|Home||Blog||Freedom Potentials||The Cross Roads||Veritas Books|
|OnTarget Archives||Newtimes Survey||Podcast Library||Video Library||PDF Library|
|Actionist Corner||YouTube Video Channel||BitChute Video Channel||Brighteon Video Channel||Social Credit Library|
25 May 2007 Thought for the Week:
ever seen Society do any of the things which Society is commonly said to do. When
anyone has been said to be a witness of the vengeance of Society, inflicted upon
one or more of its members, what was actually seen was a hangman, a rope, a support
for a rope, a moveable platform, a superintending officer, a stopwatch and a victim
No one has made it clearer than Douglas in the third Chapter of 'Social Credit',
Sir Roderick Braithwaite, former Senior Advisor to Blair wrote (2nd August 2006, Financial Times) that there were senior diplomats in the Foreign and Commonwealth Office and those in the Ministry of Defence who: 'would not be too upset if (Blair) was tried as a war criminal.'
There was a lone cheerleader for Blair in London, on Friday, Iraq's 'President' Jalal Talabani, who hailed him as a 'hero' - but, as others in the corrupt puppet government, the British and US troops are all that stand between his head and his shoulders.
Anti war MP George Galloway, who hosts a radio programme, told his listeners on Trimdon day, that he had ordered an eco friendly car and told the dealer to paint it black: 'The colour of Blair's heart'. On the same day BBC Radio 5 did an unofficial poll of the reactions of their listeners. Seventy two percent of their comments were summed up succinctly by one listener, who emailed : 'Good riddance.' "
Felicity Arbuthnot's full article is placed on the League's website under section "On Target Britain," titled: "Tony Blair but don't break out the champagne just yet".
ZIMBABWEAN AND AFRICAN MELTDOWN
The media has devoted a reasonable amount of space to Zimbabwe's President Robert Mugabe as he attempted to secure his political power until he is 89 (he is presently 83). This attempt has involved "stacking" the central committee which makes presidential nominations, as well as arresting, beating and torturing opposition activists. And - bingo - Mugabe has been re-endorsed as presidential candidate for the 2008 one person/democracy "election". Bob the Mug has even denounced his vice president Joyce Mujuru, also known during the "liberation war" by her non de gurerre as "Spill Blood".
"Spill Blood" complained about Mugabe's "paranoid delusions," which is putting it mildly. The country is already living with daily economic chaos, with little food and fuel available. Sanctions and international condemnation of Mugabe came, not from the allowing of blacks to kill White farmers, but sadly from the crackdown on political opponents. It seems anti-White racism is to be internationally accepted. Mug has told the West to "go hang" and no doubt he could show us how. Meanwhile the leaders of the Southern African Development Community, leaders of 14 Southern African countries expressed its "solidarity with the Government and the people of Zimbabwe" ("African Leaders Want Mugabe Sanctions Lifted," The Weekend Australian 31/3/-1/4/07, p.13).
They wanted sanctions, imposed by the West lifted. They did not explain how one could have solidarity with Mugabe, and also those he tortured: talk about two bob each way! But of course, ultimately, their solidarity was with Mugabe and not the mythical 'people'. Many of these countries also have appalling human rights records, and now, following the racial principle (oppose Whites, support Blacks) they are endorsing a dictator to continue to torture and kill, mostly Black folk, but some Whites too. As Janet Albrechtsen, one of the few Australian journalists to take Mugabe to task has said: "His leadership seems to have inspired a unique African racism, blacks killing blacks ethnic cleansing was part of Mugabe's political repertoire."
journalist, UK "gay activist" Peter Tatchell (cited to give an illustration on
the extent of the problem) wrote in The Independent (cited The Australian
27/3/07 p.15): "Large sections of the liberal and left opinion have gone soft
on their commitment to universal human rights. They rightly condemn the excesses
of British and US government policy but rarely speak out against oppressors who
are non-white or adherents of minority faiths. There are no mass protests against
female genital mutilation, forced marriages, the stoning of women and gender apartheid
in the Middle East."
A good question from a "gay activist," apart from accepting the standard liberal-left nonsense that Botha "murdered" blacks. Consider South Africa today under black rule. The Australian Beacon (TAB) (Issue 20, 2007 p.5) reports on "Operation White Clean-up", which is a plan by the police and army to eliminate all White people on the death of Nelson Mandela. The ANC slogan coined by ANC Peter Mokaba, "Kill the Boer, kill the farmer" was found by the South African Human Rights Commission not to be hate speech, but an expression of "the constitutional right to free speech." (TAB p.12).
