Science of the Social Credit Measured in Terms of Human Satisfaction
Christian based service movement warning about threats to rights and freedom irrespective of the label, Science of the Social Credit Measured in Terms of Human Satisfaction
"All that is necessary for the triumph of evil is that good men do nothing"
Edmund Burke
Science of the Social Credit Measured in Terms of Human Satisfaction
Home Blog Freedom Potentials The Cross Roads Veritas Books
OnTarget Archives Newtimes Survey Podcast Library Video Library PDF Library
Actionist Corner YouTube Video Channel BitChute Video Channel Brighteon Video Channel Social Credit Library

On Target

4 June 2010 Thought for the Week:

“The essential Western European, whether he be an Englishman, a Frenchman, a German, an American or South African, is afflicted with a form of soul-sickness which undermines his morale, stifles imagination and enterprise and inhibits mental activity in all its forms, an illness which naturally varies in intensity according to personal circumstances. Unable to be true to himself, the Western European has become the victim of cultural and political distortion, the main symptoms as experienced by the individual being the lack of a sense of direction and purpose; in other words, a haunting sense of the futility of existence, all concentrated finally in an intense desire, most keenly felt by young people, to kick over and destroy the prevailing order… What we need, if we are to do ourselves any good, is to gain an insight into the etiology of it, tracing with precision the nature of the distortion and the causes which lie immediately behind the symptoms…

After all, how can we hope to be able to identify and understand a distortion of moral and political identity if we do not already possess in our minds a reasonably clear picture of the pattern before it was distorted? The entire known history of the human race will confirm that man is essentially a social animal and that he needs, as one of the first requirements of his moral health, the security provided by a sense of community or sense of belonging, which is something he has never been able to find hitherto except in some circumscribed group or community made up of individuals much the same as himself…

The science of anthropology has had to be falsified and smothered to a truly astonishing degree to prevent information of this kind being universally known and understood. Many of those sciences whose purpose it is to help man understand himself anthropology, psychology, genetics, etc., are in the same state of eclipse today as were astronomy and other sciences in the Middle Ages and for the same reason: that their findings threaten the foundations of existing power structures, whether these be religious or political or financial.”

- - Ivor Benson in “The Zionist Factor” 1987


Source -National Policy Institute UK:
A few simple comments on Islam and remembering Enoch Powell...and his prophetic words! For friends abroad - all this commentary below is quite true! Brigadier Powell was a good man and able to see what was coming. How, I don't know, but he was right and he was castigated and sacked, for his comments, back in the 1960s! Such is the way our so-called civilised society treats our "Wise Men" these days! Posted on May 22, 2010:

Enoch warned:
“Then there are the 'no-go' areas ... areas in the United Kingdom where the Queen's writ does not run ... If these areas were described as what they are—namely, pockets of territory occupied by the enemy, as surely as if they had been captured and held by parachute troops—then perhaps it would be realised how preposterous is the situation. In fact the policy of refraining from the re-establishment of civil government in these areas is as wise as it would be to leave enemy posts undisturbed behind one's lines.”

This situation has been brought to mainland Britain by the elites:
People are too frightened to speak about what is being done to them and their families or express their fears for the future. If they live near immigrants they blot anxiety out and pretend everything is alright. If someone gets mugged or raped nearby they are relieved because it did not happen to them. They avoid subways and many other hides for muggers that the planners built into their stupid housing schemes. You only have to go a couple of miles from affected areas and people are oblivious to what is happening because the elites are browbeating them into thinking things are fine. If they have had experience of the reality when they go to unaffected areas they won’t speak about it for fear of condemnation. They are frightened to look into the future and what natural care they have for their children has to be repressed.

As Enoch Powell put it
“Have you ever wondered, perhaps, why opinions which the majority of people quite naturally hold are, if anyone dares express them publicly, denounced as ‘controversial, ‘extremist’, ‘explosive’, ‘disgraceful’, and overwhelmed with a violence and venom quite unknown to debate on mere political issues? It is because the whole power of the aggressor depends upon preventing people from seeing what is happening and from saying what they see.”

There are characteristic features of invasion: immigrants and their descendants are taking over our communities and our religious symbols are being replaced mainly by Muslim symbols - churches converted to mosques and Christians forbidden to wear crucifixes at work! Contemporary elites must know what Sharia Law is and are aware of the widespread child-rape of young British girls by Muslim communities yet they are delivering our women into servitude under Sharia Law. Many evil judges campaign for it.

