Flag of the Commonwealth of Australia
 
 
Christian based service movement warning about threats to rights and freedom irrespective of the label.
"All that is necessary for the triumph of evil is that good men do nothing"
Edmund Burke
Flag of the Commonwealth of Australia
 
 
Home blog.alor.org Newtimes Survey The Cross-Roads Library
OnTarget Archives The Social Crediter Archives NewTimes Survey Archives Brighteon Video Channel Veritas Books

On Target

Thought for the Week:

A Blessed and Holy Christmass Season To All

14 December 2007

"Sad indeed would the whole matter be if the Bible had told us everything God meant us to believe. But herein is the Bible itself greatly wronged. It nowhere lays claim to be regarded as the Word, the Way, the Truth. The Bible leads us to Jesus, the inexhaustible, the ever-unfolding Revelation of God. It is Christ "in whom are hid all the treasures of wisdom and knowledge," not the Bible, save as leading to him… The Son of God is the Teacher of men, giving to them of his Spirit - that Spirit which manifests the deep things of God, being to a man the mind of Christ. The great heresy of the Church of the present day is unbelief in this Spirit. The mass of the Church does not believe that the Spirit has a revelation for every man individually - a revelation as different from the revelation of the Bible, as the food in the moment of passing into living brain and nerve differs from the bread and meat. If we were once filled with the mind of Christ, we should know that the Bible had done its work, was fulfilled, and had for us passed away, that thereby the Word of our God might abide for ever."

- - George McDonald in "Unspoken Sermons," 1867.

"If democracy contained what the politicians have said that it contains, and nothing more, it would be an entirely hopeless enterprise… Were it not better to be a peasant and reverence a lord, than be a politician and reverence nothing? The old aristocratic idea had more blood in it than that, and was more nearly a real and credible thing. A lord, a peasant, a priest - good enough, if only the lord had fed the peasant, and the priest had reverenced his soul; but since the peasant fed the lord and had to himself all the reverence in his own narrow, glimmering heart, he grew and lightened, and came to be at length himself both lord and priest! That is the authentic biology of democracy."

- - Charles Ferguson in "The Religion of Democracy," 1911


THOSE WHO LIVE BY IMMIGRATION, DIE BY IMMIGRATION

by James Reed
The election has been and gone and as expected Comrad Kev now leads the good ship Australia ever closer to the unforgiving reefs of the new world order. The Kyoto Protocol - that holy of holy paper tiger for the Greens - has been signed and Asian-born Senator Penelope Ying Yen Wong, becomes the first Asian-born Australian to become a minister. My hot prediction is that down the track when the knives come out for Big Kev, Yin Yen Wong will rise to the challenge of becoming prime minister, in the new Republic of Australia (or "Austrasia").

John Howard exits the stage carrying forward the agenda of Whitlam-Fraser-Hawke-Keating. Asian immigration was higher under Howard (>70%) than under any of the Labor PMs. And of course, as a good new world order man, Howard disarmed Australia.

I have written before of the "Howard illusion"; for too long many conservatives have been intellectually challenged and maintained that "Howard is secretly on side". Howard was never on side. My late Father summed up Howard when Howard was treasurer under Mal Fraser: "He's the 'so-and-so' that dreams up all this evil stuff."

Ironically it was high Asian immigration into Howard's electorate that finished him off. Now that he has gone - and good riddance - maybe conservatives can start to wake up that the time in now one minute to the final midnight.


OH DEAR… THEY STILL DON'T GET IT!

by Betty Luks
So many Liberals appear to believe the main reason for their defeat at the polls was because an aging John Howard led the presidential-style campaign and the younger Costello - or even Malcolm Turnbull - should have been appointed to do the job. According to that viewpoint appearance, image, is everything, nothing else counts.

By their fruits: But surely, many Australians now realise that whatever the so-called 'conservative' Liberal party presented itself as, in reality, its actions were nothing more than those of a centralist-one-world party who continued to betray their fellow Australians to the Neo-Communist World State.

With the recent death of former PM of Rhodesia Ian Smith still fresh in our minds we could benefit from the warning journalist Ivor Benson gave us when exposing Smith's betrayal of the people of Rhodesia in the 1960-70s. There is an important lesson for us here which we must act upon, if we want to retain any hope of saving our freedoms and sovereignty.

First, get it clear in your mind, for all his pretensions, Ian Smith was not a conservative.
South African born, Ivor Benson was a journalist in South Africa and Fleet Street, London. In 1964 he became Information Adviser to Prime Minister Ian Smith and remained in the post for two years and saw at first hand what was really happening.

