|Home||blog.alor.org||Newtimes Survey||The Cross-Roads||Library|
|OnTarget Archives||The Social Crediter Archives||NewTimes Survey Archives||Brighteon Video Channel||Veritas Books|
17 March 2012 Thought for the Week:
Byoblu intervista Nigel Farage: Mr. Nigel, the governments of two democratic states have been removed in the space of a day and replaced by two technocratic governments, controlled by men originating from international high finance and the Trilateral Commission… Is this a coincidence?
Investigative journalist Greg Palast warns us ‘not to buy’ the version put out by the politicians and mainline media of what happened to Greece. He says:
THE UNITED STATES OF EUROPE (EU) PLANNED AND PLOTTED LONG AGO
It was in January 1958 that the League published an article by Mary H. Gray in The New Times; that’s over 50 years ago.
The Free Trade Area is the lure; it is the honey on the flypaper from which we shall find it impossible to extricate ourselves. A nation can withdraw from an agreement; a treaty can be annulled; but once a people have discarded their nationhood and merged their identity in a cosmopolitan crowd, they are no longer a nation. And that is just what is planned for the British people…”
It all came to pass as was planned: The political parties fed the people just what they thought they could get away with, continually putting in place policies that took away genuine freedoms and rights. Having watched what was happening for many a long year you could say I have become very cynical – and you would be right! I liken the two main political parties to two prongs on the one fork – a fork that has continually stabbed the Australian people in the back whilst the reflection from the glint of metal appears as a false shining light of honesty and truth and integrity.
And that is how I see the public spat between Wayne Swan (Labor) and the Queensland billionaire Clive Palmer (LNP donor), “The rising influence of vested interests is threatening Australia’s egalitarian social contract”, claims Wayne Swan. (https://www.themonthly.com.au) “Wayne Swan knows nothing about me, or our democracy” counters Clive Palmer (March 5, 2012). “All Australians have an inherent right to be treated equally under the law regardless of our race or means or where we live. We are one nation, with a diverse and rich background. The heritage of all Australians, rich or poor, and that of our leaders, elected or not, is something we all must respect.”
Comment: This ‘leadership’ nonsense simply won’t wash Mr. Palmer. It is rather like saying the German people should have respected the heritage of Adolf Hitler, or the Russian people the heritage of Joseph Stalin. What nonsense. People respect those who prove their integrity, their loyalty and in the case of politicians, their genuine representation and service to their fellow countrymen, etc.
Let me remind you of what you had to say in 2009: “Mining Magnate Defends China from ‘Racists’”. According to Australia’s fifth richest man, Clive Palmer, the Rudd government’s foreign investment rules are “racist” discriminating against Chinese companies seeking to buy Australian resource projects. Chinese investors would not tolerate “the idea of being discriminated against because of the colour of their skin” (The Australian 30/9/09, p.1).
OT continues: “Recall also that China is a communist society that, under Mao, murdered millions of its own people. Beijing has celebrated the 60th anniversary of communist power, when it should be lamenting 60 years of tyranny and oppression…” On Target, 6/11/2009
Palmer continues: “To classify people by their means, race, class or gender is not a substitute for robust discussion about ideas or solutions to pressing national problems. John F. Kennedy once said words to the effect that ''governments may come and go but ideas go on for ever''. (emphasis added…ed) Read further:..
IDEAS sure as hell do ‘go on forever’ Mr. Palmer! The Greek people, the Irish people, the Italian people and the Australian people are now aware of that as they struggle to survive the latest attacks on their freedoms, their livelihoods and their national sovereignties.
The Courier Mail (3/3/2012) asks about Clive Palmer: “So what is Palmer's motivation with this flurry of very public battles on multiple fronts? Has he lost the plot, or is he a master tactician who is all too often underestimated by his opponents? Or is he perhaps just a frustrated barrister who dropped out of a law degree at the University of Queensland in the '80s, to later end up as media spokesman for the Bjelke-Petersen-era National Party during the 1986 election campaign, and is today one of the LNP's biggest donors?”
