|Home||blog.alor.org||Newtimes Survey||The Cross-Roads||Library|
|OnTarget Archives||The Social Crediter Archives||NewTimes Survey Archives||Brighteon Video Channel||Veritas Books|
13 June 2008 Thought for the Week:
Is it possible to have a financial system that does not indebt us as we become richer? Yes, there is one, it was proposed to the world in 1918: Social Credit.
Social Credit does not create un-payable debts because it would cause money to be created to the rhythm of production and to disappear to that of consumption.
If it is somehow possible in a limited time to consume more than we produce because of earlier surpluses, it is impossible on the whole to consume more than that which is produced. No one can make a loaf of bread, a pair of boots, or a pin disappear that was not first produced.
If money would arrive according to production and disappear according to consumption the system of progressive indebtedness would be inconceivable.
An individual or a group of individuals could certainly still indebt themselves but on the whole the common debt would not exist.
On the contrary real total enrichment would express itself by a total financial enrichment; and instead of taxes and surcharges (GST) on prices, individuals would receive dividends and discounts on prices.
The present system is a lie; it is a false accounting. Social Credit would be a just accounting; an exact financial expression of economic realities. The present system can only produce rotten fruit. Social Credit would produce good fruit, in abundance for all.
- - Taken from Louis Even's "In This Age of Plenty"
IS IT SENSELESS ? NOT ON YOUR KNIFE !
by James Reed
Even the Australian Defence Force is getting
in on the act: "ADF Needs Power to 'Take on Asia Threat'" The
Australian 25/3/08 p.4. They want the capacity to "rip the arm
off" any Asian power. Even China? India?
But it is not senseless. The lies about Asia are needed to keep the globalist economic strategy going. If that stumbles, then the masters of war, the Mother Courages in their war wagons, now travelling at supersonic speed, get let loose to kill.
War and the making and selling of weapons of war is the biggest business next to financial alchemy. Why aren't the gun banners dealing with this issue: could it be that they are discriminating against small private guns?
IN CASE OF ANY FUTURE WAGE-SLAVE UPRISINGS ?
The following media release when read in
conjunction with the above article by James Reed is rather sobering
reading: "The Parliamentary Secretary for Defence Support, the Hon.
Dr Mike Kelly AM MP, today (23/5/08) welcomed the launch of the
Australasian Civil Military Police Network (ACMPN) in Canberra.
In launching the network Dr Kelly said, "The concept for this initiative is consistent with the Government's plans to improve co-ordination between non Government and Government agencies involved in peace-building, (don't you just love the term 'peace building'. What you think is meant by 'peace building' is not the same thing as what these people mean! 'ed) stabilisation and reconstruction efforts ('reconstruction'? along the lines of the Iraqi 'reconstruction efforts'? 'ed) in response to international emergencies.
"The launch of the network also complements a core election commitment to establish an Asia Pacific Centre for Civil-Military Co-operation." The Asia Pacific Centre for Civil-Military Co-operation will draw upon expertise across Government agencies and the Non Government Organisation sector to help strengthen the effectiveness of Australia's international emergency management capabilities."
Should any of the present wage-slaves feel
the urge to protest against these further moves towards a regional
police-military force, the media contacts for the Rudd regime's
Mr. Rudd has just announced he wants to
see an Asian Union along the lines of the European Union! And you
thought he was for Australia and Australians!
WE WERE ONCE NEARLY FREE OF THIS PARASITE
A parasite is: an animal or plant that lives in or on a host (another animal or plant); the parasite obtains nourishment from the host without benefiting or killing the host. But the history of mammon points to the fact that unless this type of parasite is kept in check, it eventually mutates into a pathogen!
Under the heading "The History of the Commonwealth
Bank" the following summary was prepared in 2002 by W.L. Rusterholtz
from the following books and reports:
And so history began:
The enormous value of the Commonwealth Bank
to Australia, was underlined by the Statement from the Chairman
of the Royal Commission on Money and Banking in 1937 when he said:
The Nation's money supply (credit) is now
being created by the Reserve Bank and other private Banks and ownership
of all credit is claimed by them, distributed as loans which are
Further interesting reading on how Australia
was successfully financed can be found in the following booklets.
All the booklets are available from the Heritage Book Services and Veritas Publishing. Send for a list of relevant books to your nearest service.
NEVER, NEVER, DOWNPLAY THE HOLOCAUST
by Peter Ewer
AND THE WINNER IS '
Pepe Escobar in the Asia Times 3/6/08
Such star power wattage, a Washington version of the Oscars, is the stock in trade of AIPAC - the American Israel Public Affairs Committee, the crucial player in what is generally known as the Israel lobby and which holds its annual Policy Conference this week in Washington at which most of the heavyweights will deliver lectures.
Few books in recent years have been as explosive or controversial as The Israel Lobby and US Foreign Policy, written by Stephen Walt from Harvard University and John Mearsheimer from the University of Chicago, published in 2007. In it, professors Walt and Mearsheimer argued the case of the Israeli lobby not as "a cabal or conspiracy that 'controls' US foreign policy", but as an extremely powerful interest group made up of Jews and non-Jews, a "loose coalition of individuals and organizations tirelessly working to move US foreign policy in Israel's direction".
