Science of the Social Credit Measured in Terms of Human Satisfaction
Christian based service movement warning about threats to rights and freedom irrespective of the label, Science of the Social Credit Measured in Terms of Human Satisfaction
"All that is necessary for the triumph of evil is that good men do nothing"
Edmund Burke
Science of the Social Credit Measured in Terms of Human Satisfaction
Home Blog Freedom Potentials The Cross Roads Veritas Books
OnTarget Archives Newtimes Survey Podcast Library Video Library PDF Library
Actionist Corner YouTube Video Channel BitChute Video Channel Brighteon Video Channel Social Credit Library

On Target

2 September 2005. Thought for the Week: "If you envisage men as being only men, you are bound to see human society, not in Christian terms as a family, but as a factory farm in which the only consideration that matters is the well being of the livestock and the prosperity or productivity of the enterprise... And it is in that situation that western man is increasingly finding himself."
Malcolm Muggeridge in "The Great Liberal Death Wish"

"I would give everything I own to have one more glimpse of my son. How dare Bush live a normal life when he has ruined mine by his lies? How dare he take 5 weeks off when he is waging a needless war?'"
Cindy Sheehan, AlterNet, USA

"Disraeli practised the teaching of Christianity; he was not merely "a baptized Jew". After the Indian Mutiny in 1857 he said: 'I protest against meeting atrocities by atrocities. I have heard things and seen things written of late which would make me almost suppose that the religious opinions of the people of England had undergone some sudden change, and that, instead of bowing before the name of Jesus, we were preparing to revive the worship of Moloch. I cannot believe that it is our duty to indulge in such a spirit'."
Benjamin Disraeli, quoted in Douglas Reed's "The Controversy of Zion".


by James Reed:

The Australian, 29 July, 2005 featured an article where aging Bob Hawke, former prime minister of Australia "warned" business leaders that they must change their "condescending" attitude towards the Chinese if they are to succeed "in the world's biggest market". Hawke has advised companies seeking to enter the Chinese market. Hawke said that an attitude of "moral superiority" has to be eliminated. Business leaders have this attitude because of China's human rights record.
Hawke said: "The US talks about human rights … we look at how long they were into their industrialisation (before considering human rights issues and black issues".
Sorry 'silver hair' its not as simple as that. Consider China's treatment of Tibet. Chairman Mao's troops, the Chinese Peoples' Liberation Army took over the country 46 years ago. Today dissidents are executed or clubbed to death. Buddhist nuns are often sexually tortured. The Chinese are "modernising" the country, building airports, highways and railways. Tibet is a "strategic buffer" to the West and a vast store of mineral and energy wealth. Hawke is saying that to make a few bucks the West should ignore Tibet. On the contrary, Tibet is a living symbol of China's real ambitions and of the fate which awaits the West if China becomes No.1.
Remember the lesson of "Pig Iron Bob" Menzies who sold Aussie steel to the Japanese in the 1930s, only to have it fired back at us in WW II.


by James Reed

Each year in our high schools students study Arthur Miller's play "The Crucible". The play, on the surface is about the Salem witch hunt trials in America in colonial days, but as Miller has said, this is just a metaphor for McCarthyism. According to the Left, America in the late 1940s and early 1950s was in the grip of a paranoid "Witch Hunt" against Communists. Senator Joseph McCarthy and the House of UnAmerican Activities Committee falsely claimed, the Left says, that Communist spies were occupying key positions. Arthur Miller is cited by our teachers as telling the "truth" about the matter: "Practically everyone I knew stood within the conventions of the political left or centre; one or two were
Communist party members, some were fellow-travellers, and most had a brush with Marxist ideas or organisations".
Miller also claims: "I have never been able to believe in the reality of these people being actual or putative traitors any more than I could be, yet others like them were being fired from teaching or jobs in government or large corporations". Miller also believes that Hollywood is guilt free as Hollywood "wrote not propaganda but entertainment … most of it mindless".

