|Home||Blog||Freedom Potentials||The Cross Roads||Veritas Books|
|OnTarget Archives||Newtimes Survey||Podcast Library||Video Library||PDF Library|
|Actionist Corner||YouTube Video Channel||BitChute Video Channel||Brighteon Video Channel||Social Credit Library|
27 July 2007 Thought for the Week:
"With freedom goes responsibility. A free man is answerable for his own acts and omissions. At Common Law Everyman is answerable for his own acts. No man is answerable for the act of another unless he has commanded or consented to it . The Common Law conception of the legal responsibility of Everyman for his own acts springs from the conviction of the moral and intellectual autonomy of Everyman. By virtue of this autonomy each man is an original source of spontaneous and rational action."
- - Richard O'Sullivan K.C. in "The Christian Philosophy in the Common Law," 1947.
GLOBAL WARMING FANTASIESby James Reed:
The next federal election, we have been told, will be fought on the issue of climate change. It is a pity that scientists who disagree with the so-called "consensus" view of climate change seldom get a fair hearing. For example, Professor Zbigniew Jaworowski, chair of the Scientific Committee of the Central Laboratory for Radiological Protection in Warsaw disagrees with the ruling orthodoxy and believes that, from his studies on glaciers that the climate may get cooler.
He is a critic of the main physical evidence advanced to support global warming based on ice cores. He has shown that air trapped in ice is not a closed system, and over time high levels of carbon dioxide get squeezed out of ancient air. In any case, Professor Jaworowski has found almost no change in the level of atmospheric carbon dioxide over the last 8,000 years.
What lies behind the global warming scam? I conjecture that it is yet another attempt by those wanting a one world government, to put their evil scheme into operation by scaring us to abandon our freedoms. Environmentalism in this sense becomes a threat to our freedom, when it should be a mechanism for preserving life on earth. Such is the perversion of rationality that we live under.
If you are of a scientific frame of mind, for references on Professor Jaworowski consult online: www.wikipedia.org/wike/zbigniew_jaworowski
CHINA AND CARBON EMISSION CUT-BACKS
Regardless of the merit, or truth, of this proposal, it seems that something is at work in the modern age, dissolving the brain-power of a generation. Is it in the water supply or the air that is breathed? The great drug that has dumbed down our people. Where has the capacity to think clearly and deeply about a topic gone?
DON'T SAY YOU WEREN'T WARNED
- TWO AUSTRALIAS
following article was sourced from Channel 7 TV: 18 July 2007:
"(We now live in) two Australias,
because Melbourne and Sydney can be regarded as one Australia where you've got
very high proportions of persons born overseas," Dr Birrell said.
doubled annual intake - and it's rising:
grouping together means that in some parts of Sydney and Melbourne, 65 per cent
of the adult population is overseas-born.
THE EROSION OF AMERICAN FREEDOMS
As US lawyer and nationalist Edgar Steele has said: "When thoughts are outlawed, only outlaws will have thoughts."
ZIMBABWEAN AND AFRICAN MELTDOWN
The media devoted a reasonable amount of space to Zimbabwe's President Robert Mugabe as he set out to secure his political power until he is 89. This involved 'stacking' the central committee, which makes presidential nominations, as well as arresting, beating and torturing opposition activists. And- bingo - Mugabe was re-endorsed as presidential candidate for the 2008 one person/democracy 'election'.
'Bob the Mug' even denounced his vice president Joyce Mujuru, also known during the "liberation war" by her non-de guerre as "Spill Blood". "Spill Blood" complained about Mugabe's "paranoid delusions" which puts the matter mildly. The country is already living with daily economic chaos, with little food and fuel available. Sanctions and international condemnation of Mugabe came, not from the allowing of Blacks to kill the White farmers but solely from the crackdown on political opponents. It seems anti-White racism is to be internationally accepted.
'Bob the Mug' has told the West "to go hang" and no doubt he could show us how. Meanwhile the leaders of the Southern African Development Community, leaders of 14 Southern African countries expressed its "solidarity with the Government and the people of Zimbabwe" ("African Leaders Want Mugabe Sanctions Lifted," The Weekend Australian 31/3/07 p.13). They wanted sanctions imposed by the West lifted, they did not explain how one could have solidarity with Mugabe, and also those he tortured: talk about 'two bob each way'! But of course, their solidarity is with Mugabe and not with the mythical 'people'.
Many of these countries also have appalling human rights records, and now, following the racial principle (oppose Whites, support Blacks) they are endorsing a dictator to continue to torture and kill, mostly Black folk, but some Whites too. As Janet Albrechtsen , one of the few Australian journalists to take Mugabe to task has said "This leadership seems to have inspired a unique African racism, blacks, killing blacks ethnic cleansing was part of Mugabe's political repertoire."
Another journalist, UK "gay activist" Peter Tatchell (cited to give an illustration on the extent of the problem) wrote in The Independent (cited The Australian 27/3/07 p.15): "Large sections of the liberal left opinion have gone soft on their commitment to universal human rights. They rightly condemn the excesses of British and US government policy but rarely speak out against oppressors who are non-whites and adherents of minority faiths. There are no mass protests against female genital mutilation, forced marriages, the stoning of women and gender apartheid in the Middle East."
