAJOR CRISIS
"The climatic battle of Khe Sanh, which now appears to have begun, has been greeted with confidence at the Pentagon and caution at the White House. President Johnson last week required the joint chiefs of staff to verify in writing that they thought Khe Sanh 'could and should be held.' President Johnson called for the renewed assessment last week after the extent and ferocity of the Viet Cong offensive in South Vietnam has shocked Washington." - From Roy Macartney, Washington, in The Age, Melbourne, February 6.
As we have constantly stressed, Communist revolutionary
war is always directed to achieve political objectives. Practising traditional
Communist morality, the Viet Cong promised that they would observe a
seven-day truce over the period of the annual celebration of Tet, the
Vietnamese lunar year at the very time they were preparing for a carefully
coordinated major offensive right throughout South Vietnam. Typical
of the many soothing statements made by both American and Australian
officials was that of the Australian Minister for the Army, Mr. Malcolm
Fraser, who said that the Viet Cong attacks on the key cities in South
Vietnam were "suicidal missions in a moment of desperation." (Vide The
Age, February 2)
It is probably true that the Americans and their
allies cannot win while they continue to fight under rules, which favour
the Communists. Major-General Thomas A. Lane, USA, Retired, whom we
have previously quoted as one of the large number of American military
authorities criticising the "no-win" policy in Vietnam, has recently
put the matter very clearly as follow:
General Lane states that, President Johnson is surrounded by men who insist that his policy of restraint is avoiding a wider war. But this leaves the Communists with the initiative to fight the war in such a way that they create the maximum amount of political confusion and social friction in the USA and Australia, where the Communists are at present scoring major success in the propaganda war.
The Pueblo incident in North Korea is a classic
example of the type of diversionary tactics the Communist strategists
are employing. Commenting on the Pueblo incident on January 25 former
Republican Presidential candidate Barry Goldwater realistically stated
that it was just a continuation of the Korean War. He continued, "I
think we never have finished that war. We have been having casualties
over there ever since the truce."
There is considerable speculation that the Communist
mastermind behind the current Viet Cong drive in South Vietnam General
Giap is proposing to try to repeat his 1954 victory against the French
at Dien Bien Phu. Khe Sanh could be the test, or perhaps the first of
many tests. It is generally overlooked that the French were capable
of fighting on militarily after their major defeat at Dien Blen Phu,
but that the loss of this major battle proved such a disastrous psychological
blow in France that the political base for the military front in Vietnam
There is only one answer to the present developing crisis: the Americans must refuse to fight any longer under rules decided by the Communists. As the American Senate Preparedness Committee has urged, all significant military targets in North Vietnam must be hit from the air, the Port of Haiphong completely blockaded to stop the flood of Soviet military and economic aid to North Vietnam and the Viet Cong.
The myth about the Soviet Union "mellowing" must be exploded and appropriate action taken. But time to do this is desperately short.
NEW ZEALAND'S REACTION TO THE WILSON BETRAYAL
"If Australia's reaction to Britain's Far East withdrawal has been one of pained acceptance, New Zealand's has been very close to consternation. It is not the Far Eastern defence structure of the future that is worrying New Zealand so much The basic cause of the near panic that prevails in Wellington today is the brutal dose of disillusionment that the mother country had administered to the faithful little dominion at a time of economic and financial distress. The fear that many New Zealanders have secretly entertained - that Britain has no intention of protecting their interests when it comes to the crucial point of entering Europe - has overnight become a publicly articulated indignation." - Douglas Brass writing from New Zealand in The Australian, January 24.
New Zealand's present political leaders have
been pathetically naive and trusting about British assurances. Their
representative in London has been careful to give no support whatever
to the rugged addresses by Australia's High Commissioner, Sir Alexander
Downer, who never loses an opportunity of appealing direct to the British
people on the Common Market threat to the nature of the old British
Commonwealth, urging that Britain should seek new and more constructive
relations with Australia, New Zealand and Canada, instead of surrendering
to the European Common Market and its growing super-bureaucracy.
