|Home||blog.alor.org||Newtimes Survey||The Cross-Roads||Library|
|OnTarget Archives||The Social Crediter Archives||NewTimes Survey Archives||Brighteon Video Channel||Veritas Books|
8 March 2013 Thought for the Week:
Atonement: "Running through all history like the thread of Ariadne, it is possible to trace a continuous policy which I can only describe as a divorce between things themselves and the description of them.... At this very period at which we live, it is probable that one of the fundamental struggles which is taking place, and one on which the future of civilisation depends perhaps more than on any other, is the attempt to obtain an atonement, or as it has been pronounced, an at-one-ment, between reality and the description of it.
Too Big to Fail has become Too Big to Trial
“HOW DO WE GET OUT OF THIS MESS’? ASKS ADAIR TURNER OF FSA
Is Douglas’ Financial Analysis Gaining Ground? asks Wallace Klinck:
“While Lord Turner is certainly correct about excessive debt accumulation and a shortage of effective income able to liquidate it, he obviously does not understand the nature of real cost as Douglas revealed it to be. Also, he seems to confine his discussion to monetary theory and does not enter into a discussion of real (cost) as opposed to financial cost and of realistic national cost accountancy. Nevertheless his advocacy of "free money to the people" is definitely a constructive progression of thought, insofar as it goes.”
Lord Adair Turner, Chairman of Britain's Financial Services Authority has issued a 70-page paper (https://www.fsa.gov.uk/library/communication/speeches/2013/0206-at)
“apparently admitting the inadequacy of current financial policies such as low interest rates and "quantitative easing" advanced to financial institutions, in dealing with our financial and economic problems--and is apparently advocating the distribution of free money to the people at large!!” wrote Wallace.
In his capacity as FSA Chairman and visiting professor, Adair gave his annual address to the Cass Business School with this year’s topic being “Debt, Money and Mephistopheles: How do we get out of this mess?”
Smear by Association: Wallace Klinck continued...
The Daily Bell - Shock: Powerful British Money Man Calls for Central ...
Bryan Monahan’s “Introduction to Social Credit” found here. Plus further reading https://www.scribd.com/doc/114593844/Money-in-Industry
John Fitzgerald’s “The Physical Basis of Leisure” here…
POVERTY AMIDST PLENTY! WHAT HAS HAPPENED?
An anonymous US banker who studied the writings of Clifford Hugh Douglas asked that question. When did he ask it? Well, he asked about the conundrum in 1935! He was questioning why the people were starving in the midst of plenty in the 1930s. He wrote:
Sounds so familiar doesn’t it? But it is not 1935, this is now 2013, 75 years later and still the bankers and their minions, the politicians, have not let go control of the peoples’ financial system.
THE RISE OF THE ROBOTS: WHAT WILL FUTURE OF WORK LOOK LIKE?
Technological progress is now eating up the better jobs, too:
He continues: "What impact will automation – the so-called "rise of the robots" – have on wages and employment over the coming decades? Nowadays, this question crops up whenever unemployment rises. In the early nineteenth century, David Ricardo considered the possibility that machines would replace labour; Karl Marx followed him.
Around the same time, the Luddites smashed the textile machinery that they saw as taking their jobs. Then the fear of machines died away…" Further reading …
SOCIAL CREDIT ANSWERS: INTRODUCTION TO HOME ECONOMICS
Frances Hutchinson, Chair of the Social Credit Secretariat and an economist in her own right, has put together a series of MP3 talks plus a series of notes for you, the layman, to grasp where we are in today’s world, how it all came about – and what is to be done about it.
Frances begins the Introduction to Home Economics with:
During the twentieth century, powerful vested interests have ensured that for the mass of the people education has been very largely reduced to the technical skills training necessary to keep the military-industrial show on the road. The financial system determines all public policy formation. And that policy is designed to fit people into the centrally-controlled institutions of government and bureaucracy which serve the global corporate system. Consequently, the entire social order - the cultural, political, economic and educational institutions – are constrained by a financial system that is beyond comprehension or control.