Although this Left propaganda is still fed to high school students the truth is that everything that Miller proclaims is false. With the opening of the Moscow archives it has been known for some time that many of the "heroes" of the left of that period were KGB operatives. Many artists were members of the Communist Party. The black singer Paul Robson, praised by Miller as a champion of anti-racism, received the Stalin Prize in 1953 and after the dictator's death he signed a eulogy which contained the words: "Glory to Stalin. Forever will his name be honoured and beloved in all lands".

That such mythology is still perpetrated in our schools through the "teaching" (or indoctrination) of children through the study of trash such as Miller's "The Crucible", is a disgrace.


by Betty Luks

John Howard, we are informed, is to receive a US Woodrow Wilson Award and one of the judging panel was Condoleezza Rice from the Bush camp. No surprises there. Howard stated he would receive the award "on behalf of all the Australian people". I want him to know he does not receive it on my behalf.


In a "Letter to the Editor" West Australian, 25/8/05, Mr.Michael Macaulay of Bayswater, WA. put the matter thus:
"The announcement that John Howard is the recipient of a top US public service award, namely the highly coveted Woodrow Wilson Award, has confirmed what one has long suspected - that the Prime Minister of Australia is clearly a servant of the US.
Australia's policies are without doubt formulated in Washington and then carried out to the letter by our "ever grateful for photo opportunities" Prime Minister, who thrives on the false adulation showered on him by George Bush and members of his administration.

Section 44 (i) of the Australian Constitution clearly states that "any person who is under acknowledgment of allegiance, obedience or adherence to a foreign power, or is a subject or citizen or entitled to the rights or privileges of a subject or a citizen of a foreign power, shall be incapable of being chosen or of sitting as a senator or a member of the House of Representatives.
The Prime Minister's track record of allegiance, obedience and adherence to the US speaks for itself. His blind obedience to the US has seen Australia support unprovoked and illegal attacks on two sovereign nations thereby breaking the Geneva Convention, the United Nations Charter, the ANZUS Treaty and the Australian Constitution.

Under his leadership, Australia, in support of the US, has refused to ratify the Kyoto Protocol, declined to sign up for the International Criminal Court, refused to support a United Nations resolution condemning Israel's wall and allowed the US to hold two Australians prisoner at Guantanamo for years without any effort to have them freed.
That's why he has received this award. He's a good and faithful public servant to the US."

I would have been more specific and said he was a good and faithful servant of the powerful neocons surrounding - and directing George Bush.


Brilliantly described by Douglas Reed in "The Controversy of Zion"* he was the idealistic schoolteacher brought to the Presidency in the United States to further the "Grand Design" of the semi-secret forces responsible for his election. The League of Nations, forerunner to the United Nations, was promoted by Wilson at the end of the First World War. It was under his presidency that the (private) Federal Reserve System was designed and set up to secure a stranglehold on the US financial system and the economy.
Woodrow Wilson was the creature of these semi-secret forces which ensured he got elected to carry out their plans. Douglas Reed wrote he was much impressed by the "uncanny knowledge" displayed by a leading Zionist of the day, Rabbi Stephen Wise, until he read his Private Papers. In 1910 Rabbi Wise told a New Jersey audience, "On Tuesday Mr. Woodrow Wilson will be elected governor of your State; he will not complete his term of office as governor; in November 1912 he will be elected President of the United States; he will be inaugurated for the second time as president".
The strategy and tactics used to get their creature elected were devised by one Edward Mandell House, Wilson's alter ego; and such tactics and strategies are now commonplace for political parties. Does the story sound familiar fellow Australian?
* "The Controversy of Zion," available from all League Book Services. It is a classic.


Eric Butler perceived (O.T. 28/9/79) that with an over exaggerated self righteousness linked with a generous nature, the American people would prove to be "almost perfect material for involvement in grandiose and highly idealistic international projects".
"Thomas Jefferson," he wrote, "described the United States as 'a universal nation pursuing universally valid ideas', while his contemporary, John Adams, claimed that the United States was destined 'to govern the globe and introduce the perfection of man'.

