2007 Thought for the Week:
The Australian Electoral Commission has agreed that a vote will not be invalid
if writing on the ballot paper does not obscure the names of candidates or the
numbers in the squares.
There is sufficient space at the top of both voting
slips to neatly write "REDUCE IMMIGRATION".
voting will be noticed by all scrutineers and if sufficient people act this way,
the impact could be huge. It is likely to be the only easy way to have a say on
Australia's future population."
- Authorised by Ken Grundy, Martins
Road, Naracoorte, S.A., 5271, October 2007
THE MEANING OF THE REALITY TV KIDNEY DONOR
by James Reed
Around late May of
this year the media carried a story about a Dutch TV show where a terminally ill
woman was to select one of three contestants to receive her kidneys when she died.
The woman was not terminally ill, but apparently the other people still needed
organs. The moral of the show was to show the plight of people needing organs.
Well, how about a new reality TV show where
terminally suffering Aussie battlers - our farmers and small business people -
are weekly saved from financial ruin by the largesse of the media? It is said
that reality TV Patty's Fort Show celebrated colonic irrigation, with the sociological
effects proudly displayed. It seems to me that worse things are seen each night
on the evening news as the casualties of the day from our poisonous pollies, are
proudly reported. Like the great TV kidney donor hoax, the joke is always upon
STATE OF EMERGENCY
Those Australians who think that immigration is good for the economy,
slows the ageing of the population, etc., etc., should contemplate the future
by reading former US Presidential candidate Pat Buchanan's magnificent book "State
of Emergency: The Third World Invasion and Conquest of America". Here Buchan shows
that the mass immigration of non-Europeans to the United States will lead to the
social breakdown of America as we know it.
book is full of statistics about the destruction of English-American culture,
the decline of schools and health and the rise of gangs, drugs and crime. Buchanan
turns his considerable critical powers to the task of destroying the foundational
myths of the open borders crowd.
And he goes further and proposes that there
are significant genetic differences between races and that Western civilisation
could only be created by Europeans:
"It is not true that all creeds and cultures
are equally assimilable in a First World nation born of England, Christianity
and Western Civilisation. Race, Faith, ethnicity and history leave genetic fingerprints
that no 'proposition nation' can erase."
believes that America has one last chance before the political power of Latinos
reaches a point where "democratic" change is impossible. He says that commonsense
policies such as having a moratorium on legal migration, putting up a fence between
the US and Mexico, ending amnesty, birthright and dual citizenship, etc., are
needed. Unfortunately he does not outline how US politicians can be forced to
take action even to enforce already existing laws on illegal immigration.
Buchanan writes: "Our great cities will all look like Los Angeles today.
Los Angeles and the cities of the Southwest will look like Juarez and Tijuana.
Though we were never consulted about this transformation, never voted for it,
and have protested against it in every poll and referendum, this is the future
the elites have prepared for our children." Commenting on this, peter Brimelow,
author of "Alien Nation"* has said in the 4 December 2006 edition of American
Conservative that this is a recipe for a revolution." Don't hold your breath on
And in England:
from Eastern Europe alone, 250,000 migrants legally come each year, under European
Union open borders migration policies. The government expected 13,000 per year
and got instead 250,000 migrants per year. Technically Britain can limit this
migration flow but it chooses not to. This issue was also discussed at Lawrence
Auster's blog site.
At first I thought that the issue of the acceptance of
national suicide was primarily the product of the acceptance of orthodox economics.
Whilst now accepting that economics has an important role, the problem seems to
be deeper and more philosophical.
cited at Auster's site puts the blame on liberalism itself:
[viewed as an "overall movement rather than a particular configuration of understandings
and institutions"] combines a very simple ultimate principle, equal freedom, with
willingness to compromise with existing arrangements while the implications of
that principle gradually transform the whole social order. That's what it means
to say that liberalism is reformist, and it's why liberals have had a perpetual
bad conscience with respect to Leftists."
"Since the 60s, and especially since
the collapse of Communism, there's no longer anything substantial opposing Liberalism
for it to compromise with or need allies against, so Liberalism can be what it
most truly is. That's why it has become more or less identical with Leftism. Its
ultimate principle of equal freedom, which is the same as "tolerance,"has become
explicit as an over-riding standard with which all human relations must comply
immediately. That's why we now live in such a radically ideological society."
* "Alien Nation" by Peter Brimelow available
from all Heritage Book Services.
6 : NOT A ROCK BAND
by Brian Simpson
you Google "Jena 6" you will find all sorts of petitions and articles pleading
to "free the Jena 6," "Black Power!"
the US of A the civil rights/multiracial movement thinks it's back in the swinging
60s, with marches and protests. The Jena 6 is a symbol of "racial injustice" the
articles say. So what is it all about? Take a deep breath and let it slowly out.
