|Home||blog.alor.org||Newtimes Survey||The Cross-Roads||Library|
|OnTarget Archives||The Social Crediter Archives||NewTimes Survey Archives||Brighteon Video Channel||Veritas Books|
|30 September 2005 Thought
for the Week: "The essential soul of a nation is in its character, its
culture and tradition. The King is the natural embodiment of Honours and Sanctions
- of Culture and Tradition and, as such, is naturally Supreme Commander of the
Our present situation is not adventitious - it is the outcome of a venomous hatred and envy of our indigenous qualities. If anyone is foolish enough to suppose that the prestige of this country and the Empire, and with them, the welfare of the population, can be restored by an appeal to an anonymous, irresponsible, and misinstructed ballot-box democracy, I can assure them that, if their opinion should prevail and our destinies be submitted to decision by that process, the outcome is a mathematical certainty - our final eclipse."
Clifford Hugh Douglas in "Realistic Constitutionalism," 1947.
UNIVERSITY DECISION SHOWS WANT OF "INTELLECTUAL SPINE"Following the decision by Deakin University not to publish Professor Andrew Fraser's article the following letter was sent to the Editor of The Australian by Nigel Jackson of Belgrave, Victoria.
"The decision by Deakin University to forbid the Deakin Law Review to publish Professor Andrew Fraser's essay "Rethinking the White Australia Policy" ('Uni backs off "racist" article', 20/9) is another major indicator of the serious loss of intellectual freedom that characterises contemporary Australia.
In simple terms, the essay and its author are the victims of the political obscurantism which is nakedly exposed by the essay's rigorous analysis. Fraser correctly points out that globalist ideology, based on 'the interwoven myths of equality and universal human rights', is enshrined in the fashionable assertion (expressed in the International Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Racial Discrimination and the Racial Discrimination Act of 1975) that 'any doctrine of superiority based on racial differentiation is scientifically false, morally condemnable, socially unjust and dangerous'.
Neither the UNO nor the Australian Parliament has any just grounds for prohibiting publication of objections to that political opinion (for that is all it is); and Deakin University ought to have had the intellectual spine to resist the pressure placed upon it. Vice-chancellor Sally Walker's excuse that 'universities are not exempt from the law, nor should they be' neglects the fact that universities, if they really acknowledge 'responsibility to encourage open public debate and scrutiny', must be willing to publicly challenge unjust laws or laws perceived as such. As it is, the University has provided further evidence to support Professor Fraser's observation that 'defenders of the ruling orthodoxy', unable to counter the growing body of scientific research unfavourable to their beliefs, 'are resorting to social ostracism, legal repression and physical coercion'.
Why is a scientific treatise met with 'hysterical reaction' and why are dissident views on race regarded 'as embarrassing social diseases'? The answer given by Professor Fraser is that such obscurantism undermines our traditional British culture and institutions which 'remain the principal constraints on managerial reach and power' of current transnational political elites. These elites use multiculturalism as a weapon to divide subject populations, 'the better to dominate them'.
It is thus in the interest of most Australians to support Professor Fraser and ensure that his views are heard and studied, rather than defamed and neglected."
FROM 'ON THE GRAPEVINE' - AUSTRALIA HAS NO CULTURE
by James Reed
An interesting article by Zuleyka
Zevallos appeared in the academic journal People and Place (vol.13, no2
2005), entitled "It's Like We're Their Culture": Second Generation Discuss Australian
Culture". Zevallos considered the views on Australian culture of 50 second-generation
migrant women aged 17 to 28 years. The women were from "Latin" and Turkish backgrounds.
These women "find it hard to see any Australian culture".
BRINGING 'EM IN BY THE BUCKET LOAD
From Len the Cleaner
Editor, you did invite me
to write again and I have taken you up on the invitation.
SOCIAL CREDIT NEWS FROM THE SOLOMON ISLANDSDear Sri Ramon Jun QUITALES II,
Thank you very much for offering to keep me posted on your activities in the Solomon's.
Thank you too for your efforts in this cause.
Your peoples' bank project looks very, very interesting and exciting.
Bill Daly, New Zealand.