CD -“The New Home Economics” CD can be purchased from Heritage Bookshop Services. Ring Doug and Jean Holmes about it. Ph.08 8396 1245
THE WAGES OF ISLAMIFICATION
by Peter Ewer
Of course Wilders distinguishes between Islam as a “totalitarian political ideology” and Muslims, for “Most Muslims are moderate” but Islam itself is not moderate” he says. No mention of immigration.
So why was Wilders robbed and threatened? The politico-intellectual class (‘new class’) generally do not see any historical racial aspect to liberal democracy: it is just an accident that it arose in Western Europe. They believe that all peoples will come to accept the wisdom of liberal democracy in a capitalist, multicultural, consumer society. Thus the Editorial of The Australian 20 February 2013, p.13 says that “our non-discriminating immigration policy and the continuation of our largely harmonious multi-ethnic society – one of the most diverse in the world – depends on a tolerance for this diversity and a commitment to Australian values.”
On the contrary, “Australian values” are undermined by the creation of this ethnic diversity by undemocratic immigration and socio-racial engineering programmes that have never been voted on, but opposed since 1947. Our immigration policy is discriminatory, deliberately geared to bring in Asians (even from traditional sources such as Britain). The demographic profile of a country cannot be altered so quickly without such a discriminatory policy. Otherwise, what sense can be made of the elite’s talk of the “Asianisation of Australia”?
Those elites who think that this project will work are mistaken: we may be ‘qualitatively’ diverse, but this to date has only been because lots of small groups are here. When the Anglo Saxon majority becomes a minority, as has been seen in the parallel of the United States, “Australian” values, if not Western values, will also disappear. But then, none dare call this... conspiracy.
MUGABE’S SOUNDS OF SILENCE
by Peter Ewer
Yes, from Rhodesia the prosperous, to Zimbabwe the black dictatorship. My, how the white liberals in the West must be happy with what they have done in bringing Rhodesia down. I can’t for the life of me figure out why these liberals are not living in Zimbabwe or the new South Africa. Could it be that they hope to transform the West into these advanced utopias?
JUST HAD TO INCLUDE THIS SNIPPET
“Some years ago at an international conference in Washington, D.C., I was having a friendly argument with a junior member of the Saudi Arabian Royal family. He was strongly anti-South Africa, claiming that Blacks were discriminated against because they did not have a vote.
We moved on to other matters, including the critical state of the world. My Moslem friend then said something I have never forgotten: "Although there was violent conflict between the Moslem and Christian worlds in the past, at least we of the Islamic world respected you. You stood firmly for something. But what does the Christian West stand for today?" A very telling question in view of the present plight of what was once called the Christian West.”
ANTI-DISCRIMINATION BILL STILL TYRANNICAL
by Ian Wilson LL.B.
Essentially this law is the Labor Party’s politically correct bill of rights, or as I prefer, “bill of wrongs”. It is part of a larger agenda, as seen with the Constitutional change proposal to recognise Aborigines for, well, whatever it is they are supposed to be recognised for. (Accounts vary: “First people”, “First Australians”, etc.)
We need to see all of this as part of a general “cultural war” and oppose it rigorously. How? At least start at grassroots level, talking to family and friends. Get the chain of resistance going.
CHINA’S CYBER WAR PRELUDE TO WAR OF LEAD
by James Reed
Conflict between China and both Vietnam and The Philippines could also draw the US into a war with China. As I see it, the Asian Century could fast go up in smoke, as will we, being “a part of Asia”.
WILL QUEEN JULIA ALSO BE ‘KNIFED’ IN THE BACK?
by Brian Simpson
Gillard hasn’t openly carried on a version of the cultural wars as we found pre-1996, with an open attack upon the British heritage of Australia; her onslaught has been more subtle and consists in measures such as the Constitutional change for Aboriginal recognition (an Australian bill of rights, I believe) and the new one-Stop-shop anti-discrimination law) a comprehensive bill of rights for new class values and the end of freedom of speech).