Six black youths are charged with beating
up a white student in December 2006. The charges were originally attempted murder,
but now the charges have been downgraded to aggravated second degree battery.
The white student was almost beaten to death, but because he is white the protesters
do not care. Indeed, because he is white is the issue.
protesters claim that there is an unequal application of laws which is responsible
for the disproportionate number of blacks in prison. The same argument is made
in Australia with our Aborigines - but it is never proven, only asserted.
could find no internet article in the Jena 6 case proving "Black Power's" point.
The best I could find is the claim that a prosecutor had declined to charge three
white children after they hung nooses in their school grounds. The authorities
claim that no law was broken and I think they are right. Indeed, the US Supreme
Court upheld the burning of crosses as part of the Second Amendment Freedom of
So consider the logic of the black's
protest. They should not be arguing for freeing the Jena 6. After all, this incident
was separate and distinct from the noose incident. What this says is it is alright
for blacks to (almost) beat whites to death. No doubt many of the black racists
believe this, but don't have the courage yet to say it. That would scare the white
bleeding heart liberals who have donated money to the Jena 6 cause.
should be said is that the Jena 6 should be dealt with by the rule of law and
if the white children with their noose did break the law, then so should they
be dealt with by law.
The Jena 6 case is really
about anti-White racism and an attack by the anti-White establishment on the people
AND SUDANESE IMMIGRATION
Kevin Andrews, alleged that African refugees are forming violent race-based gangs
and has stopped new African refugee applications until next year - until after
the November election of course! (The Australian 5/10/07 p.5)
Black gangs in parks and nightclub fights were some of the problems.
articles in this weekly commentary have documented those problems. But Nationals
MP John Forrest has said that he had written to Andrews, and said to the media
that African refugees are "beautiful people". Does Forrest imply that non-African
refugees are not "beautiful people"? Has he met every one of them or even a representative
This is the typical "no-brainer" statement
that is seldom ever challenged. Mr. Forrest, explain yourself!
MULTICULTURAL MEDIA MANIPULATION
Len the Cleaner
I can't help but put in my 5 cents worth on the Sudanese debate.
Consider The Australian's treatment on 8 October 2007, "Proud Aussie Turns
His Back on Howard".
Here a well-dressed Sudanese says that he is a proud
"Aussie" not a "Sudanese" ("I do not want to live in a country where people call
me Sudanese; I think of myself as an Australian"). Well, whatever happened to
multiculturalism! Can we cut out the immigrant refugee grants and largesse
This is biased journalism at its worse:
of course there are decent hard-working Sudanese refugees. But as always, with
numbers comes trouble. Capturing statistical and demographic difficulties is too
hard for the media journalists when today one needs only a big coloured photograph
and a knee-jerk headline.
AND THE REFUGEES
by Betty Luks
the West, Jewish intellectuals rigorously defend immigration, refugees and a generally
"open borders world." For those who wish to read about Jewish involvement in US
immigration policy, there is no better starting point than Kevin MacDonald's "The
Culture of Critique".
But this philosophy
of openness has ramifications. In August, Israel refused sanctuary to Darfur refuges
(The Australian 21/8/07 p.11). A flood of asylum-seekers had been entering
Israel from Darfur through the desert border region with Egypt. Word of jog opportunities
in Israel brought the surge in asylum-seeker numbers. Now a limited number of
refugees would be allowed to remain, but new asylum-seekers would be sent back
Warfare in Darfur between the pro-government
militias and rebels has resulted in the deaths of 200,000 people and the displacement
of 2.5. million since February 2003. Thus it has been argued by Israel refugee
supporters that compassion should be shown to the refugees because of the past
sufferings of the Jew. But Ephraim Zuroff of the Nazi-hunting Simon Wiesenthal
Centre appealed to reality: "Israel can't throw open the gates and allow unlimited
access to people who are basically economic refugees."
is an example that immigration critics in Australia should remember.
THE 'LITTLE PEOPLE' - A GEM FROM HISTORY
I once read a most entertaining journal by American anthropologist
John Greenway, who wrote of his experiences in this country 'pursuing the Old
Stone Age Aborigines of Australia': "Down Among the Wild Men" (Hutchinson & Co.
London, 1973). He had come to believe that in every part of the tropical Old World
before the invasions by the large Negroes in Africa, by the Mongoloids in Asia
and by the Australoids in Australia, there were indigenous inhabitants, little
people, known as Negritos.
I had heard stories
of these little people still existing in Australia a number of years ago and was
pleased that an article about them was eventually published in the Heritage journal.