Palmer is an Assets Trader: “Palmer's billions do not come from creating assets of value. There are no major mines, resorts or factories that Palmer has built himself. He is an asset trader, who started in property and moved to mineral tenements in hot sectors such as iron ore and coal, and sources his cash flow from the Yabulu refinery he (in very savvy fashion) bought from BHP Billiton towards the bottom of the cycle.
Ironically, the one thing he appears to have been stripped of - the Gold Coast soccer licence - is possibly the only recognisable entity he has helped build from scratch. And it is highly doubtful today whether the licence is worth anything like $18 million. Assets can be bought and sold, though. Or litigated. And Palmer appears very adroit at both.”
As for Wayne Swan: Playing the ‘class war’ card has worn very thin indeed Wayne. The Labor movement and party have been around for a hundred or more years and in that time many ambitious men and women have climbed to political power and perks on the backs of hard working Australians – and still the working classes are struggling to hold their heads above water! Dear God, please spare us from all such people! Labour has known of the answer to the 'class war' for more than eighty years. Read... "Socialism and Social Credit 1935" for the historical evidence.
PLAY THE RACE CARD AGAIN, SAM!
by Peter West
Thomson himself says that the new class progressives’ false sense of moral superiority has effectively censored debate on the population pressures faced by people in Sydney’s west which is the area that receives most of Sydney’s refugee intake. While the inner-city elites champion onshore processing of asylum-seekers they do not offer up their suburbs as sites for processing. Thomson asks whether “Balmain be an ideal suburb for those who eventually meet the requirements for permanent settlement to establish new communities, possibly with the building of a Mosque for their religious observances.” Melbourne too would be excellent! Canberra would be best of all!
Thomson says that the high moral standard mentality is found in the new class elites’ attitudes to the “stolen generation” and in the history of the White Australia policy. The taxpayer funded Immigrant Nation sees the White Australia Policy as “racist” and dismisses concerns of the working class for protection of their jobs.
Thomson concludes by observing that the progressives still hold to exclusive divisions, being elitists and as such they have a prejudice against the working class, born from their university education. Overall a good article on themes dear to my heart. This is about the best article on this issue which I have seen in the orthodox media so it is worth noting its existence for the record.
LET’S HAVE SOME PLURALISM AND DIVERSITY IN FINANCE
by James Reed
Hutchinson and Burkitt draw parallels between Douglas’ position and that of economic institutional analysis, Thorstein Veblen, who coined the term in 1900 in his book The Place of Science in Modern Civilization. In particular, Veblen criticises orthodox economics for its reductionistic treatment of the machinery of credit as a mere “refined system of barter”.
According to Hutchinson and Burkitt, “Douglas’ rejection by orthodoxy was due in no small measure to the impracticality of tailoring his theoretical observations within the constraints of neo-classical general free market equilibrium theory.” However since the time of Douglas the most able of critics have pounded away at the philosophical foundations of this orthodoxy and found it wanting. That is good news for social crediters who have been granted a window of theoretical opportunity.
CONSTITUTIONAL BETRAYAL: TIME TO PUT REAL PRESSURE ON ABBOTT
by Ian Wilson LL.B.
Howard, an alleged monarchist, gave us a Constitutional referendum about the republic. Noel Pearson, a champion of proposed Constitutional changes believes that he can convince Tony Abbott to back the full packet of changes, including a clause outlawing racial discrimination. (The Australian, February 10, 2012, p.2)
THE HUMAN RIGHTS TO THE LOOT
by Ian Wilson LL.B.
In the UK about 200 foreign criminals escaped deportation in 2010 using Article 8 of the European Convention on Human Rights which guarantees the right to “family and private life”.
This is an example of how a piece of law, which in a normal society would function well, but in our corrupted society behaves abnormally. That is why our Constitution should not be touched. For any change, however small, will give miles of power to our politically correct legal establishment.
