|Home||blog.alor.org||Newtimes Survey||The Cross-Roads||Library|
|OnTarget Archives||The Social Crediter Archives||NewTimes Survey Archives||Brighteon Video Channel||Veritas Books|
July 2007 Thought for the Week:
- - John Perkins in "Confessions of an Economic Hit Man," 2004
THE FAILURE OF ABORIGINAL SEPARATISM
Hell is not an exaggeration to describe the light of most Aboriginal communities, and an extract from Hughes' book published in The Australian has the title "Hell of Best Intentions" (26-27/5/06 p.21). In particular the recently released report, Little Children are Sacred, report of the Northern territory Board of Inquiry into the Protection of Aboriginal Children from Sexual Abuse, is over three hundred pages of horror and shame. Alcohol-induced sexual predatory attacks of children were found in almost every community - fuelled also by degrading pornography, drug abuse and domestic violence.
White workers who should be helping Aborigines were found to be sexual predators, preying on underage Aboriginal girls. These are the worst sort of people, acting oh so politically correct on the surface - but given the slightest opportunity watch for the sleaze.
As an election is in the air, the Howard government has now found a "problem" and it is mobilizing resources using the police and army. Howard will ban alcohol and pornography. Last year I said that this should be done and I came under criticism from some readers as well as fellow writer Ian Wilson for undermining liberty. But it is the right move, even though Howard is acting now for election brownie points. But if he acted last year in a crusade to save Aboriginal Kids, maybe all those little Aboriginals who have been raped and brutalised, in the meantime would not have been. But that's politics.
I notice that John Howard has said: "What matters more: the constitutional niceties, or the care and protection of young children." (The Australian 22/6/07 p.1) What for the power grab once more? The issues of constitutional law and the care and protection of young children are not opposing issues. Beware of someone who speaks like that - they are looking to grab more centralised power. Who to blame? The argument of Helen Hughes needs to be taken much further. Leftist, politically correct approaches to the Aboriginal issue have been a disaster. Thus this issue gives us reason to believe that these approaches are incoherent in other areas of social policy, such as the environment, refugees and immigration. If they got it wrong there, then they are likely to be wrong everywhere.
Australians should be reading to understand HOW their national sovereignty was
whittled away by very clever and traitorous elites.
THE GLOBAL WARMING SCAM
Fortunately there are excellent books debunking the science of global warming and exposing the politics. On the science issue S. Fred Singer and Dennis T. Avery have published Unstoppable Global Warming Every 1,500 Years (Rowman and Littlefield, Lanham 2007). These authors argue that the Earth is warming, but human emitted carbon dioxide plays a minor role. Based on an array of scientific evidence they argue that the present-day warming is part of natural 1,500 year cycle that has been occurring for a million years.
Henrik Svensmark and Nigel Calder in The Chilling Stars: A New Theory of Climate Change, (Icon books, London 2007) argue that an especially violent sun has meant that less cosmic rays (high level energy rays from outer space) have reached Earth, producing less clouds. Human-induced carbon dioxide has had little to do with this.
The politics of global warming and its one world agenda have been well detailed in a most enjoyable book by Christopher Horner, The Politically Incorrect Guide to Global Warming and Environmentalism, (Regnery Publishing Washington DC, 2007). This book clearly demonstrates that global warming is a political weapon for the one world agenda.
Leftists argue that
the problem , being a global one can only be effectively dealt with by global
organisations and directing them requires constraining the nation state and crushing
book is jam-packed with quotes from green-leftist types which will alarm even
the most steel-hearted of actionists. For example Susan Sontag, Jewish Marxist,
said in the Partisan Review Winter 1967:
As Horner aptly entitles one of his chapters, green is indeed the new red. I was pleased to see Horner have ago at James Lovelock's Gaia theory, which sees the earth itself as a holistic organism, a creation of the Earth goddess herself. On this view, people are "pollution" and as Lovelock argues in his latest book The Revenge of Gaia (2006) the end result of modernity will be a few breeding pairs of humans left at the poles after the rest have died off. Humanity is like a splinter in Gaia's finger, which will ultimately be eliminated.