John Greenway explained in his journal how these little people came to be 're-discovered'
on the Australian mainland in the late 1930s.
1935, Norman Tindale (I understand he was associated with the South Australian
Museum for many years) found a handful of old photographs at the Warburton Mission
in West Australia, purportedly taken in the far northwest of western Australia.
One picture showed a line of naked Aborigines of small stature in front of a bush-and-leaves
shelter. Tindale deduced that there was too much foliage for the Great Sandy Desert,
where Colonel Egerton Warburton was supposed to have taken the pictures (in the
few periods when he was not worrying about death from thirst), and thought that
in all probability the shelter was made of wild banana leaves. Now the only place
wild bananas plants grew in Australia was in a small tropical rain forest around
Lake Barrine on Queensland's Atherton Plateau.
was 1938 before Tindale and Professor Joseph B. Birdsell travelled to that particular
Queensland jungle in search of these 'little people' - and found them. A photograph
of Prof. Birdsell and an adult male Negrito appear in Greenway's book.
were not, in fact, 'lost' at all; they were not 'unknown' and though there may
be many within the Land Rights movement who would like them to, they had not fallen
down Orwell's black hole of history. Most of the remaining few hundred, of what
once had to be a continental population, were then living on isolated mission
stations, but, like a 'lost' book in a library out of sight among the other books
on the shelves, the Negritos, the 'little people' were re-discovered, they were
'found' on the Atherton Plateau.
OTHER LITTLE GEM IS THE SECRET OF 'CREDIT CREATION':
The experiences of
those two men is just what I thought of when I came across the book "I Paid
Hitler" by Fritz Thyssen which was published by Hodder and Stoughton in 1941
- and found the following little gem within its pages.
But first, for our younger
generation some background notes are needed. It is noted in the book, that at
the 1939 outbreak of WWII, Fritz Thyssen the German industrialist who had for
more than fifteen years backed Hitler and financed his movement, fled from Nazi
Germany to Switzerland.
in his memoirs:
"Hitler is totally ignorant of economics. He lets
himself be taken in by notions which he thinks he understands and which do not
make the slightest sense
One day Dr. Schacht, weary of all the futile and
costly agitation of the party economists, declared publicly that it was absurd
from the economic standpoint to build pyramids in order to occupy the unemployed
"Hitler," wrote Thyssen, "is constantly afraid of not seeing
things in large enough proportions. Pyramids, Napoleonic roads, Roman roads are
an obsession with him. He plans his highways for centuries to come
does not count. And unhappy Dr. Schacht had to torture his brain to find a way
of financing these unproductive projects. After exhausting himself in protesting
he eventually resigned his office. Yet he must bear part of the responsibility."
Dr. Schacht's role in 'credit creation':
And now we come to
that little 'gem' of history. Thyssen continued: "It was he, indeed, who
at the beginning of the new regime showed the Nazis how to use credit. No doubt
he desired to remain within reasonable limits. But Hitler, seeing that credit
could be created - according to Dr. Schacht's incautious formula - never wanted
to halt his course
Hitler had learned the secret of Mammon's
insidious power, but compared with today's military and political 'leaders' Hitler
was a bit of a piker.
Take George Bush for instance; his ambitious projects
and agendas are much more extravagant and are of far greater epic proportions
to those of Hitler, hence the nation's huge trillions of dollars of 'credit' debt
- based on Mammon's rules - is now bringing that nation to its knees.
JOHN HOWARD'S EQUIVALENT OF THE PYRAMIDS
for John Howard, he most certainly believes he must keep the people working by
imposing his own version of pyramid building. "Jobs are worth a rate rise: PM"
(The Weekend Australian 27-28/10/07 p-.1). "John Howard has placed the
goal of full employment higher than any other economic measure as the Coalition
braces itself for a rise in official interest rates in the middle of the election
Has Howard ever asked himself whether
in this technological, automated machine age, we can, feed, clothe and house ourselves,
without the need for full human employment? If he was not so blinkered by Mammon
he would say the answer is: absolutely, positively, yes! But Howard as a servant
of Mammon, believes that it is right, it is moral, it is just, to place further
financial hardships on those with bank overdrafts and mortgages - as he continues
to promote 'full employment' whether needed or not.
political dinosaurs are still trying to force their outdated politics into the
dramatic dynamic social changes of the developed nations - and they do not work.
It's time to think outside the box. It's
time to think BIG*.
With the development of industry, technology and then
automation, the dynamics of societies changed dramatically. Answers
had to be found:
§ What to do with the workers when they were sacked to
make way for the new machines?
§ How were the workers and their families to
gain access to food, clothing and shelter?
§ What to do with the excess production
coming off the production lines?
§ How to find fresh markets for the production?