In his newsletter Behind the News September 1977, Benson wrote:
"Mr Ian Smith is not a conservative let alone a right-wing extremist; never was a conservative and never will be. He is a liberal or progressive, or leftist, always was and always will be. Thus an astonishing situation has been created in which a dyed-in-the-wool liberal finds himself today the prime minister and leader of a small country which has adopted a posture of defiance towards a revolutionary imperialism, which is essentially liberal, leftist, call it what you will."

In his book, "Truth Out of Africa" he continued:
"The weirdness of Ian Smith's behaviour as leader of the Rhodesian Front Party (RF) can be easily explained: he was playing a double game; he was betraying the party whose programme of principles he had publicly endorsed; and he was doing this from a position of strength, profoundly convinced that he was advancing the cause of truth and justice, and always covertly supported from sources outside his RF party.

It was not the outside powers trying to enforce revolutionary change in Rhodesia that Mr. Smith was fighting - his real opponents were the RF members of parliament who had chosen him as party leader and prime minister plus the rank and file members of the RF … Mr Smith as a dedicated liberal and proponent of multiracialism had decided that there was no better position from which to advance his 'ideals' than from inside a political party that was most effectively opposing them.

As events were to show, Ian Smith was a shrewd, tough and ruthless party-political operator who knew very well how to exploit to the utmost a psychology of group dynamics which makes it well nigh imperative for any group that is threatened from without to render blind loyalty and submission to its leader.

Thus the Rhodesians were reduced to a moral condition described in the Gospels: having eyes they could not see, having ears they could not hear, and having minds they could neither understand nor remember.

Many were to be the target of Ian Smith's enmity as, in an atmosphere of bewilderment reminiscent of George Orwell's Animal Farm, he picked off one by one those who opposed him or might do so in the future…"

Twelve RF members of parliament rebelled against Smith and formed an opposition Rhodesian Action Party (RAP). Even a deputy minister attached to the Prime Minster's office rebelled and resigned from his job…"

"The real traitors," wrote one correspondent, "though never numerous, were well positioned in the party structure." Oh! How frighteningly familiar it all sounds for Australia.


FURTHER LESSONS FOR AUSTRALIA FROM SMITH'S PASSING

by James Reed
Zimbabwe's Deputy Information Minister in commenting on the passing of Ian Smith said that Smith was an "unrepentant racist". A few writers dared to argue in the print media that Smith was not a tyrant such as his black successor Marxist Robert Mugabe.

And now President Mugabe has further mutilated Zimbabwe's already dying economy by announcing a law giving the State a controlling stake in mining operations across this torn and bleeding land. The State can now take over 51 per cent of companies' strategic fuels and minerals. And, legalising theft, 25 per cent can be taken without any payment at all. This is all done "in virtue of its [the State's] original ownership of all useful minerals in its sub-soils." Say goodbye to all new mining developments by private individual companies.

Zimbabwe has achieved something rarely accomplished by a society: the rate of inflation is no longer calculated, according to a recent article in The Times of London, because the shops no longer have enough goods left on the shelves to do price comparisons.

The last inflation figure, calculated at October 2007 gave an inflation rate of 14,840 per cent. Mugabe's solution to the inflation problem was to send soldiers to shops that refused to lower prices and have the soldiers loot the shops!

The liberals in the West though are happy, because, after all, Mugabe is black so whatever happens, by definition, all is well.


THE BIRD FEEDER

(Author unknown)
I bought a bird feeder. I hung it on my back porch and filled it with seed. What a beauty of a bird feeder it is thought I as I filled it lovingly with seed. Within a week we had hundreds of birds taking advantage of the continuous flow of free and easily accessible food. But then the birds started building nests in the boards of the patio, above the table, and next to the barbecue. Then came the poop. It was everywhere: on the patio tiles, the chairs, the table...everywhere!

Then some of the birds turned mean. They would dive bomb me and try to peck me even though I had fed them out of my own pocket. And others birds were boisterous and loud.
They sat on the feeder and squawked and screamed at all hours of the day and night and demanded that I fill it when it got low on food. After a while, I couldn't even sit on my own back porch.

So I took down the bird feeder and in three days the birds were gone. I cleaned up their mess and took down the many nests they had built all over the patio. Soon, the back yard was like it used to be...quiet, serene and no one demanding their rights to a free meal.

Now let's see.... 'our' government gives out free food, subsidized housing, free medical care, and free education and allows anyone born here to be an automatic citizen.
Then the illegals came by the tens of thousands. Suddenly our taxes went up to pay for free services; small apartments are housing 5 families; you have to wait 6 hours to be seen by an emergency-room doctor; your child's 2nd grade class is behind other schools because over half the class doesn't speak English.
Corn Flakes now come in a bilingual box; I have to "press one" to hear my bank talk to me in English, and people waving flags other than the flag of my own country" are squawking and screaming in the streets, demanding more rights and free liberties.

