25 May 2006
Thought for the Week:
"The official doctrine
that race is only skin deep is only one of the official fictions underpinning
the transnational system; more fundamental to the regime's legitimacy is the cornucopian
myth of endless economic growth. Seen through the eyes of the managerial class,
Australia is an economy, not a country. Nevertheless, a folk memory still survives
of a time when Australia was "the lucky country", the homeland of a
particular people of British stock with their own particular way of life. Should
the globalist economy first falter and finally fail, regime change may yet be
possible for this and other Western countries.
It may well be that only a miracle
can save us now; all the more reason, then, to recall that God helps those who
help themselves. The capacity to act remains the key to our political salvation."
- Professor Andrew Fraser from his banned article: "Rethinking the White
GOD MAY WE MOCK?by Patrick Buchanan American
"such lies and errors had been directed at the Quran or the Holocaust," said Archbishop
Angelo Amato, the Vatican's secretary for the congregation for the doctrine of
the faith, "they would have justly provoked a world uprising."
was speaking of "The Da Vinci Code," the Ron Howard film that debuts at Cannes
and opens worldwide this week, and is expected to gross $500 million by summer's
The archbishop's point is undeniable. Blasphemous
cartoons of the Prophet with a bomb in his turban, published a few months ago
in a Danish newspaper and reprinted on the front pages of Europe's major papers,
ignited demonstrations in Muslim communities across Europe and violent and deadly
riots across the Islamic world. Leaders friendly to the West, from Egypt to Afghanistan,
felt compelled to denounce the cartoons, as did many in the West, as a provocation
and insult to the faith of a billion people. In the 1990s, the British novelist
Salman Rushdie spent years in hiding after Ayatollah Khomeini issued a "fatwa"
calling for his killing for publishing the blasphemous "Satanic Verses." In the
1970s, the film "Muhammad," starring Anthony Quinn, was pulled from many U.S.
theatres after bomb threats. The film had offended Muslim faithful by showing
the face of Muhammad.
But, denying the Holocaust is verboten:
Last February, British historian David Irving, whose books on World War II
have sold in the millions, was convicted in an Austrian court of Holocaust denial
and sentenced to three years in prison. His crime: In two speeches in Austria
in 1989, Irving asserted there were no gas chambers at Auschwitz. Though he recanted
in court, it did not save him. Prosecutors felt his sentence was too light. Karen
Pollock of Great Britain's Holocaust Education Trust applauded the verdict: "Holocaust
denial is anti-Semitism dressed up as intellectual debate. It should be regarded
as such and treated as such." In nine countries of Europe, Holocaust denial is
In the United States, to deny the Holocaust happened or suggest that
it has been exaggerated is not a crime, but marks one down as a social leper.
If you would know who wields cultural power, ask yourself: Whom is it impermissible
to offend? Thus the hoopla attending the release of "The Da Vinci Code," based
on the Dan Brown novel that has sold 7 million copies in the United States, tells
us something about whose God it is permissible to mock and whose faith one is
allowed to assault.
For what "The Da Vinci Code" says is that Roman Catholicism
is a gigantic fraud, that the church has for centuries been perpetrating a monstrous
hoax, duping hundreds of millions into believing something it knows is a bald-faced
At the novel's heart lies the contention that Jesus and Mary Magdalene
were married, that they had a daughter, that the Vatican has known this and been
hiding the descendants of Jesus, that Opus Dei is a secret order whose agents
will engage in murder to protect the secret. Leonardo da Vinci's painting "The
Last Supper" is said to hold the secret, as Jesus is portrayed touching the hand
of the youngest apostle, John, who holds the place of honor at his side" and who
is, on close inspection, Mary Magdalene.
Catholic teaching and tradition, the Holy Grail is the chalice that contained
the blood of Jesus. In the book, the Holy Grail is Mary Magdalene, carrying the
flesh and blood of Jesus in her womb. If "The Da Vinci Code" is based upon facts,
no other conclusion follows than that to be a Catholic is either to be in on this
fraud or to be the dupe of those perpetuating it.
But if it is fiction, why
would Hollywood put out so viciously anti-Catholic a film that can only have the
effect of undermining the faith of millions of Christians?
Putting "The Da
Vinci Code" on film, with what it alleges about the Catholic Church, is the moral
equivalent of making a movie based on the "The Protocols of the Elders of Zion"
and implying this is the truth about the Jewish plot to control the world.
imagines Ron Howard and Tom Hanks would take a pass on that script.
the "Hitler's Pope" smear of Pius XII, a man who did more than any other to save
the Jews in World War II, "The Da Vinci Code" is a Big Lie that, though readily
refuted by the facts, will be believed.
