|Home||blog.alor.org||Newtimes Survey||The Cross-Roads||Library|
|OnTarget Archives||The Social Crediter Archives||NewTimes Survey Archives||Brighteon Video Channel||Veritas Books|
24 February 2012 Thought for the Week:
“Social Credit is based upon the Christian philosophy, which emphasises the importance of the individual and the subservience of the institution to the needs of the individual…”
- - Introduction by Eric D. Butler in “Social Credit and Catholicism” by George-Henri Levesque, O.P., Professor of Economics, Laval and Montreal Universities Dominican House of Studies, Ottawa.
WHY ARE THE IRISH PEOPLE BURDENED WITH A DEBT THEY DID NOT INCUR?
by Betty Luks
Klaus Masuch replied to Mr. Browne’s insistent questioning: “I can understand that this is a difficult decision to be made by the government and there’s no doubt about it but there are different aspects of the problem to be, to be balanced against each other and I can understand that the government came to, came to the view that, all in all, the costs for the, for Irish people, for the, for the stability of the banking system, for the confidence in the banking system of taking a certain action in this respect which you are mentioning could likely have been much bigger than the benefits for the taxpayer which of course would have been there. So the financial sector would have been affected; the confidence of the financial sector would have been negatively affected, and I can understand that there were, that there was a difficult decision but that the decision was taken in this direction.”[italics added]
“The people’s welfare is not of great concern to us” says Mammon, “but our system is”.
Watch again Professor Keen’s youtube video: He admits banks create credit ‘out of nothing’ and yet the people are expected to believe that not only should banks be legally allowed to claim the credit (a form of money) as their own, but that, we the people, should repay the created-out-of-thin-air credit, but also be charged further interest on it.
Listen to Jeremy Lee’s: "New World Order and Global Debt", (1992).
DO WE GET READY FOR AUSTRALIA’S OWN GREEK - AND IRISH – ‘TRAGEDY’?
Heard on radio last evening that the banksters are insisting the terms for Greece’s bailout include the Greek peoples’ wages and pensions be reduced by 20% - will this happen in Australia? Are Australian banks in trouble due to them also having gambled on the Derivatives markets? The Sydney Morning Herald reported:
“There are 12 secret documents judged to be so potentially damaging that releasing their contents would endanger the stability of Australia's whole economic system. Australia's biggest banks, insurers and superannuation funds are named, and some are apparently shamed, in ''risk registers'' kept by the federal government's banking regulator. But in a gaping hole in Australia's defences against the global financial crisis, the Herald can reveal the crucially important registers were only compiled months after the worst of the crisis struck. The regulator warns the risks outlined in the registers are so sensitive that releasing the information ''may affect the stability of Australia's economy''. The registers pinpoint the weakest links in Australia's multibillion-dollar financial services industry, outlining where individual institutions pose systemic risks and the possible remedies by the regulator.
The Herald sought risk registers drafted by the Australian Prudential Regulation Authority, which is responsible for addressing system-wide risks in Australia's financial system, under freedom-of-information laws. The request sought registers kept during the height of the global financial crisis, which occurred when Lehman Bros collapsed in 2008. (Read further here)
The scale of the problem: Australian Banks have a combined exposure of $13,785 Billion (or $13.785 Trillion) to derivatives and other 'off balance sheet’ business as at 30 June 2008. These are the most recent figures publicly available… The source is credited to APRA or the Australian Prudential Regulatory Authority. At the time he emphasised, this is their exposure, not their turnover." Continue reading here…
A correspondent reminded us that we should not forget that brave little nation of Rhodesia, now known as Zimbabwe. The League did its best to expose the western forces that were intent on seeing it destroyed. (www.alor.org/Volume14/Vol14No39.htm and https://alor.org/Volume1/Vol1No38.htm)
But not all are sad memories. Some good jokes are on this one:
THE GREAT GILLARD-RUDD CONSPIRACY
by James Reed
The average voter, the Labor elite knows, has a really short memory. And there you have it, the misery goes on and on and on, until we are all equal at the bottom of the river. That is, unless we choose to do something about it.
SCIENTISTS REJECT THE RELIGION OF CLIMATE CHANGE
by James Reed
The article mentions the case of an editor of one climate journal who published an article by another scientist arguing that warming was occurring, but it was not unusual given climate changes over the past 1000 years.
The article is a good one but fails to generalise its position: science is generally in service of the establishment and heretics are usually punished. Change occurs largely by heretics keeping their heads and outliving establishment scientists. My guess is that many, if not all, the heretics on the list would have their own politically correct bias, say on race research.
by Peter Ewer
He then needed nine operations in an attempt to save his leg, but this proved ultimately unsuccessful. The teacher is in dispute with the Education Department over compensation. The school also dealt with the matter internally and did not inform the police. “Inquiries by police have not led to a formal investigation or any charges being laid.” If one thinks about the politics behind this story one finds a concise summary of “the world turned upside down”. Such is justice in our amputated culture.