In an interview with Prime Minister Holyoake
in 1962 after he had been campaigning in Britain with Mr. D.J. Killen,
M.P against Britain joining the EEC, Mr. Eric Butler attempted to convince
the New Zealand leader that the British people had such an affection
for New Zealand that a powerful appeal by Mr. Holyoake would have a
major impact in Britain. But Mr. Holyoake would have none of it. Before
the last New Zealand General Elections he publicly told New Zealanders,
the great majority of whom have shown they are strongly pro-Rhodesian,
that his Government would tolerate no further action against Rhodesia.
The time has come for New Zealanders, like Australians to face the facts of life as revealed by the wrecker Harold Wilson. They should prepare themselves for the next scuttle by the Wilson Government, which will be from Fiji and other British Pacific Islands. Canberra and Wellington should be planning to take these over as their direct responsibility. And they should be looking westwards across the Indian Ocean to South Africa, Rhodesia and the Portuguese Territories, making military and economic alliances with resourceful people who have proved far more reliable than Mr. Harold Wilson and his Socialist Government.
AMERICAN NEGRO AGITATOR IN AUSTRALIA
"An American Negro Bishop said last night that there were serious racial overtones in Australia. The Aboriginal problem had implications of racialism or, at best, paternalistic benevolence. Bishop P.A. Taylor of the United States of America Methodist Church, said: 'As long as any nation deals with groups either within its borders or beyond its national limits with discrimination or indifference it is courting disaster. The nations of our world are swiftly dividing into the rich and the poor, the haves and the have-nots. As long as the have-nots represent the vast majority of world population, there can be no world peace. "' - The Australian, February 5.
As soon as he arrived in Australia Bishop Taylor
started sniping at Australia's immigration policy. He claimed that when
seeking a visa he had to state his race. This was evidence of "racialism",
he claimed. But the Department of Immigration has obtained a copy of
the visa form Bishop Taylor filled in before leaving America, and there
is no reference on this form to race. Australia is in fact one of the
very few countries in the world, which does not require racial identification
of people seeking visas. Officers of the Department of immigration had
talked to Bishop Taylor in Adelaide after he claimed in Perth that he
had to state his race when applying for his Australian visa. But he
continued to maintain that his claim concerning his visa was correct.
His statements in Australia revealed him to be
a typical agitator, of which there are many in the USA deliberately
exploiting race to further revolutionary policies. He attempted to whitewash
the "Civil Rights" movement in the USA, which has been shown conclusively
to be the instrument of the Communist revolutionaries, who believe that
they can exploit the Negro to collapse America from within. Anyone doubting
this should read the book, It's Very Simple, by Alan Stang.
Australia has no race problems because of the wisdom of those who founded Australia as a nation. Australia can best help other peoples by maintaining a stable, homogeneous population, and offering advice and assistance to overcome production problems. The Bishop Taylors everywhere are suggesting that the Indians, for example, are living in poverty because the "have" nations are more prosperous. The logical conclusion is the Socialist solution that the "haves" should be compelled to share with the "have-nots". This is no solution whatever, but is part of the revolutionary programme.
MR. HAROLD WILSON'S PREDICTION ON THE "BRIDGE TO PEACE"
"The bridge to peace in Vietnam was now much shorter, the British Prime Minister, Mr. Harold Wilson, said yesterday. 'Our task is to help narrow the differences and to avoid encouraging the hawks, whether they be in Hanoi or Washington', he told the Russian Prime Minister, Mr. Kosygin in a formal luncheon toast." - The Australian, January 25.
At the very moment the British Socialist leader was talking about the possibility of peace in Vietnam, the Communists were on the eve of their massive assaults. It is the Harold Wilsons who are encouraging the "hawks" in Hanoi, Moscow, Peking, and in all parts of the world by their failure to face the truth that there is an international revolution being promoted and master-minded by criminals determined to conquer the world. One of these criminals is Kosygin of the Soviet Union. He replied to Mr. Wilson's toast in Moscow by telling him that if Britain wanted peace, it should demand an end to American bombing of North Vietnam. In the meantime the Soviet leaders are making their contribution to "peace" by providing North Vietnam and the Viet Cong with a steady flow of sophisticated weapons.
ON TARGET BULLETIN
SUBJECT FOR DISCUSSION
|© Published by the Australian League of Rights, P.O. Box 27 Happy Valley, SA 5159|