|Home||blog.alor.org||Newtimes Survey||The Cross-Roads||Library|
|OnTarget Archives||The Social Crediter Archives||NewTimes Survey Archives||Brighteon Video Channel||Veritas Books|
11 July 2014 Thought
for the Week:
REMEMBER PETER SPENCER AND HIS STAND FOR PROPERTY RIGHTS?
“Peter Spencer’s Hunger Strike against unconstitutional carbon-fuelled actions by the Commonwealth Government”
Farmer Peter Spencer – Victim of World Government Agenda
“How galling. The very political parties who approved the legislation permitting the stealing of Peter Spencer’s land are saying he should take his case to the courts! The courts will try the case based on that same legislation which is now LAW! Australians need to wake up. The one-worlders are in positions of power. They must be disabused as to their role and purpose in Parliament.” On Target, Vol.46 No1 - 15 January 2010: https://alor.org/Volume46/Vol46No1.htm Peter Spencer: Finally will present his case ABC News: “Peter Spencer will finally be allowed to comprehensively present his case to the court on the 24th November (2014) after over six years of overcoming many obstacles. If successful the case will set a precedent to make governments of all descriptions to think twice before arbitrarily taking property rights.
He has filed approximately 10,000 documents before the court, mostly from the Commonwealth and some from NSW. In 2010, the High Court, in an unusual move, agreed that the matter should be sent back for a full hearing in the Federal Court. The matter will be heard by Justice Gleeson.”
WILL OUR HISTORY RECORD PETER SPENCER’S STRUGGLE NOT IN VAIN?
On the 24th November 2014 Mr. Peter Spencer will appear before Justice Gleeson in the Federal Court – just over 800 years to the day since a group of Barons and Cardinal Stephen Langton swore an oath before the high altar to compel the reigning King John to accept The Charter of Liberties – which led on to the signing of Magna Carta in 1215.
There is a plaque among the ruins of the Abbey at Bury-St Edmunds commemorating the stand taken by Cardinal Stephen Langton, and the Barons of Magna Carta fame. The introduction reads: Near this spot on 20.11.1214 Cardinal Langton and the Barons swore at St. Edmunds altar that they would obtain from King John the ratification of Magna Charta.
The last lines say:
WHEN WILL IT START COOLING? … A ‘COOL’ QUESTION INDEED!
What’sUpWithThat website http://wattsupwiththat.com/ June 28, 2014
“A couple of years ago the question was asked “When will it start cooling?” Of course solar denialists misconstrued this innocent enquiry. There is no doubt – we all know that lower solar irradiance will result in lower temperatures on this planet. It is a question of when. Solar activity is much lower than it was at a similar stage of the last solar cycle but Earthly temperatures have remained stubbornly flat. Nobody is happy with this situation. All 50 of the IPCC climate models have now been invalidated and my own model is looking iffy. <
FREEDOM, DEMOCRACY, SOVEREIGNTY … AND SCIENTIFIC TRUTH
Source: The Galileo Movement - The Restoration of Freedom, Democracy, Sovereignty & Scientific Truth in Australia - Identifying The Failings And Moving Forward.
Introduction: The Galileo Movement is a voluntary, independent and nonaligned apolitical group of volunteers dedicated to restoring scientific integrity to climate science and dedicated to implementation by government of honest policy based on empirical scientific evidence. It's clear for all to see that climate science is corrupted. It's self-evident that corruption is driven in large part by dishonest and/or weak national governance. Climate policy has severe future ramifications on governance and freedom. Australia's sovereignty is threatened by politically-driven falsehoods from UN agencies and Australian government agencies funded by taxpayers. As a result efforts to restore scientific integrity encroach politics.
UN Agenda 21 in particular is a highly politicised umbrella campaign encompassing three parts:
All three parts rely on claims contradicting empirical scientific evidence. UN Agenda 21 is a politically driven campaign to undermine Australian sovereignty and governance. Graham Williamson is a private citizen whose immense dedicated work aims to inform and hold accountable politicians and advocates of cutting human CO2. Prior to posting his documents he readily agreed to posting his personal declaration of interests, below. As a non-political group, The Galileo Movement Advises that statements in Graham's already widely circulated documents are not necessarily those of The Galileo Movement. We are pleased though to share Graham Williamson's carefully researched articles. Loss Of Independence And Integrity: The Decline Of The CSIRO And The Agendas Behind That Decline (PDF 1,138KB)
Continue reading here.. https://www.galileomovement.com.au/australia_democracy.php And now to the ‘Climate Conscious’ website:
AGENDA 21: POLITICIANS SHUTTING THE DEBATE DOWN
Response of the Shadow Minister for Climate Action, Environment and Heritage To Agenda 21 - Graham Williamson March 2013 (Revised Ed) https://www.conscious.com.au/docs/letters/GregHuntAG21Rev.pdf
A ‘Planet Saving’ Program Which is Simply Too Good To Publicise
One person who is at the forefront of Australian politics and should be well informed about bipartisan ‘environmental’ initiatives such as AG 21, is Greg Hunt, currently the Shadow Minister for Climate Action, Environment and Heritage. Between 1994 and 1998, Greg worked as a senior adviser to the then Minister for Foreign Affairs, Alexander Downer. In 2004 he became Parliamentary Secretary to the Minister for Environment and Heritage and in January 2007 was appointed Parliamentary Secretary to the Minister for Foreign Affairs. After the November 2007 Federal election, Greg was appointed Shadow Minister for Climate Change, Environment and Urban Water, a role that brought together the great interests of his time in parliament. In September 2008 his role was expanded to include all water responsibilities. In December 2009 Greg’s role was expanded once more when he was appointed Shadow Minister for Climate Action, Environment and Heritage.
