|Home||blog.alor.org||Newtimes Survey||The Cross-Roads||Library|
|OnTarget Archives||The Social Crediter Archives||NewTimes Survey Archives||Brighteon Video Channel||Veritas Books|
1 March 2013 Thought for the Week:
When asked the question: “What is freedom?” Clifford Hugh Douglas answered: “It is the right to choose or refuse one thing at a time.”
The cuneiform inscription is the earliest known written appearance of the word “freedom” (ama-gi) or “liberty”. It is taken from a clay document written about 2300BC in the Sumerian city-state of Lagash.
- - Taken from “Origins of the Common Law” by Arthur R. Hogue 1966
Human Rights Commission - On Target 1985:
It is incredible that the whole face of traditional Australia may be changed by the decision of one man, as said by Premier Sir Joh Bjelke-Petersen. He was referring to the split decisions in both High Court rulings, which were 4-3 in favour of the Commonwealth.
“PUBLIC DEFENDS FREEDOM, THE ‘HUMAN RIGHTS COUNCIL’ DOESN’T”
wrote Andrew Bolt on his Blog 17/2/2013.
While it is pleasing to see Andrew is pursuing the issue of freedom of speech, he does need to be reminded Australians had a tradition of freedom of speech but it was sadly eroded thanks to the Liberals under Malcolm Fraser.
The Human Rights Commission was set up by the Liberals so as to implement United Nations edicts!
By the way, what happened to the Howard government’s 1985 stated intention to abolish the Human Rights Commission? And how can we believe the latest claim on their behalf? If elected, we are assured:
How will the Liberals act this time? It seems we are to expect far-reaching changes in the Human Rights Commission’s culture, etc. No, they won’t abolish the Human Rights Commission if elected – but they will ‘transform the debate’.
Andrew continues: “Paul Kelly describes an inspiring Coalition plan to restore free speech in Australia”: “The Australian Human Rights Commission is slated for far-reaching changes in its culture, priorities and operational methods under a Coalition government, with opposition legal affairs spokesman George Brandis determined to transform the debate about human rights in Australia… Brandis believes the Left’s once commanding ascendancy over the human rights domain is now eroding because of overreach and a popular backlash. At Senate estimates last week and in an interview with The Australian this week, Brandis defined his line of attack: he believes the commission does not honour its statutory charter and pursues a highly selective and ideological agenda that is unacceptable to a Coalition government…”
Here we go again.
The Liberal’s philosophical position has moved dramatically over the last fifty or so years.
1949 - No 13: “We Believe in the Great Human Freedoms:
Whether the issue is Land Rights and the First People being written into the Commonwealth Constitution, Anti-Discrimination laws or Agenda 21, or the myriad of United Nations conventions and treaties that successive traitorous politicians of all political parties have exposed us to, please grasp the fact that they are all interconnected in one way or another – and none to our benefit or freedoms.
Ivor Benson in “Undeclared War: the Struggle for Africa” 1978, wrote: “There is no proletarian, not even a Communist movement that has not operated in the interest of money, in the direction indicated by money, and for the time permitted by money – and that without the idealist among its leaders having the slightest suspicion of the fact”.
DVDs: Geoff McDonald “Red over Black” (some extra material on DVD) $12.00 posted.
FIGHT BACK AGAINST THE CRUSADERS!
by Ian Wilson LL.B.
Northern Territory Liberal Adam Giles (“Story Didn’t Begin in 1901”, The Australian 14 February 2013, p.12) says that Australia’s history did not begin in 1901, but incorporates Aboriginal history. And what if the Aborigines were not the first ones here or the only ones here in prehistory?
That is the core assumption in this debate, that Aborigines were the only ones to occupy “Australia”, for what – 40,000 years? In fact, “Australia” began with British settlement. Australia is a nation state, a modern creation and not a mere land mass. The existence of indigenous people prior to this is irrelevant. The Asian countries have little concern for indigenous people in their lands; consider the Japanese attitude to the native people of their land whose existence doesn’t define Japan.
Finally, if any people deserve to be recognised in the Constitution it is the British – but the new class will never do this and instead work tirelessly to destroy Anglo-Australia. Well, on this issue fight them! Start telling everyone you know that Aboriginal recognition is a feel-good smokescreen that will give the lawyers chance to use the Constitution to create, in part, a bill of rights.
SOUTH AFRICAN ACTIVIST FORMS PARTY TO TAKE ON ANC
A former anti-apartheid activist Mamphela Ramphele is now accusing the ruling ANC party of corruption, thwarting democracy, and abusing power. https://www.aljazeera.com/news/africa/2013/02/201321812375758625.html Mamphela Ramphele, an anti-apartheid activist and co-founder of South Africa's Black Conscious Movement, has announced the formation of a new political party to take on the 101-year-old African National Congress (ANC) of Nelson Mandela.
The 65-year-old medical doctor and social anthropologist told a news conference on Monday that her party will serve millions of South Africans who want a new beginning. "Join me in building the South Africa of our dreams," she said.