"On one hand the United States made a special contribution to furthering the best features of Western Civilisation, while on the other hand the enormous wealth" was used as a base "by international financiers and their associates to work towards the age-old goal for a World State".

The United States was the base from which Wall Street international financiers operated to impose Bolshevism upon the unfortunate peoples of Russia. It was the base from which the attack on the old British Empire was sustained. It was the base from which blood transfusions for maintaining the Communist Empire were (and are) financed. The people of the United States, and their resources, were sucked into disasters like Vietnam - and now Afghanistan and Iraq.
Perhaps one of the most hopeful developments in the world crisis is that the American people are increasingly rejecting the concept of being used to create New World Orders.
But sadly, these powerful forces have now brought America to her knees (with Australia close behind) while at the same time building up their next 'centre of power' - Communist China.


by James Reed

Gary McKinnon, a British computer engineer, brought the US defence systems to their knees. From a computer in his bedroom in North London, McKinnon hacked into the Pentagon army, navy and NASA systems. McKinnon put out of action Earlestation in New Jersey responsible for the restocking of the Atlantic Fleet. Surely if there were terrorists out there, they would be doing it McKinnon's way rather than using planes and bombs. Why then haven't terrorists made use of cyber-attacks? Is it because terrorists are technically unsophisticated or is there another reason? Could cyber-terrorism be the shape of the future?


by Ian Wilson LL.B.

Some of Britain's most eminent judges have warned politicians that they must not undermine the independence of the judiciary in the "war on terrorism'. Blair had told the judges that he would renounce part of the European Convention on Human Rights. Lord Carlile of Berriew, a deputy High Court judge said: "If the government undermines the judiciary then the judiciary might be tempted to undermine the government. Lord Ackner said: "The judiciary will oppose attempts to undermine its independence. These suggestions that we [politicians and judges] are all a team and should pull together is such rubbish that the judiciary will ignore it". Further conflict between parliament and the judiciary seems inevitable.


by James Reed

We have been waiting a long time to see any strong criticism of the multicultural madness in the Murdoch press. Perhaps the London bombings is a turning point. John Stone wrote in an article entitled "One Nation, One Culture," The Australian 22 July 2005, that what is at fault for the London bombings is that "successive British governments have persisted in the multicultural folly that a nation can be built on separate and equal cultures. Moreover, under Tony Blair in particular, Britain's immigration policies and border patrols against illegal immigration have become international jokes and now a national tragedy".

Stone goes on to point out that even those journalists from the Left, such as Pamela Bone "have questioned the whole basis of our official multicultural policies". Stone asks: "can we any longer pretend that our official multicultural policies, introduced by Gough Whitlam and assiduously pursued by all his successors, are in our national interest?

More pointedly, how are we to handle our growing self-created Muslim problem?
"Catch the Fire Ministries" was found "guilty" under the Victorian "Racial and Religious Tolerance Act" for religious vilification of Islam for making claims, amongst others, that Islam plans to take over the world.

The Australian 27 July 2005, published an article by Daniel Pipes "Jihadist Motive No Secret" where he states: "The terrorists want to establish a Muslim world dominated by Islamic law". The terrorists want "a world dominated by Muslims, Islam and the Sharia… the establishment of a worldwide caliphate founded on Sharia". The dogma of multiculturalism and its associated politically correct fear and legal sanctions involved in criticising cultures, religions and races is permitting terrorism to flourish.