Greg has clearly been well situated, over a long period of time, to observe the implementation of AG21 first hand. The following account details Greg’s inability to respond, or deliberate determination not to respond, to simple questions about the implementation of AG21. In my correspondence with Greg Hunt I asked the following questions with his partial responses in blue below (see Appendix A for full details)…
Response from Greg Hunt: “There is nothing to ban. It is a 20 year old non binding declaration. I can honestly tell you that I had never heard of it raised once during the entire period of the Howard Government in the party room or in ministerial discussions.... For the final time I had never heard of the issue, heard it raised by Ministers, MP's or constituents until 19 years after the thing was apparently signed...... Given that for the first 19 years the issue appears to have escaped both of our attention can I respectfully suggest that the discovery of a dead, irrelevant declaration 19 years after the fact may cause everyone to be calm...... I will respectfully draw this engagement to a conclusion and encourage you from here to approach State based Governments as we have no powers over local Governments.”
So according to Greg, AG21 is a “20 year old non binding declaration”, it is a “dead, irrelevant declaration” and he has “never heard of the issue, heard it raised by Ministers, MP's or constituents until 19 years after the thing was apparently signed.” Greg then advised me he no longer wished to discuss it saying he wished to “draw this engagement to a conclusion”.
In my subsequent unanswered response I drew Greg’s attention to the Government’s web site:
I then asked Greg: “Is this what you mean by a dead irrelevant declaration?” So although the Government states it is implementing AG21 with a “strong national response to meet our obligations under this international agreement”, according to Greg “it is a 20 year old non- binding declaration” or “dead agreement” which he has never heard of until recently. Where on earth has he been? Greg’s blatant denial of both our “strong national response” and our “obligations”, even after 20 years of implementation throughout Australia, is indeed alarming.
As Greg should also be aware, Agenda 21 is the cornerstone of the Commonwealth Government’s National Strategy for Ecologically Sustainable Development which states: “the Rio Declaration and Agenda 21 provide a broad framework for global sustainable development.”
As pointed out by Bayside Council’s 2003 submission into the Commonwealth Government’s Inquiry into Sustainable Cities 2025:
From On Target files. Vol.17 No.8 - 6 March 1981:
Bending the Knee to ‘Mother Earth’: David Thompson, On Target 19 June 1992:
‘DEBT FOR EQUITY SWAPS’… On Target, Vol.46 No.24 2010
“… We thought the following campaign worth reporting on. It seems to be a union initiative - good for them. While we may not agree with all of their aims or claims, we certainly do agree that “… Queensland’s assets belong to the people and should not be sold off, as has happened in other parts of the Commonwealth under various traitorous governments.
But, where were these unions when Jeremy Lee was writing the following ten years ago? (On Target Vol.35 No.4 and Vol.36 No.23:
It said: "ESTES PARK, Colorado. At the edge of Rocky Mountain National Park last week, some of the world's most powerful bankers advanced a bold new strategy for dealing with environmental degradation in the Third World. Their plan is to use the immense debts owed by many impoverished countries to pressure them into taking steps to conserve their threatened environments....
Dubbed a "debt-for-nature-swap"' the plan calls for outside forces to pay off parts of a targeted country's outstanding debts in exchange for concessions to protect natural regions.
At one session, Dr. Raymond Dasmann, of the University of California at Santa Cruz, told Sweatman and an audience of several hundred, 'Beware of bankers bearing gifts'..."
Queenslanders may have forgotten One Nation’s Senator Len Harris who warned of vast tracts of North Queensland being “officially valued by none other than the chairman of the Wet Tropics Management Authority, Tor Hundloe in conjunction with the World Bank and the International Monetary Fund. " And it all had to do with DEBT!” https://alor.org/Volume46/Vol46No24.htm
QUEENSLAND GOVERNMENT: NEW BILL DENIES NATURAL JUSTICE
Source: Evacuation Grounds Blogspot:
If the new Mineral and Energy Resources (Common Provisions) Bill 2014 is passed in its current form the ability for neighbours to object to any new mining or coal seam gas project will not be available. The property rights and principles of natural justice of landowners will be severely compromised by the proposed changes. For those attending the PRA conference it was very evident the personal and emotional toll this battle has had upon Peter due to the stress of not having his issues addressed by the neighbouring Coal Project and the disregarded impacts on their water supply for their cattle and livelihood.