From: Solomon SocialCredit Date: Tue, 20 Sep
Dear Sri Ramon Jun QUITALES II,
Thank you for your efforts to advance Social Credit in the Solomon's. In New Zealand (and) Canada the attempts to advance SC via the political party system has constantly proved to be soul destroying, taking always a great deal of effort and to date after many decades, still nothing to show for it.
I encourage you in your wonderful endeavours but also encourage you to seriously consider how much more useful it will be to have a SC movement outside of the party system - a grass roots movement and possibly also experiments in local credit schemes to demonstrate the advantages of using debt-free money systems.
The Democrats for Social Credit stood many candidates at New Zealand general elections last Saturday and barely got even a few votes. Also the SC Party in NZ over the years has from time to time allowed itself to support objectives that are not in any way real social credit, such as they are now supporting a 1 percent turnover tax. True this might provide a more sensible tax system to what is presently operating but does not in any way acknowledge the need for a completely new, and true to nature money system, in which almost all taxes could be easily abolished.
I'm on friendly terms with many people in the party here but have seen so much wasted effort and compromises over the decades that it would be unfortunate if this tragedy were repeated in the Solomon's.
With kindest regards and very best wishes for the future,
Bill Daly, New Zealand
US GOVERNMENT DID NOT FAIL ITS MISSION IN THE WAKE OF HURRICANE
following analysis of the US government response towards their people after Hurricane
Katrina is sobering reading. The analysis is by American author and writer G.
tells first responders not to respond until told to do so.
SO - WHAT'S GOING ON HERE?Were agents of the federal government trying to kill American citizens? Were they trying to obtain the maximum death toll and the highest level of human suffering?
It would seem that way at first, but I would like to suggest that this incredible behaviour stems from something else - something equally unsettling.
The primary job of the military, FEMA, and Homeland Security is not to protect the American people in times of emergency but to protect the government in times of emergency and keep it functioning.
Their primary assignment is, not to rescue people, but to control them. Their directive is to relocate families and businesses, confiscate property, commandeer goods, direct labour and services, and establish martial law.
The reason FEMA and Homeland security failed to carry out an effective rescue operation is that this was not their primary mission, and the reason they blocked others from doing so is that any operations not controlled by the central authority are contrary to their directives.
Their objective was to bring the entire area under the control of the federal government - and this they succeeded in doing very well. They did not fail in New Orleans. They were a huge success.
Once this simple fact is understood, everything that happened in the wake of Katrina becomes understandable and logical. If there are new terrorist attacks against the United States or Great Britain (or any other country), what we witnessed in New Orleans may have been a glimpse into the future of what was once a civilized world.
THE FROG IN THE WELLby James Reed
The Murdoch Press continues to celebrate the seeming divine inevitability of Chine becoming "No.1".
A recent article by Paul Lloyd in The Advertiser review (27-28 August 2005) entitled "New World Order" begins:
"The Middle Kingdom is destined to fulfil the ancient Chinese belief that it is the centre of the universe." China will overtake the US by 2049. Australians are the frogs in the well that can't comprehend the vast ocean that is China outside the well. That ocean is fast developing into a military tsunami.
Japanese Economics, Trade and Industry Minister, Shoichi Nakagawa, expressed concerns about the joint military exercises between Russia and China on Shandong Peninsula, China. The exercises were a strategic initiative by which Russia would aid China in suppression of Taiwan's independence. The Japanese see the emergence of an alliance to challenge American influence in the Pacific. Old 'commos' die hard.
by Andrew Ryan
Thomas E. Woods Jr. has published "The Politically Incorrect Guide to American History," (Regnery Publishing, 2004).
Woods is of the view that the states should have a prominent role as sovereign entities and that the federal government should be strictly limited. From this perspective Woods argues for a number of interesting theses.
The "American Revolution" was not a "revolution" but a conflict to preserve, for Americans, long-established rights which had been cast aside. The First Amendment prohibition against Congress enacting any law "respecting an establishment of religion" was to prevent federal interference with state religious establishments.
Woods argues that the civil war was not about slavery, but about the place of the States in the Union. Northerners, including Lincoln were not racial egalitarians but white supremacists. Lincoln himself supported repatriation of Negroes back to Africa.