In December 2008 the Lord Chief Justice, Lord Phillips, told the London Muslim Council he was willing to have Sharia law in this country, so long as it did not conflict with the laws of England and Wales, or lead to the imposition of severe physical punishments. In the same month Lady Butler-Sloss, England’s first female Appeal Court judge, called for ministers to change the law for Muslims, so that a decree absolute could not be issued by a civil court until evidence had been obtained of a Sharia divorce. Delivering women to Sharia Law is a cruel wicked act. This is encouraged by dishonourable Christian leaders like the Archbishop of Canterbury.

Enoch warned of The Enemy Within and that our internal enemies could not believe their luck with mass immigration. It gave them the forces of revolution. It is not outside forces that threatened us but traitors who pretend to act in our interests while they surrender us to Islam. This process can be researched under “Eurabia”. The Revolutionary Vanguard is not poised to strike but in power!

What was to come was predicted by Enoch who saw similar symptoms in Northern Ireland: “Yet even though that picture is dark and darkening, there is one factor which has not yet been injected… That factor is firearms and explosives.
With communities which are so divided nothing can prevent the injection of explosives which we know perfectly well from experience in other parts of the United Kingdom and the world. At first there will be horrified astonishment, and inquiry as to what we have done wrong that such things should be happening. Then there will be feverish endeavour to find methods to allay the supposed grievances which lie behind the violence. Then follows exploitation by those who use violence of the ascendancy they have thus gained over the majority and over authority. The thing goes forward, acting and reacting, until a position is reached in which - I shall dare say it - compared with those areas, Belfast today will seem an enviable place.”

The open war begun on July 2005 when Young Muslims blew up London buses. There are hundreds of investigations being undertaken into Muslim “terrorists” but the elites are still importing them at half a million a year!”  


Victoria sets loose its discrimination witchhunters Andrew Bolt Herald Sun, 17/5/2010: “Victoria’s equal opportunity police were just not getting enough complaints to work with. So this foolish Labor Government this week unleashed them to go invent some more, passing even more oppressive Equal Opportunity laws: Deputy Premier and Attorney-General Rob Hulls welcomed the passage of the new reforms, saying they ensured Victorians benefited from equal opportunity laws fit for the 21st century…

He said the new laws would help stamp out entrenched and systemic discrimination against minority groups by giving the Victorian Equal Opportunity and Human Rights Commission the ability to investigate persistent and systemic discrimination without first requiring a complaint to be made.
Let me show you what kind of divisive thing you may now get, using as an example a case from the commission’s own files: (The Equal Opportunity Commission) hired May Helou, head of the Islamic Council of Victoria’s women’s support group. Her job, the EOC said, was to ensure “Arabic and Muslim communities are aware of their rights under anti-discrimination laws” and give “support to people wishing to make a complaint”.

The hounds had been set loose…
In March 2002, Helou told Muslim converts at the ICV headquarters of a seminar on jihad to be run by Catch the Fire and asked them to go. Said one later, she didn’t want the meeting to be held “without any Muslims present”. So when (pastors) Nalliah and Scot got up to speak at their seminar about jihad, they had in front of them 250 born-again Christians - and three people they did not know were Muslims.

And back at the EOC, Helou waited for the three to call with their complaint....
The pastors were at long last tried at VCAT before Justice Michael Higgins… and some curious things soon became clear. First, even one of the converts had to admit that Scot, who’d been born in Pakistan and got degrees there in theology and applied mathematics, actually understood the Koran far better than did the people complaining he’d misquoted it. Second, as I wrote at the time, many of the complaints accused Scot of no more than quoting the Koran accurately…

The verdict was also odd. The pastors were found guilty of vilifying Muslims even though the judge identified only one thing Scot had said that was factually wrong: he’d given the wrong birth-rate for Muslims here. And, the judge, added, he’d failed to quote a verse that showed Allah was merciful. Higgins said the real problem with the seminar was that it was not “balanced”...

The Labor and Green politicians who voted for this legislative bullying are grossly impertinent and irresponsible. The consequences, when they come, must not be dismissed as unforeseen or even unintended. Everyone should know they’ve been predicted from the start.”

Further reading (but not for the fainthearted): “The Camp of the Saints” by Jean Raspail, 1973.
Surely an apocalyptic novel? A philosophical dissection of the erosion of Western civilisation taking on whole clusters of polemical issues – over-population, race, the Third World and the character of liberal thought and sentiment. A special price for Australian readers, $28.00 including postage.  


by Peter Ewer
Before the arrest of Pakistani immigrant Faisal Shahzard in the Times Square bombing attempt, the liberal press, without any evidence, pushed the idea that he was white. That was real news. But after his arrest the story dies. It is a pity because Shahzard should have been a pin-up boy for multiculturalism: he had a typical American life, a wife, a good job and came from a well-off Pakistani family. So all of the usual liberal-left excuses for terrorism are not applicable. The deeper truth at work here is the ultimate failure of the multicultural, multiracial society, which will always self-destruct.  