Just my opinion, but maybe it's time for the government to take down the bird feeder. If you agree, pass this message on; if not, continue cleaning up the poop!


THE MINISTERIAL OATH OF KEVIN RUDD

from Philip Benwell, MBE:
As with former Labor Prime Minister, Paul Keating, Kevin Rudd has dropped the Oath or Affirmation of Allegiance of Ministers of The Crown to The Queen in favour of one to Australia, similarly as follows:
"I, Kevin Michael Rudd, do swear that I will well and truly serve the Commonwealth of Australia, her land and her people, in the office of the prime minister, so help me God,"

He is able to do this because there is no specific requirement set down in the Constitution which only provides for the Oath of Members of the Parliament under Part 1: 42:
"Every senator and every member of the House of Representatives shall before taking his seat make and subscribe before the Governor-General, or some person authorised by him, an oath or affirmation of allegiance in the form set forth in the schedule to this Constitution" which is:

OATH:
I, A.B., do swear that I will be faithful and bear true allegiance to Her Majesty Queen Elizabeth, Her heirs and successors according to law. SO HELP ME GOD!

AFFIRMATION:
"I, Kevin Michael Rudd, do swear that I will well and truly serve the Commonwealth of Australia, her land and her people, in the office of the
prime minister, so help me God,"


CHINA AND WORLD DOMINATION : WORLD WAR IV

by James Reed
Some years back the Chinese Defence Minister gave a speech about war plans against the United States. he said that China had only about 5 to 10 years left before attacking to gain "living space" for its race. The speech was made in confidence to his military leadership, but leaked to the Hal Turner show in America. The significance of this is far greater than other issues such as a nuclear armed Iran. It could mean that up to 80 per cent of the world's population will be eliminated. Certainly if China wants "living space" that must mean that the West will be treated along the lines of how China treats Tibet at present.

Scores of books are available outlining China's vision of world domination based upon their idea of Chinese racial superiority over all things foreign: Steven Mosher, "Hegemon: China's Plan to Dominate Asia and the World"; Bill Gertz, "The China Threat" (2001); Jeb Babbin, "Showdown: Why China Wants War with the United States" and Constantine Menges, "China: The Gathering Storm" to name a few.

The economic and political direction taken by Australia in recent times puts Australia into the class of being a colony of China. In any future conflict with the United States we are likely to be the bloody meat in the sandwich. If there was ever a good reason for embracing social credit and opting out of the global madhouse, the coming nuclear war - World War IV - this is it!


WALL-TO-WALL LABOR

Phillip Benwell MBE has circulated a letter to likeminded groups with an appeal to work together to come against the expected push for a republic. We publish a portion of his letter.

The current situation:
"Politics is similar to our tactics of chess where players must foresee the consequences of any move they make and neutralize the opposition. There are no excuses for failure.
We should therefore never underestimate the acumen of Labor Party apparatchiks, however obtuse Ministers may be, nor should we take the intellect of leading republicans for granted, particularly since virtually all leading constitutional jurists are republicans. With only eight out of forty-four proposals successfully passing the referendum process since Federation, they more than anyone else would realize that within the next decade there is no way in which they will be able to persuade the Australian people to trust politicians sufficiently enough to vote for a republic under Section 128 of the Constitution, whether the President were to be elected by the Parliament or the People.

Not one of Rudd's comments has been constant:
The proposed referendum to be held in Barbados on whether or not it should become a Republic will provide an impetus to our republicans and particularly to our media which will undoubtedly call for immediate moves towards constitutional change and whilst the Prime Minister had said that a republic was not high on his agenda and later that a referendum would not be held during his first term, not one of his comments has been constant, other than it is on his agenda! It may well be true that he, himself, may have other priorities, but it is likewise true that many within his Cabinet are fanatical republicans.

It is therefore reasonable to assume that we could face a scenario where the Rudd Government will introduce a Plebiscite with an innocuous and misleading question such as 'Do you want an Australian as Head of State' and will take a simple majority of 50% plus one as a mandate to use the Australia Acts, the powers of which have never been tested in this area, to circumvent Section 128 by repealing the Constitution Act in its entirety and replacing the Constitution with a republican one of their own drafting. Whilst this would be very unconventional, and some would hold illegal, I ask whenever have these niceties prevented governments, in their belief that Parliament is essentially supreme, from acting first and then contesting any legal challenge, particularly when they have use of the public purse?