A good question from a "gay activist" apart from accepting the liberal-left nonsense that Botha "murdered" blacks. Consider South Africa today under Black rule. The Australian Beacon (Issue 20, 2007 p.5) reports on "Operation White Clean-Up," which is a plan by the police and army to eliminate all White people on the death of Nelson Mandela. The ANC slogan coined by ANC Peter Mokoba, "Kill the Boer, kill the farmer" was found by the South African Human Rights Commission not to be hate speech, but an expression of the constitutional right to free speech." (p.12) But, imagine the different response if Afrikaners starting chanting "Kill the Xhosas, kill the blacks" at the next funeral of a white farmer and his family, murdered by blacks.
In South Africa, attacks on white farmers continue unabated. Since 1994, the year the ANC took power, white farm workers and their families have been murdered. According to President Thabo Mbeki of South Africa, these farm murders are "the final stage of the revolution." (Cited Australian Beacon p.12)
CONRAD BLACK CONVICTED OF FRAUD AND OBSTRUCTING JUSTICE
The Canadian-born peer was accused of stealing millions from Hollinger International where he was chief executive until November 2003. Convicted on three counts of fraud, Lord Black could face 35 years in jail when sentenced in November. He first entered the business in 1969 by buying a local paper, the Sherbrooke Record, with his friend David Radler.
Within a decade, the pair had a successful chain of papers and hit the big-time in 1985 by buying the Telegraph titles in Britain. His rise put him in the big league with Robert Maxwell and Rupert Murdoch. Robert Maxwell also fell foul of the law, and committed suicide rather than face the consequences of his criminal actions.
jury was given details of Black's lavish lifestyle, which the Chicago court heard
was partly funded through fraud. Black's co-defendants and former Hollinger International
executives Jack Boultbee, Peter Atkinson and Mark Kipnis have also been found
guilty of fraud.
MONARCHY PRODUCES BUMPER PROFIT
from David Flint's
Until 1760, the costs of the Crown were paid by The King directly from his own revenues. From that time the practice developed of the Sovereign agreeing, for the term of his or her reign, to transfer the revenues - but not the underlying properties which produce the income - in return for what was called the Civil List. Even with other grants-in-aid, as payments additional to the Civil List are known, this has proved in recent years to be a bargain for the British government.
This profit is the
net income the government receives from the Crown Estate and certain other hereditary
revenues. This financial year the gross income was 184.8 million pounds. In return,
the government funds the costs of the British Crown, which last year were 37.4
million pounds. The profit therefore amounts to 147.4 million pounds. This is
about 345 million Australian dollars.
Do some journalists and underemployed republican politicians seriously think that when Mr Keating, for example, gave some memento of Australia to say, the President of Indonesia, Mr. Keating rather than the Australian Government paid for this? Of course they don't. They know that official gifts are in all instances charged to the costs of a ministerial or official visit. Another canard is to add some accounting figure for security costs, as though the officers involved are not already employed to perform these services.
will cost £3 million annually
For each Briton, this year, the cost of the Crown is about 62 pence but this is covered several times by the income from the Crown Estate. And as Sir Alan Reid, Keeper of the Privy Purse, pointed out, the 62 pence "is the annual cost, not the daily, weekly or monthly cost." Sir Alan added: "We are pleased that the total cost of the Monarchy is now 7% lower in real terms than it was in 2001. The reduction in the amount of Head of State expenditure reflects the continuous attention the Royal Household pays to obtaining the best value for money in all areas of expenditure.
"In the current year there was a real decrease in expenditure of 2.7% due mainly to a reduction in refurbishment costs at the Palace of Holyroodhouse, offset by increased costs in dealing with a greater number of Freedom of Information enquiries. [DF: These would be mainly inquires from journalists many of which would not be bona fide inquiries, but campaigns to misuse the news columns to attack the Royal Family or invade their privacy.]
The real news
We must not
forget that our Westminster system, with the constitutional monarchy at its heart,
is the only stable and democratic model of government which both works for extended
periods and has been successfully exported to other countries. That is its principal
benefit. But I would say that the fact that the monarchy effectively costs the
British nothing, and is self financing, is surely another advantage. When I pointed
this out to a republican, he seethed as he asserted: "When Britain becomes a republic,
we'll nationalise the Crown Estate."
let us not forget that another significant benefit of constitutional monarchy
is its prodigious impact on trade. As we reported in this column on 9 March 2007,
the marriage of Princess Mary to Crown Prince Frederik has led to a surge in trade
between Australia and Denmark.
THE RSPCA AND ITS QUESTIONABLE ACTIONS
NSW Volunteer Fire Fighters' Association has established its own website and email
newsletter. Mal Davies, the editor reported on the Gestapo-like tactics of the
RSPCA towards a 71 year-old farming lady and writes:
Mr. Davies continues:
The RSPCA "converged on a defenceless farmer's property with orders to execute
her cattle that they considered starving. The only sound that was drowning out
the rifle shots being fired by the RSPCA Brown Shirt's muskets, was that throbbing
hum of the diesel engine powering the semitrailer truck laden with feed arriving
on the killing fields for the so called famished stock. This was accompanied with
the anguished cries of a 71 year-old lady, the distraught victim, being restrained
by attending police. Did they stop the executions? - NO BLOODY WAY
Farmer Shoots Back At RSPCA
Killing: Had feed - and hope:
Comment: What on earth is happening to this country when such Gestapo-like tactics are carried out on a defenceless 71 year-old woman?
|© Published by the Australian League of Rights, P.O. Box 27 Happy Valley, SA 5159|