Waiting to return is Rudd – remember him? It is a toss-up whether he is worse than Gillard, but really the names don’t matter and nor do the individuals in this system where structuralism rules. My guess is Rudd will be returned as “leader” just before the election, as a circuit breaker. Tony Rabbit may not be able to cope. Then, probably, another hung parliament. (No, this doesn’t mean that parliamentarians will be hung!)
GAY MARRIAGE AND BRITAIN
by Peter West
Thankfully the vote has caused deep divisions in the Tories’ camp and may be the beginning of the end for Cameron, yet another disastrous politician. Britain is an experiment which is just a few years down the track from us, and the New World Order hasn’t forgotten us here in Australia and will be working us over in the near future.
DOUG CHRISTIE BATTLING SEVERE ILLNESS
We know that the many League supporters, and freedom lovers generally around the world, who knew of, or who met Doug Christie, would want to know. We received the following email from Canadian Paul Fromm:
Keltie Zubko, Doug Christie's wife and mother of his children, has sent out a message which included the following:
His email address is email@example.com and he can get them on his cellphone, which he has with him in the hospital while they do more tests and try to get his pain and nausea under control before he can, we hope, come home.
He does not have the stamina right now for visitors or many phone calls. For quite a few years now, I’ve been trying to get him to at least start on his memoirs, and I want to tell you that he’s left a body of writing that I will be able to work with so that his courageous story will be told.
Thanks again for the loving kindness of you, our friends near and far. You have supported the principles of freedom for many years, through all these struggles and we are deeply grateful for you. - - signed: Keltie Zubko Email address: firstname.lastname@example.org
On behalf of all League supporters our national director Louis Cook sent the following message:
COALITION FOR UN AGENDA 21
Indeed, the WBCSD’s website is rather candid about its aims and its “One World vision,” explicitly touting the UN Agenda 21 and its radical plan for transforming human civilization. “The One World vision is the ultimate stage of a conceptual evolution that started decades ago,” the council notes on its site. “This evolution produced several paradigm shifts that combine how we comprehend our world, and, as a result, how we try to deal with it.”
“GMO Giant Monsanto Joins Big Business Coalition for UN Agenda 2”, by Alex Newman
Despite the widespread suspicion and criticism plaguing both Monsanto and the global Big Business alliance pushing the UN’s Agenda 21, the company and the coalition celebrated the move in a recent press release. According to the announcement late last month, (January 2013 …ed) the biotech behemoth will be rolling out a “sustainability” course for its employees all over the world. Chairman and CEO Hugh Grant will represent the GMO company as a “Council Member” in the global “sustainable development” coalition.
Even though Monsanto has become probably one of the most controversial companies in the world, it is extraordinarily well connected in the halls of power, and the global business alliance for “sustainable development” celebrated the firm’s decision to sign up. “In joining the WBCSD, Monsanto is taking an important step along a continuum towards developing a more sustainable agriculture system — one that improves our daily lives, respects our global environment and recognizes the importance of the world’s small-holder farmers,” claimed council President Peter Bakker in a statement posted on the group’s website. Farming and global agriculture must change, the WBCSD continued. “We must find new ways to protect soils, enhance ecosystems and optimize land use in ways that are environmentally sound,” Bakker added in the press release. “And we must move towards a future vision for agriculture where absolutes become as out of place as a one-size-fits-all approach to farming.”
Meanwhile, even as opposition to the UN’s vision of so-called “sustainable development” continues to surge worldwide, the controversial biotech giant also publicly celebrated its decision to join forces with Big Business “sustainability” proponents. The press release publicly announcing the move claimed that a growing population would put a strain on natural resources and that “new agriculture systems” would be needed for “sustainability” purposes.
“At Monsanto, our company vision for sustainable agriculture strives to contribute to meeting the needs of the growing population, to protect and preserve natural resources, and to help improve lives,” said Jerry Steiner, the biotech firm’s executive vice president for sustainability and corporate affairs. “We are excited to join the WBCSD and connect with a global coalition of more than 200 companies that advocate for progress on sustainable development.”