Here’s a story that has “everything”: “Stabbed Nurse Sponsored Man,” The Australian 14/5/2010, p.3). A Sydney nurse sponsored a man. Police are questioning him (the man cannot be named for “legal reasons”) over the stabbing to death of the nurse.
He proclaims his innocence and has said “I’m the foreigner, I’m the one with the colourful background. Whenever there’s been finger pointing in the past, it’s the new guy, it’s the strange guy, the guy they don’t know anything about.” What can we say? 


by Chris Knight
A Christian preacher was handing out leaflets to shoppers in a Cumbrian (UK) shopping mall. He stated to a passer-by and a “gay” police community support officer that as a Christian he believed that homosexuality was a sin. He was arrested and charged for using abusive or insulting words or behaviour contrary to the Public Order Act 1986 (UK).
The preacher said: “My freedom was taken away on the hearsay of someone who disliked what I said and I was charged under a law that doesn’t apply.”

This is a sick society, one which is turning on itself much like people on certain drugs scratch and slash at their flesh. The Public Order Act was not meant for this purpose – or at least that is what was said at the time of the passing of the Act.In the US a third year law student at Harvard Law School has been “crucified” for saying in an email to friends that African-Americans may be less intelligent than Whites. The thought police are taking action: action about a private individual making a private remark. The storm troopers of political correctness also march down your street.  


by Chris Knight
No, Kevin Rudd is not responsible for these weird cosmological events – if they are real (and if he is real, not some sort of politically correct, social construction). I write this inspired by the words which I just read by David Burchell (“The Catastrophic Cleverness of the Political Class”, The Australian 3/5/2010, p.24) on Rudd’s misperception of his public image:
“No doubt we are all dupes to our self-image, and underestimate how keenly people see through us. But in Rudd’s case the distance between public opinion and his living nurtured self-image is vertigo-inspiring.” Indeed – the opinion polls show that Julia Gillard is rising to knock Rudd over and become our first dyed-red haired socialist PM – but only for a little while until she too is blown over to be replaced by Penny Wong, our first Asian PM. Watch the changes then as Australia Asianises at light speed. Soon I will have to write for the League in Mandarin!

As for Saturn and Jupiter it seems that one of Jupiter’s red stripes has suddenly disappeared and that there is a large rotating hexagonal structure circling the north pole of Saturn. The hexagon is 60 miles deep and 15,000 miles wide. Perhaps there is a political conspiracy in space. If so, Kevin Rudd may have a place to go when the Labor Party get out the traditional back-stabbing dagger.  


by Clifford H. Douglas, 1919
Note the date of this article. It is as relevant today as it was ninety years ago. “Elsewhere an attempt has been made to show the dangerously false premises on which the New Unionist Party bases all its hopes of Reconstruction. As The New Age has pointed out, the keynote of the symphony we are to play under the conduct of Mr. Lloyd George and the industrial federations behind him is production, production, yet more production; and by this simple remedy we are to change from a nation with a C3 population and many grievances into a band of busy B’s (or is it AI’s?) healthy, wealthy, happy and wise.

It is a simple little remedy - one wonders why we never thought of it before. You seize any unconsidered trifle of matter which may be lying about, preferably on your neighbour’s territory, and you make it into something else quite unspecified. You assert by a process of arithmetical legerdemain known as cost accounting that the value of the original matter, which we may call “a” is now a+(b+c)+(d+e), “b” being labour, “c” overhead charges, “d” selling charges and “e” profit, and that the “wealth” of the country is increased by this operation in respect of a sum equal to (b+c+d+e). With the aid of your banking system you now create credits which show that “a” is a + etc. - (x+y) (where “x” is loss in trading, etc., and “y” is depreciation) and there you are—AI.

The chief objection to this otherwise fascinating idea is that despite a large body of most respectable and even highly paid accountants and bankers who will produce quantities of figures to prove that “a” has now become (a+b, etc.) and that the wealth of the country has been increased, etc., etc., the facts do not, unfortunately, confirm their statements.

The power used in doing work on “a” has been dissipated in heat and otherwise; the tools have been worn, the workmen have consumed food and clothes and have occupied houses, and what you have actually got is “a” minus any portion of “a” lost in conversion; b, c, d, e, etc., are the price paid by the community for the increased adaptability of “a” to the needs of the community, which price must in the last event be paid for in effort. The question of the gain in adaptability depends on what you produce; but payment is inevitable.