Along with this Woods shows that the North abandoned established laws of war in its "total war" against the South that involved barbarism that had not been seen in civilised times. Civilians were targeted in such campaigns of terror that made the London bombings look like a Sunday school picnic. This is a provocative book. Australia needs its own version.
TURNING GREENHere is a 'horror story' that I have received by email.
Nottingham police have been urged to wear the Islamic battle symbol in the form of "good faith" ribbons to show solidarity with the Muslim community. Green is the battle flag of Islam: Mohammed wore a green turban when he rode into battle and his followers carried green banners. That's multiculturalism for you, British style.
I no longer despair or get upset about these absurdities; with each new drop of madness the hope that the toxins of liberalism will be bled out of the body social endures.
LAUNCESTON CONSERVATIVE SPEAKERS' CLUBThe next meeting of the LCSC will be held on Wednesday, 28 September, 2005.
Guest speaker will be Mr Ray Escobar convener of the One Nation Party [Tas]. His subject will be "What's in store for Us?"
He will be focusing on "what the government has in store for farmers, pensioners, the unemployed, small business, unions and workers of Australia. Your very livelihood and assets are in peril."
Venue is: the Max Fry Hall, Trevallyn and the meeting commences at 7.30pm.
POWERS AND RESPONSIBILITIES OF GOVERNOR GENERALAt the League of Rights' annual "Frank Bawden Memorial Dinner", Dr. David Mitchell outlined the Constitutional responsibilities and duties of the Governor General.
Which leads us to ask:
Can the Australian people join together on this one important issue and convince the Governor-General to act on their behalf? Surely telecommunications is a vital national public utility and should not be in the hands of foreigners nor potential enemies - and what about our military defence?
Send to the Mayo Tape Library, Box 6 Hahndorf, SA 5245 for the Frank Bawden Memorial Dinner address by constitutional authority Dr. David Mitchell - $6.00 posted - and then ask yourself, can the Australian people forget their differences and come together on this one most important issue? Is there a constitutional power the people can insist the Governor General use to still block the sale of Telstra?
AUDIO TAPES OF DAVID MITCHELL'S BRILLIANT ADDRESSES AVAILABLESeminar: "The Spirit of Australia's Constitution and History".
South Australians were treated to a veritable historical, legal and philosophical feast by Dr. David Mitchell at the "Spirit of Australia's Constitution and History" seminar recently held in Adelaide.
One person commended us for having the foresight to invite such a man of deep understanding, knowledge and wisdom and encouraged us to "bring him back again".
Dr. Mitchell deals with some of the wild claims circulating among some of Australia's "freedom movements".
· Claimed: The Commonwealth Constitution was originally a British Act of Parliament and it is not 'legal' in Australia.
· Documents used to appoint Australia's Governor-General are 'illegal', therefore he is not legally appointed.
· The 'half-truthful' claims of some secessionist movements and what those claims mean in law.
· The real facts about the ruling in the England and Wales High Court Chancery Division of a case brought before The Honourable Mr. Justice Lightman, largely designed by Mr. Ian Henke of Hastings, Victoria. Mr. Henke and a group of other Australians sought a decision invalidating the whole of Australia's Commonwealth Constitution Act. Dr. Mitchell dealt with the Appeal and what the Court's decision actually meant.
· It appears the editor of "It's Time" newspaper has fallen into the trap of believing some of the wild claims. In an article "Constitution in jeopardy - once again," Issue 110, which outlines the details of Mr. Henke's first appeal to the England and Wales High Court, the editor claims: "The case of course does expose the invalidity of all present Australian authority, but we always knew that."
· Can we respectfully suggest "It's Time" editor and readers purchase the tapes and listen to what Dr. Mitchell has to say on the matters raised.
· An appeal to 'freedom movements' not to seek to destabilise Australia's legal structure and to be more constructive in their actions.
· And much, much more.
Available in Audio Tape form from the Mayo Tape Library.
Mayo Tapes have packaged the set of six tapes for the price of $30.00 posted.
Order your copies now by sending a Cheque/Money Order to: Mayo Tapes, Box 6, Hahndorf, S.A.
Don't forget to include your return address.
|© Published by the Australian League of Rights, P.O. Box 27 Happy Valley, SA 5159|