Of course this may never happen, but, as in chess, we must always anticipate all potential moves by our opponent and be prepared to counter them. To do otherwise would be failing in our duty to protect our Constitution."


THE ENEMY WITHIN

The American people must be feeling a huge sense of betrayal as they learn more and more about what happened that fateful day now known as 9/11.
A former president of Italy is publicly claiming Intelligence Agencies are aware the Twin Towers attack was "an inside job" run by the CIA and Israel's Mossad. (Source: ReportersNotebook.com)

The headlines read: Man who blew the whistle on Gladio tells Italy's largest newspaper attacks were run by CIA, Mossad.

On 30th November, 2007 the former President of Italy, Francesco Cossiga, wrote in Italy's largest newspaper: "Bin Laden supposedly confessed the Qaeda September attack to the two towers in New York claiming to be the author of the attack of the 11, while all the intelligence services of America and Europe … now know well that the disastrous attack has been planned and realized from the CIA American and the Mossad with the aid of the Zionist world in order to put under accusation the Arabic countries and in order to induce the western powers to take part … in Iraq and Afghanistan." (This is a rough translation from Italian to English using Babelfish.)

Mr. Cossiga previously stated, in 2001:
"The mastermind of the attack must have been a "sophisticated mind, provided with ample means not only to recruit fanatic kamikazes, but also highly specialized personnel. I add one thing: it could not be accomplished without infiltrations in the radar and flight security personnel." In November, 2007, he stated in an interview with the respected Italian newspaper Corniere della Sera, his doubts about the official story on the terrorist attacks of September 11, 2001 in New York

Operation Gladio - a rogue intelligence network:
He was elected President of the Italian Senate in July 1983 before winning a landslide 1985 election to become President and lead the country for seven years until April 1992. Cossiga's tendency to be outspoken upset the Italian political establishment and he was forced to resign after revealing the existence of, and his part in setting up, Operation Gladio - a rogue intelligence network under NATO auspices that carried out bombings across Europe in the 60's, 70's and 80's.
Gladio's specialty was to carry out what they coined 'false flag operations,' terror attacks that were blamed on their domestic and geopolitical opposition. Cossiga's revelations contributed to an Italian parliamentary investigation of Gladio in 2000, during which evidence was unearthed that the attacks were being overseen by the U.S. intelligence apparatus.

In March 2001, Gladio agent Vincenzo Vinciguerra stated, in a sworn testimony: "You had to attack civilians, the people, women, children, innocent people, unknown people far removed from any political game. The reason was quite simple: to force ... the public to turn to the state to ask for greater security." (Aka John Howard's 'terrorist' propaganda?)

Cossiga's new revelations appeared in Italy's oldest and most widely read newspaper, Corriere della Sera.
Cossiga first expressed his doubts about 9/11 in 2001. Coming from a former head of state, Cossiga's assertion that the 9/11 attacks were an inside job and that this is common knowledge amongst global intelligence agencies is highly unlikely to be mentioned by any establishment media outlets, because like the hundreds of other sober ex-government, military, air force professionals, allied to hundreds more professors and intellectuals - he can't be sidelined as a 'crackpot conspiracy theorist'.


REFERENDUM BEFORE MORE FLUORIDATION

by Don Auchterlonie
Speaking at a meeting of 400 people in Geelong, Victoria to hear Prof. Paul Connett, world expert on fluoridation, on 21/10/07 Mr. Peter Kavanagh MLC announced that he had introduced a bill to give people in unfluoridated areas in Victoria a referendum before fluoride was put in their water.

The bill was debated at length in the Victorian parliament on 21/11/07. Most Government (Labor) MP's heaped scorn on the bill and Mr. Kavanagh. Most Liberal MP's said they supported fluoridation but people should decide the issue locally. A few admitted there was scientific evidence on both sides of the debate.

Mr. Atkinson (Liberal) questioned the lack of studies on health effects of fluoridation in regard to ADD and type 2 diabetes. He was "angry at the stonewalling and at times what appears to be almost an industry behind fluoridation that does not really have the benefits to point to ....nobody has bothered to, or nobody wants to, do the scientific work. I think we should all be demanding that that scientific work be done.

Mr. Kavanagh pointed out that there is very strong opposition to fluoridation in Western Victoria. "I attended a meeting of 800 people in Warnambool" Mr. Kavanagh said "less than 6% of the world's population drink deliberately fluoridated water ....the onus of proving that a poison is beneficial is on the proponent of the practice ..."

The bill was passed 21 to 19. It won't get to the Lower House because the government has a majority there, it is however a ray of light in the fluoridation debate.

© Published by the Australian League of Rights, P.O. Box 27 Happy Valley, SA 5159