But that it will be a box-office smash,
that it is the subject of lavish praise in the press, that it is the best-selling
novel of the 21st century, tells us we live not just in a post-Christian era,
but in an anti-Catholic culture not worth defending or saving, for it is truly
UNITES INDIAN MUSLIMS AND CHRISTIANSReuters
May 15, 2006 - Krittivas Mukherjee
"A powerful organisation of Indian Islamic
clerics promised on Monday to help Christian groups launch protests if the authorities
did not ban the screening of the controversial film, "The Da Vinci Code". Protest
in India against the film have so far been low key, but several Catholic groups
have threatened to stage street demonstrations and even to shut down cinema halls
Now, powerful Islamic clerics have joined issue with Christians,
saying "The Da Vinci Code" is blasphemous as it spreads lies about Jesus Christ.
"The Holy Koran recognises Jesus as a prophet. What the book says is an insult
to both Christians and Muslims," Maulana Mansoor Ali Khan, general secretary of
the All-India Sunni Jamiyat-ul-Ulema, an umbrella organisation of clerics, told
Reuters. "Muslims in India will help their Christian brothers protest this
attack on our common religious belief."
IT TO THEMby James Reed
In a US address
Dr. George Pell, Archbishop of Sydney made remarks about the intolerance of the
Muslim faith. He said that the Koran had "invocations to violence."
and "other groups" were outraged but Prime Minister John Howard is standing by
his man. Now will those "other groups" who police thought in Australia and elsewhere
be lodging, or helping to lodge, a human rights and equal opportunity complaint
under the Racial Discrimination Act against Pell?
After all, his sins are
seemingly as great as those of the "Two Danny's," the pastors from Catch the Fire
Ministries who, through saying much the same thing were found to be in breach
of Victoria's Racial and Religious Tolerance Act.
A prima facie case
is there: if the two Danny's can go down then why not a more influential Christian
leader such as Dr. Pell - and maybe even Prime Minister John Howard - two for
the price of one!
Far be it for someone as unworthy as me to suggest to the
Mighty what they should do, but my curiosity is aroused: do they have the guts
to pelt it to Pell? That is a battle that I would like to see while sipping a
OF THE CHRISTIAN HOLY BOOK?
by Betty Luks
In fairness to the Muslim people and the criticisms of their Holy Book surely
it is also time Christians noticed the barge poles in their own eyes instead of
merely pointing to the splinters in Muslims' eyes?
I have written about this
in an article to appear in next month's New Times Survey - "Words to Ponder".
In referring to the conflict in the Middle East, the Israeli converted to Christianity,
Israel Shamir, makes mention of "the archaic religious content", the "archaic
model of domination, genocide and enslavement" found in Judaism.
writes: "The mainstream media of the West usually presents the conflict in
terms of Muslims versus Jews. But the conflict as seen by Jews, is Jews versus
Gentiles. In their minds, the Temple Mount (in Jerusalem) is a magic Ring of Power,
one they should assume when the time is right. As the Ring in Tolkien's
Lord of the Rings (the British professor was a very learned man) it should bring
forth the Messiah.) For the Jewish mystics, this Messiah is not the Christian
In their book, the Messiah is not a gentle Jesus with a message for
all mankind. Their Messiah would forever enslave the nations of the Earth and
make the chosen people the masters of the universe. Their Messiah, Lord Enslaver
of the People of Earth, is the AntiChrist of (Christian) prophecies
Christian reader will not like this:
Now where are we Gentiles to look
for "this archaic model of domination, genocide and enslavement" which "calls
for archaic religious content"? For those who have eyes to see need look no further
than that portion of the Bible known as the Old Testament in which can be found
the "archaic model of domination, genocide and enslavement" which is 'wrapped
up' in mystical "archaic religious content".
Reed, one Gentile who displayed his moral courage through his writings, also warned
his people of what was happening in their midst. In "The Controversy of Zion"
he took his readers back to the beginnings of this affair, back to 458BC. It was
there that the petty Palestinian tribe of Judah (earlier disowned by the Israelites)
produced a racial creed: this was the day on which the theory of the master-race
was set up as "The Law".