The green world view is indeed one hostile to the value and dignity of individuals because it is fundamentally a red view.
YES, VIRGINIA THERE IS AND HE CARRIES A HAND GUN!
One can argue more convincingly that it was the lack of guns at Virginia Tech - the Tech had a gun-free policy as a typical trendy liberal institution - which led to the massacre. Add to this the fact that officials communicated about the presence of the killer by internet/emails, not a loud speaker, (!!!) and one has all the ingredients for disaster. An armed teacher or student could have prevented the massive death toll by one good shot. US Firearms Sociology expert John Lott and William Landes in their study "Multiple Victim Public Shootings, Bombings and Right-to-Carry Concealed Handgun Laws", found that the only policy to influence multiple victim public shootings is the passage of concealed handgun laws. When states passed these laws the rates of multiple-victim public shootings fell by 60 per cent. Virginia Tech was a gun-free zone and psycho-killers prefer gun-free zones. Remember: taking guns from law-abiding citizens does not mean less guns; it just means criminals have guns to prey upon the defenceless citizenry.
Johnny Howard of course milked the situation for political mileage, saying that he prevented a "gun culture" developing in Australia by the 1996 gun bans. Yet a few years back an Asian with an illegal handgun killed people at a Victorian university. That of course was an excuse to tighten up further on guns. But all this has done is create a black market. Sydney and Melbourne are awash with illegal guns - and that is an even worse "gun culture"!
The racial aspects of the Virginia Tech massacre are not even mentioned by the mainstream press. The trigger which set off this unbalanced Asian may have been a failed inter-racial romance, although there are some doubts about this. Well, why not blame that rather than guns? Why not blame the influence of violent movies (Saw, Texas Chain Saw Massacre) which seem to have influenced the killer's own artistic works? Why not indeed. And if the killer was white and the victims black, this would also be a race hate crime. You don't believe me? Radio shock jock (white) merely used rap talk to refer to Rutgers University women's basketball team as "nappy-headed ho's" and blam, he's fired. The basketball players claim to be scared for life. Pull the other law suit pay out!
Lawrence Auster says at his blog site on the race connection:
Is that a racist thing to say? The fact is that immigration is by itself a traumatic
experience, and that the immigration of poor non-whites into a prosperous, majority-white
country often (and predictably) triggers feelings of racial alienation, racial
envy, and racial hostility on the part of the non-white immigrant toward the majority
ADVANCE NOTICE FOR NATIONAL WEEKEND
The question to be tackled
by Professor Andrew Fraser and Dr. David Mitchell: "Is the West's Future: Immigration
Forever and a Day? The venue will be The Hume Inn, Albury, NSW.For those early
birds Phone: 02 6021 2733 to make your accomodation bookings.
FILM-MAKER MICHAEL MOORE HAS SAID 9/11 COULD BE INSIDE JOB
"Academy Award winner Michael Moore answered questions on 9/11 truth during a sneak peak of his new documentary, SiCKO, in New York . Our reporters were initially avoided by Moore, but he subsequently decided to approach We Are Change.org/ Infowars.com reporters for a discussion.
Moore brought up his lingering questions on 9/11, which are a clear departure from the 'government negligence' picture he painted in his film Fahrenheit 9/11, released some three years ago. Moore told reporters, "I've had a number of fire fighters tell me over the years and since Fahrenheit 9/11 that they heard these explosions--that they believe there's MUCH more to the story than we've been told. I don't think the official investigations have told us the complete truth-- they haven't even told us half the truth."
Michael Moore brought up the blackout of video at the site of the alleged Pentagon plane crash on his own, appearing quite willing to discuss subjects that so-called left gatekeepers have previously refused to raise questions about. "I've filmed there before down at the Pentagon-- before 9/11-- there's got to be at least 100 cameras, ringing that building, in the trees, everywhere. They've got that plane coming in with 100 angles. How come we haven't seen the straight-- I'm not talking about stop-action photos, I'm talking about the video. I want to see the video; I want to see the 100 videos that exist of this," Moore said.