JEWS ON: IS RACE WAR IN AMERICA INEVITABLE ?
by Peter Ewer and John Steele
“Is Race War in America Inevitable?” by Kirby Ferris, currently the Research Director of Jews for the Preservation of Firearms Ownership, cites approvingly a review of the same title by Ferris of Thomas Chittum’s Civil War Two: "The Coming Breakup of America" (1998). Chittum argued for the common sense position that “multi-cultural, multi-racial and multi-ethnic democracies don’t last very long, if they even get started in the first place. The minute a single race, religion or ethnic group loses a large majority in a nation, that nation begins to undergo internal fracture.”
Ferris, summarising Chittum, says that this is already occurring in the American Southwest. Not only will Hispanic migration, most of it illegal, result in conflicts with Whites, but American blacks are returning to the Old South, so a three way contest is going to occur. Southern conflict will ignite northern conflict in cities between Black and Hispanic Street gangs, perhaps now close to one million armed and aggressive young men, and the city’s “White population.”
Ferris concludes: “Don’t get mad at Thomas Chittum for his pragmatic insight. His book is controversial and opinionated but it is not a racist screed. You just might as well get mad at the weatherman who tells you a hurricane is coming.” And indeed, such a hurricane is coming to assault the quiet lives of the West.
THE GREAT LIBERAL SELF DECEPTION
by James Reed
He claims that even opposition groups put the number of Hom rebels killed in recent conflict as 55. Bradley sees a repeat of the “Libyan debacle” occurring. Of course behind all of these conflicts are the murky ideologies of economics and power which human rights talk merely covers. Bradley points out that the Western elites basically know that Islamists will take over Syria as in Libya and make the life of ordinary Syrians, worse. But the new Islamist despots are likely to be hostile to Iran and this suits the West which fears a nuclear-armed Iran. Bradley concludes that for the West the ordinary Syrians “can suffer in silence, it seems. US and Israeli “Security interests” must come first, and are best served by a pact with the devil.” So much for the rhetoric of “human rights”.
THE ABSURDITY OF NATIVE TITLE
by Ian Wilson LL.B.
Think deeply about all of this when contemplating the proposed Constitutional changes. If these changes are in place there will be a Constitutional duty for eternal Aboriginal advancement. I take it that the present legal regime which delivered the above goodies is “racist” and inadequate for why then bother changing the Constitution. If this is so then what does the future hold? How about giving 100% of Australia’s mineral resources to Aborigines as these resources are out of the “red land”? And what would communist China think then??
The absurdity of native title? What I find problematic is that the legislation pushes the pre-modernity ideal of connection to the land, but as in this case, the settlement is for the very modernist ideal of money and lots of it. If “money can’t buy love”, then how can it buy unity and fellowship with “the land”?
SAVED FROM AN ICE AGE ! GOD BLESS GLOBAL WARMING !
by James Reed
I conclude, that Global warming, if (and that’s a big IF) occurring, is overall good for humanity in the long run. Carbon “pollution” is our ice age solution.
IRELAND TO HOLD REFERENDUM ON ‘EURO PACT’
Irish voters will have their say on the European Union fiscal treaty after the Dublin authorities reluctantly announced a referendum yesterday. The Irish coalition government had hoped to avoid a vote, but advice from its Attorney-General said that one should be held. Ministers will now be campaigning strongly for an endorsement of the treaty and crossing their fingers that things go to plan, acutely aware that previous referendums have produced results which the authorities did not hope for or expect. Voters rejected the Lisbon Treaty in 2008 before passing it at the second time of asking a year later.
A distinct strain of anti-European sentiment is obvious in the Irish Republic where the bailout from the EU and other institutions has produced resentment about the strict austerity measures which accompanied it. Irish ministers maintain they are confident of winning the vote, which could take place in May. But European sources have openly said that Dublin lobbied for treaty wording that would make a referendum unnecessary.
Although the government has a solid majority the Irish Labour party, who are the junior partners in the ruling coalition, slipped in a recent opinion poll. Support meanwhile rose significantly for Sinn Fein, whose anti-Europe stance means it will be campaigning for a No vote.
Victorian State Lunch and Seminar: Saturday 17th March 2012, commencing 11.00am.
Change of Phone and Fax numbers:
|© Published by the Australian League of Rights, P.O. Box 27 Happy Valley, SA 5159|