Douglas Reed writes:
is to formal Judaism and Zionism what the Communist Manifesto was to the
destructive revolution of our (20th) century. It is the basis of the Torah ("the
Law") contained in the Pentateuch, which itself forms the raw material
of the Talmud, which again gave birth to those "commentaries" and commentaries-on-commentaries
which together constitute the Judaic "law".
Deuteronomy is also the
basis of the political programme, of worldly dominion over nations despoiled and
enslaved, which has been largely realized in the West during the Twentieth Century.
Deuteronomy is of direct relevancy to the events of our day, and much of
the confusion surrounding them disperses if they are studied in its light."
Reed explains how the confusion came about:
"Another paradox in the story
of Zion is that in our generation Christian divines and theologians often insist
that 'Jesus was a Jew', whereas the Judaist elders refuse to allow this (those
Zionist rabbis who occasionally tell political or 'interfaith' audiences that
Jesus was a Jew are not true exceptions to this rule; they would not make the
statement among Jews and seek to produce an effect among their non-Jewish listeners,
for political reasons)." 
law for the sinner and another for God's 'chosen':
It has been my experience
these judaized Christian divines have one law for us miserable sinners but have
a different standard of measurement for God's 'chosen'. When questioned about
the Israelis' treatment of the Palestinians, they apply a different standard of
conduct because "the Jews are God's chosen people"! Silly me! I thought we were
all saved by Grace not by race!
And what about that sad, paradoxical
figure - the "judaized" westerner?
They can be seen swanning around the
world as they fawn over and are feted by the rich and powerful. Professor Kevin
MacDonald writes about these sad, pathetic creatures in "The Conservatism of Fools"
(The New Times Survey May, 2006. $3.00 posted).
These are the westerners
who betray their own people as they push the agenda set out for the New World
Order. They are in fact, anti their own nation - globalization - anti
their own culture - multiculturalism - and anti their own race - floods
of alien immigrants.
 "The Controversy of Zion,"
by Douglas Reed $38.00 posted.  "Facts Are Facts," by
Benjamin Freedman. $10.50 posted
Books available from all League Book Services.
"LET'S NUKE IRAN
AND MAKE THE TERRORISTS GLOW!"
by James Reed
Is this correct: Osama and the boys live in Iran and work at a nuclear
weapon's facility making bombs that will soon be launched in Muslim missiles on
Israel and New York? Now have I got the neocon story right or have I messed up
the buzz words? Iraq was invaded because Saddam Hussein was involved in 9/11 and
had weapons of mass destruction. Today even the Bush administration admits that
this is not so. Saddam was a bad anti-democratic guy who had to go so that Iraq
could have democracy and McDonalds - and the US lots of oil.
Yes, they were
right that Saddam was a tyrant. But today Iraq totters on the brink of civil war
and genuine democracy seems as remote a possibility of achieving in Iraq as it
does achieving in the US or Australia.
The neocons are concerned about a nuclear
Iran and an "undemocratic Iran". Now wait a moment. The current president Mahmood
Ahmadi-Najad may say nasty things about Jews and terrible things about the Holocaust,
but he is still an elected leader, however "extremist".
Iran's system is superior
to most other systems in the Arab world, about which Americans never complain.
Most Arab leaders are also anti-semitic.
It is a strange double standard.
It is also a strange double standard for the US to reward nation like Pakistan
- which transferred nuclear technology to North Korea - yet punish Iran for wanting
the bomb. Israel raised its finger to international restrictions on nuclear weapons
for the "real politics" reason of national security. From their perspective that
made sense. Jewish academic and military historian Professor Martin van Creveld
has said on this general issue:
"Obviously, we [Israeli's] don't want Iran
to have a nuclear weapon, and I don't know if they are developing them, but if
they're not developing them, they're crazy."
my opinion it is dangerous for any nation to have nuclear weapons, but today,
thanks to Albert Einstein and others of his ilk, the nuclear demon is out of the
atom. The same arguments used to justify the invasion of Iraq are now being used
by neocons to justify a proposed invasion - or more likely - strategic nuclear
attack on Iran. All of the past failures have been forgotten. Use of nuclear weapons
on Arabs will be a disaster for it will truly be the symbolic attack that unites
the Arab world, even more against the West.
All I can say, with a sigh, is
that they don't call themselves neocons for nothing. The slimiest used car salesman
has nothing on these guys. At least he doesn't shoot himself in the foot!
