Flag of the Commonwealth of Australia
 
 
Christian based service movement warning about threats to rights and freedom irrespective of the label.
"All that is necessary for the triumph of evil is that good men do nothing"
Edmund Burke
Flag of the Commonwealth of Australia
 
 
Home blog.alor.org Newtimes Survey The Cross-Roads Library
OnTarget Archives The Social Crediter Archives NewTimes Survey Archives Brighteon Video Channel Veritas Books

On Target

2 March 2004. Thought for the Week: "I have come that you might have Life and have it more abundant."

A Most Blessed Holy Week
For All our Readers

TO SUMMON OUR LOYALTY TO GOD

by Nigel Jackson
Whilst the following was sent to the editor of the Melbourne Age as a response by Mr. Nigel Jackson, it was thought appropriate to give it prominence in this edition of On Target.

"There is nothing "curious", as you put it in your editorial (20/3), about the survival of the union jack on our national flag, for it is a noble emblem that proclaims our historical and cultural origins.
Nor would the creation of an Australian republic be a "reform", but, rather a falling away from one of the most successful constitutions in the world, based on the grandeur of eleven centuries of royal tradition.
As for the heraldic significance of the union jack's positioning in the top left quadrant of our flag, betokening subordination, does it not occur to you that, though the physical British empire has gone, the more profound cultural British empire survives - here and elsewhere - embedded in the English language; and that this is an empire acknowledgment of which causes us pride, not shame?
Within the union jack is the sacred icon of the cross, a precious Christian symbol, certainly, but also a more ancient carrier of meaning of a worldwide provenance.
And while it is true that the stars of the Southern Cross "shine on everyone alike", they also gleam in the night as heralds calling us to raise our hearts, much as our Sovereign stands as the Star of our realm to summon our loyalty through her to God.
It is in this context that the will of the people truly will be done, whereas the "democracy" that you espouse is just a chimera and means of chicanery by which a worldly despotism hopes to thrive at our expense."


SLASHING AGAIN THE GORDIAN KNOT

by Betty Luks
At this most holy time of the Christian calendar it is a time for reflection on the eternal things, those things above the physical, the material -- the things of the spirit, the foundation of any community or society. In his study of ancient myths and legends, The White Goddess, the poet Robert Graves wrote an interesting footnote on the legend of the Gordian master-knot, the truths within which are being played out in the world today.
Gordium was in ancient Eastern Phrygia and according to local tradition whoever untied the knot would become master of Asia. Because of its position, Gordium commanded the main trade route across Asia Minor from the Bosphorous to Antioch, so that, the manifest meaning of the prophecy was that nobody could rule Asia Minor who did not hold Gordium.
It was from Gordium that Alexander the Great began his Eastern campaign which culminated in the defeat of Darius at Issus.
The Gordian knot should have been 'untied' by reading the 'divine' message it contained…but
Alexander who had not the learning, patience or ingenuity to perform the task decently, used his sword.
By cutting the master-knot Alexander ended an ancient religious dispensation, and since his act seemed to go unpunished - he afterwards conquered the whole of the East as far as the Indus Valley - it became a precedent for rating military power above religion or learning; just as the sword of Brennus the Gaul thrown into the scales that measured out the agreed tribute of Roman gold, provided a precedent for rating military power above justice or honour…..

March 2004: In the occupied land of the Palestinian people, in the territory known as the 'Gaza-strip', a wheel-chair bound elderly Muslim cleric, whilst being assisted and escorted from a place of worship - a mosque - was blown to pieces by a missile fired by an Israeli pilot from an American-built Apache helicopter-gunship, on the orders of neo-Alexanderian-neanderthals.


PITY THE 'BLIND' MAN

As usual, the venom spills over on to the pages and into his articles at anything which even remotely reminds him of Christianity, or of that great patriotic Australian, Eric Dudley Butler, and/or the Australian League of Rights:
"Passion at the forefront of religious bigotry", by Phillip Adams, The Australian, 23rd March 2004.
First he takes Mel Gibson to task for daring to recoup 'squids of money' from the venture.
Come on Phillip! Mel would have learned all the tricks of the trade and the importance of publicity from his Hollywood Jewish mentors and managers. Why is it alright for ones such as the Abe Foxman's of this world to amass fortunes but not for a Christian gentile such as Mel Gibson?
Anyway, the Jews who hate Jesus Christ just can't help themselves - they are the ones who have brought the movie to the attention of the public - and to Christians in particular - by continually harping on it and criticising it. Their own actions gave it such good publicity.