It is not the purpose of this short article to depreciate the services of accountants; in fact, under the existing conditions probably no body of men has done more to crystallise the data on which we carry on the business of the world; but the utter confusion of thought which has undoubtedly arisen from the calm assumption of the book-keeper and the accountant that he and he alone was in a position to assign positive or negative values to the quantities represented by his figures is one of the outstanding curiosities of the industrial system; and the attempt to mould the activities of a great empire on such a basis is surely the final condemnation of an out-worn method.

While the effect of the concrete sum distributed as profit is overrated in the attacks made on the capitalistic system, and is far and increasingly less important than the overhead charges added to the value of the product in computing its factory cost, it is the dominant factor in the political aspect of the situation, because the equation of production is stated by the capitalist in a form which requires it to be solved in terms of selling price while “e,” the profit, is always a plus quantity.

In economics we are dealing with facts not figures:
Now the prime necessity of the situation, which is world wide at this time, is to realise that in economics we are dealing with facts and not figures; and mechanical facts at that. The conversion of a bar of iron into a nut and bolt and its change in price from 2d. or 3d. to, say, Is. means absolutely nothing at all beyond the fact that we have transformed a certain amount of potential energy into work in the process of changing the bar of iron into a nut and bolt, and that an arbitrary and totally empirical measure of this potential energy in various forms is contained in the figures of price. The factor which gives real character to the operation is the “ inducement to produce.”

If the object of this use of material and energy is simply finance, we shall get a financial result of some sort - but two real things result in any case. First we have definitely decreased the energy potentially available for all other purposes, and secondly we have obtained simply a nut and bolt, in return for a bar of iron and a definite amount of energy dissipated. If by wealth is meant the original meaning attached to the word - “well-being” - the value in well-being to be attached to our bolt and nut depends entirely on its use for the promotion of well-being (unless we admire bolts and nuts as ornaments), and bears no relation whatever to the empirical process of giving values to a, b, and c, etc.

Let us particularise:
The immediate necessity as to which all political parties are agreed is improved housing. The financier says, “Yes, you shall have money for housing as the result of building gunboats for Chile,” (or as Australia’s bankers and politicians say today: “Yes, you shall have money for housing as the result of the big international corporations mining and selling our mineral resources to build up the next great world powers (at our expense and to the western world’s demise) China and India”), thereby implying that there is a chain of causation between gunboats for Chile and houses for Camberwell.

Not only is there no such real chain of causation, but the building of gunboats for Chile, or elsewhere, decreases the energy available to build those houses, and when the total available energy is utilised, as has been approximately the case during the war, and may easily be so again, not all the gunboats ever sold, no matter what the accounting figures attached to the transaction may indicate in added wealth to this country, will produce one house at Camberwell, or anywhere else. What is, of course, common to the two is the “inducement to produce,” but that may or may not be a sound inducement.

The matter is really very serious.
The economic effect of charging all the waste in industry to the consumer so curtails his purchasing power that an increasing percentage of the product of industry must be exported.

The effect of this on the worker is that he has to do many times the amount of work which should be necessary to keep him in the highest standard of living, as a result of an artificial inducement to produce things he does not want, which he cannot buy, and which are of no use to the attainment of his internal standard of well-being.
While the mechanism of the process is possibly too technical for his general comprehension, he has grasped the drift of the situation and shows every sign of a determination to make things interesting.

On the other hand, we see a good sound reason for the capitalist’s hatred for internationalism; failing interplanetary commerce, he will have nowhere to export to, and will be faced with the horrible prospect of dividing up the world’s production amongst the individuals who produce. In which case a larger number of people than at present will agree that it is possible to overproduce gunboats. Given this situation, what will be the result of a “strong” Coalition Government ?” (emphasis added…ed)

Source: The English Review, December: No.1373 New Series, Vol. XXIV, No. 9, (2/1/1919).  


In a delightfully amusing skit John Clarke and Bryan Dawe (ABC’s 7.30 Report) expose the utter absurdity of the world’s present financial system. We just had to include the transcript in this OT issue as sometimes humour is the best way to get the message across.