THE MELANESIAN MELTDOWN
Australian-led security forces have brought an uneasy peace to
the Solomon Islands. Under heavy guard, over 300 Chinese-born migrants were evacuated
after their businesses were targeted in Honiara. In media commentary on the rioting
Greg Sheridan, Foreign Editor for The Australian, 20/4/06, p.12 wrote an
insightful article entitled simply: "Melanesia is a Huge Disaster."
he said is part of a "profound, civilisation-wide crisis that shows no serious
sign of improvement." Sheridan admitted that "introducing democracy in cultures
that aren't accustomed to it is gruesomely difficult."
is alone in facing that crisis and helping to deal with it. Melanesia contains
7 million people with one of the highest population growth rates in the world;
it has epidemic AIDS and other sexually transmitted disease rates. And, surprise,
surprise, it is all coming our way: "In the end, Canberra will pay for and cope
with their problems: disease, crime, eventual immigration, legal or illegal to
Australia; aid bills; penetration of organised crime: gun, drug and people smuggling
and much more." And much more? What other horrors lay in store for us? The joys
A tribal society has been forced
to play the game of civilised, multicultural modernity - and it doesn't work.
Sheridan himself concludes: "There are no solutions. Nothing works. Yet ultimate
failure is not an option." A wrong turn has been taken; the ideology of multiracial
cosmopolitanism is a failure.
THE MELANESIAN SOCIAL CREDIT GROUP AND PARTY
Target has received a report from the social credit group in the Solomon Islands.
They write that at the recent elections the "Solomons Social Credit Party
(SoCred Party) garnered three (3) seats contested by its official candidates with
additional five (5) seats contested by its financial members as independents."
They continue: In lieu of what is happening now in the country, "we
at the National Executive Council [NEC] of SoCred Party in co-ordination with
our own people's oriented non-governmental organisation, the Grassroots Network
for Good Governance Trust Board Incorporated planned to hold several workshops
in Honiara and key urban centres of nine (9) islands provinces to educate the
people as to the policies of the SoCred Party with a combination of 'debt-free
sovereign credit' and national system economics", which they see as the only way
forward for the country to recover economically.
The plan is to hold at least
five (5) workshops for the general public in Honiara and another nine (9) workshops
[one for each islands' provinces] in the provinces and are appealing for funds
towards their costs. They are planning to hold the workshops "between 2nd May
2006 to 30th June 2006 and for the general public to petition their own constituency's
Member of National Parliament to either directly join our SoCred Party or support
our policies on social credit, debt free sovereign credit and national system
economics for the benefit of Solomon Islands and to avoid its economic collapse."
They write: "To remove any colours of politics on these proposed workshops,
it will be sponsored by the Grassroots Network for Good Governance Trust Board
Incorporated who have more than 5,000 members from the rural areas throughout
the Solomon Islands. It's only a pity that most [if not all] of our members are
poor and they can't afford to contribute a single cent to cover the cost of our
APPEAL FOR OUR HELP:
They have appealed for funds to carry out that education of their people.
Readers who would like to know more about them can make contact through the following
Solomons Social Credit Party Trust Board, Incorporated. SoCred
Party, SoCred House - Matavale Road Between YWCA & SIBC P.O. Box 1349 - Honiara
City, Solomon Islands Phone: +677-22-320; Fax: +677-27-509; Mobile: +677-95-888
Sri Ramon Jun QUITALES, ll, Secretary-General,
GRASSROOTS NETWORK FOR GOOD GOVERNANCE TRUST BOARD, INCORPORATED, Quimanser House
- East Kola'a Ridge P.O. Box 113, Honiara City, Solomon Islands. Phone: +677-27-508
Fax: +677-27-509 Mobile: +677-95-888 Email: email@example.com
ASIANISATION AND FOREIGN WORK VISAS
Len the Cleaner
The newspapers are awash with the 'joys' that foreign workers
and students allegedly bring to Australia. Take The Adelaide Advertiser
20/40/06, proclaims "Students Pour $20M into the Economy".
Over the past ten
years the number of international students enrolling in public schools in South
Australia has increased by almost 500 per cent. (I may be a humble cleaner but
I can do my sums!) Apparently the schools receive 70 per cent of their tuition
fees. But the schools are not the richer for this - rather the fees are making
up for government cutbacks in the funding of public schools.
Over the past
ten years the cutbacks have resulted in these schools becoming virtual war zones
and social disaster areas. Teachers are regularly bashed, discipline is lacking
and students have become increasingly 'feral'.
of pursuing the cult of sucking-up to the foreign and hating the local, governments
should have cleaned up our own education nest. In the long term, given the present
state of decay the international cash cows may, one day, not turn up for milking.