He complains the film contributes to religious conflict, quoting David Denby of The New Yorker: "Gibson's timing couldn't be more unfortunate: another dose of death-haunted religious fanaticism is the last thing we need."
Now that's a bit rich coming from the group who have churned out 'holocaust-death-haunted-religious-fanaticism' movies all these years!
He outrageously suggests that the story of the Crucifixion "ties in to thousands of years of anti-semitism."
As the Jewish convert to Eastern Orthodox Christianity, Steven Greenhut, wrote (On Target 19th March 2004): "They (the critics) are sounding increasingly bitter, increasingly desperate given the success of the movie and their own irrelevance."

How does Stephen Greenhut's impression of the film differ from Phillip Adams'?
Stephen wrote: "The beauty of the film, beyond the magnificent imagery, fine acting and stunning photography, was the portrayal of the key action of our faith as a real event. This, I suppose, is a close portrayal of how the crucifixion and the hours leading up to it took place. As such, I watched and wondered. What would I have done?"
He noted: "I can't recall any similar effort to shut down a movie, to destroy the reputation of a producer or to associate a project with the vilest half-truths and innuendoes."

How snide and revealing are your comments Phillip Adams!
Just to give his article the right finishing touches, he has a go at Fred Tobin, Hutton Gibson and of course, Eric Butler.
But to continue with Stephen Greenhut:
"Because the Gospel story still matters. It still offends. It still causes haters of the message to want to crucify, albeit figuratively, the messenger."
Is this why Phillip Adams will never understand where Eric Dudley Butler and the Australian League of Rights are coming from? How can you explain to a blind man the Light of the Sun?


SEEMS BUSH'S LITTLE 'MATE' IS IN TROUBLE

The electronic and print media are abuzz with the news of John Howard's waning credibility in the minds of many Australian people -- and his dwindling electoral stocks.
A new opinion poll has predicted a huge groundswell vote against Howard in the federal elections due before Christmas, giving Labor a lead of 10%, which, if eventually translated into the ballot box ensures a route of Coalition members in the House of Representatives.
Howard has had a hugely damaging public brawl with the Chief of the Federal Police, Bill Keelty, who earned respect and approval from his fellow-Australian for his work in Bali after the terrorist attack in 2002.
Keelty expressed the view that Australia was more vulnerable to terrorist attack since its 'entry' into Iraq and the Madrid massacres. Howard, unwisely, disputed his police chief's view and publicly reprimanded him, but was forced into 'damage control' after many people expressed outrage at the behaviour of the Prime Minister.

LABOR MEMBER SPEAKS OUT ON SALE OF TELSTRA

by Don Auchterlonie
Federal Member for McMillan, Christian Zahra spoke out against the sale of Telstra during a recent debate in Parliament on the 'privatisation' of Telstra Bill.
Victorian activists should send the politician messages of support and encouragement for the stand he is taking. Mr. Zahra says there is no support in rural areas for the sale of Telstra.
He conducted his own survey of the rural areas of his electorate, and over 12,000 people responded to him. Out of the 12,000 who responded 10,079 thought the Telstra services would deteriorate if the remaining shares were sold. Overwhelmingly, the people said, "Do not sell the remaining shares of Telstra" reported Mr. Zahra.
It was reported in the local paper he went on to denounce the Nationals for failing to stand up for country areas. "The Nationals have really sold out the interests of rural and regional Australia," he said, "They have been a gutless mob."

THE CRIME COMMITTED IN OUR NAME

by John Pilger from LewRockwell.com. 22nd March 2004.
"The invasion of Iraq, which began one year ago today, was 'organised with lies,' says the new Spanish Prime Minister. Does anyone doubt this any more?
And yet these proven lies are still dominant in Australia. Day after day, their perpetrators seek to obfuscate and justify an unprovoked, illegal attack that killed up to 55,000 people, including at least 10,000 civilians; that every month causes the death and injury of 1000 children from exploding cluster bombs; that has so saturated Iraqi towns and cities with uranium that American and British soldiers are warned not to go where Iraqi children play, for fear of contamination.
Set that carnage against the Madrid atrocity. Terrible though that act of terrorism was, it was small compared with the terrorism of the American-led 'coalition.' Yes, terrorism. How strange it reads when it describes the actions of 'our' governments. So saturated are we in the West in the devilry of Third World tyrants (most of them the products of Western imperialism) that we have lost all sense of the enormous crime committed in our name.
This is not rhetoric. In 1946, the judges who tried the German leadership at Nuremberg called the unprovoked invasion of a sovereign country "the supreme international war crime." That principle guided more than half a century of international law, until Bush and Blair and Howard tore it up, covering their actions with a litany of lies.