Frankenfood Products: Monsanto, of course, has come under heavy criticism recently — particularly last year when a French university study found that its genetically engineered “frankenfood” products were associated with serious health concerns such as cancer. In the wake of the explosive research findings, which the company itself criticized as flawed, the Russian government actually banned the import or sale of Monsanto’s NK603 genetically engineered corn. European authorities considered similar measures as well.
Also widely criticized is the corporate giant’s business model itself — patenting genetically engineered DNA and using the force of government to protect what it calls its “intellectual property,” even when that DNA ends up contaminating an unwitting farmer’s crops. The U.S. government, in particular, is filled with former high-ranking Monsanto figures, and it plays a key role in pushing the firm’s dubious products worldwide. When governments or scientists express concerns about the health or economic impacts of GMOs, official documents have revealed, American authorities stand ready to exert overwhelming pressure to crush any resistance.
Aside from the numerous controversies surrounding genetically engineered food and Monsanto in particular, the whole concept of “sustainability” has also attracted a firestorm of criticism and outrage. Still, key members of the so-called global “establishment” — the UN, Big Business, taxpayer-funded “non-governmental organizations” (NGOs), the Obama administration, the mega-wealthy, among other powerful forces — have been promoting what they misleadingly tout as “sustainable development” for decades.
The ultimate UN plan, known as “Agenda 21,” was outlined and agreed to by national governments and dictatorships worldwide at a 1992 UN summit in Rio de Janeiro.
“Agenda 21 is a comprehensive plan of action to be taken globally, nationally and locally by organizations of the United Nations System, Governments, and Major Groups in every area in which human impacts (sic) on the environment,” the UN admits on its website, sparking suspicions from analysts who point out that virtually every aspect of human existence has some “impact” on the “environment.”
While the U.S. Senate never ratified the UN scheme, both Democrat and Republican administrations, working with state and local officials, have been busy implementing it across the United States for decades. Using grants and federal pressure, presidents from George H.W. Bush, who originally signed on to Agenda 21, to Obama most recently, have been busy pushing and implementing the controversial UN plan within America.
However, as public awareness of the plan has grown in recent years, opposition to the whole scheme has been steadily increasing as well.
Other states are also working on similar laws as opposition to the controversial global agenda surges nationwide — especially at the grassroots level. The Republican National Committee (RNC) and numerous state Republican parties, meanwhile, have also urged GOP officials at all levels of government to battle the UN scheme. More than a few Democrats have also urged opposition to the global plan.
And across America, local government meetings have been increasingly swamped by concerned citizens demanding an end to their elected officials’ cooperation with the agenda and its myriad tentacles — especially ICLEI, a Germany-based, UN-backed organization working to implement the plan formerly known as the International Council of Local Environmental Initiatives.
Monsanto joins a wide range of other international mega-corporations as part of the global “sustainability” alliance for businesses that includes Big Banks, Big Oil, Big Pharma, and more.
As The New American reported last year from the most recent UN Conference on Sustainable Development, known as “Rio+20,” the global alliance pushing Agenda 21 is wide-ranging. Ruthless dictatorships — a top Chinese Communist Party official chaired the whole UN summit, for instance — have joined forces with Big Business, NGO front groups for the establishment, and powerful interests worldwide in the quest for global government. “Sustainability” is simply the buzzword used to conceal the increasingly transparent real agenda.
Alex Newman, a foreign correspondent for The New American, is currently based in Europe. For complete article:
Agenda 21 is based on the principle that government is the maker of rights
Booklet: “Confronting Earth Summit: Agenda 21” - The United Nations Programme of Action from RIO. $5.00 posted from League book services.
Listen to South Australian parliamentarian outlining just what Agenda 21 means for communities world-wide.
|© Published by the Australian League of Rights, P.O. Box 27 Happy Valley, SA 5159|