But image the different response if Afrikaners started chanting "Kill the Xhosas, kill the blacks," at the next funeral of a white farmer and his family murdered by blacks. In South Africa, attacks on white farmers continues unabated. Since 1994, the year the ANC took power, 1,334 white farmers, farm workers and their families have been murdered.
According to President Thabo Mbeki of South
Africa, these farm murders are "the final stage of the revolution" (cited The
Australian Beacon p.12).
A SHORT HISTORY OF IMMIGRATION MADNESS
Rather than going
through the boring process of citing authorities to refute the "economic argument",
the "ageing argument", let's go another way.
Oh, and why not move a few hundred refugees to Mr. Legrain's own house? Won't that improve his productivity? Further, if population increases are so good, then why not keep the potential migrants in their home country - or how about us moving en masse to the standard migration countries? Legrain's thesis is incoherent.
by James Reed
In an article by Katherine Betts and Michael Gilding ("The Growth Lobby and Australia's Immigration Policy," People and Place vol.14, 2006), the authors discuss the power of a pro-immigration lobby based around housing, land development and construction. These authors deal with the impact of this lobby on the Howard government in 1996 to 1999. Nevertheless it is clear that this lobby has been strong throughout the entire post World War II period, and after 1947 has been increasingly dominated by ethnics. It is now a self-perpetuating machine that has been long out of control.
If the immigration problem cannot be dealt with, forget about solving the economic problem and creating a social credit world. Immigration ties us to globalisation and breaks down the national unity necessary for resisting the new world order.
ASIANISATION TO SINK JOHNNY HOWARD
by Peter West
Asian immigration has transformed Howard's seat from a safe one to a marginal one. Demography and the racial mix will play a big part in ending the career of little John.
comes something even worse - the ABCish, ever politically correct Maxine McKew,
and of course, a party of clones. But will Kevin Rudd and the girls really be
Let independents answer the call and may what remains of our Australia, vote for them against the hollow men and women of the new world order. Bring it on !
OUR FIRST 'CHINESE' PRIME MINISTER
One of the iron laws of social decay is that Australia's PMs get progressively worse.
As bad as Keating was, Howard is worse because he gave to superficial viewers the illusion of being on-side. Rudd will move Asianisation into Chinese-isation. Even some in the media are nervous about these prospects (e.g., Dennis Shanahan, "One-Man Band Rudd Risky as China's Mate," The Australian 13/4/07 p.14).
Rudd will be our first Chinese PM and will lay the foundation for Australia being a colony of the New Chinese empire. That is where Asianisation ends.
At last some prominent Australians are speaking out on the centralist, dictatorial, arrogant stance by John Howard and his cronies in power. The Age (Kenneth Nguyen 16/5/07) reported on what former Federal Court judge Murray Wilcox QC recently had to say on the matter:
"Australia is increasingly an "elected dictatorship", former Federal Court judge Murray Wilcox, QC, declared yesterday, in a speech lashing the Howard Government for muscling in on state governments.
Mr Wilcox, speaking to the Law
Society of the ACT yesterday, slammed recent Federal Government announcements
that funding for the states would depend on the states introducing performance-based
pay for teachers and transferring their product liability powers to the Commonwealth.
Wilcox had numerous suggestions for improving what he described as the "serious
deficiencies in the quality of our democracy", including: § Strengthening the
distinction between Commonwealth and State powers.
IS IT TOP MARKS FOR STUDENTS' ART PROJECT?
This work was criticised by two academics John Hookman and Gary MacLennan ("Philistines of Relativism at the Gates," The Australian 11/4/07 p.33) as showing the end results of the relativism of "post-modernism" which, like a bad smell, filters through cultural studies. The alternative lies in embracing aesthetic and moral values.
There is nothing to be gained by childish satire which takes on vulnerable people in our society like the disabled. It is really poor taste, even though in a liberal democracy one should - in principle - have the freedom to do it. What is more interesting is when satire and humour are turned against the truly powerful and the real rulers of society. But we don't see our funny men and women having the guts and brain power to do that, do we?
THE NORTHERN TERRITORY 'STATE' ISSUE AND REPUBLICANISM
Flint's Opinion Column:
suggestion is a revolutionary one:
The Federal Constitution assumes the existence of a governor in each state.
want 'poodle' governor?
advancing the cause of a new state do not need this ideological republican distraction.
ACM will put in a submission expanding on these views.
THE GROANING BURDEN OF THE USA's FINANCIAL DEBT
In an article by Richard Cook titled "An Emergency Program of Monetary Reform for the United States," he explains that "at the end of 2006, the total debt in the United States, including household, business, and all levels of government, the financial debt, was $48.3 trillion US dollars."
computer thesaurus tells me:
most powerful and productive nation in recorded history:
|© Published by the Australian League of Rights, P.O. Box 27 Happy Valley, SA 5159|