On February 4 last year, in a speech lasting less than an hour, John Howard referred more than 30 times to the "threat" posed by Saddam Hussein. He offered authoritative detail: that Iraq's "arsenal of chemical and biological weapons (was) intact" and was a "massive program." All of this was false.
Ray McGovern, one of the CIA's most senior analysts and a personal friend of George Bush snr, told me: "It was 95 per cent charade. And they all knew it: Bush, Blair, Howard."
The true danger is where a rampant superpower will strike next: watch out Korea, Syria, Iran, even China.

The genocidal embargo aided and abetted by Australia
Set that truth against the present carnage in Iraq, and set it against the wilful destruction that preceded it, which was barely reported in Australia.
The UN's two senior officials in Iraq in the 1990s, Denis Halliday and Hans Von Sponeck, both assistant secretaries-general of the UN, have described in detail a "genocidal embargo" imposed by America under a UN flag of convenience, aided and abetted by Australia.
"Almost a million Iraqis died as a direct result," Halliday told me, "including at least half a million children. The UNICEF studies are on the record. It was US policy to destroy the infrastructure of Iraq, such as the water supply, which killed thousands of infants. By the time Bush invaded, a once prosperous country was a stricken nation." In fact, UN records show that up to July 2002, more than $US5 billion worth of humanitarian aid, approved by the UN Security Council and paid for by Iraq, was blocked by the US.
How many Australians are aware of this and Australia's complicity?

Howard sent RAN ships to police what in reality was a medieval-style siege? Who dared listen to Halliday and other distinguished witnesses that it was this terrible siege that reinforced Saddam's rule and prevented the Iraqi people from getting rid of him?


Framing national debate in terms and clichés of mendacious power
All this has been suppressed in Australia while the latest lies are channelled and amplified by journalists. I am not referring to the usual far-right windbags but those broadcasters who believe sincerely they are being objective; by constantly framing the national debate in the terms and clichés of mendacious power, they collude with it, censoring by omission. Do they ever consider that the very notion of a 'war on terror' is absurd when the power in Washington claiming to combat terror has run an empire of terror: Indonesia, Vietnam, Cambodia, Laos, Chile, El Salvador, Nicaragua and now Haiti, again? By comparison al-Qaeda is a lethal flea. The true danger is where a rampant superpower will strike next: watch out Korea, Syria, Iran, even China.

As the prisoners begin to struggle home from the American concentration camp at Guantanamo Bay, the scale of the crime is emerging. We now know that the British military command virtually refused to send troops to Iraq until Blair gave them a guarantee they would not be prosecuted by the International Criminal Court. Blair's guarantee was worthless. And that frightens the British establishment, and the Australian establishment, too.
Unlike the US, Britain and Australia are signatories to the ICC.

The times are changing; Washington-manipulated show trials of Third World dictators are giving way to the promise of universal justice, however tenuous it may seem. The dock awaits those Westerners who bring terrorism to faraway countries, then watch it blow back in our faces. Like al-Qaeda, they should not be allowed to get away with it."

John Pilger was born and educated in Sydney, Australia. He has been a war correspondent, filmmaker and playwright. Based in London, he has written from many countries and has twice won British journalism's highest award, that of "Journalist of the Year," for his work in Vietnam and Cambodia. © John Pilger 2004, John Pilger Archives.


BUSH SAYS 'GOD' CHOSE HIM TO LEAD NATION

by Barry Turner
The following article was taken from the Australian League of Rights' sister publication the British On Target. The writer, Barry Turner, is a former British Army officer. He has written extensively on the horrendous circumstances and appalling conditions the Iraqi people have had to suffer - and for which much of the responsibility lies at the feet of western governments.

God in the service of George W. Bush - some god!
The caption to a photograph published in The Independent on Sunday 9th November, 2003 ran "a boy lies in hospital after being severely injured by a cluster bomb near his Baghdad home:
The covering article was headed "Allies resist call to clear up lethal aftermath of war", and opened with: "The British and U.S. governments have significantly watered down efforts to create a legal obligation to clear up millions of bombs in former war zones such as Iraq, Kosovo, Afghanistan and Laos, aid agencies say".