John Clarke and Bryan Dawe calculate the cost of the European debt crisis:
KERRY O'BRIEN, PRESENTER: Time for John Clarke and Bryan Dawe with a few reflections on Europe's financial woes.
BRYAN DAWE: Your name is Roger yes? JOHN CLARKE: Roger.
BRYAN DAWE: Ah, that's your name? JOHN CLARKE: Roger.
BRYAN DAWE: Good. And what do you do Roger? JOHN CLARKE: I'm a financial consultant.
BRYAN DAWE: Ah, financial consultant, eh? JOHN CLARKE: Roger, yes.
BRYAN DAWE: Terrific and Roger how is business at the moment? JOHN CLARKE: Not bad thank you. Been a bit quiet lately.
BRYAN DAWE: How do you mean lately? JOHN CLARKE: Since the war. Been a bit quiet.
BRYAN DAWE: Fair enough. Okay, Roger your special subject tonight is the economies of the European community. Your time starts now. Best of luck. JOHN CLARKE: Thank you.
BRYAN DAWE: How much does Greece owe, Roger? JOHN CLARKE: $367 billion.
BRYAN DAWE: Correct. And who do they owe it to? JOHN CLARKE: Mostly to the other European economies.
BRYAN DAWE: Correct. How much does Ireland owe? JOHN CLARKE: $865 billion.
BRYAN DAWE: Correct. Who do they owe it to? JOHN CLARKE: Other European economies mostly.
BRYAN DAWE: Correct. How much does Spain and Italy owe? JOHN CLARKE: $1 trillion each. BRYAN DAWE: Correct. Who to? JOHN CLARKE: Mainly France, Britain and Germany.
BRYAN DAWE: Correct. And how are Germany, France, Britain going Roger? JOHN CLARKE: Well they're struggling a bit, aren't they?
BRYAN DAWE: Correct. Why? JOHN CLARKE: Well ‘cause they've lent all the vast amounts of money to other European economies that can't possibly pay them back.
BRYAN DAWE: Correct so what are they go to go have to do? JOHN CLARKE: They're going to have to bail them out.
BRYAN DAWE: Correct. Where are they getting the money to do that Roger? JOHN CLARKE: That is a good question. I don't know the answer to that one. (laughs)
BRYAN DAWE: How much does Portugal owe? JOHN CLARKE: Hang on a minute, what was the answer to that earlier question?
BRYAN DAWE: Just keep answering the questions Roger. Where is Portugal going to get the money it owes to Germany if Germany can't get back the money that it lent to Italy? JOHN CLARKE: Just a minute. What was the answer to the previous que- The question was: How can broke economies lend money to other broke economies who haven't got any money because they can't pay back the money the broke economy lent to the other broke economy and shouldn't have lent it to them in the first place because the broke economy can't pay back?
BRYAN DAWE: You are wasting valuable time Roger. How much money does Spain owe to Italy? JOHN CLARKE: $41 billion. But where are they going to get it?
BRYAN DAWE: Correct. What does Italy owe to Spain? JOHN CLARKE: $27 billion but they haven't got it - they're broke.
BRYAN DAWE: Correct. How can they pay each other if neither of them has any money? JOHN CLARKE: They're going to get a bailout, aren't they?
BRYAN DAWE: Correct. And where is the money coming from for the bailout? JOHN CLARKE: That is what I'm asking you!
BRYAN DAWE: Correct. Why are people selling the European currency and buying the US dollar? JOHN CLARKE: Because the US economy is so much stronger than the European economy.
BRYAN DAWE: Correct. Why is that Roger? JOHN CLARKE: Because it's owned by China.
BRYAN DAWE: Correct and very well done! And after that round you've lost $1 million. JOHN CLARKE: I've lost $1 million? I thought you said well done!
BRYAN DAWE: Yes well done - you've only lost $1 million. That's an extraordinary performance Roger. JOHN CLARKE: I've only lost $1 million.
BRYAN DAWE: Very well done. JOHN CLARKE: That's quite good is it?
BRYAN DAWE: Oh it's excellent. JOHN CLARKE: Sell everything immediately. Quickly!

KERRY O'BRIEN: I think it's called laughing as you sink.

The New York Times have produced a graph to highlight the utter absurdity of banks and governments owing each other many billions of euros (converted to US dollars for its readers).
Go to the following internet address to view the graph:-  


Advance notice that the League of Rights National Weekend for 2010 will be at the Bendigo Motor Inn, 232 High St., Kangaroo Flat on September 24, 25 and 26th. We have reserved 20 rooms in the Motel.
There are 16 rooms on street level, so, advance booking is recommended. Full details of prices and booking details will be sent on a separate enclosure. The theme of the Seminar is “The Law of Love”

- - Donald Auchterlonie National Director. 

© Published by the Australian League of Rights, P.O. Box 27 Happy Valley, SA 5159