Walt and Mearsheimer also made the key point that "anyone who criticizes Israeli actions or says that pro-Israel groups have significant influence over US Middle East policy stands a good chance of being labeled an anti-Semite". Anyone for that matter who "says that there is an Israeli lobby" also runs the risk of being charged with anti-Semitism.
All the candidates in the House say yeah...
AIPAC keeps a very close relationship with an array of influential think-tanks, like the American Enterprise Institute, the Center for Security Policy, the Hudson Institute, the Jewish Institute for National Security Affairs, the Middle East Forum, the The Project for the New American Century (PNAC) and the Washington Institute for Near East Policy. Sprinkled neo-cons in these think-tanks can be regarded as a microcosm of the larger Israel lobby - Jews and non-Jews (It's important to remember that Richard Perle, Douglas Feith, David Wurmser and five other neo-cons drafted the infamous "A Clean Break" document to Benjamin Netanyahu in 1996 - the ultimate road map for hardcore regime change all over the Middle East.)
The house that AIPAC built
AIPAC maintains a virtual stranglehold over the US Congress. Critics of the Israel lobby other than Walt and Mearsheimer also contend that AIPAC essentially prevents any possibility of open debate on US policy towards Israel. Compare it with a 2004 report by the Pentagon's Defense Science Board, according to which "Muslims do not hate our freedom, but rather they hate our policies".
AIPAC and Iran
Essentially these are:
Walt and Mearsheimer also seem not to accept that oil, and rivalry with Russia and China, have also played a crucial part in why the US went to war in Iraq and may attack Iran in the near future. Anyway only insiders as themselves - with unassailable establishment credentials - could have started, at the highest levels of public debate, a serious discussion of extreme pro-Zionism in the public and political life of the US."
Full article at: https://www.atimes.com/atimes/Middle_East/JF03Ak01.html
THE PAWNS OF PORN
by James Reed
The article begins with the standard relativistic whitewash: how can you really tell the difference, what is pornography and what is art? After all Titian's Venus at Urbino (1538), a famous painting of a nude was controversial in its day. Pornography is a social construction. Such, as I read the article, is the basic argument of the book by Alan McKee and others in "The Porn Report".
Pornography now is mainstream and although
there was a feminist critique of porn in the 1970s and 80s, porn
is now 'hip' with an affluent Y generation of upwardly mobile females
consuming it. The extract from The Weekend Australian contained
only one paragraph indicating the author's attitudes to the argument
that pornography can be psychologically harmful and this was to
dismiss the argument.
LETTERS TO THE PRESS
Rudd's Asian union: To the Editor,
The Australian, 5th June 2008
Tippling after midnight: To the Editor,
Herald Sun 2/6/08:
LETTER IN THE PRESS:
The high price of crude oil will not persist
- - Stan Yeaman, (the author, is a retired oil executive) City Beach, WA
WILL THERE ALWAYS BE AN ENGLAND ?
The following report highlights the real agenda behind the Racial and Religious Vilification legislation imposed upon western nations. We wonder, will the Christian Church leaders stand up to be counted, thus defending the rights granted them as long ago as 1215AD under Magna Carta?
"The End Of England? From Investor's
Business Daily , posted Monday, June 02, 2008
Cunningham said the officer told him and Abraham in February that they "were in a Muslim area and were not allowed to spread our Christian message. He said we were committing a hate crime by telling the youths to leave Islam and said that he was going to take us to the police station." The men also said the officer told them that if they returned, they would "get beaten up." It's not clear from media reports who would administer the beatings, the Muslims or the police.
Either way, this is another disturbing example of a great nation ceding its culture because its elites are too invested in political correctness (read Cultural Marxism) . They're so intent on establishing themselves as models of tolerance and moral defenders of diversity that they're willing to be cowed by the radical elements of Islam that are eating away at their civilization. Already the archbishop of Canterbury, Rowan Williams, has said that "Shariah law is inevitable" in the United Kingdom, and menacing no-go areas in Muslim neighbourhoods where non-Muslims should fear to tread have cropped up.
Maybe Williams has given up. But one Anglican bishop, a brave soul who happens to have a Muslim name, has not. Pakistan-born Michael Nazir-Ali, the Bishop of Rochester, has made it clear that England has to fight for its cultural life and cannot yield to Islamic extremists who he says are taking advantage of the moral vacuum left by a nation that has largely abandoned Christianity in the wake of the 1960s cultural revolution.
As Archbishop Williams was busy surrendering
his nation and his faith earlier this year, Nazir-Ali dared to publicly
refer to the no-go areas in Muslim neighbourhoods and blame them
on government multicultural policies that create divisiveness. For
that, this courageous clergyman has received death threats.
|© Published by the Australian League of Rights, P.O. Box 27 Happy Valley, SA 5159|