In Iraq these were the innocent people that the Coalition Forces "invaded" to liberate, some 10,000 of whom perished. Countless more were maimed arid injured in this relentless United States drive towards "democracy" amongst the alien and historic cultures of the Middle East. This, of course, does not include 1,000,000 innocent Iraqi men, women and children who died as a result of the deliberate destruction of the civilian infrastructure during the first Gulf War in 1991, and a decade of unnecessarily draconian sanctions driven by the United States and the United Kingdom in the name of the United Nations.
It does not include a legacy of directly inflicted or American-sponsored genocide elsewhere, in East Timor, Latin America and Indo China.

Let us take just one view, from the United States grass-roots, sent by one of our correspondents, in the case of the contrived United States invasion of Panama under President Bush the elder:
"Well you're better off taking chances on the "outside" until this shit [Iraq, 2003] blows over. I was gonna re-up [re-enlist] back in '88 but I had a feeling that Central America would be calling me. Sure enough, a year after I got out Bush 1 sent my old unit to Panama. Trust me, from what my old cohorts told me about that event you want nothing to do with a mess like this! My old unit did perimeter duty on a civilian neighbourhood that the air force fire-bombed. They burned down about 10 city blocks, elderly, kids, babies, everybody burned. If you ever get a chance, go to a video store and rent a -movie called "The Panama Deception". That tells the story of what happened down there. . . . It was fun playing G.I. Joe in peacetime, but it's sheer hell in war time!"

Those senior officers of the Armed Forces who take up directorships in the Armaments Industry, those who stroll dutifully to Christian church services at the weekend, those senior civil servants who formulate our policies, those off-shore bankers and tycoons who milk our economy, and the economies of Third World countries they help to arm or "liberate", those mothers who drive their children to school in well-upholstered off-road four-wheel-drive vehicles during the week and many others in the comfortably secure materialist environment of Great Britain, (and Australia …ed) might well reflect on precisely which god, or what kind of god, they have in mind…?


ARISTIDE AND THE OPERATION 'ENDURING SWEATSHOP'

Succinct summary of the US-fomented Haitian coup d'etat. Excerpts from "Hidden from the Headlines" a Haiti Action Committee pamphlet https://www.haitiaction.net/HidFrame.html

"The United States is attacking Haiti's government and popular organizations not because Haiti is a compliant partner, but precisely because it represents an alternative to globalization and corporate domination.
Despite strong opposition from the business sector, on February 7, 2003, Aristide doubled the minimum wage from 36 to 70 gourdes a day. This wage hike affects the more than 20,000 people who work in Port-au-Prince assembly factories, which contract with major U.S. corporations such as Wal-Mart and Disney.
In 1995, with near universal support from the Haitian people, Aristide disbanded the Haitian military, perhaps the single greatest advance in Haiti since independence. Clearing away the prime historic instrument of state repression has allowed the Haitian people to enjoy a level of freedom of speech and assembly unprecedented in Haitian history.

When Aristide returned to Haiti in 1994, U.S. officials expected that Haiti's public enterprises (the telephone, company, electrical company, airport, port, three banks, a cement factory and flourmill) would be quickly sold to private corporations, preferably to U.S. multinationals working in partnership with the Haitian elite. In the last months of his first term as President, Aristide refused to move forward with privatisation, calling instead for a national dialogue on the issue. It was at this point that $550 million in promised international aid stopped flowing.

Haiti is currently implementing a Universal Schooling Program aimed at giving every child an education. More schools were built in Haiti from 1994-2000 than between 1804 and 1994 - many in rural areas where no schools existed previously.
These programmes represent a progressive agenda, initiated under the most trying conditions. They give hope to the people of Haiti, as demonstrated by the massive popular support that continues to be manifested for the Aristide government. And they are the reason that the United States government has targeted the government of Haiti.

The Short Answer - Aristide
1. Doubled the minimum wage
2. Dismantled the military
3. Built schools
4. Opposed privatisation
5. Won elections

US interests are
1. Economic: Secure Haiti as cheap labour source for US multinationals' sweatshop suppliers
2. Political, or The Mafia Don principle: demonstrate to other leaders in the region what happens when you defy the US agenda (a special delivery on that message to Chavez in Venezuela)
3. Strategic: Create a Haitian military that will operate as US proxy so that #1 will happen and #2 will not be necessary again.