Multiculturalism thus, is a form of terrorism itself.


by James Reed

An article tucked away on page 11 of The Australian 8 August 2005, had the headline "Riyadh Warned Britain of Blasts". Saudi Arabia had warned Britain of an "imminent" terrorist threat a few weeks before the July London bombings. Calls from two al Qa'ieda operatives were traced to suspected British terrorists. This warning came four months before the attack.
Meanwhile political correctness still reigns in London. Allegations that police had been race profiling suspected terrorists to include Asians and Blacks was rejected by the chief constable of the British Transport Police, Ian Johnston, who said that this hands the tactics to the terrorists, who, presumably will now use blonde Anglo Saxon women as suicide bombers.

The reality of the matter is that the racial aspect is relevant. Denying that is not only political correctness gone mad - it is an invitation for leaving the terrorist problem unsolved.


There have already been some big winners out of Australia's free-trade deal with the United States - American lawyers and lobbyists. Foreign Minister Alexander Downer, in answer to a question from his Labor counterpart Kevin Rudd, has revealed the government spent $1.5 million on US-based lobbyists and lawyers to get the deal. The firm Bockorny Petrizzo Inc was paid $605,409 over two-and-a-half years for its efforts.
Congress insider magazine The Hill recently named the firm, and one of its chief lobbyists David Bockorny, as one of the most influential lobbyists in Washington. Australia paid another $839,343 to the huge law firm Mayer, Brown, Rowe and Maw over the same two-and-a-half years for its efforts. The firm, with more than 1,300 lawyers across the US and Europe, is one of the 10 largest law operations in the world.
Another $59,649 was paid to the firm Covington and Burling for its legal advice and lobbying over a new type of visa for Australian business people.
Since the trade deal started operation this year, Australia's trade deficit with the US has worsened. Australian exports fell $9.4 billion over the 12 months to June this year, while imports from the US jumped $2 billion to $21.3 billion. The trade deficit now stands at $11.8 billion, the largest Australia runs with any nation. (Internet report).


by Jennifer Loewenstein, visiting Fellow at the Refugee Studies Centre at Oxford University in the fall.
She can be reached:

Jennifer: "When one takes back stolen properties from a thief, the thief should not cry and make a fuss about it." What you wrote is the exact truth that, deep inside their guts, the majority of the world knows ....but they are in a state of disbelief and confusion by the huge propaganda of the international Zionism that is now ruling the earth. They have turned the picture, the Zionist Israeli Jews who are the thieves of land that does not belong to them, and now pictured and falsely demonstrated by the greatest propaganda on earth as the victims who are dragged out of their properties. Comment from the Adelaide Institute website.

"A great charade is taking place in front of the world media in the Gaza Strip. It is the staged evacuation of 8000 Jewish settlers from their illegal settlement homes, and it has been carefully designed to create imagery to support Israel's US-backed takeover of the West Bank and cantonization of the Palestinians.
There was never the slightest reason for Israel to send in the army to remove these settlers. The entire operation could have been managed, without the melodrama necessary for a media frenzy, by providing them with a fixed date on which the IDF would withdraw from inside the Gaza Strip. A week before, all the settlers will quietly have left with no TV cameras, no weeping girls, no anguished soldiers, no commentators asking cloying questions of how Jews could remove other Jews from their homes, and no more trauma about their terrible suffering, the world's victims, who therefore have to be helped to kick the Palestinians out of the West Bank.

Relocate to other illegal settlements - and handsome compensation in the bargain
The settlers will relocate to other parts of Israel and in some cases to other illegal settlements in the West Bank handsomely compensated for their inconvenience. Indeed, each Jewish family leaving the Gaza Strip will receive between $140,000 and $400,000 just for the cost of the home they leave behind. But these details are rarely mentioned in the tempest of reporting on the "great confrontation" and "historical moment" brought to us by Sharon and the thieving, murderous settler-culture he helped create…

Where were the media feeding-frenzies when the 23,000 Palestinian homes were bulldozed?

