|Home||Blog||Freedom Potentials||The Cross Roads||Veritas Books|
|OnTarget Archives||Newtimes Survey||Podcast Library||Video Library||PDF Library|
|Actionist Corner||YouTube Video Channel||BitChute Video Channel||Brighteon Video Channel||Social Credit Library|
17 May 2013 Thought for the Week:
Lord Christopher Monckton, 3rd Viscount Monckton of Brenchley
In defiance of the scientific method and of the natural law, both of which absolutely require that both sides of an academic dispute be heard in academe itself as well as in the media, on too many subjects too many “scientists” and “journalists” have let prejudice stand in the way of legitimate scientific questioning of the party line.
Their shoddy conduct would have horrified Alhazen, the astronomer and philosopher of science in 11th-century Iraq who founded the scientific method. He wrote: “The seeker after truth does not place his faith in any mere consensus, however venerable. Instead, he checks and checks again. The road to the truth is long and hard, but that is the road we must follow.”
If we follow the road to the truth, the climate scare is over. It has served one useful purpose: to remind us not to trust anyone just because he wears a white coat with Biros sticking out of the front pocket.”
- - The News Weekly 11 May 2013
SUPERANNUATION – AND THE FABIAN SOCIALIST ROAD TO COMMUNISM
by James Reed
The Banking Swindle
The source of this systemic instability is, Dr. Bolton explains in great historical detail, the fractional reserve system of debt finance, where the banking system can create credit by loaning out, without having the reserves to meet all of these outlays simultaneously. That is why a run on the banks leads to a bankruptcy. Banks make the gamble that not everybody will want all of their money out at the same time. The system rolls along based on usury, with interest charged on this smoke and mirrors ‘credit’. That interest, however, has to be paid back with real wealth – which when expressed in ‘money’ terms creates more cycles of this usury and debt. (p.21) Bankers forever get richer as debt levels spiral out of control.
This proposal is being made now not because of the “goodness” of the IMF (they are evil), but because the fractional reserve system is becoming obsolete – because the Lords of International Finance now own almost everything, as Patrick Wood has said in commentarywww.augustForecast.com. Control now flips to the direct control of resources rather than indirectly owning resources through debt-based finance.
Unions and Superannuation
The financial dealings of the funds is less than transparent. Indeed the trustee boards of superannuation funds are dominated by union control, a legacy, Gilligan explains, from the Keating creation of compulsory superannuation, which was done as something of a deal between Labor and the Unions.
The Self-Destruction of Super
Treasury analysis based on “sensitivity analysis” has been based on the assumption of high investment returns. And markets are risky, and for the reasons detailed above in this essay, are likely to get riskier. Keating’s scheme is thus a disaster waiting to happen thousands of times worse than the ‘pink batt foul-up’.
Gilligan concludes his brilliant economic detective work
** The Man From Runnymede by Jeremy Lee:
But he was already well enough known for the traditional enemy, the Trading Banks, to approach Eric and ask him to train their staff to effectively fight nationalization. It must have been an invidious choice. But he knew that a "State Monopoly of Credit" - as outlined in Karl Marx's famous "ten steps" in the Communist Manifesto, was an even worse alternative to the world-wide power of private banking. For the bank nationalization battle the gloves were temporarily laid down, to be picked up as that particular skirmish was over. A small number of branch bank managers became supporters of the League.
The Douglas Manual - Chapter: Illusions of Nationalization compiled by Philip Mairet
IMMIGRATION CURBS TO PLEASE UKIP VOTERS
Well, well, well. The UK Government “will outline a range of measures intended to curb immigration in next week’s Queen’s Speech in the hope of wooing voters who have switched to UKIP. Landlords will have to make sure that their tenants are legally in the country when they make tenancy agreements under the plans. Ministers are still considering how to restrict access to benefits, the NHS and other public services as part of a drive to make…”
Cameron eats words after Farage’s feast
GET READY TO FIGHT THE LOCAL GOVERNMENT REFERENDUM
by Ian Wilson LL.B.
Yes, a referendum on this, but never one on immigration – thus write “Reduce Immigration” on both of your ballot papers, it is still a formal vote. Consequently a thinking person needs to be suspicious why the elites want this change. The move has been previously tried by both the Whitlam and Hawke governments who were anti-state.
Essentially this is part of a grand plan to eliminate the states and centralise power in Canberra with mega-councils playing an administrative role. As we cannot trust the power elite –EVER – never, never, vote for any Constitutional change however “motherhood”. Likewise for the forthcoming Aboriginal recognition proposal.
A NATIONAL SUMMIT ON "FUTURE OF LOCAL GOVERNMENT"
It was Alison Walpole of Victoria who sent us the details of the National Summit to be convened by the Municipal Association of Victoria, and to be held in Melbourne 22-23 May 2013. The summit is open to anyone with an interest in local government – as long as they have a spare $594! There won’t be too many struggling ratepayers attending, they find it hard enough just to keep up with their present rate charges! But there is another matter that needs to be taken into account.
But what about the Delphic Technique? Have you heard of it? Probably Not.