Summary
Aristide symbolised the popular resistance to the US neoliberal agenda in Haiti and the region. Haitian neoliberals, representing the sweatshop owning class, could not win democratic elections, due to the strength of the popular movement led by Aristide.
The US created the "Contra" force to invade and destabilise Aristide's government, and then sent in the US Marines to remove him. Now they will install the sweatshop owners as puppet government, assassinate the leaders of the Lavalas movement, and re-establish the Haitian military to protect the interests of US multinationals and the sweatshop owners in maintaining Haiti as a cheap labor assembly production site.


URGENT SUBMISSIONS FOR SENATE ENQUIRY INTO REPUBLIC

from Phillip Benwell, Australian Monarchist League
There are only a few days to the close of submissions for the Senate Inquiry into a Republic. As of the 21st March, only 110 submissions have been posted onto the Senate web-site. Admittedly it is ten days since they have posted submissions, but 110 submissions, of which approximately half are negative to the Inquiry is not enough to make the sort of impact we need. If you have not yet written your submission, may I urge you to do so saying in your own words:
NO to any plebiscites. They are contrary to our Constitution and should not be used to upset a Referendum result with which Senators are not in agreement.
NO to a further Referendum on constitutional change. After all it is just over four years since the last exhaustive debate and Referendum of 1999.
NO to a republic. This is not an issue with the people. Using polls of 1200 people is not sufficient to warrant such a large expenditure by the Senate on this Inquiry.
Submissions can be emailed as follows: The Secretary, Senate Legal and Constitutional References Committee, Parliament House, CANBERRA ACT 2600. Phone: 6277 3560 Fax: (02) 6277 5794 Email: legcon.sen@aph.gov.au

BASIC FUND

The Basic Fund figure has risen to $18,614.60 - that's very encouraging. Although it would be such a load off our minds if we could have a rush of contributions which would bring us up closer to the target for this financial year. Please consider contributing to the fund. The League works with a very moderate basic fund, but it does need to fill it each year.

ADELAIDE CONSERVATIVE SPEAKERS' CLUB

The next gathering of the CSC will be held on Monday 5th April, 2004 at the Public Schools' club, 207 East Terrace (cnr. Carrington) Adelaide. A two-course Dinner, $18 per person, will be served from approx. 6.30pm. Guest speaker on "Sex Education in the Schools", is Mr. David d'Lima, J.P., B.Th., Dip. Ed. David, a member of Festival of Light, has served in a full-time 'faith' capacity since 1994.
Children in South Australian State Schools have been exposed to morally bankrupt sex education for many years. But in 2003 a far worse attack upon their welfare surfaced when 15 State Schools began trialling the controversial "Share" sex education curriculum. David will reveal why many parents were outraged by the package and why the Labor Government has been forced to reconsider its approach.
Bookings to be in by Thursday 1st April by phoning: 8296 4704. The message will be taped by the Mayo Tape Library as usual. Readers of On Target can obtain a copy of the address by ordering from Mayo Tapes, Box 6, Hahndorf, South Australia 5245.

BOOKS ON THE IMPORTANCE OF COMMON LAW

"Magna Carta" - Its continuing importance in our lives today. Price$ 8.00 posted

"The Making of Magna Carta" - Price S8.00 posted

"The Father of Lies" - by Arthur Chresby. Price $5.00 posted

"Towards Better Government" - An excellent booklet for understanding common law and how common law is an integral part of our Constitution and law today, in other words RIGHT NOW!
Excerpt: The Magna Charta 1225, which is still valid today and is the hallmark of our freedom and liberties, states: "No freeman shall be taken or imprisoned or be disseised of his freehold, or liberties, or free customs or be outlawed, or exiled, or any otherwise destroyed, nor will we not pass upon him, nor condemn him, but by lawful judgement of his peers, or by the law of the land. We will sell to no man, we will not deny or defer to any man either justice or right.
Price $8.00 posted

"The Westminster Tradition and Australia" - The parliamentary democratic system inherited from Britain by Leslie R. Marchant. Price S20.00 posted

"The Australian Heritage Series" - Three excellent essays by Canon Arthur Fellows, Dr. David Mitchell and Dr. Geoffrey Dobbs. Price $8.00 posted

"The Essential Christian Heritage" - Magna Carta - Individual Sovereignty - English Common Law - Charity - Representative Government -Personal Responsibility by Eric D. Butler. Price $3.50 posted.

© Published by the Australian League of Rights, P.O. Box 27 Happy Valley, SA 5159