TURNING THE WORLD UPSIDE DOWN AND INSIDE OUT
by Chris Knight
She is deeply alarmed about the situation that “much of public discourse has departed sharply from reality.” (p.ix) and that no debate is permitted on politically correct issues. Thus: “Society seems to be in the grip of mass derangement.” (p.x) She says: “In the West, the forces of ideology are well on the way to unstitching the fabric of society.” Phillips sees the problem with the West’s worship of reason and the inability of dealing with those who follow irrationality and violence.
That, to my mind, is putting the cart before the horse. Arguably it is the widespread lack of critical rationality – not questioning immigration, multiculturalism, multiracialism, feminism and the other contents of Pandora’s Box – which has led to our present plight of the decay of the West. These cancerous ideologies have deracinated us and caused a loss of racial identity. Hence, why not allow hundreds of thousands of unassimilable people to live in the West, as we have no identity? These sorts of questions are not analysable within Phillips’ paradigm. That being said, it is good to be able to cite an establishment journalist who says what none of our Australian de-gassed journalists say.
SOMETHING EXTRAORDINARY AND HISTORIC TOOK PLACE RECENTLY
'Dr. Eowyn', 2 February, 2012: Something extraordinary and historic took place mere days ago in Las Vegas, Nevada.
For three days, from January 29 and 31, 2012, in the Tuscany Hotel & Casino, more than 120 county sheriffs, from across the United States of America, met in a first annual, "Constitutional Sheriffs Convention". This is what Wikipedia says about U.S. sheriffs:
The first Constitutional Sheriffs Convention is the brainchild of the www.CountySheriffProject.org and the
Constitutional Sheriffs and Peace Officers Association at www.CSPOA.org .
The convention's objective is two-fold:
Given the importance of the convention, it is curious to say the least that the media have chosen to totally ignore it. Curious, too, is the fact that I scoured the Internet yesterday but could find scant news on the convention, much less a report - not even on the website of the County Sheriff Project.
NDAA is the notorious National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 which effectively nullifies the Bill of Rights by making it lawful for the U.S. President and the military to arrest and detain U.S. citizens without charge or trial.
From the Oath Keepers' website, it appears the sheriffs at the convention did not sign the Resolution as a collective body.
American Constitution has been overthrown:
Rhodes was followed by several sheriffs, who spoke one by one. They included:
An excellent video of these men explaining their problems with Federal agents and how they defeated them can be seen by going to www.YouTube.com and typing in: Constitutional sheriffs.
A BIG STINK ABOUT MIGRATION AND MULTICULTURALISM
by James Reed
Ok Teresa, all is forgiven, you’ve said the ‘M’ word. However the comments were enough to get all of the professional ethnics, new class academic bleeding hearts etc. etc. to roll out the well known “we/you [Anglos of course] are so, so racist.”
All this boot licking when the “Asian powers” have immigration policies today which are racially-based and far more restrictive than the White Australia policy ever was, and where some ethnic minorities learn the real meaning of oppression. Are you tired of being kicked yet?
SURE, WE ARE ALL RACISTS!
by James Reed
Furedi goes on to discuss the federal government’s comprehensive anti-racism campaign and asks why this should be occurring now: “Racism no longer speaks the confident language of superiority, but expresses the silent anxiety of those who are lost.”
My take on this is that racial pride is a biological natural phenomena, and our type of multiculturalism, multiracialism is unnatural. It can only survive by a massive social structure which deracinates and dispossess the majority. This is done because it suits the financial elite to have a cosmopolitan society.
Ultimately all will be divided and conquered and crushed. In a nutshell, its all about money, power and global domination by people who make James Bond’s villains look like choir boys. And at the moment it looks like they have well and truly kicked our posteriors.
IF ONLY THE CONSTITUTION HAD A BIT OF “RACISM”, ANGLO-SAXONS MIGHT SURVIVE!
by James Reed:
Yet the politically correct have still squawked about the “racist” Section 25.
Section 51 (xxvi), the people of any race section, has only been used to make beneficial laws for Aborigines, and this has been tested by the High Court of Australia, Windschuttle points out:
CONSTITUTIONAL CULTURAL WARS: TAKE A STAND AGAINST THE PC LAWYERS
by Ian Wilson LL.B.
This is the most dangerous set of proposed Constitutional changes ever made in Australia’s history. It will give untold power to the High Court to create a politically correct bill of rights and complete the transformation of Australia into the Multicultural Fascist State (MFS) as James Reed calls it. Looking through the report I have found no solid argument to show that sections 25 and 51 xxvi disadvantage Aborigines. The Committee object to Section 51 (xxvi) because hypothetically it could be used in this way. But that is not a realistic argument. Hypothetically there could be a revolution in Australia with the entire Constitution replaced with one with racial rules with real teeth – but arguing from mere logical possibilities is not good law. The present culture and laws arguably already contributes all that is needed for Aboriginal “advancement”, and it is never shown what else is needed that can’t be provided by the present legal system, which as I see it is already pathetically politically correct.