§ Fresh markets were found, but other nations were also developing
led to the industrialised nations scouring the world for new markets and competing
against each other. This competition was simply war by other means.
finally the economic wars led to military wars.
need to see the DVD and/or VIDEO * "It's Time to Think BIG. It's Time to Think
Outside the Box" by Betty Luks; a paper presented in Adelaide earlier this year.
Price: $18.00 posted. Available from Heritage Book Services, P.O. Box 27, Happy
Valley 5159. .
DON'T GET GetUp
by Betty Luks
I don't find
the push by the online group GetUp to my liking. It is promoting the "three competing
parties" - Labor, Democrats and Greens - who "have come together in one political
ad - under the banner - with an urgent plea to all Australians: Vote to end the
Coalition's rubber stamp in the Senate!" And how is this done? By financially
supporting the political advertising they wish to promote.
are concerned that if the Coalition once more gets control of both Houses in the
coming federal election, they will do what they have already been doing, making
"it a mere rubber stamp for their own policy."
what if Labor should gain control of both Houses?
me which party, Tweedle Dumb or Tweedle Dumber, wouldn't do that if and when in
control of the Senate?
While GetUp insist
they are not about "taking sides, it's about a functioning house of review where
no one party - whether Liberal or Labor - holds all the cards," one must ask why
the group chose to support three Leftist internationalist parties?
not choose one or two of the smaller groups who are pushing for policies that
will support all Australian families? That would have made more political
sense to me.
TO THE EDITOR
The letter from Longreach (last 31st August
ed) is a fair start, but omits
crucial issues. Consider this: We have a nice but modest house in - say, Camberwell,
Melbourne. We have difficulty with the upkeep, but the property has been in our
family for well over 100 years and we are determined to keep it for our children
Now, way over the other side of town are many families
almost ungovernable, who not only fight each other and all of their neighbours,
but even fight to the death within the families. The disruption is so great that
the police and the riot squad have been involved. Consequently, the area is a
Now, one large family, surveying the prospect, decide that no way will
they help clean up. No, they decide secretly and unilaterally that they will live
in our house. They sneak across town, avoiding any office entitled UNHCR, and
come up over our back gate. Fortunately our dogs alert us and with difficulty
we shut them in our garage. Here, we feed them, tend them, send in teachers, do
all that we can, and surely, more than we consider their due, but this family
having no sense of the sanctity of life, indulge in all sort of bizarre conduct
to draw publicity and to achieve their will by moral blackmail.
live in our house. They will take advantage of our generous law and build
a Mosque on our front lawn facing our street.
But now, the unkindest cut!
Some of our citizens, from their ivory towers, insult us and declare that it is
all our fault that we do not take them into our house. This to me is "the last
Surely, there can be no real peace in our land until all of these
Bleeding Hearts are rostered to the Red Cross, to have their sleeves rung out.
Sincerely, S. Hayward, Seymour Victoria.
Those farmers who have written to the Weekly
Times in support of GM crops and food should have signed off as either Charlie
Monsanto or Freddy Bayer for they are simply regurgitating the propaganda devised
by Monsanto and Bayer.
Let there be no mistake neither are really interested
in improving the financial returns of family owned farms. They are however definitely
working towards control of the world's food supply from the farm base.
farmers will be aware that as far back as the late 18th century a character named
Adam Weishaupt developed a secret organisation known as the Illuminati at the
behest of the world's largest international banking family. The objective being
One World Government and the progressive control of food and water, and the plentiful
supply of credit to entrap individuals, companies and yes, even governments.
Fortunately after many years of extensive research trials in the UK and the EU,
with a population of 445 million and by far Australia's largest customer (excluding
minerals) with trade of over $65.5 billion, resulted in damning indictment of
GM crops as being harmful to wildlife. As a consequence, both Monsanto and Bayer
have withdrawn their GM seeds rather than face endless litigation and are now
concentrating on sales within the USA, Latin America and the Pacific Rim, including
dear old Australia with its clean green reputation. The question now is, how many
of the farmers in favour of GM crops have given any thought to who is going to
supply the patented seed each year, and the necessary fertilizers to maximise
growth. And, at what cost?
And most importantly, how many farmers are aware
that they are being systematically eased off their farms as imported foods from
transnational companies fill the supermarket shelves. How many are aware that
the USA's largest meat processor Swift and Company, who exports into our traditional
markets, now owns Australia's largest meat exporter Australian meat Holdings.
All courtesy of our federal government in the name of free trade!
back to GM crops, for scientific details about the damage they cause, refer to
Google on the Internet and enter either www.i=sis.org or simply 'world scientists'
Yours sincerely, Bill Brown, (Farmer) Colac, Victoria.