He went on to imply the implausibility of a pilot executing the flight pattern of the flight that allegedly hit the Pentagon. "Why don't they want us to see that plane coming into the building? Because, if you know anything about flying a plane, when you're going 500 miles per hour, if you're off by that much, you're in the river. So, they hit a building that's only 5 stories high ...[unclear] that expertly. I believe that there will be answers in that video tape and we should demand that that tape is released."
Michael Moore was
not vague or bashful in discussing 9/11 truth--rather, he demanded a "new investigation
before we get too far away from this-- to find out the whole truth." "And I intend,
in my own way, to find some answers," Moore added. "Thank you for doing whatever
DVD - "9/11
AND THE SEARCH FOR TRUTH":
indicate which title you wish to receive.
THE FALKLANDS WAR AND DUTY TO HIS COUNTRY
From David Flint's
At first the British government were apprehensive of allowing Prince Andrew to remain on Invincible, and wished to move him to a desk job. The prospect of the son of the Queen being killed in action was a possibility, and the government wished to avoid such a circumstance. However, the Queen insisted that Prince Andrew be allowed to remain with his ship, and so he joined the Invincible as it sailed south, as a Sea King helicopter co-pilot.
Throughout the conflict Prince Andrew flew on various missions, including Anti-Submarine Warfare (ASW) and Anti-Surface Warfare search (ASuW), as well as other missions. He also helped in casualty evacuation, transport and Search and Air Rescue (SAR). When the conflict ended, and Invincible returned to Portsmouth, the Queen and Prince Philip joined other families of the crew to welcome the vessel home.
remained with HMS Invincible, with brief assignments to the carrier HMS
Illustrious, Culdrose, and the Joint Services School of Intelligence, Ashford,
Kent, until 1983.
I SALUTE OUR SERVICEMEN
THEN AND NOW - PRINCE ANDREW:
am not a war correspondent, but a veteran of a campaign to recover the Falkland
Islands from what was a friendly nation, Argentina, whose leadership embarked
upon an expedition to forcibly take a group of British islands in the South Atlantic,
8,000 miles from here.
Without doubt, the nature of conflict has changed since I was at war. When we set off for the Falklands, in 1982, circumstances were completely different from those we find ourselves in today. Back then, it was a clear case of British territory being invaded by an aggressor nation. It is just as clear to me now that it was our duty to go those 8,000 miles to recover those islands. We were dispatched, as I remember it, with a great sense of national pride. We were on a recovery mission, plain and simple.
today more complex and contentious:
"It is only because of my continued personal relationships with naval and military units, and because I have visited Iraq on two occasions, that I have an understanding of what our Servicemen and women are facing today. I recall there was a poster slogan from the Second World War: "Careless Talk Costs Lives". It is true today. And in my opinion it is even more vital today because of the advances in media communications, 24-hour news channels and internet connectivity.
your view about the rights and wrongs:
(it's Aussie mateship
"I recently held a reunion dinner for those of us who served in 820 Naval Air Squadron and Invincible and I can truly say that that bond is as evident today as it was 25 years ago. On Sunday, many of us Falkland veterans will be on Horse Guards to commemorate that event and, at the same time, go some way to recognising the people of this great nation for their support as we toiled all those miles away. In this way, we can demonstrate our thanks for the unlimited support we received, as was shown when we departed Portsmouth at the beginning of April and on our return in August.
Circumstances well beyond the understanding
of many people:
WANTED - WANTED - COPIES OF "THE NEW TIMES" FOR POSTERITY
The following copies on our files of The New Times are missing, and we are looking to our older readers to help us in the search for them. Would any subscriber who is able to help please contact the Melbourne Office and leave their telephone number. They will then be contacted.
|© Published by the Australian League of Rights, P.O. Box 27 Happy Valley, SA 5159|