Al Jazeera's Tania Page, reporting from Johannesburg, said Ramphele also talked about the high unemployment among the young people in South Africa. "About 50 percent of 18 to 24-year-olds in this country are unemployed," Page said.
Oh dear… seems to me, along with the both Black and White peoples of South Africa, we’ve all heard this song before.
THE FAILURE OF ‘DEMOCRACY’ IN AFRICA:
Jeremy wrote: "As Kenya is the latest African country to blow itself to pieces (Naivasha, where the most recent massacre occurred, is my home town) the following article, by a Kikuyu from Kenya is poignant and prescient. He is evidently a Christian who dares say what the pallid church leaders of the West dare not!"
Mukui Waruiru wrote:
The ANC plans to maintain its hold on power for decades to come, by inciting racial resentment against the white minority. There is a real danger that the country may join the long list of failed democracies in Africa. Unless a new generation of enlightened black leaders emerges in South Africa, committed to promoting Christian values, property rights, and free market economic policies, South Africa's future looks bleak". Read further…
We ask the question:
Ivor Benson warned in “Undeclared War: the Struggle for Africa” published in 1978.
THE WORLD OF MULTICULTURAL LAW
by Ian Wilson LL.B.
The man grew up in a violent home and witnessed his father stab his mother. The District Court had, in the light of R v Fernando (1992) taken into account issues of social disadvantage, but the Appeals Court felt that a long history of criminal activity diminished and R v Fernando effect:
Behind all of this is the Establishment’s “concern” about high rates of Aboriginal imprisonment. This sounds like something out of the (allegedly) “racist” Apartheid South Africa, where bad cops frame innocent blacks solely because of skin colour. But in reality the people imprisoned have committed serious crimes just like the assault described here.
Overrepresentation in gaols cannot, without logical circularity be given as a reason for sentence mitigation in an individual case because “overrepresentation” is not a relevant causal factor to the commission of the crime in the specific case.
Social deprivation issues had already been considered by the Court of Appeal. If issues of colonisation are held to be relevant, any Aboriginal will be able to argue for sentence mitigation on this basis. No doubt the New Class would want that, which would create a special law for Aboriginal offenders, against other dispossessed peoples. Maybe in turn other peoples such as refugees will be given special treatment. Watch the rule of law fall apart.
It is vital to oppose the constitutional reform to recognise indigenous people because of the hidden agenda behind this change. Any change, however token, will be used in legal argument to support precedents such as R v Ipeelee and to further multiculturalise the law. The law has already been too far multiculturalised.
FROM POLITICALLY CORRECT STATION TO STATION
by Peter West
Now we have the new attorney general, Mark Dreyfus, “the son of a man who arrived in Australia stateless after escaping the Nazis”. (The Weekend Australian 9-10 February 2013, p.18). I read the rest of the story and it is said his grandparents “sent my father, then aged 11, and his older brother Richard to Australia.
They arrived at Station Pier in Melbourne in July 1939… my grandmother and grandfather managed to escape from Germany, arriving in Australia as stateless persons in December 1939”.
Dreyfus wants to strike the “right balance” on free speech. He is quoted as saying: “I think there are other important objectives in the law and the protection that is provided the Australian community by existing anti-discrimination legislation could be seen to be part of that. You are not free to (falsely) cry ‘Fire!’ in a crowded theatre”. True but irrelevant to the anti-discrimination issue. The false crying of ‘Fire!’ is not the expression of a political belief.
BBC PANORAMA SET TO REVEAL NEW DETAILS ON HOW IRAQ WAR BEGAN
Adam Sherwin, The Independent, UK,18 February 2013.
Taylor, renowned for his sources within the security services, is expected to reveal new information about claims, which turned out to be false, that Saddam Hussein's regime was actively pursuing weapons of mass destruction. The episode will look ahead to the publication of the Chilcot report into the conflict. It is due to air on BBC1 on 18 March, two days before the anniversary, and is being treated with the highest sensitivity inside a BBC still reeling from the journalistic failures exposed during the Savile scandal.
It was Andrew Gilligan's Today programme claim that the Government "sexed up" the intelligence inserted into the dossier detailing Saddam's weapons' programme which led to the 2004 resignation of Greg Dyke, the BBC Director-General and Chairman Gavyn Davies, following the publication of the Hutton Report. Taylor's film threatens to reopen the issue at a time when the BBC is still suffering a power vacuum at the highest echelons. Potentially controversial BBC investigations face the closest scrutiny following the "serious failure of BBC journalism" which led to Lord McAlpine being falsely identified as a paedophile in a Newsnight report.
A BBC source said: "Helen Boaden is still Director of News and there is a perfectly robust chain of command in place, which goes all the way up to Acting Director General, Tim Davie". In a recent BBC series on espionage, Taylor spoke to "Curveball", an Iraqi defector who confirmed that he fabricated the claims about Iraq's weapons of mass destruction which were quoted as "facts" by former US Secretary of State Colin Powell when he presented the case for war to the United Nations.