Where were the cameramen in May 2004 in Rafah when refugees twice over lost their homes again in a single night's raid, able to retrieve nothing of what they owned?
Where were they when bulldozers and tanks tore up paved streets with steel blades, wrecked the sewage and water pipes, cut electricity lines, and demolished a park and a zoo; when snipers shot two children, a brother and sister, feeding their pigeons on the roof of their home?
When the occupying army fired a tank shell into a group of peaceful demonstrators killing 14 of them including two children?
Where have they been for the past five years when the summer heat of Rafah makes life so unbearable it is all one can do to sit quietly in the shade of one's corrugated tin roof -- because s/he is forbidden to go to the sea, ten minutes' walking distance from the city center? Or because if they ventured to the more open spaces they became walking human targets?
And when their citizens resisted, where were the accolades and the admiring media to comment on the "pluck," the "will" and "audacity" of these "young people"?

On Tuesday, 16 August, the Israeli daily Haaretz reported that more than 900 journalists from Israel and around the world are covering the events in Gaza, and that hundreds of others are in cities and towns in Israel to cover local reactions.
Were there ever that many journalists in one place during the past 5 years to cover the Palestinian Intifada?
Where were the 900 international journalists in April 2002 after the Jenin refugee camp was laid to waste in the matter of a week in a show of pure Israeli hubris and sadism?
Where were the 900 international journalists last fall when the Jabalya refugee camp in Gaza lay under an Israeli siege and more than 100 civilians were killed?
Where were they for five years while the entire physical infrastructure of the Gaza Strip was being destroyed?
Which one of them reported that every crime of the Israeli occupation from home demolitions, targeted assassinations and total closures to the murder of civilians and the wanton destruction of commercial and public property- increased significantly in Gaza after Sharon's "Disengagement" Plan - that great step toward peace - was announced?

Where are the hundreds of journalists who should be covering the many non-violent protests by Palestinians and Israelis against the Apartheid Wall?
Non-violent protesters met with violence and humiliation by Israeli armed forces?
Where are the hundreds of journalists who should be reporting of the bisection of the West Bank and the subdivision of each region into dozens of isolated mini-prisons?
Why aren't we being barraged by outraged reports about the Jewish-only bypass roads?
About the hundreds of pointless internal checkpoints? About the countless untried executions and maimings?
About the torture and abuse of Palestinians in Israeli prisons?
Where were these hundreds of journalists when each of the 680 Palestinian children shot to death by Israeli soldiers over the last 5 years was laid to rest by grief-stricken family members?

The shame of it all defies words
Now instead report after report announces the "end to the 38 year old occupation" of the Gaza Strip, a "turning point for peace" and the news that "it is now illegal for Israelis to live in Gaza."

Is this some kind of joke?
Yes, it is "illegal for Israelis to live in the Gaza Strip" as colonizers from another land. It has been illegal for 38 years. (If they wish to move there and live as equals with the Palestinians and not as Israeli citizens they may do so.) Jews are retaining control of the land - a giant penal colony
Sharon's unilateral "Disengagement" plan is not ending the occupation of Gaza. The Israelis are not relinquishing control over the Strip. They are retaining control of all land, air and sea borders including the Philadelphi corridor along the Gaza/Egypt border where the Egyptians may be allowed to patrol under Israel's watchful eye and according to Israel's strictest terms.
The 1.4 million inhabitants of Gaza remain prisoners in a giant penal colony, despite what their partisan leaders are attempting to claim. The IDF is merely redeploying outside the Gaza Strip, which is surrounded by electrical and concrete fences, barbed wire, watchtowers, armed guards and motion censors, and it will retain the authority to invade Gaza on a whim.
Eight thousand Palestinian workers working in Israel for slave wages will soon be banned from returning to work. Another 3,200 Palestinians who worked in the settlements for a sub-minimum-wage have been summarily dismissed without recourse to severance pay or other forms of compensation. Still others will lose their livelihoods when the Israelis move the Gaza Industrial Zone from Erez to somewhere in the Negev desert.