Further, the prohibition of racial discrimination clause will be used by the lawyers to guarantee open borders and previously unimaginable oppressive anti-White “racist” laws. Conservative organisations such as this one will be closed down and possibly members and/or readers arrested! Sure it won’t happen overnight but given the trend of things it will happen. It is just the nature of things. The Andrew Bolt case indicated that we need to go in exactly the opposite direction.
Phillip Ruddock, the Howard government’s minister who abolished the “corrupt” money-sink of the Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Commission (ATSIC) said in December last year that it would have been harder to abolish ATSIC if the Constitutional changes now canvassed were in place. Thus corrupt, money-wasting organisations would still be seen as “advancement”. Ruddock said that the idea of putting within the body of the Constitution recognition of the prior occupation of Australia by Aborigines and Torres Strait Islanders and respect for their culture”, gives you more hooks on which you can hang potential litigation.” (The Australian, December 26, 2011, p.1) Even the idea that Parliament should be able to legislate for Aboriginal advancement would be “in effect abdicating” parliamentary power to the High Court (ie. lawyers).
The Northern Territory intervention would be immediately legally challenged. Further, the idea of “advancement” is vague and will lead to massive legal disputes. (The Australian, December 19, 2011, p.1) One of the most important articles published about the proposed race powers is S. Rintoul, “Lawyers Backed New Race Powers”, The Australian, January 4, 2012, p.2. The article discusses the Law Council of Australia submission: “A submission by the council recommended key changes to the Constitution ultimately adopted by the panel in its report.” The Council supported “an approach to constitutional recognition which goes beyond the preamble to the Imperial Act and secures enforceable rights.” The Council had suggested a new Head of Power obliging government to make laws “beneficial” to Aborigines and Torres Strait Islanders (the panel used the term “advancement”). They also recommended “a general guarantee of racial equality and racial non-discrimination.” Now you know where all of this has come from.
It has been reported that the deadline for this referendum has allegedly shifted because the expert panel believes that if things are rushed then it would be defeated. (The Weekend Australian, January 21 – 22, 2012, p.1) Don’t go back to sleep!!! This article reports the opinion of certain elites and not Gillard.
SOUTHWEST SYDNEY AND THE ART OF THE “DRIVE-BY”
A drive-by has nothing to do with purchasing a few bottles of grog from your local drive in bottle-o. No. Rather, drive-bys involve thugs driving by some target and spraying bullets, usually by automatic fire rather than aimed fire. The issue is discussed by Tim Priest “Courts Must Back Police in the Fight Against Guns”, The Australian, January 20, 2012, p.10.
Although this sounds like an anti-gun piece, it is not as Priest rather politely is concerned about this: “There is no deterrent to the culture of gun possession that grips many young men of ethnic background in southwest Sydney. And it is a culture. It is not a “spike” or a “peak” in crime statistics. It is a culture that is here to stay. Make no mistake about that.” It makes me laugh after reading the hard-line stuff from former policeman Tim Priest, to then turn to the collar-and-tie article of Scott Morrison, “Rule of Law for All Migrants”, The Australian, January 23, 2012, p.10.
Morrison “celebrates” in his article the Liberal Party’s achievements, which, as I see it, includes: Robert Menzies embracing post-war immigration (which set in motion all the issues we face today), Harold Holt abolishing the White Australia Policy, and Malcolm Fraser allowing in the Indo-Chinese refugees and beginning the Asianisation of Australia and John Howard, embracing Asianisation and establishing a Chinese ruling class in Australia: e.g., “The Howard Legacy”.
Morrison though is aware, vaguely, of the “social dislocation arising from Europe’s failed immigration policies”, and home-grown terrorism. He says that Europe did not follow Australia’s immigration path; on the contrary, we have, and the claim that Australia has avoided the problems of Europe because of some slight statistical advantage of skills is sheer nonsense. The daily stories from the papers, such as the quote given above by Tim Priest, refute this. Morrison needs to get out after dark in rough areas and see the world which the Liberals have helped create.
THE GENTLE ART OF SCIENTIFIC FRAUD
by Brian Simpson
THE “ASSASSINATE-THE-PRESIDENT” STORY NEEDS TO BE READ VERY CAREFULLY
by Peter Ewer
Now one needs to read Adler’s comments calmly and think about the facts. As I read it, he did not say that Obama should be liquidated – only that this option may in the future be considered by Mossad. It is clearly a hypothetical statement, and one which is very unrealistic. I agree with conservative Jews who are hostile to Obama, but the opportunity to toss Obama out of office democratically and legally is right before them.
CHNAGE OF TELEPHONE NUMBER
South Australiab Bookshop Services - Please note in your teledex Doug and Jean Holmes phone number is changed to: 08 8396 1245
|© Published by the Australian League of Rights, P.O. Box 27 Happy Valley, SA 5159|