Barbarians Through the Gates - These Waters Run Deeper Than We May Think
We must also see the mighty oil industry, like the pharmaceutical and agri-chemical industries, not in the service of the likes of we ordinary mortals, of whatever perceived social class, but as conglomerates, under the control of a Ruling Elite; multinational corporations that have become a politically dominant end in themselves for the purpose of control and profit within the global economic model. British interests in this environment are often, and with superficial logic, seen as paramount in what one has to accept is this supranational and ruthlessly competitive global economic scenario.
But in the United Kingdom this is too readily associated in some minds with traditional Tory values based on the imperial tradition - the position of what we tend to see as that of the "squirearchy". Conversely, attitudes critical of what is now in reality International Finance-Capitalism come to be erroneously identified with the political Left, or "progressive" faction.
However, we must remember that the invasion of Iraq was pursued, against strong public opposition from all sections of the community, by a Labour Government. Objections to what was reported by B.B.C. journalists and others ("B.B.C. hits back over 'rhetoric' claims", The Independent on Sunday, 13th April, 2003), was neither politically Left or Right.
It was reported by seasoned journalists such as Robert Fisk, John Pilger and John Simpson as his convoy of Kurds and American Special Forces was bombed by an American aircraft with the loss of 18 lives. John Pilger wrote, in The Independent on Sunday of 6th April, 2003, under the heading "We see too much. We know too much. That's our best defence"…”
SHARE LAUGH WITH RAMPAGING HORDES WHILE COUNTRY BURNS
by James Reed
To scare them off a campaign of anti-British ads is being devised mentioning the bad weather and food as reasons not to come. But come they will and Britain will continue to be swamped until either it becomes poorer and worse than the Third World – or until it gets out of the EU and UN and controls its own borders and its own economy.
THE ELECTION OF LIES
by James Reed
THE POLITICALLY CORRECT KILLER: AND LOGICAL CONCLUSION OF OBAMANATION
by Peter West
Beyond all of this, there are some interesting things to note about Dorner’s last stand, where he was burnt to a crisp. This may have occurred because the police used pyrotechnic teargas. The mainstream media reported that on a police scanner apoliceman said: “Burn this motherf—-er” (The Australian 15 February 2013, p.7). Then there is the report that Dorner’s wallet was found inside the burnt cabin. You can see the charred remains on Youtube – nothing survived it. No wallet could have survived.
Overall the Dorner story is odd. Ignore things like the police zeal to get him, including seven LAPD officers opening fire on a truck driven by two innocent women (two Hispanic women being mistaken for one black man??) Dorner waits five years to seek his revenge for being sacked from the LAPD. The police also turned off its police scanners to prevent journalism listening in, but one group heard “Going forward with the burn”.
THE NEW CLASS – OR GUESS WHO’S COMING TO EAT US
by James Reed
Nick Cater (“Top of the Class and Looking Down on the Nation”, The Australian 4 February, 2013, p.12) points out that traditional class divisions in Australia have largely been replaced by a division between those who have been educated at university, and those who have not. In particular most of these people educated in the arts, social sciences and law are social progressives and have no religion (bar humanism and liberalism itself).
As in Australia and the United States, the new class is the ruling class or new power elites. B. Hussein Obama is their pin-up, and identity politics their game. I hope this ends with some global disaster which smashes their comfortable system to bits. My hopes were riding on Asteroid 2012 DA14 which recently passed 32,000 kms from Earth, (some satellites, geostationary satellites, orbit at 35,000 kms) but no such luck. Maybe a giant solar storm will fry every computer on Earth, turning out the lights permanently on a tribe of people, more horrible than Orcs and Goblins combined.
Time for the Axe to Fall on Academics
I, for one, see this as a fitting end because all these academics have done with their sacred freedoms is attack Traditional society. I say let the forces of the market destroy them and the evil universities! May the internet render them redundant!
SETTING US UP FOR FURTHER INVASION?
by James Reed
The reason for this is that Australia, beginning in the post World War II period, began surrendering its heritage, first with immigration of non-British migrants, then with the end of the White Australia Policy, then with multiculturalism and Asianisation. Now Asianisation is morphing into Chinese colonisation. I guess in this context it would make little sense for new world order politicians being too concerned about defence when in fact the war has happened and the ‘old’ Australia is no more.
HERE COMES THE BLACK POPE!
Cardinal Peter Turkson, from Ghana, Africa, could be the first black Pope. Although Italians are favoured to carry on the franchise, my bet is on the Black Pope. The reason is that Catholicism is fast becoming a religion of coloured people, just like the United States is becoming a State for coloured people.
The Catholic Church in the West falls over itself to support almost all politically correct causes relevant to race and migration. It is still a bit slow in embracing homosexualism, at least openly, but respect to doctrine, that will come. Thus, better then to have a Black Pope, so that the true colours of the Church can be seen. Turkson and Obama will be quite a team!
|© Published by the Australian League of Rights, P.O. Box 27 Happy Valley, SA 5159|