What will it take to get the truth across to people?
To the young woman of Neve Dekalim who can speak her words without batting an eyelash of embarrassment or shame?
As the cameras zoom in on angry settlers poignantly clashing with their "brothers and sisters" in the Israeli army, who will be concerned about their other brothers and sisters in Gaza?
When will the Palestinian history of 1948 and 1967, and of each passing day under the violence of dispossession and dehumanization, get a headline in our papers?
I am reminded of an interview I had this summer in Beirut with Hussein Nabulsi of Hizbullah an organization that has had nothing to do with the movement for Palestinian national liberation whatsoever, but one that has become allied with those it sees as the real victims of US and Israeli policies and lies. I remember his tightly shut eyes and his clenched fists as he asked how long Arabs and Muslims were supposed to accept the accusations that they are the victimizers and the terrorists. "It hurts," he said in a whispered ardour. "It hurts so much to watch this injustice every day". And he went on to explain to me why the Americans and the Israelis with their monstrous military arsenals will never be victorious."


The Annual Basic Fund concludes this week with the final figure of $54,446.80. Thank you to all those generous and loyal people who have demonstrated their confidence and support in the work of the League by their financial support. A good result. As reported last week, we are taking another giant step of faith and details will be presented at the AGM in October.


We cannot emphasise too strongly just what a valuable tool is the League of Rights' CDRom with its forty years of On Target political and social commentary. The above historical information is speedily 'tapped into' on your computer - it is at your finger tips with the use of this valuable tool. CDRom at any of the League Book Services. Price: $32.00 posted.

ALOR has brought out a Special Edition of the August 2005 The New Times Survey. It contains an essay - "Racial Treason: From White Australia Policy to the Yellow Australia Policy" - with a comprehensive bibliography. Contributing writers John Peterson and Rohan Phillips have delved back fifty or more years into Australia's history to dis-uncover those who were first pushing for the immigration and multicultural/multiracial policies and Asianisation of Australia; policies that have dramatically changed the culture and demography of our nation. Many will not like what they read, but the facts speak for themselves.

One reader commented after reading the Special Edition
"We really didn't have many batting for us did we?" No D.A., we didn't. We were sold out, we were betrayed by our so-called leaders.

Send for your bulk supplies now! One copy $3.00 posted; five copies $12.50 posted and 10 copies $20.00 posted. Send Money Order/Cheque to Australian League of Rights, Box 1052, GPO, Melbourne 3001. Don't forget to include return address


Last calls for the two-day 'school' on "The Spirit of Australia's Constitution and History". Dr. David Mitchell, B.A., LL.B., LL.M., Ph.D. has graciously consented to present this two-day seminar outlining the foundations of our Constitution and History. The two-day school will be filmed to ensure wider distribution.
The dates are: Saturday and Sunday 10th-11th, September, 2005. The venue is The Public Schools' Club, 207 East Terrace, Adelaide. The Frank Bawden Memorial Dinner will be held on Saturday evening, 10th September, 2005.
Further details available by phoning: 8296 4704.
Two-day Seminar: $24.00. Frank Bawden Memorial Dinner: $26.00. Sunday Lunch: $10.00.
Post cheques/money orders to: Heritage Books, P.O. Box 27, Happy Valley 5159.
Don't forget to indicate what the bookings and monies are for - and include your name and address.


Pastor Danny Nalliah from "Catch the Fire Ministries" has accepted an invitation to present a paper "A Christian's Right to Free Speech," at the National Seminar on the Saturday (morning) 8th October.

Mr. Paul Fromm from Canada will also be one of the guest speakers.

Now is the time to make plans for the National Weekend's "New Times Dinner", Seminar and Divine Service and Conference.
Dates are: "New Times" Dinner, Friday 7th October. Seminar, Saturday, 8th October and Divine Service and Conference, Sunday, 9th October, 2005. A flyer will go out with On Target in the near future.
Venue is: The Main Function Room, The Hume Inn, Wodonga Place, Albury NSW.
© Published by the Australian League of Rights, P.O. Box 27 Happy Valley, SA 5159