Please click on [https://www.beefcentral.com/news/letters-to-the-editor/letter-why-landholders-need-to-review-resource-act-changes/] to a letter from Glen Martin of Shine Lawyers for a very readable summary of some very worrying aspects of this new bill.
Summary of Letter – Why Qlders need to review Resource Act changes by June 30
The submission deadline for this new bill is (was) June 30. This is far too short of a time span set in the busy timeframe of the end of the financial year to understand a long, complex new bill and amendments to 5 other existing resources acts. PRA urges all Queenslanders to contact their local member of parliament, write a letter to the editor and to write a submission to the parliamentary committee if only to say nothing more than that before such sweeping changes are made wide public discussion should be allowed in a time frame more suitable to the length, complexity and grave implications of this new bill.
Source: Evacuation Grounds Blogspot http://evacuationgrounds.blogspot.com.au/
CONSTITUTIONAL CHALLENGE: MORE REVEALING DETAILS ABOUT ABORIGINAL RECOGNITION
by Peter Ewer
This is obviously absurd because if one recognises a “first people” (which I do not,) then logically their languages are “first languages”. The committee wants to remove the “race power” from the Constitution, which they regard as “discriminatory”, but inconsistently are faced with the problem of how to legally justify special laws to be made on what we would call an affirmative action basis.
The ruling idea is to add a special section for “advancement”. This, as I see it, will be an eternal affirmative action section that politically correct lawyers will exploit until Australia ceases to exist, probably in about 30 years time.
Keep spreading the word: say NO to the lawyers who want to get their hands on our Constitution. Just imagine what they would do if a new section 116 A is added prohibiting discrimination on the grounds of race, colour, ethnic or national origin? When Australia becomes majority Asian – in less than a few decades – do you really think that any of this pc stuff will survive? But open immigration is precisely what will be produced.
NOW THEY WANT OUR MILK!
by Richard Miller
At the moment there is great demand for Tasmanian milk products in Asia, so the self-destructive logic of Australian globalism and Asianism is to sell, sell, sell, so that the Chinese can optimise their profits by simply owning dairy farms. Does that make any sense? I guess it does if your government is a puppet government merely serving the interests of the global elite. Source: The WE Australian 21-22 June 2014, p.2.
WHEN FOOD BECOMES A LUXURY ITEM
by Chris Knight
There are many hypotheses about the cause of this, including the mounting evidence that Big Agri, with its GMO crops and Dr Frankenstein approach to food production is nearing collapse. But linking all of this is the fact that in the end the elites don’t care if we ordinary plebs starve. No doubt they have massive stockpiles of food and weapons to make the folks on the TV show Doomsday Preppers look… well… unprepared. So, how about we little folk start to get prepared as well?
THE NATURE OF A GOOD JUDGE
by Ian Wilson LL.B.
Justice Carmody has said that “separation of powers doctrine is a two-way street. In return for the unfettered independence to make decisions, judges must not meddle in the administration of enacted laws by the executive and departments of state. They do not have the liberty of allowing curial decisions to be infected by bias or extraneous considerations such as personal opinions or ideological, political or religious belief. It is clearly wrong… for judges to deliberately frustrate or defeat the policy goals of what they might personally regard as unfair but (which are) none the less regular laws under cover of office as a form of redress or amelioration.”
For such comments Justice Carmody (then Judge Carmody) was criticised by various sectors of the politically correct establishment, who saw the judicial role as going beyond the allegedly limited view of upholding the rule of law, to embrace social engineering and judicial innovation. Former High Court Justice, Michael Kirby, is good example of the social innovation judge, who used his own values as a guide for decision-making. The appointment of Tim Carmody is good news and a step in the right direction.
A WORLD JUST PLAIN RUNNING OUT OF STEAM
by Brian Simpson
IN his paper “Is US Economic Growth Over?” (September 2012) Gordon makes the point that it is simply an assumption that economic growth will continue forever. As he says, “there was virtually no economic growth before 1750, suggesting that the rapid progress made over the past 250 years could well be a unique episode in human history rather than a guarantee of endless future advances at the same rate.” Thoughts about the limits, if not the end of growth, are also offensive to many alternative economists who also believe that technology will ring in a paradise on earth. I am naturally sceptical of all such proclamations given the intrinsic limits of humanity, or what Christians used to call, original sin.
|© Published by the Australian League of Rights, P.O. Box 27 Happy Valley, SA 5159|