After reading up on the Delphic Technique I was reminded of what Alison Walpole wrote to her local paper on the subject of local government:
“Let us hear the truth,” wrote Alison to the Editor of the Wangaratta Chronicle 6th April 2013.
THE DELPHIC TECHNIQUE - LET’S STOP BEING MANIPULATED
The following comes from American folk fighting for their land rights and is written by Albert V. Burns: “More and more, we are seeing citizens being invited to “participate” in various forms of meetings, councils, or boards to “help determine” public policy in one field or another. They are supposedly being included to get ”input” from the public to help officials make final decisions on taxes, education, community growth or whatever the particular subject matter might be. Sounds great, doesn’t it? Unfortunately, surface appearances are often deceiving.
You, Mr. or Mrs. Citizen, decide to take part in one of these meetings. Generally, you will find that there is already someone designated to lead or “facilitate” the meeting. Supposedly, the job of the facilitator is to be a neutral, non-directing helper to see that the meeting flows smoothly. Actually, he or she is there for exactly the opposite reason: to see that the conclusions reached during the meeting are in accord with a plan already decided upon by those who called the meeting.
The process used to “facilitate” the meeting is called the Delphi Technique. This Delphi Technique was developed by the RAND Corporation for the U.S. Department of Defense back in the 1950s. It was originally intended for use as a psychological weapon during the cold war. However, it was soon recognized that the steps of Delphi could be very valuable in manipulating ANY meeting toward a predetermined end.
How does the process take place?
The stage is now set for the rest of the agenda to take place.
This is the weak link in the chain, which you are not supposed to recognize.
So, now, those who organized the meeting in the first place are able to tell the participants and the rest of the community that the conclusions, reached at the meeting, are the result of public participation. Actually, the desired conclusions had been established, in the back room, long before the meeting ever took place. There are variations in the technique to fit special situations but, in general, the procedure outlined above takes place.
The natural question to ask here is:
The reality is that the final outcome was already determined long before any public meetings took place, determined by individuals unknown to the public. Can you say “Conspiracy?” These “Change Agents” or “Facilitators” can be beaten! They may be beaten using their own methods against them.
Because it is so important, I will repeat the suggestions I gave in the last previous column.
Two: Stay focused! Always write your question or statement down in advance to help you remember the exact manner in which your question or statement was made. These agents are trained to twist things to make anyone not acceding to their agenda look silly or aggressive. Smile, wait till the change agent gets done speaking and then bring them back to your question. If they distort what you said, simply remind those in the group that what he or she is saying is not what you asked or said and then repeat, verbatim, from your notes the original objection.
Three: Be persistent! Wait through any harangues and then repeat the original question. (Go back and reread the previous column.)
Four: (I wish to thank a reader of the previous column for some EXCELLENT suggestions.)
To quote my informant:
THATCHER’S EXTREME 'CONSERVATISM'
Further to the discussion on the death of Lady Thatcher. “Thatcher's extreme "conservatism " failed because it did not recognize the intrinsically distributive character of nature. She did not understand that the real purpose of production is consumption. She was the quintessential Puritan and did not understand the implications and potential of our Cultural Heritage as it allows the displacement of human labour from production processes.
She recognized the fundamental correctness of efficiency but did not know how to distribute the results that flow from it. Her philosophical Puritanism precluded such understanding. Almost all Governments eventually fall on the rocky shoals of such financial ignorance.
ALL IN A GOOD CAUSE - THE ‘50 TO 1’ PROJECT
Dear Sirs, my name is Gordon Alderson.
CANADIAN CBC IS HIRING – BUT NOT CAUCASIANS, WRITES PAUL FROMM
Casting call! Hello! If you’re here to find instructions regarding a self tape audition submission for the male Kids’ CBC Host, you’re in the right place! Below, you will find a PDF with the audition material and all of the instructions.
Please only submit if you match the following criteria:
So does this also mean “no Irish” need apply?
Immigration Minister Jason Kenney, who was also involved in the decision to review the government’s hiring practices, which give priority to qualified applicants from minority groups, said everyone should be considered for federal jobs.
“We are in favour of appropriate diversity in the public service and reasonable efforts to achieve it, but we don’t think any Canadians should be excluded from applying within their government,” he told CBC News.
LETTER TO THE PRESS
Editor of The Age, 9th May 2013
- - Nigel Jackson, Belgrave Victoria
LEAGUE OF RIGHTS 2013 NATIONAL WEEKEND - FORWARD NOTICE
The 2013 National Weekend beginning with the 67th New Times Dinner on the Friday evening, 4th October will be held for the first time in Adelaide, South Australia.
The dates and events are as follows:
The South Australian League members and supporters are looking forward to hosting this annual event and welcoming interstate visitors into their midst. The advance notice will help you plan a holiday along with attending our New Times Dinner, National Seminar and Action Conference. |
The following accommodation addresses are within reasonable motoring distance of Lothlorien, Happy Valley.
|© Published by the Australian League of Rights, P.O. Box 27 Happy Valley, SA 5159|