The arbitrary nature of Australia's immigration
programme is well illustrated by recent events. Immigration Minister Amanda Vanstone
has rejected further increases in Australia's skilled migration rate even though
the dark lords of big business have been lobbying hard for more cheap skilled
Indications are the big business lords will get their way towards
the end of the next financial year. Now however there will be an increase in migrant
According to Amanda: "Cupid's arrow (is) out and flying around"
(The Australian 2/5/06). God help us!
Opposition Leader Kim Beazley
has said that he will abolish foreign trade worker visas, saying that they deprive
Australians of training and jobs. The Trade Skills Training Visa scheme gave jobs
to largely unskilled migrants rather than to young Australians. According to The
Advertiser, Beazley said to them at a meeting in Adelaide, "Immigration must
not be at the expense of opportunities for young Australians."
"The foreign apprenticeship visas are pitched at regional areas across Australia,
where as many as one in three young Australians are unemployed. Instead of helping
these young Australians into work, Mr. Howard is making it harder for them by
encouraging employers to hire foreign apprentices instead."
Only Please! These migration schemes primarily operate to increase the number
of non-White migrants to Australia. Thus we have cases such as where a highly
skilled Norwegian associate professor in applied mathematics and reservoir engineering,
and his family, is being forced to leave Australia and return to Norway. (The
Advertiser, 21/4/06, p.15) The conclusion is inescapable " they don't want
Nordic migrants anymore - they want Asians and Africans.
ANOTHER BULL IN THE PADDOCK?
Statistics show that about 30 per cent of men who undergo a
paternity test discover that they have been cuckolded: deceptively raising someone
else's child. (The Australian 18/4/06 p.3)
Before the Full bench of
the High Court is the case of a Victorian father Liam Magill who is claiming he
was deceived into paying tens of thousands of dollars to an unfaithful wife who
had two children by another man (men?). (The Australian 20/4/06, p.1)
a rare situation, including judicial comment on an on-going case, one High Court
judge - the ever politically correct justice Michael Kirby - said that the case
would open a "Pandora's box" as the law of deceit could be used by people who
are emotionally wounded: "We know that in the family law situation, it is not
just an ordinary case about money, it is often a case that involves a lot of emotion."
Well, so what! When men through property settlements
are ruined and end up living in poverty ( I know of many cases personally) there
is a lot of emotion there by gleeful ex-wives. What is Kirby proposing? That injustices
based upon deception be allowed?
That is the logical conclusion of his comments
- obviously made to test public reaction. If paternity fraud is rife then there
is more reason, not less to give justice to men. But let me have a gentlemen's
bet with you. In my opinion the politically correct High Court will decide against
Mr. Magill. They will say that the law of deceit applies to commercial matters
and that this matter is personal.
If that is what they decide - in accordance
with Kirby's position - it would be a flawed decision that discriminates against
men, contrary to statute law. We - long suffering men of Australia - await the
judgement with interest.
OVER THE WESTby James Reed
from the China threat department. US Strategy Adviser Clyde Prestowitz has
recently published a book on the next Billion New Capitalists. Prestowitz is president
of the Economic Strategy Institute in Washington.
He sees the endless supply
of cheap Chinese labour as likely to propel China forward as the world's No.1
industrial and manufacturing power. The US will be gutted as services, research
and development all go to China. This is likely to happen, he believes as early
as 2025. Then India will rise to compete with China.
And then what? How does
the story end? Do these two nations continue to churn away, supplying cars and
consumer goods to their teeming billions? What remains of the world's environment
after the onslaught of these giants?
Prestowitz doesn't go into such questions
nor does he consider the prospects of a possible threesome military nuclear battle
between China, India and the decaying US. The trouble is that the West has its
head in the sand on these questions. Thus John Howard can blindly agree to sell
Australian uranium to China without any real concern about the proliferation of
Chinese nuclear missiles.
Sure, just maybe existing "safeguards" will prevent
Australian nuclear material ending up in bombs that ultimately annihilate us (China
is the only nation with missiles trained on US cities and strategic targets).
The West, thanks to enemies which it has allowed to flourish in its heart, is
facing its greatest threat to its existence since the times prior to the Fall
In my opinion, it is no longer possible to save the West as we know
it, but it may be possible to save our race if we can awaken our people in time.
Perhaps when the present and future dark ages end, it may be possible to build
a humane society based upon truth and liberty, instead of the present slave regime,
grounded upon lies and deception.